Re: M151 MUTT replica kit
Many unibody cars have springs. All of them except Citroens, as far as I know. |
Re: M151 MUTT replica kit
Many unibody cars have springs. All of them except Citroens, as far as I know. |
Re: M151 MUTT replica kit
And I thought all vehicles have springs, well except my soapbox
derby entry. and hardtail. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Bret Ludwig wrote: > > Many unibody cars have springs. All of them except Citroens, as far as > I know. |
Re: M151 MUTT replica kit
And I thought all vehicles have springs, well except my soapbox
derby entry. and hardtail. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Bret Ludwig wrote: > > Many unibody cars have springs. All of them except Citroens, as far as > I know. |
Re: M151 MUTT replica kit
And I thought all vehicles have springs, well except my soapbox
derby entry. and hardtail. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Bret Ludwig wrote: > > Many unibody cars have springs. All of them except Citroens, as far as > I know. |
Re: M151 MUTT replica kit
My Senility?? Darn, I had forgotten all 'bout that :(.
My pre-mature, er, um, whatever we were talking about not-withstanding a bit of research reveals that M151 Mutts were, with very few exceptions, buit with steel bodies. try this web site instead- http://www.geocities.com/fordm151/ Per http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/...2?viscount=100 Ford didn't go with the aluminium body due to problems with stress cracking. It also sems there would have been corrosion problems between the aluminium & steel components. as all the the MUTTS I've seen have been rusted, not corroded I stand by my assertation that M151s awere, for all practicle intents & purposes, Steel, nor Aluminium. For some pictures of rather rusty MUTTS I'd suggest- http://www.sphynx.com/mitymite/m151half.html The exceptions may have been some speacial "airbourne" models which may or may not have seen actual service. I have not been able to find any references on the web (for what THATS worth) that these things ever actually existed. Per our last, er, um, discussion + input from my wife's second cousin's husband (you remember him, Right??) on the the subject these rumours may be refering to the Mighty Mite vehicle- http://www.4wdonline.com/Mil/M422/MightyMite.html Fondest Regards, H. On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:16:05 -0800, L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@cox.net> wrote: >Howard, > Apparently your senility wouldn't allow your to remember that upon >research I corrected myself, saying they were all made from an aluminum >unitized body: http://www.m151.uklinux.net/military/m151/m151.html > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O >mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > >Howard Eisenhauer wrote: >> >> We've been through this before- >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...teel+titanium& >> >> The vast majority of 151s were built outta steel, not aluminum (or >> even, dare I say it- Titanium) :). >> >> Howard. >> >> p.s.- my old Duster was unibody & IT had springs, they were even >> "Real" :). H |
Re: M151 MUTT replica kit
My Senility?? Darn, I had forgotten all 'bout that :(.
My pre-mature, er, um, whatever we were talking about not-withstanding a bit of research reveals that M151 Mutts were, with very few exceptions, buit with steel bodies. try this web site instead- http://www.geocities.com/fordm151/ Per http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/...2?viscount=100 Ford didn't go with the aluminium body due to problems with stress cracking. It also sems there would have been corrosion problems between the aluminium & steel components. as all the the MUTTS I've seen have been rusted, not corroded I stand by my assertation that M151s awere, for all practicle intents & purposes, Steel, nor Aluminium. For some pictures of rather rusty MUTTS I'd suggest- http://www.sphynx.com/mitymite/m151half.html The exceptions may have been some speacial "airbourne" models which may or may not have seen actual service. I have not been able to find any references on the web (for what THATS worth) that these things ever actually existed. Per our last, er, um, discussion + input from my wife's second cousin's husband (you remember him, Right??) on the the subject these rumours may be refering to the Mighty Mite vehicle- http://www.4wdonline.com/Mil/M422/MightyMite.html Fondest Regards, H. On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:16:05 -0800, L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@cox.net> wrote: >Howard, > Apparently your senility wouldn't allow your to remember that upon >research I corrected myself, saying they were all made from an aluminum >unitized body: http://www.m151.uklinux.net/military/m151/m151.html > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O >mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > >Howard Eisenhauer wrote: >> >> We've been through this before- >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...teel+titanium& >> >> The vast majority of 151s were built outta steel, not aluminum (or >> even, dare I say it- Titanium) :). >> >> Howard. >> >> p.s.- my old Duster was unibody & IT had springs, they were even >> "Real" :). H |
Re: M151 MUTT replica kit
My Senility?? Darn, I had forgotten all 'bout that :(.
