It is against the law for a truck or passenger car to tow a trailer
above 55 MPH: http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc22406.htm in
Kalifornia.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

"Dave C." wrote:
>
> OK, you advocate death penalty for 56 in a 55. What do you advocate for 56
> in a 55 with a truck? -Dave

 

Speed limits are just guidelines like the maximum towing capacity of a
vehicle... right Josh??

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3F95EC6A.B20AE64E@***.net...
> It is against the law for a truck or passenger car to tow a trailer
> above 55 MPH: http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc22406.htm in
> Kalifornia.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> "Dave C." wrote:
> >
> > OK, you advocate death penalty for 56 in a 55. What do you advocate for
56
> > in a 55 with a truck? -Dave

 

Speed limits are just guidelines like the maximum towing capacity of a
vehicle... right Josh??

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3F95EC6A.B20AE64E@***.net...
> It is against the law for a truck or passenger car to tow a trailer
> above 55 MPH: http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc22406.htm in
> Kalifornia.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> "Dave C." wrote:
> >
> > OK, you advocate death penalty for 56 in a 55. What do you advocate for
56
> > in a 55 with a truck? -Dave

 

Speed limits are just guidelines like the maximum towing capacity of a
vehicle... right Josh??

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3F95EC6A.B20AE64E@***.net...
> It is against the law for a truck or passenger car to tow a trailer
> above 55 MPH: http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc22406.htm in
> Kalifornia.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> "Dave C." wrote:
> >
> > OK, you advocate death penalty for 56 in a 55. What do you advocate for
56
> > in a 55 with a truck? -Dave

 

In article <bn6emj$tpp0p$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de>, "Joe" <me@privacy.net
(jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> writes:

>Speed limits are just guidelines like the maximum towing capacity of a
>vehicle... right Josh??

LOL
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html

 

In article <bn6emj$tpp0p$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de>, "Joe" <me@privacy.net
(jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> writes:

>Speed limits are just guidelines like the maximum towing capacity of a
>vehicle... right Josh??

LOL
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html

 

In article <bn6emj$tpp0p$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de>, "Joe" <me@privacy.net
(jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> writes:

>Speed limits are just guidelines like the maximum towing capacity of a
>vehicle... right Josh??

LOL
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html

 

Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message news:<5e190aec50b6739ba291544f9a87fbb9@dizum.com>. ..
> >Not being an SUV driver, I'd simply steer out of the way, knowing that I
> >can actually turn sharply without rolling over. With any luck, it would
> >be rainy, or on a curve, and I could see evolution in action as a bonus.
> >
> >Lisa
>
> Lisa, you scored with me. Taking on hundreds of redneck bozos takes guts.
>
> You must have been reading my posts, because I have said the same thing
> over and over and over again, almost to the point of ad infinitum & ad
> nauseum.
>
> Building cars in the 2000's with the balance (or lack of) of cars discarded
> to the rubbish bin in the 1920's is the epitomy of hilarity. I never cease
> to be amazed that so many fools are blowing their wads on those tipsy SUVs.
>
> The problem with SUVs isn't fuel consumption. Its your gas. You can burn
> it with a match for all I care. The problem is you SUV owners are going to
> kill somebody with it because you are scared shitless to whip that steering
> wheel back and forth to do a collision advoidance. You have no alternative
> but to plow at full speed directly into some defenseless car full of kids
> because if you try anything like steering around an emergency situation you
> will flip and kill yourself first, before continuing your death slide into
> your victims' car and taking them out as well.
>
> There is a way. If it can be reasonably demonstrated (51%) that you could
> have prevented a fatal by manuevering, but you didn't, I would charge you
> with frustrated manslaughter. Even though its really your SUV's fault
> because it steers like a battleship. I would also hold the manufacturer
> accountable for peddling off an accident waiting to happen. Prosecute some
> of those executives for conspiracy to commit unmitigated manslaughter.
> Don't fine them...they've already made monetary allowances for fines and
> judgments in the overcharges. Don't those trash heaps cost $30,000 and up?
>
> One more thing for you out there that don't read my posts regularly. You
> already know how tipsy SUVs are. But its worse than you think. When they
> are loaded to maximum gross weight, including the roof rack load, they are
> MORE TIPSY. And when fuel is minimum, they are MORE TIPSY YET. All things
> considered, they are much much worse than you thought and worse than
> CONSUMER REPORTS THINK ALSO. I suggest all you SUV owners organize and
> launch a class-action suit to recover all the unused value (as if they had
> any to start with) left in your SUVs, based on a straight-lin 10 year
> depreciation. It will bankrupt the lenders, dealers, and manufacturers!
> Take the money and run before you flip and kill yourself or ram somebody
> and go to prison penniless.
>
> Federal Government: In between wars, set up the DOT so it regulates and
> certifies cars for roadworthiness just like you did private airplanes back
> in the '30s. Don't let any cars be sold for the road unless they are
> triple safe.

How about if everyone hangs up the damn cell phone, stops playing with
the radio, and slows down to the posted speed limit? Keep a 4 second
gap between vehicles and pay attention to what you're doing, and all
cars and trucks are safe. OK, all except the ones with morons,
drunks, and selfish bastards at the wheel. By morons, I mean the ones
who literally don't know how to handle their vehicle properly, and
according to the laws of physics.

 

Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message news:<5e190aec50b6739ba291544f9a87fbb9@dizum.com>. ..
> >Not being an SUV driver, I'd simply steer out of the way, knowing that I
> >can actually turn sharply without rolling over. With any luck, it would
> >be rainy, or on a curve, and I could see evolution in action as a bonus.
> >
> >Lisa
>
> Lisa, you scored with me. Taking on hundreds of redneck bozos takes guts.
>
> You must have been reading my posts, because I have said the same thing
> over and over and over again, almost to the point of ad infinitum & ad
> nauseum.
>
> Building cars in the 2000's with the balance (or lack of) of cars discarded
> to the rubbish bin in the 1920's is the epitomy of hilarity. I never cease
> to be amazed that so many fools are blowing their wads on those tipsy SUVs.
>
> The problem with SUVs isn't fuel consumption. Its your gas. You can burn
> it with a match for all I care. The problem is you SUV owners are going to
> kill somebody with it because you are scared shitless to whip that steering
> wheel back and forth to do a collision advoidance. You have no alternative
> but to plow at full speed directly into some defenseless car full of kids
> because if you try anything like steering around an emergency situation you
> will flip and kill yourself first, before continuing your death slide into
> your victims' car and taking them out as well.
>
> There is a way. If it can be reasonably demonstrated (51%) that you could
> have prevented a fatal by manuevering, but you didn't, I would charge you
> with frustrated manslaughter. Even though its really your SUV's fault
> because it steers like a battleship. I would also hold the manufacturer
> accountable for peddling off an accident waiting to happen. Prosecute some
> of those executives for conspiracy to commit unmitigated manslaughter.
> Don't fine them...they've already made monetary allowances for fines and
> judgments in the overcharges. Don't those trash heaps cost $30,000 and up?
>
> One more thing for you out there that don't read my posts regularly. You
> already know how tipsy SUVs are. But its worse than you think. When they
> are loaded to maximum gross weight, including the roof rack load, they are
> MORE TIPSY. And when fuel is minimum, they are MORE TIPSY YET. All things
> considered, they are much much worse than you thought and worse than
> CONSUMER REPORTS THINK ALSO. I suggest all you SUV owners organize and
> launch a class-action suit to recover all the unused value (as if they had
> any to start with) left in your SUVs, based on a straight-lin 10 year
> depreciation. It will bankrupt the lenders, dealers, and manufacturers!
> Take the money and run before you flip and kill yourself or ram somebody
> and go to prison penniless.
>
> Federal Government: In between wars, set up the DOT so it regulates and
> certifies cars for roadworthiness just like you did private airplanes back
> in the '30s. Don't let any cars be sold for the road unless they are
> triple safe.

How about if everyone hangs up the damn cell phone, stops playing with
the radio, and slows down to the posted speed limit? Keep a 4 second
gap between vehicles and pay attention to what you're doing, and all
cars and trucks are safe. OK, all except the ones with morons,
drunks, and selfish bastards at the wheel. By morons, I mean the ones
who literally don't know how to handle their vehicle properly, and
according to the laws of physics.

 

Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message news:<5e190aec50b6739ba291544f9a87fbb9@dizum.com>. ..
> >Not being an SUV driver, I'd simply steer out of the way, knowing that I
> >can actually turn sharply without rolling over. With any luck, it would
> >be rainy, or on a curve, and I could see evolution in action as a bonus.
> >
> >Lisa
>
> Lisa, you scored with me. Taking on hundreds of redneck bozos takes guts.
>
> You must have been reading my posts, because I have said the same thing
> over and over and over again, almost to the point of ad infinitum & ad
> nauseum.
>
> Building cars in the 2000's with the balance (or lack of) of cars discarded
> to the rubbish bin in the 1920's is the epitomy of hilarity. I never cease
> to be amazed that so many fools are blowing their wads on those tipsy SUVs.
>
> The problem with SUVs isn't fuel consumption. Its your gas. You can burn
> it with a match for all I care. The problem is you SUV owners are going to
> kill somebody with it because you are scared shitless to whip that steering
> wheel back and forth to do a collision advoidance. You have no alternative
> but to plow at full speed directly into some defenseless car full of kids
> because if you try anything like steering around an emergency situation you
> will flip and kill yourself first, before continuing your death slide into
> your victims' car and taking them out as well.
>
> There is a way. If it can be reasonably demonstrated (51%) that you could
> have prevented a fatal by manuevering, but you didn't, I would charge you
> with frustrated manslaughter. Even though its really your SUV's fault
> because it steers like a battleship. I would also hold the manufacturer
> accountable for peddling off an accident waiting to happen. Prosecute some
> of those executives for conspiracy to commit unmitigated manslaughter.
> Don't fine them...they've already made monetary allowances for fines and
> judgments in the overcharges. Don't those trash heaps cost $30,000 and up?
>
> One more thing for you out there that don't read my posts regularly. You
> already know how tipsy SUVs are. But its worse than you think. When they
> are loaded to maximum gross weight, including the roof rack load, they are
> MORE TIPSY. And when fuel is minimum, they are MORE TIPSY YET. All things
> considered, they are much much worse than you thought and worse than
> CONSUMER REPORTS THINK ALSO. I suggest all you SUV owners organize and
> launch a class-action suit to recover all the unused value (as if they had
> any to start with) left in your SUVs, based on a straight-lin 10 year
> depreciation. It will bankrupt the lenders, dealers, and manufacturers!
> Take the money and run before you flip and kill yourself or ram somebody
> and go to prison penniless.
>
> Federal Government: In between wars, set up the DOT so it regulates and
> certifies cars for roadworthiness just like you did private airplanes back
> in the '30s. Don't let any cars be sold for the road unless they are
> triple safe.

How about if everyone hangs up the damn cell phone, stops playing with
the radio, and slows down to the posted speed limit? Keep a 4 second
gap between vehicles and pay attention to what you're doing, and all
cars and trucks are safe. OK, all except the ones with morons,
drunks, and selfish bastards at the wheel. By morons, I mean the ones
who literally don't know how to handle their vehicle properly, and
according to the laws of physics.