|
Re: new wrangler - ug
This is paragraph two from that new report:
"The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two doors. The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first four-door model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline (cylinders all in a row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel drive instead of the standard four-wheel-drive setup." You could also take this to mean that in future years '07+ that both 2 and 4 door models are slated for production. <dvitous@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1158943161.704127.95400@i42g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com... > > Jeffrey DeWitt wrote: >> I don't believe it, your paper is wrong or you misunderstood what they >> said. >> >> O7 is the first year for the 4 door Wrangler, but there is no way they >> are getting rid of the "iconic" 2 door. >> > > Granted... I am the product of the public school system... but > regardless of what part of the world you're from... (perhaps with the > exception of some certain parts of some southern states...) it's pretty > hard to misinterpret: > > "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two > doors." > > It goes on to say > > "The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first > four-door model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline > (cylinders all in a row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel > drive instead of the standard four-wheel-drive setup." > > Full article is here: > > http://www.suntimes.com/output/auto/car-news-car11.html > > Could be wrong? Sure. But reliable auto writers typically dance > around "absolutes" when talking rumor - as there's always plenty of > rumor to go around. It runs rampant in the motorcycle press. But '07 > is a ways away, and decisions could change. Perhaps its an > announcement to gauge backlash? > > Dropping a popular, well-selling vehicle with a strong fan base doesn't > make sense to me either. > > - Dan - > |
Re: new wrangler - ug
This is paragraph two from that new report:
"The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two doors. The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first four-door model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline (cylinders all in a row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel drive instead of the standard four-wheel-drive setup." You could also take this to mean that in future years '07+ that both 2 and 4 door models are slated for production. <dvitous@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1158943161.704127.95400@i42g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com... > > Jeffrey DeWitt wrote: >> I don't believe it, your paper is wrong or you misunderstood what they >> said. >> >> O7 is the first year for the 4 door Wrangler, but there is no way they >> are getting rid of the "iconic" 2 door. >> > > Granted... I am the product of the public school system... but > regardless of what part of the world you're from... (perhaps with the > exception of some certain parts of some southern states...) it's pretty > hard to misinterpret: > > "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two > doors." > > It goes on to say > > "The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first > four-door model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline > (cylinders all in a row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel > drive instead of the standard four-wheel-drive setup." > > Full article is here: > > http://www.suntimes.com/output/auto/car-news-car11.html > > Could be wrong? Sure. But reliable auto writers typically dance > around "absolutes" when talking rumor - as there's always plenty of > rumor to go around. It runs rampant in the motorcycle press. But '07 > is a ways away, and decisions could change. Perhaps its an > announcement to gauge backlash? > > Dropping a popular, well-selling vehicle with a strong fan base doesn't > make sense to me either. > > - Dan - > |
Re: new wrangler - ug
That is the way I understood it also.
Chris "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message news:a2fdc$451415a5$422afc51$15161@FUSE.NET... > This is paragraph two from that new report: > > "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two doors. > The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first four-door > model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline (cylinders all in a > row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel drive instead of the > standard four-wheel-drive setup." > > You could also take this to mean that in future years '07+ that both 2 and > 4 door models are slated for production. > > > <dvitous@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:1158943161.704127.95400@i42g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com... >> >> Jeffrey DeWitt wrote: >>> I don't believe it, your paper is wrong or you misunderstood what they >>> said. >>> >>> O7 is the first year for the 4 door Wrangler, but there is no way they >>> are getting rid of the "iconic" 2 door. >>> >> >> Granted... I am the product of the public school system... but >> regardless of what part of the world you're from... (perhaps with the >> exception of some certain parts of some southern states...) it's pretty >> hard to misinterpret: >> >> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two >> doors." >> >> It goes on to say >> >> "The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first >> four-door model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline >> (cylinders all in a row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel >> drive instead of the standard four-wheel-drive setup." >> >> Full article is here: >> >> http://www.suntimes.com/output/auto/car-news-car11.html >> >> Could be wrong? Sure. But reliable auto writers typically dance >> around "absolutes" when talking rumor - as there's always plenty of >> rumor to go around. It runs rampant in the motorcycle press. But '07 >> is a ways away, and decisions could change. Perhaps its an >> announcement to gauge backlash? >> >> Dropping a popular, well-selling vehicle with a strong fan base doesn't >> make sense to me either. >> >> - Dan - >> > > |
Re: new wrangler - ug
That is the way I understood it also.
Chris "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message news:a2fdc$451415a5$422afc51$15161@FUSE.NET... > This is paragraph two from that new report: > > "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two doors. > The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first four-door > model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline (cylinders all in a > row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel drive instead of the > standard four-wheel-drive setup." > > You could also take this to mean that in future years '07+ that both 2 and > 4 door models are slated for production. > > > <dvitous@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:1158943161.704127.95400@i42g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com... >> >> Jeffrey DeWitt wrote: >>> I don't believe it, your paper is wrong or you misunderstood what they >>> said. >>> >>> O7 is the first year for the 4 door Wrangler, but there is no way they >>> are getting rid of the "iconic" 2 door. >>> >> >> Granted... I am the product of the public school system... but >> regardless of what part of the world you're from... (perhaps with the >> exception of some certain parts of some southern states...) it's pretty >> hard to misinterpret: >> >> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two >> doors." >> >> It goes on to say >> >> "The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first >> four-door model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline >> (cylinders all in a row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel >> drive instead of the standard four-wheel-drive setup." >> >> Full article is here: >> >> http://www.suntimes.com/output/auto/car-news-car11.html >> >> Could be wrong? Sure. But reliable auto writers typically dance >> around "absolutes" when talking rumor - as there's always plenty of >> rumor to go around. It runs rampant in the motorcycle press. But '07 >> is a ways away, and decisions could change. Perhaps its an >> announcement to gauge backlash? >> >> Dropping a popular, well-selling vehicle with a strong fan base doesn't >> make sense to me either. >> >> - Dan - >> > > |
Re: new wrangler - ug
That is the way I understood it also.
Chris "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message news:a2fdc$451415a5$422afc51$15161@FUSE.NET... > This is paragraph two from that new report: > > "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two doors. > The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first four-door > model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline (cylinders all in a > row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel drive instead of the > standard four-wheel-drive setup." > > You could also take this to mean that in future years '07+ that both 2 and > 4 door models are slated for production. > > > <dvitous@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:1158943161.704127.95400@i42g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com... >> >> Jeffrey DeWitt wrote: >>> I don't believe it, your paper is wrong or you misunderstood what they >>> said. >>> >>> O7 is the first year for the 4 door Wrangler, but there is no way they >>> are getting rid of the "iconic" 2 door. >>> >> >> Granted... I am the product of the public school system... but >> regardless of what part of the world you're from... (perhaps with the >> exception of some certain parts of some southern states...) it's pretty >> hard to misinterpret: >> >> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two >> doors." >> >> It goes on to say >> >> "The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first >> four-door model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline >> (cylinders all in a row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel >> drive instead of the standard four-wheel-drive setup." >> >> Full article is here: >> >> http://www.suntimes.com/output/auto/car-news-car11.html >> >> Could be wrong? Sure. But reliable auto writers typically dance >> around "absolutes" when talking rumor - as there's always plenty of >> rumor to go around. It runs rampant in the motorcycle press. But '07 >> is a ways away, and decisions could change. Perhaps its an >> announcement to gauge backlash? >> >> Dropping a popular, well-selling vehicle with a strong fan base doesn't >> make sense to me either. >> >> - Dan - >> > > |
Re: new wrangler - ug
I figure anything those Bozos do is just going to increase the potential
collector value of my Jeep. If I take good care of it, as I plan to do, my heirs stand to make a pile of money out of a "non-lifted, non-hacked, original condition" 1995 Wrangler. Earle "c" <c@me.org> wrote in message news:2dVQg.70$QT.43@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com... > That is the way I understood it also. > > Chris > > "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message > news:a2fdc$451415a5$422afc51$15161@FUSE.NET... > > This is paragraph two from that new report: > > > > "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two doors. > > The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first four-door > > model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline (cylinders all in a > > row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel drive instead of the > > standard four-wheel-drive setup." > > > > You could also take this to mean that in future years '07+ that both 2 and > > 4 door models are slated for production. > > > > > > <dvitous@gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:1158943161.704127.95400@i42g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com... > >> > >> Jeffrey DeWitt wrote: > >>> I don't believe it, your paper is wrong or you misunderstood what they > >>> said. > >>> > >>> O7 is the first year for the 4 door Wrangler, but there is no way they > >>> are getting rid of the "iconic" 2 door. > >>> > >> > >> Granted... I am the product of the public school system... but > >> regardless of what part of the world you're from... (perhaps with the > >> exception of some certain parts of some southern states...) it's pretty > >> hard to misinterpret: > >> > >> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two > >> doors." > >> > >> It goes on to say > >> > >> "The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first > >> four-door model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline > >> (cylinders all in a row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel > >> drive instead of the standard four-wheel-drive setup." > >> > >> Full article is here: > >> > >> http://www.suntimes.com/output/auto/car-news-car11.html > >> > >> Could be wrong? Sure. But reliable auto writers typically dance > >> around "absolutes" when talking rumor - as there's always plenty of > >> rumor to go around. It runs rampant in the motorcycle press. But '07 > >> is a ways away, and decisions could change. Perhaps its an > >> announcement to gauge backlash? > >> > >> Dropping a popular, well-selling vehicle with a strong fan base doesn't > >> make sense to me either. > >> > >> - Dan - > >> > > > > > > |
Re: new wrangler - ug
I figure anything those Bozos do is just going to increase the potential
collector value of my Jeep. If I take good care of it, as I plan to do, my heirs stand to make a pile of money out of a "non-lifted, non-hacked, original condition" 1995 Wrangler. Earle "c" <c@me.org> wrote in message news:2dVQg.70$QT.43@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com... > That is the way I understood it also. > > Chris > > "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message > news:a2fdc$451415a5$422afc51$15161@FUSE.NET... > > This is paragraph two from that new report: > > > > "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two doors. > > The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first four-door > > model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline (cylinders all in a > > row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel drive instead of the > > standard four-wheel-drive setup." > > > > You could also take this to mean that in future years '07+ that both 2 and > > 4 door models are slated for production. > > > > > > <dvitous@gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:1158943161.704127.95400@i42g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com... > >> > >> Jeffrey DeWitt wrote: > >>> I don't believe it, your paper is wrong or you misunderstood what they > >>> said. > >>> > >>> O7 is the first year for the 4 door Wrangler, but there is no way they > >>> are getting rid of the "iconic" 2 door. > >>> > >> > >> Granted... I am the product of the public school system... but > >> regardless of what part of the world you're from... (perhaps with the > >> exception of some certain parts of some southern states...) it's pretty > >> hard to misinterpret: > >> > >> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two > >> doors." > >> > >> It goes on to say > >> > >> "The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first > >> four-door model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline > >> (cylinders all in a row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel > >> drive instead of the standard four-wheel-drive setup." > >> > >> Full article is here: > >> > >> http://www.suntimes.com/output/auto/car-news-car11.html > >> > >> Could be wrong? Sure. But reliable auto writers typically dance > >> around "absolutes" when talking rumor - as there's always plenty of > >> rumor to go around. It runs rampant in the motorcycle press. But '07 > >> is a ways away, and decisions could change. Perhaps its an > >> announcement to gauge backlash? > >> > >> Dropping a popular, well-selling vehicle with a strong fan base doesn't > >> make sense to me either. > >> > >> - Dan - > >> > > > > > > |
Re: new wrangler - ug
I figure anything those Bozos do is just going to increase the potential
collector value of my Jeep. If I take good care of it, as I plan to do, my heirs stand to make a pile of money out of a "non-lifted, non-hacked, original condition" 1995 Wrangler. Earle "c" <c@me.org> wrote in message news:2dVQg.70$QT.43@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com... > That is the way I understood it also. > > Chris > > "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message > news:a2fdc$451415a5$422afc51$15161@FUSE.NET... > > This is paragraph two from that new report: > > > > "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two doors. > > The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first four-door > > model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline (cylinders all in a > > row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel drive instead of the > > standard four-wheel-drive setup." > > > > You could also take this to mean that in future years '07+ that both 2 and > > 4 door models are slated for production. > > > > > > <dvitous@gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:1158943161.704127.95400@i42g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com... > >> > >> Jeffrey DeWitt wrote: > >>> I don't believe it, your paper is wrong or you misunderstood what they > >>> said. > >>> > >>> O7 is the first year for the 4 door Wrangler, but there is no way they > >>> are getting rid of the "iconic" 2 door. > >>> > >> > >> Granted... I am the product of the public school system... but > >> regardless of what part of the world you're from... (perhaps with the > >> exception of some certain parts of some southern states...) it's pretty > >> hard to misinterpret: > >> > >> "The 2006 Jeep Wrangler is the last SUV to be offered with only two > >> doors." > >> > >> It goes on to say > >> > >> "The 2007 Wrangler soon arrives with availability of its first > >> four-door model, a V-6 engine instead of the traditional inline > >> (cylinders all in a row) six-cylinder and the chance to get rear-wheel > >> drive instead of the standard four-wheel-drive setup." > >> > >> Full article is here: > >> > >> http://www.suntimes.com/output/auto/car-news-car11.html > >> > >> Could be wrong? Sure. But reliable auto writers typically dance > >> around "absolutes" when talking rumor - as there's always plenty of > >> rumor to go around. It runs rampant in the motorcycle press. But '07 > >> is a ways away, and decisions could change. Perhaps its an > >> announcement to gauge backlash? > >> > >> Dropping a popular, well-selling vehicle with a strong fan base doesn't > >> make sense to me either. > >> > >> - Dan - > >> > > > > > > |
Re: new wrangler - ug
The United States of American may have won the battles, but we lost
World War II. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ |
Re: new wrangler - ug
The United States of American may have won the battles, but we lost
World War II. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands