Re: More VW Diesel Knee-Slappers
An attempt to clean diesel pollution:
http://www.hjs.com/hjs_englisch/aktuelles12.htm "L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote: > > https://www.wviz.org/features/0519saf_future_car.asp > http://pbshawaii.org/index_home_file...4/saf_cars.pdf > > > I hope everyone gets a chance to watch "future car" that was on > > last night on Public Broadcasting Station, narrated by Allan Alda, he > > gets an honest opinion from all the hybrid prototype manufacturers, > > diesel will always be too dirty for California, even with it's gigantic > > after burner catalytic converter. The gasoline engine, battery, > > generator, motor, hybrids that in reality get about 35 of their 60 MPG > > advertised. The Hydrogen internal combustion engine storage tank is far > > too explosive. Storage battery, just changes the place where the > > pollution was generated. Daimler is working on an platform that > > chemically turns hydrogen into electricity without storage batteries to > > drive electric motors, which is twenty years away, until then the > > contentious is gasoline is the most efficient, cleanest fuel available. > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ |
Re: More VW Diesel Knee-Slappers
An attempt to clean diesel pollution:
http://www.hjs.com/hjs_englisch/aktuelles12.htm "L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote: > > https://www.wviz.org/features/0519saf_future_car.asp > http://pbshawaii.org/index_home_file...4/saf_cars.pdf > > > I hope everyone gets a chance to watch "future car" that was on > > last night on Public Broadcasting Station, narrated by Allan Alda, he > > gets an honest opinion from all the hybrid prototype manufacturers, > > diesel will always be too dirty for California, even with it's gigantic > > after burner catalytic converter. The gasoline engine, battery, > > generator, motor, hybrids that in reality get about 35 of their 60 MPG > > advertised. The Hydrogen internal combustion engine storage tank is far > > too explosive. Storage battery, just changes the place where the > > pollution was generated. Daimler is working on an platform that > > chemically turns hydrogen into electricity without storage batteries to > > drive electric motors, which is twenty years away, until then the > > contentious is gasoline is the most efficient, cleanest fuel available. > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ |
Re: More VW Diesel Knee-Slappers
An attempt to clean diesel pollution:
http://www.hjs.com/hjs_englisch/aktuelles12.htm "L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote: > > https://www.wviz.org/features/0519saf_future_car.asp > http://pbshawaii.org/index_home_file...4/saf_cars.pdf > > > I hope everyone gets a chance to watch "future car" that was on > > last night on Public Broadcasting Station, narrated by Allan Alda, he > > gets an honest opinion from all the hybrid prototype manufacturers, > > diesel will always be too dirty for California, even with it's gigantic > > after burner catalytic converter. The gasoline engine, battery, > > generator, motor, hybrids that in reality get about 35 of their 60 MPG > > advertised. The Hydrogen internal combustion engine storage tank is far > > too explosive. Storage battery, just changes the place where the > > pollution was generated. Daimler is working on an platform that > > chemically turns hydrogen into electricity without storage batteries to > > drive electric motors, which is twenty years away, until then the > > contentious is gasoline is the most efficient, cleanest fuel available. > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ |
Re: More VW Diesel Knee-Slappers
"doesn't mean that mine smokes" Lets see a picture of your bumper.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Paul Calman wrote: > > You may have worked on some of them, and apparently failed to figure them > out, but that doesn't mean that mine smokes. Even if it did, a little smoke > at 50 MPG would still produce less pollutants than transparent exhaust at > 25MPG. Still, I could care less about emissions, I have it because it is an > economical vehicle. Your logic is flawed, your hatred of these vehicles is > based upon a 'feeling', rather than facts. Most of these vehicles lived out > their engineered lifespan, or died of poor maintenance. They were not meant > to last this long, and had flaws, any company's cheapest vehicle does, just > like your Jeep. > Your first post states that a diesel Jeep would be a bad idea. Do you think > that Mercedes Benz doesn't know how to build a good diesel? My smokey little > 1963, 190DC returned 38-40 MPG , and still ran, without ever having the head > or pan removed, when I sent it to the boneyard for burning oil at 874,000 > miles. I would welcome a small displacement, Mercedes designed, direct > injected diesel in a Jeep. Turbo would be a mistake, but a VW Corrado style > blower might work. > That Fonda crack was low. Shame on you. > -- > Paul Calman, Hathaway Pines, California |
Re: More VW Diesel Knee-Slappers
"doesn't mean that mine smokes" Lets see a picture of your bumper.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Paul Calman wrote: > > You may have worked on some of them, and apparently failed to figure them > out, but that doesn't mean that mine smokes. Even if it did, a little smoke > at 50 MPG would still produce less pollutants than transparent exhaust at > 25MPG. Still, I could care less about emissions, I have it because it is an > economical vehicle. Your logic is flawed, your hatred of these vehicles is > based upon a 'feeling', rather than facts. Most of these vehicles lived out > their engineered lifespan, or died of poor maintenance. They were not meant > to last this long, and had flaws, any company's cheapest vehicle does, just > like your Jeep. > Your first post states that a diesel Jeep would be a bad idea. Do you think > that Mercedes Benz doesn't know how to build a good diesel? My smokey little > 1963, 190DC returned 38-40 MPG , and still ran, without ever having the head > or pan removed, when I sent it to the boneyard for burning oil at 874,000 > miles. I would welcome a small displacement, Mercedes designed, direct > injected diesel in a Jeep. Turbo would be a mistake, but a VW Corrado style > blower might work. > That Fonda crack was low. Shame on you. > -- > Paul Calman, Hathaway Pines, California |
