More New Scrambler Details
#101
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: More New Scrambler Details
Don't get your panties in a wad. The OP said "There's no replacement
for displacement." Obviously, from this example, there is, and it
worked quite well. Now, go take your prozac and calm down...
> Yeah, it'd probably beat a 5.0 with twin turbos on it too.
> Lesse...apples/oranges...oranges/apples...
>
> ok! OK! I got it, let's compare a twin turbo, nitrous injected, mid
> nineties ZX300, ported, polished, full race cam, open headers and
> a...oh, say...a '73 Chevy Impala with four bent pushrods and a spun main
> bearing...? How would that come out? Yeah, I guess you're
> right...displacement has no bearing on it...
>
> Joshua Nelson wrote:
> >>"There's No Replacement For Displacement."
> >
> >
> >
> > I dunno about that. A buddy of mine has a 1990 Eagle Talon TSi Turbo
> > AWD. It's only a 4-cylinder engine. I am not sure of the exact
> > displacement, but it can't be more than 2.5 liters at the very most.
> > Yet with those twin turbos, it will blow away all but the beefiest of
> > muscle cars. I personally witnessed it smoke a 5.0 Mustang.
>
> --
> __________________________________________________ _________
> tw
> 03 TJ Rubicon
> 01 XJ Sport
>
> There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> -- Dave Barry
>
> http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
> (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> __________________________________________________ _________
for displacement." Obviously, from this example, there is, and it
worked quite well. Now, go take your prozac and calm down...
> Yeah, it'd probably beat a 5.0 with twin turbos on it too.
> Lesse...apples/oranges...oranges/apples...
>
> ok! OK! I got it, let's compare a twin turbo, nitrous injected, mid
> nineties ZX300, ported, polished, full race cam, open headers and
> a...oh, say...a '73 Chevy Impala with four bent pushrods and a spun main
> bearing...? How would that come out? Yeah, I guess you're
> right...displacement has no bearing on it...
>
> Joshua Nelson wrote:
> >>"There's No Replacement For Displacement."
> >
> >
> >
> > I dunno about that. A buddy of mine has a 1990 Eagle Talon TSi Turbo
> > AWD. It's only a 4-cylinder engine. I am not sure of the exact
> > displacement, but it can't be more than 2.5 liters at the very most.
> > Yet with those twin turbos, it will blow away all but the beefiest of
> > muscle cars. I personally witnessed it smoke a 5.0 Mustang.
>
> --
> __________________________________________________ _________
> tw
> 03 TJ Rubicon
> 01 XJ Sport
>
> There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> -- Dave Barry
>
> http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
> (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> __________________________________________________ _________
#102
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: More New Scrambler Details
The quote was that there are "no replacements for displacement." This
implies that there is absolutely nothing you can do to compensate for
lower displacement. But that is patenently false, as there are PLENTY
of replacements for displacement... to name a few random examples: 1)
turbos, a la the Eagle Talon TSi, 2) lower vehicle weight (a 600cc
Honda CBR would undoubtedly smoke a 5.0 mustang as well), 3) gearing
(a 1.5L stock Honda Civic could out-accelerate my off-road geared 5.7L
CJ) and so on ad nauseum.
Adding the words "all else being equal" to the end of the sentence
changes the whole meaning of the quote.... that's a no brainer. I
don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that two indentical
vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
will perform the same.
In practice, I have had the opportunity to drive numerous vehicles
ranging from a 0.4L dirt bike to a 5.9L Suburban and have found engine
size alone offers no meaningful indication of how the vehicle will
accelerate or power.
implies that there is absolutely nothing you can do to compensate for
lower displacement. But that is patenently false, as there are PLENTY
of replacements for displacement... to name a few random examples: 1)
turbos, a la the Eagle Talon TSi, 2) lower vehicle weight (a 600cc
Honda CBR would undoubtedly smoke a 5.0 mustang as well), 3) gearing
(a 1.5L stock Honda Civic could out-accelerate my off-road geared 5.7L
CJ) and so on ad nauseum.
Adding the words "all else being equal" to the end of the sentence
changes the whole meaning of the quote.... that's a no brainer. I
don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that two indentical
vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
will perform the same.
In practice, I have had the opportunity to drive numerous vehicles
ranging from a 0.4L dirt bike to a 5.9L Suburban and have found engine
size alone offers no meaningful indication of how the vehicle will
accelerate or power.
#103
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: More New Scrambler Details
The quote was that there are "no replacements for displacement." This
implies that there is absolutely nothing you can do to compensate for
lower displacement. But that is patenently false, as there are PLENTY
of replacements for displacement... to name a few random examples: 1)
turbos, a la the Eagle Talon TSi, 2) lower vehicle weight (a 600cc
Honda CBR would undoubtedly smoke a 5.0 mustang as well), 3) gearing
(a 1.5L stock Honda Civic could out-accelerate my off-road geared 5.7L
CJ) and so on ad nauseum.
Adding the words "all else being equal" to the end of the sentence
changes the whole meaning of the quote.... that's a no brainer. I
don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that two indentical
vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
will perform the same.
In practice, I have had the opportunity to drive numerous vehicles
ranging from a 0.4L dirt bike to a 5.9L Suburban and have found engine
size alone offers no meaningful indication of how the vehicle will
accelerate or power.
implies that there is absolutely nothing you can do to compensate for
lower displacement. But that is patenently false, as there are PLENTY
of replacements for displacement... to name a few random examples: 1)
turbos, a la the Eagle Talon TSi, 2) lower vehicle weight (a 600cc
Honda CBR would undoubtedly smoke a 5.0 mustang as well), 3) gearing
(a 1.5L stock Honda Civic could out-accelerate my off-road geared 5.7L
CJ) and so on ad nauseum.
Adding the words "all else being equal" to the end of the sentence
changes the whole meaning of the quote.... that's a no brainer. I
don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that two indentical
vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
will perform the same.
In practice, I have had the opportunity to drive numerous vehicles
ranging from a 0.4L dirt bike to a 5.9L Suburban and have found engine
size alone offers no meaningful indication of how the vehicle will
accelerate or power.
#104
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: More New Scrambler Details
The quote was that there are "no replacements for displacement." This
implies that there is absolutely nothing you can do to compensate for
lower displacement. But that is patenently false, as there are PLENTY
of replacements for displacement... to name a few random examples: 1)
turbos, a la the Eagle Talon TSi, 2) lower vehicle weight (a 600cc
Honda CBR would undoubtedly smoke a 5.0 mustang as well), 3) gearing
(a 1.5L stock Honda Civic could out-accelerate my off-road geared 5.7L
CJ) and so on ad nauseum.
Adding the words "all else being equal" to the end of the sentence
changes the whole meaning of the quote.... that's a no brainer. I
don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that two indentical
vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
will perform the same.
In practice, I have had the opportunity to drive numerous vehicles
ranging from a 0.4L dirt bike to a 5.9L Suburban and have found engine
size alone offers no meaningful indication of how the vehicle will
accelerate or power.
implies that there is absolutely nothing you can do to compensate for
lower displacement. But that is patenently false, as there are PLENTY
of replacements for displacement... to name a few random examples: 1)
turbos, a la the Eagle Talon TSi, 2) lower vehicle weight (a 600cc
Honda CBR would undoubtedly smoke a 5.0 mustang as well), 3) gearing
(a 1.5L stock Honda Civic could out-accelerate my off-road geared 5.7L
CJ) and so on ad nauseum.
Adding the words "all else being equal" to the end of the sentence
changes the whole meaning of the quote.... that's a no brainer. I
don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that two indentical
vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
will perform the same.
In practice, I have had the opportunity to drive numerous vehicles
ranging from a 0.4L dirt bike to a 5.9L Suburban and have found engine
size alone offers no meaningful indication of how the vehicle will
accelerate or power.
#105
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: More New Scrambler Details
You said, "I don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that
two identical
vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
will perform the same." Would you like to put some money on that?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Joshua Nelson wrote:
>
> The quote was that there are "no replacements for displacement." This
> implies that there is absolutely nothing you can do to compensate for
> lower displacement. But that is patenently false, as there are PLENTY
> of replacements for displacement... to name a few random examples: 1)
> turbos, a la the Eagle Talon TSi, 2) lower vehicle weight (a 600cc
> Honda CBR would undoubtedly smoke a 5.0 mustang as well), 3) gearing
> (a 1.5L stock Honda Civic could out-accelerate my off-road geared 5.7L
> CJ) and so on ad nauseum.
>
> Adding the words "all else being equal" to the end of the sentence
> changes the whole meaning of the quote.... that's a no brainer. I
> don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that two indentical
> vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
> will perform the same.
>
> In practice, I have had the opportunity to drive numerous vehicles
> ranging from a 0.4L dirt bike to a 5.9L Suburban and have found engine
> size alone offers no meaningful indication of how the vehicle will
> accelerate or power.
two identical
vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
will perform the same." Would you like to put some money on that?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Joshua Nelson wrote:
>
> The quote was that there are "no replacements for displacement." This
> implies that there is absolutely nothing you can do to compensate for
> lower displacement. But that is patenently false, as there are PLENTY
> of replacements for displacement... to name a few random examples: 1)
> turbos, a la the Eagle Talon TSi, 2) lower vehicle weight (a 600cc
> Honda CBR would undoubtedly smoke a 5.0 mustang as well), 3) gearing
> (a 1.5L stock Honda Civic could out-accelerate my off-road geared 5.7L
> CJ) and so on ad nauseum.
>
> Adding the words "all else being equal" to the end of the sentence
> changes the whole meaning of the quote.... that's a no brainer. I
> don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that two indentical
> vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
> will perform the same.
>
> In practice, I have had the opportunity to drive numerous vehicles
> ranging from a 0.4L dirt bike to a 5.9L Suburban and have found engine
> size alone offers no meaningful indication of how the vehicle will
> accelerate or power.
#106
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: More New Scrambler Details
You said, "I don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that
two identical
vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
will perform the same." Would you like to put some money on that?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Joshua Nelson wrote:
>
> The quote was that there are "no replacements for displacement." This
> implies that there is absolutely nothing you can do to compensate for
> lower displacement. But that is patenently false, as there are PLENTY
> of replacements for displacement... to name a few random examples: 1)
> turbos, a la the Eagle Talon TSi, 2) lower vehicle weight (a 600cc
> Honda CBR would undoubtedly smoke a 5.0 mustang as well), 3) gearing
> (a 1.5L stock Honda Civic could out-accelerate my off-road geared 5.7L
> CJ) and so on ad nauseum.
>
> Adding the words "all else being equal" to the end of the sentence
> changes the whole meaning of the quote.... that's a no brainer. I
> don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that two indentical
> vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
> will perform the same.
>
> In practice, I have had the opportunity to drive numerous vehicles
> ranging from a 0.4L dirt bike to a 5.9L Suburban and have found engine
> size alone offers no meaningful indication of how the vehicle will
> accelerate or power.
two identical
vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
will perform the same." Would you like to put some money on that?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Joshua Nelson wrote:
>
> The quote was that there are "no replacements for displacement." This
> implies that there is absolutely nothing you can do to compensate for
> lower displacement. But that is patenently false, as there are PLENTY
> of replacements for displacement... to name a few random examples: 1)
> turbos, a la the Eagle Talon TSi, 2) lower vehicle weight (a 600cc
> Honda CBR would undoubtedly smoke a 5.0 mustang as well), 3) gearing
> (a 1.5L stock Honda Civic could out-accelerate my off-road geared 5.7L
> CJ) and so on ad nauseum.
>
> Adding the words "all else being equal" to the end of the sentence
> changes the whole meaning of the quote.... that's a no brainer. I
> don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that two indentical
> vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
> will perform the same.
>
> In practice, I have had the opportunity to drive numerous vehicles
> ranging from a 0.4L dirt bike to a 5.9L Suburban and have found engine
> size alone offers no meaningful indication of how the vehicle will
> accelerate or power.
#107
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: More New Scrambler Details
You said, "I don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that
two identical
vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
will perform the same." Would you like to put some money on that?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Joshua Nelson wrote:
>
> The quote was that there are "no replacements for displacement." This
> implies that there is absolutely nothing you can do to compensate for
> lower displacement. But that is patenently false, as there are PLENTY
> of replacements for displacement... to name a few random examples: 1)
> turbos, a la the Eagle Talon TSi, 2) lower vehicle weight (a 600cc
> Honda CBR would undoubtedly smoke a 5.0 mustang as well), 3) gearing
> (a 1.5L stock Honda Civic could out-accelerate my off-road geared 5.7L
> CJ) and so on ad nauseum.
>
> Adding the words "all else being equal" to the end of the sentence
> changes the whole meaning of the quote.... that's a no brainer. I
> don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that two indentical
> vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
> will perform the same.
>
> In practice, I have had the opportunity to drive numerous vehicles
> ranging from a 0.4L dirt bike to a 5.9L Suburban and have found engine
> size alone offers no meaningful indication of how the vehicle will
> accelerate or power.
two identical
vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
will perform the same." Would you like to put some money on that?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Joshua Nelson wrote:
>
> The quote was that there are "no replacements for displacement." This
> implies that there is absolutely nothing you can do to compensate for
> lower displacement. But that is patenently false, as there are PLENTY
> of replacements for displacement... to name a few random examples: 1)
> turbos, a la the Eagle Talon TSi, 2) lower vehicle weight (a 600cc
> Honda CBR would undoubtedly smoke a 5.0 mustang as well), 3) gearing
> (a 1.5L stock Honda Civic could out-accelerate my off-road geared 5.7L
> CJ) and so on ad nauseum.
>
> Adding the words "all else being equal" to the end of the sentence
> changes the whole meaning of the quote.... that's a no brainer. I
> don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that two indentical
> vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
> will perform the same.
>
> In practice, I have had the opportunity to drive numerous vehicles
> ranging from a 0.4L dirt bike to a 5.9L Suburban and have found engine
> size alone offers no meaningful indication of how the vehicle will
> accelerate or power.
#108
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: More New Scrambler Details
LOL, so do you think they will perform the same Bill?
I wouldn't take that bet or argue they would perform the same....
;-)
Mike
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> You said, "I don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that
> two identical
> vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
> will perform the same." Would you like to put some money on that?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Joshua Nelson wrote:
> >
> > The quote was that there are "no replacements for displacement." This
> > implies that there is absolutely nothing you can do to compensate for
> > lower displacement. But that is patenently false, as there are PLENTY
> > of replacements for displacement... to name a few random examples: 1)
> > turbos, a la the Eagle Talon TSi, 2) lower vehicle weight (a 600cc
> > Honda CBR would undoubtedly smoke a 5.0 mustang as well), 3) gearing
> > (a 1.5L stock Honda Civic could out-accelerate my off-road geared 5.7L
> > CJ) and so on ad nauseum.
> >
> > Adding the words "all else being equal" to the end of the sentence
> > changes the whole meaning of the quote.... that's a no brainer. I
> > don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that two indentical
> > vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
> > will perform the same.
> >
> > In practice, I have had the opportunity to drive numerous vehicles
> > ranging from a 0.4L dirt bike to a 5.9L Suburban and have found engine
> > size alone offers no meaningful indication of how the vehicle will
> > accelerate or power.
I wouldn't take that bet or argue they would perform the same....
;-)
Mike
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> You said, "I don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that
> two identical
> vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
> will perform the same." Would you like to put some money on that?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Joshua Nelson wrote:
> >
> > The quote was that there are "no replacements for displacement." This
> > implies that there is absolutely nothing you can do to compensate for
> > lower displacement. But that is patenently false, as there are PLENTY
> > of replacements for displacement... to name a few random examples: 1)
> > turbos, a la the Eagle Talon TSi, 2) lower vehicle weight (a 600cc
> > Honda CBR would undoubtedly smoke a 5.0 mustang as well), 3) gearing
> > (a 1.5L stock Honda Civic could out-accelerate my off-road geared 5.7L
> > CJ) and so on ad nauseum.
> >
> > Adding the words "all else being equal" to the end of the sentence
> > changes the whole meaning of the quote.... that's a no brainer. I
> > don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that two indentical
> > vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
> > will perform the same.
> >
> > In practice, I have had the opportunity to drive numerous vehicles
> > ranging from a 0.4L dirt bike to a 5.9L Suburban and have found engine
> > size alone offers no meaningful indication of how the vehicle will
> > accelerate or power.
#109
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: More New Scrambler Details
LOL, so do you think they will perform the same Bill?
I wouldn't take that bet or argue they would perform the same....
;-)
Mike
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> You said, "I don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that
> two identical
> vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
> will perform the same." Would you like to put some money on that?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Joshua Nelson wrote:
> >
> > The quote was that there are "no replacements for displacement." This
> > implies that there is absolutely nothing you can do to compensate for
> > lower displacement. But that is patenently false, as there are PLENTY
> > of replacements for displacement... to name a few random examples: 1)
> > turbos, a la the Eagle Talon TSi, 2) lower vehicle weight (a 600cc
> > Honda CBR would undoubtedly smoke a 5.0 mustang as well), 3) gearing
> > (a 1.5L stock Honda Civic could out-accelerate my off-road geared 5.7L
> > CJ) and so on ad nauseum.
> >
> > Adding the words "all else being equal" to the end of the sentence
> > changes the whole meaning of the quote.... that's a no brainer. I
> > don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that two indentical
> > vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
> > will perform the same.
> >
> > In practice, I have had the opportunity to drive numerous vehicles
> > ranging from a 0.4L dirt bike to a 5.9L Suburban and have found engine
> > size alone offers no meaningful indication of how the vehicle will
> > accelerate or power.
I wouldn't take that bet or argue they would perform the same....
;-)
Mike
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> You said, "I don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that
> two identical
> vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
> will perform the same." Would you like to put some money on that?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Joshua Nelson wrote:
> >
> > The quote was that there are "no replacements for displacement." This
> > implies that there is absolutely nothing you can do to compensate for
> > lower displacement. But that is patenently false, as there are PLENTY
> > of replacements for displacement... to name a few random examples: 1)
> > turbos, a la the Eagle Talon TSi, 2) lower vehicle weight (a 600cc
> > Honda CBR would undoubtedly smoke a 5.0 mustang as well), 3) gearing
> > (a 1.5L stock Honda Civic could out-accelerate my off-road geared 5.7L
> > CJ) and so on ad nauseum.
> >
> > Adding the words "all else being equal" to the end of the sentence
> > changes the whole meaning of the quote.... that's a no brainer. I
> > don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that two indentical
> > vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
> > will perform the same.
> >
> > In practice, I have had the opportunity to drive numerous vehicles
> > ranging from a 0.4L dirt bike to a 5.9L Suburban and have found engine
> > size alone offers no meaningful indication of how the vehicle will
> > accelerate or power.
#110
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: More New Scrambler Details
LOL, so do you think they will perform the same Bill?
I wouldn't take that bet or argue they would perform the same....
;-)
Mike
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> You said, "I don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that
> two identical
> vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
> will perform the same." Would you like to put some money on that?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Joshua Nelson wrote:
> >
> > The quote was that there are "no replacements for displacement." This
> > implies that there is absolutely nothing you can do to compensate for
> > lower displacement. But that is patenently false, as there are PLENTY
> > of replacements for displacement... to name a few random examples: 1)
> > turbos, a la the Eagle Talon TSi, 2) lower vehicle weight (a 600cc
> > Honda CBR would undoubtedly smoke a 5.0 mustang as well), 3) gearing
> > (a 1.5L stock Honda Civic could out-accelerate my off-road geared 5.7L
> > CJ) and so on ad nauseum.
> >
> > Adding the words "all else being equal" to the end of the sentence
> > changes the whole meaning of the quote.... that's a no brainer. I
> > don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that two indentical
> > vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
> > will perform the same.
> >
> > In practice, I have had the opportunity to drive numerous vehicles
> > ranging from a 0.4L dirt bike to a 5.9L Suburban and have found engine
> > size alone offers no meaningful indication of how the vehicle will
> > accelerate or power.
I wouldn't take that bet or argue they would perform the same....
;-)
Mike
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> You said, "I don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that
> two identical
> vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
> will perform the same." Would you like to put some money on that?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Joshua Nelson wrote:
> >
> > The quote was that there are "no replacements for displacement." This
> > implies that there is absolutely nothing you can do to compensate for
> > lower displacement. But that is patenently false, as there are PLENTY
> > of replacements for displacement... to name a few random examples: 1)
> > turbos, a la the Eagle Talon TSi, 2) lower vehicle weight (a 600cc
> > Honda CBR would undoubtedly smoke a 5.0 mustang as well), 3) gearing
> > (a 1.5L stock Honda Civic could out-accelerate my off-road geared 5.7L
> > CJ) and so on ad nauseum.
> >
> > Adding the words "all else being equal" to the end of the sentence
> > changes the whole meaning of the quote.... that's a no brainer. I
> > don't think you'll find anyone to argue the point that two indentical
> > vehicles, equipped exactly the same except for different engine size,
> > will perform the same.
> >
> > In practice, I have had the opportunity to drive numerous vehicles
> > ranging from a 0.4L dirt bike to a 5.9L Suburban and have found engine
> > size alone offers no meaningful indication of how the vehicle will
> > accelerate or power.