On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 18:49:53 -0700, "Gerald G. McGeorge"
<gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:

>
>> "P e t e F a g e r l i n" <pete@petefagerlin.com> wrote in message
>> From OE Help:
>
>> To ignore a conversation...... <
>
>> If you can't figure that out, you could exercise some self-control
and
>just resist the apparently overwhelming urge that you have to read
threads
>that don't interest you. <
>
>Frankly, I ignore the SOBs, but it's just too much fun to just annoy
the
>crap out of these pompous asses!

How do you equate whining about people posting in *your* newsgroup
with annoying the crap out of "those ********"?

It looks like you got an extra helping of forked tongue somewhere
along the line.

 

On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 18:49:53 -0700, "Gerald G. McGeorge"
<gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:

>
>> "P e t e F a g e r l i n" <pete@petefagerlin.com> wrote in message
>> From OE Help:
>
>> To ignore a conversation...... <
>
>> If you can't figure that out, you could exercise some self-control
and
>just resist the apparently overwhelming urge that you have to read
threads
>that don't interest you. <
>
>Frankly, I ignore the SOBs, but it's just too much fun to just annoy
the
>crap out of these pompous asses!

How do you equate whining about people posting in *your* newsgroup
with annoying the crap out of "those ********"?

It looks like you got an extra helping of forked tongue somewhere
along the line.

 

On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 18:49:53 -0700, "Gerald G. McGeorge"
<gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:

>
>> "P e t e F a g e r l i n" <pete@petefagerlin.com> wrote in message
>> From OE Help:
>
>> To ignore a conversation...... <
>
>> If you can't figure that out, you could exercise some self-control
and
>just resist the apparently overwhelming urge that you have to read
threads
>that don't interest you. <
>
>Frankly, I ignore the SOBs, but it's just too much fun to just annoy
the
>crap out of these pompous asses!

How do you equate whining about people posting in *your* newsgroup
with annoying the crap out of "those ********"?

It looks like you got an extra helping of forked tongue somewhere
along the line.

 

> Jeeps are SUVs, the Grand Cherokee is a bloated joke of a SUV. <

Actually thr Grand Cherokee is rather svelte as "SUVs" go, and is quite
capable off road. Since I have one, I might know about that .... but what
the Hell would the truth matter to a good green zealot, eh?

> The Wrangler passes the grade of being usefull in hard work offroad
environments, <

Oh, you know all about that, do you?

> but the Cherokee and GC don't they're too much the product of being aimed
at supermarket warriors. <

Actually, my lippy, uninformed friend, both are VERY good off road vehicles.
(Do us a favor and read a bit before you post, ok?)

 

> Jeeps are SUVs, the Grand Cherokee is a bloated joke of a SUV. <

Actually thr Grand Cherokee is rather svelte as "SUVs" go, and is quite
capable off road. Since I have one, I might know about that .... but what
the Hell would the truth matter to a good green zealot, eh?

> The Wrangler passes the grade of being usefull in hard work offroad
environments, <

Oh, you know all about that, do you?

> but the Cherokee and GC don't they're too much the product of being aimed
at supermarket warriors. <

Actually, my lippy, uninformed friend, both are VERY good off road vehicles.
(Do us a favor and read a bit before you post, ok?)

 

> Jeeps are SUVs, the Grand Cherokee is a bloated joke of a SUV. <

Actually thr Grand Cherokee is rather svelte as "SUVs" go, and is quite
capable off road. Since I have one, I might know about that .... but what
the Hell would the truth matter to a good green zealot, eh?

> The Wrangler passes the grade of being usefull in hard work offroad
environments, <

Oh, you know all about that, do you?

> but the Cherokee and GC don't they're too much the product of being aimed
at supermarket warriors. <

Actually, my lippy, uninformed friend, both are VERY good off road vehicles.
(Do us a favor and read a bit before you post, ok?)

 

"bllsht" <nospam@invaliddot.net> wrote in message
news:clr8qvc4ee3r7c4l5vifmrdnniddkuvh61@4ax.com...
> Get back in your Geo Metro and haul *** outa here.
>

Whats a Geo Metro? I drive a 88 Isuzu Bighorn (Released in the USA as the
Trooper II), used to drive a big Nissan Sedan before it was stolen, and
usually drive a Holden Commodore these days.
none are especially noteworthy as being compact econoboxes.

Oh and I've taken my stock 2.8L T-diesel Isuzu with AT tires through where a
Cherokee with MTs bogged down.

rhys

 

"bllsht" <nospam@invaliddot.net> wrote in message
news:clr8qvc4ee3r7c4l5vifmrdnniddkuvh61@4ax.com...
> Get back in your Geo Metro and haul *** outa here.
>

Whats a Geo Metro? I drive a 88 Isuzu Bighorn (Released in the USA as the
Trooper II), used to drive a big Nissan Sedan before it was stolen, and
usually drive a Holden Commodore these days.
none are especially noteworthy as being compact econoboxes.

Oh and I've taken my stock 2.8L T-diesel Isuzu with AT tires through where a
Cherokee with MTs bogged down.

rhys

 

"bllsht" <nospam@invaliddot.net> wrote in message
news:clr8qvc4ee3r7c4l5vifmrdnniddkuvh61@4ax.com...
> Get back in your Geo Metro and haul *** outa here.
>

Whats a Geo Metro? I drive a 88 Isuzu Bighorn (Released in the USA as the
Trooper II), used to drive a big Nissan Sedan before it was stolen, and
usually drive a Holden Commodore these days.
none are especially noteworthy as being compact econoboxes.

Oh and I've taken my stock 2.8L T-diesel Isuzu with AT tires through where a
Cherokee with MTs bogged down.

rhys

 

"TJim" <jim@ranlet.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:0sOdnfVtQddk6TmiRVn-sA@comcast.com...
> LMAO!! Have you ever seen a Cherokee on the trail. They can be awesome!
>
> --
> Jim
> --

Over rock and dry, I don't like em in mud or sand. besides they're normally
sold here with road only tires due to the sales coming form Supermarket
warriors only.

rhys