Re: More VW Diesel Knee-Slappers
"doesn't mean that mine smokes" Lets see a picture of your bumper.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Paul Calman wrote: > > You may have worked on some of them, and apparently failed to figure them > out, but that doesn't mean that mine smokes. Even if it did, a little smoke > at 50 MPG would still produce less pollutants than transparent exhaust at > 25MPG. Still, I could care less about emissions, I have it because it is an > economical vehicle. Your logic is flawed, your hatred of these vehicles is > based upon a 'feeling', rather than facts. Most of these vehicles lived out > their engineered lifespan, or died of poor maintenance. They were not meant > to last this long, and had flaws, any company's cheapest vehicle does, just > like your Jeep. > Your first post states that a diesel Jeep would be a bad idea. Do you think > that Mercedes Benz doesn't know how to build a good diesel? My smokey little > 1963, 190DC returned 38-40 MPG , and still ran, without ever having the head > or pan removed, when I sent it to the boneyard for burning oil at 874,000 > miles. I would welcome a small displacement, Mercedes designed, direct > injected diesel in a Jeep. Turbo would be a mistake, but a VW Corrado style > blower might work. > That Fonda crack was low. Shame on you. > -- > Paul Calman, Hathaway Pines, California |
Re: More VW Diesel Knee-Slappers
"doesn't mean that mine smokes" Lets see a picture of your bumper.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Paul Calman wrote: > > You may have worked on some of them, and apparently failed to figure them > out, but that doesn't mean that mine smokes. Even if it did, a little smoke > at 50 MPG would still produce less pollutants than transparent exhaust at > 25MPG. Still, I could care less about emissions, I have it because it is an > economical vehicle. Your logic is flawed, your hatred of these vehicles is > based upon a 'feeling', rather than facts. Most of these vehicles lived out > their engineered lifespan, or died of poor maintenance. They were not meant > to last this long, and had flaws, any company's cheapest vehicle does, just > like your Jeep. > Your first post states that a diesel Jeep would be a bad idea. Do you think > that Mercedes Benz doesn't know how to build a good diesel? My smokey little > 1963, 190DC returned 38-40 MPG , and still ran, without ever having the head > or pan removed, when I sent it to the boneyard for burning oil at 874,000 > miles. I would welcome a small displacement, Mercedes designed, direct > injected diesel in a Jeep. Turbo would be a mistake, but a VW Corrado style > blower might work. > That Fonda crack was low. Shame on you. > -- > Paul Calman, Hathaway Pines, California |
Re: More VW Diesel Knee-Slappers
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 19:10:39 UTC "Jerry McG"
<gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote: > > That Fonda crack was low. Shame on you.< > > Take it as you will. May I remind you that Jane Fonda's appearance in the > 1979 movie "The China Syndrome", in which she drove a diesel Rabbit, not > only fooled thousnds of politically correct consumers into buying those > clattering, smoke belching road-turtles, she also helped destroy the nuclear > power industry in the USA. 25+ years later, neither appear to have been good > for the country! Speaking for myself and a large number of Vietnam vetrans, nothing could be too low for that bitch - any mention should be considered a compliment. -- Will Honea |
Re: More VW Diesel Knee-Slappers
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 19:10:39 UTC "Jerry McG"
<gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote: > > That Fonda crack was low. Shame on you.< > > Take it as you will. May I remind you that Jane Fonda's appearance in the > 1979 movie "The China Syndrome", in which she drove a diesel Rabbit, not > only fooled thousnds of politically correct consumers into buying those > clattering, smoke belching road-turtles, she also helped destroy the nuclear > power industry in the USA. 25+ years later, neither appear to have been good > for the country! Speaking for myself and a large number of Vietnam vetrans, nothing could be too low for that bitch - any mention should be considered a compliment. -- Will Honea |
Re: More VW Diesel Knee-Slappers
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 19:10:39 UTC "Jerry McG"
<gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote: > > That Fonda crack was low. Shame on you.< > > Take it as you will. May I remind you that Jane Fonda's appearance in the > 1979 movie "The China Syndrome", in which she drove a diesel Rabbit, not > only fooled thousnds of politically correct consumers into buying those > clattering, smoke belching road-turtles, she also helped destroy the nuclear > power industry in the USA. 25+ years later, neither appear to have been good > for the country! Speaking for myself and a large number of Vietnam vetrans, nothing could be too low for that bitch - any mention should be considered a compliment. -- Will Honea |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:19 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands