Can you think of a product that was sub par? Although, the troops
that came in after me didn't think much of the M-16. Anyway, I thought
those decisions were made at the Pentagon level.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Lon wrote:
>
> You must have been in the wrong place. I was at White Sands and
> SAC Hqs and can recall several rather questionable contract awards
> purely from a technical basis.

 

Actually, the BRAC (Base Realignemt and Closure) list was written for
Clinton and ratified/approved by congress, so all the politician
dirtbags are responsible. This isn't a partisan thing at all, except if
the base falls in a powerful senator's district (Clinton, Lott,etc.).
Then it doesn't happen. Believing any of those sleazes is better than
any other one is the real crime of the two-party system :)

Matt

 

Actually, the BRAC (Base Realignemt and Closure) list was written for
Clinton and ratified/approved by congress, so all the politician
dirtbags are responsible. This isn't a partisan thing at all, except if
the base falls in a powerful senator's district (Clinton, Lott,etc.).
Then it doesn't happen. Believing any of those sleazes is better than
any other one is the real crime of the two-party system :)

Matt

 

Actually, the BRAC (Base Realignemt and Closure) list was written for
Clinton and ratified/approved by congress, so all the politician
dirtbags are responsible. This isn't a partisan thing at all, except if
the base falls in a powerful senator's district (Clinton, Lott,etc.).
Then it doesn't happen. Believing any of those sleazes is better than
any other one is the real crime of the two-party system :)

Matt