My pre-mature, er, um, whatever we were talking about not-withstanding a bit of research reveals that M151 Mutts were, with very few exceptions, buit with steel bodies. try this web site instead- http://www.geocities.com/fordm151/ Per http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/...2?viscount=100 Ford didn't go with the aluminium body due to problems with stress cracking. It also sems there would have been corrosion problems between the aluminium & steel components. as all the the MUTTS I've seen have been rusted, not corroded I stand by my assertation that M151s awere, for all practicle intents & purposes, Steel, nor Aluminium. For some pictures of rather rusty MUTTS I'd suggest- http://www.sphynx.com/mitymite/m151half.html The exceptions may have been some speacial "airbourne" models which may or may not have seen actual service. I have not been able to find any references on the web (for what THATS worth) that these things ever actually existed. Per our last, er, um, discussion + input from my wife's second cousin's husband (you remember him, Right??) on the the subject these rumours may be refering to the Mighty Mite vehicle- http://www.4wdonline.com/Mil/M422/MightyMite.html Fondest Regards, H. On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:16:05 -0800, L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@cox.net> wrote: >Howard, > Apparently your senility wouldn't allow your to remember that upon >research I corrected myself, saying they were all made from an aluminum >unitized body: http://www.m151.uklinux.net/military/m151/m151.html > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O >mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > >Howard Eisenhauer wrote: >> >> We've been through this before- >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...teel+titanium& >> >> The vast majority of 151s were built outta steel, not aluminum (or >> even, dare I say it- Titanium) :). >> >> Howard. >> >> p.s.- my old Duster was unibody & IT had springs, they were even >> "Real" :). H |
Re: M151 MUTT replica kit
If their bodies were made of steel, cutting them in half wouldn't
have been a problem, they'd just weld the ends back together as most Japanese ricers are salvaged. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Howard Eisenhauer wrote: > > My Senility?? Darn, I had forgotten all 'bout that :(. > > My pre-mature, er, um, whatever we were talking about not-withstanding > a bit of research reveals that M151 Mutts were, with very few > exceptions, buit with steel bodies. > > try this web site instead- > > http://www.geocities.com/fordm151/ > > Per > http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/...2?viscount=100 > Ford didn't go with the aluminium body due to problems with stress > cracking. It also sems there would have been corrosion problems > between the aluminium & steel components. as all the the MUTTS I've > seen have been rusted, not corroded I stand by my assertation that > M151s awere, for all practicle intents & purposes, Steel, nor > Aluminium. For some pictures of rather rusty MUTTS I'd suggest- > > http://www.sphynx.com/mitymite/m151half.html > > The exceptions may have been some speacial "airbourne" models which > may or may not have seen actual service. I have not been able to find > any references on the web (for what THATS worth) that these things > ever actually existed. Per our last, er, um, discussion + input from > my wife's second cousin's husband (you remember him, Right??) > on the the subject these rumours may be refering to the Mighty Mite > vehicle- > > http://www.4wdonline.com/Mil/M422/MightyMite.html > > Fondest Regards, > > H. |
Re: M151 MUTT replica kit
If their bodies were made of steel, cutting them in half wouldn't
have been a problem, they'd just weld the ends back together as most Japanese ricers are salvaged. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Howard Eisenhauer wrote: > > My Senility?? Darn, I had forgotten all 'bout that :(. > > My pre-mature, er, um, whatever we were talking about not-withstanding > a bit of research reveals that M151 Mutts were, with very few > exceptions, buit with steel bodies. > > try this web site instead- > > http://www.geocities.com/fordm151/ > > Per > http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/...2?viscount=100 > Ford didn't go with the aluminium body due to problems with stress > cracking. It also sems there would have been corrosion problems > between the aluminium & steel components. as all the the MUTTS I've > seen have been rusted, not corroded I stand by my assertation that > M151s awere, for all practicle intents & purposes, Steel, nor > Aluminium. For some pictures of rather rusty MUTTS I'd suggest- > > http://www.sphynx.com/mitymite/m151half.html > > The exceptions may have been some speacial "airbourne" models which > may or may not have seen actual service. I have not been able to find > any references on the web (for what THATS worth) that these things > ever actually existed. Per our last, er, um, discussion + input from > my wife's second cousin's husband (you remember him, Right??) > on the the subject these rumours may be refering to the Mighty Mite > vehicle- > > http://www.4wdonline.com/Mil/M422/MightyMite.html > > Fondest Regards, > > H. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:15 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands