Libert Diesel...Nov 04 or early 05?
#61
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Libert Diesel...Nov 04 or early 05?
If you had read the chart you too would have known those are
propose values, and that the dirty diesel doesn't not come close to
passing them now, and that that there was nothing said about the cleaner
burning gasoline, that's why I put my test up. Go ahead a pollute the
world form your little island, just don't try BS us.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Chris Galvin wrote:
>
> What an excitable chap. Actually Bill you've been foiled by your own
> references the first of which states that as of now all vehicles, diesel,
> gasoline or vinegar, must meet the same emmission requirements. Probably why
> those pesky diesel VW passenger cars are welcome in California.
> Also if you had half a brain you'd realise that 4wd vehicles are perfectly
> suited to diesel engines due to the extra torque low down. Jesus in most of
> outback Australia, where EVERY vehicle is a 4wd, diesel is the only fuel
> sold.
> Have a nice day.
> Chris
propose values, and that the dirty diesel doesn't not come close to
passing them now, and that that there was nothing said about the cleaner
burning gasoline, that's why I put my test up. Go ahead a pollute the
world form your little island, just don't try BS us.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Chris Galvin wrote:
>
> What an excitable chap. Actually Bill you've been foiled by your own
> references the first of which states that as of now all vehicles, diesel,
> gasoline or vinegar, must meet the same emmission requirements. Probably why
> those pesky diesel VW passenger cars are welcome in California.
> Also if you had half a brain you'd realise that 4wd vehicles are perfectly
> suited to diesel engines due to the extra torque low down. Jesus in most of
> outback Australia, where EVERY vehicle is a 4wd, diesel is the only fuel
> sold.
> Have a nice day.
> Chris
#62
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Libert Diesel...Nov 04 or early 05?
http://money.cnn.com/2004/03/25/pf/autos/diesels/
Not that I expect this to change a closed mind.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:409991D5.524589A6@***.net...
> If you had read the chart you too would have known those are
> propose values, and that the dirty diesel doesn't not come close to
> passing them now, and that that there was nothing said about the cleaner
> burning gasoline, that's why I put my test up. Go ahead a pollute the
> world form your little island, just don't try BS us.
I see syntax is not your only weak point; Australia is quite a large
island, about the same size as USA.
Chris.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Chris Galvin wrote:
> >
> > What an excitable chap. Actually Bill you've been foiled by your own
> > references the first of which states that as of now all vehicles,
diesel,
> > gasoline or vinegar, must meet the same emmission requirements. Probably
why
> > those pesky diesel VW passenger cars are welcome in California.
> > Also if you had half a brain you'd realise that 4wd vehicles are
perfectly
> > suited to diesel engines due to the extra torque low down. Jesus in most
of
> > outback Australia, where EVERY vehicle is a 4wd, diesel is the only fuel
> > sold.
> > Have a nice day.
> > Chris
Not that I expect this to change a closed mind.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:409991D5.524589A6@***.net...
> If you had read the chart you too would have known those are
> propose values, and that the dirty diesel doesn't not come close to
> passing them now, and that that there was nothing said about the cleaner
> burning gasoline, that's why I put my test up. Go ahead a pollute the
> world form your little island, just don't try BS us.
I see syntax is not your only weak point; Australia is quite a large
island, about the same size as USA.
Chris.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Chris Galvin wrote:
> >
> > What an excitable chap. Actually Bill you've been foiled by your own
> > references the first of which states that as of now all vehicles,
diesel,
> > gasoline or vinegar, must meet the same emmission requirements. Probably
why
> > those pesky diesel VW passenger cars are welcome in California.
> > Also if you had half a brain you'd realise that 4wd vehicles are
perfectly
> > suited to diesel engines due to the extra torque low down. Jesus in most
of
> > outback Australia, where EVERY vehicle is a 4wd, diesel is the only fuel
> > sold.
> > Have a nice day.
> > Chris
#63
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Libert Diesel...Nov 04 or early 05?
http://money.cnn.com/2004/03/25/pf/autos/diesels/
Not that I expect this to change a closed mind.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:409991D5.524589A6@***.net...
> If you had read the chart you too would have known those are
> propose values, and that the dirty diesel doesn't not come close to
> passing them now, and that that there was nothing said about the cleaner
> burning gasoline, that's why I put my test up. Go ahead a pollute the
> world form your little island, just don't try BS us.
I see syntax is not your only weak point; Australia is quite a large
island, about the same size as USA.
Chris.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Chris Galvin wrote:
> >
> > What an excitable chap. Actually Bill you've been foiled by your own
> > references the first of which states that as of now all vehicles,
diesel,
> > gasoline or vinegar, must meet the same emmission requirements. Probably
why
> > those pesky diesel VW passenger cars are welcome in California.
> > Also if you had half a brain you'd realise that 4wd vehicles are
perfectly
> > suited to diesel engines due to the extra torque low down. Jesus in most
of
> > outback Australia, where EVERY vehicle is a 4wd, diesel is the only fuel
> > sold.
> > Have a nice day.
> > Chris
Not that I expect this to change a closed mind.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:409991D5.524589A6@***.net...
> If you had read the chart you too would have known those are
> propose values, and that the dirty diesel doesn't not come close to
> passing them now, and that that there was nothing said about the cleaner
> burning gasoline, that's why I put my test up. Go ahead a pollute the
> world form your little island, just don't try BS us.
I see syntax is not your only weak point; Australia is quite a large
island, about the same size as USA.
Chris.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Chris Galvin wrote:
> >
> > What an excitable chap. Actually Bill you've been foiled by your own
> > references the first of which states that as of now all vehicles,
diesel,
> > gasoline or vinegar, must meet the same emmission requirements. Probably
why
> > those pesky diesel VW passenger cars are welcome in California.
> > Also if you had half a brain you'd realise that 4wd vehicles are
perfectly
> > suited to diesel engines due to the extra torque low down. Jesus in most
of
> > outback Australia, where EVERY vehicle is a 4wd, diesel is the only fuel
> > sold.
> > Have a nice day.
> > Chris
#64
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Libert Diesel...Nov 04 or early 05?
http://money.cnn.com/2004/03/25/pf/autos/diesels/
Not that I expect this to change a closed mind.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:409991D5.524589A6@***.net...
> If you had read the chart you too would have known those are
> propose values, and that the dirty diesel doesn't not come close to
> passing them now, and that that there was nothing said about the cleaner
> burning gasoline, that's why I put my test up. Go ahead a pollute the
> world form your little island, just don't try BS us.
I see syntax is not your only weak point; Australia is quite a large
island, about the same size as USA.
Chris.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Chris Galvin wrote:
> >
> > What an excitable chap. Actually Bill you've been foiled by your own
> > references the first of which states that as of now all vehicles,
diesel,
> > gasoline or vinegar, must meet the same emmission requirements. Probably
why
> > those pesky diesel VW passenger cars are welcome in California.
> > Also if you had half a brain you'd realise that 4wd vehicles are
perfectly
> > suited to diesel engines due to the extra torque low down. Jesus in most
of
> > outback Australia, where EVERY vehicle is a 4wd, diesel is the only fuel
> > sold.
> > Have a nice day.
> > Chris
Not that I expect this to change a closed mind.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:409991D5.524589A6@***.net...
> If you had read the chart you too would have known those are
> propose values, and that the dirty diesel doesn't not come close to
> passing them now, and that that there was nothing said about the cleaner
> burning gasoline, that's why I put my test up. Go ahead a pollute the
> world form your little island, just don't try BS us.
I see syntax is not your only weak point; Australia is quite a large
island, about the same size as USA.
Chris.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Chris Galvin wrote:
> >
> > What an excitable chap. Actually Bill you've been foiled by your own
> > references the first of which states that as of now all vehicles,
diesel,
> > gasoline or vinegar, must meet the same emmission requirements. Probably
why
> > those pesky diesel VW passenger cars are welcome in California.
> > Also if you had half a brain you'd realise that 4wd vehicles are
perfectly
> > suited to diesel engines due to the extra torque low down. Jesus in most
of
> > outback Australia, where EVERY vehicle is a 4wd, diesel is the only fuel
> > sold.
> > Have a nice day.
> > Chris
#65
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Libert Diesel...Nov 04 or early 05?
http://money.cnn.com/2004/03/25/pf/autos/diesels/
Not that I expect this to change a closed mind.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:409991D5.524589A6@***.net...
> If you had read the chart you too would have known those are
> propose values, and that the dirty diesel doesn't not come close to
> passing them now, and that that there was nothing said about the cleaner
> burning gasoline, that's why I put my test up. Go ahead a pollute the
> world form your little island, just don't try BS us.
I see syntax is not your only weak point; Australia is quite a large
island, about the same size as USA.
Chris.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Chris Galvin wrote:
> >
> > What an excitable chap. Actually Bill you've been foiled by your own
> > references the first of which states that as of now all vehicles,
diesel,
> > gasoline or vinegar, must meet the same emmission requirements. Probably
why
> > those pesky diesel VW passenger cars are welcome in California.
> > Also if you had half a brain you'd realise that 4wd vehicles are
perfectly
> > suited to diesel engines due to the extra torque low down. Jesus in most
of
> > outback Australia, where EVERY vehicle is a 4wd, diesel is the only fuel
> > sold.
> > Have a nice day.
> > Chris
Not that I expect this to change a closed mind.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:409991D5.524589A6@***.net...
> If you had read the chart you too would have known those are
> propose values, and that the dirty diesel doesn't not come close to
> passing them now, and that that there was nothing said about the cleaner
> burning gasoline, that's why I put my test up. Go ahead a pollute the
> world form your little island, just don't try BS us.
I see syntax is not your only weak point; Australia is quite a large
island, about the same size as USA.
Chris.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Chris Galvin wrote:
> >
> > What an excitable chap. Actually Bill you've been foiled by your own
> > references the first of which states that as of now all vehicles,
diesel,
> > gasoline or vinegar, must meet the same emmission requirements. Probably
why
> > those pesky diesel VW passenger cars are welcome in California.
> > Also if you had half a brain you'd realise that 4wd vehicles are
perfectly
> > suited to diesel engines due to the extra torque low down. Jesus in most
of
> > outback Australia, where EVERY vehicle is a 4wd, diesel is the only fuel
> > sold.
> > Have a nice day.
> > Chris
#66
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Libert Diesel...Nov 04 or early 05?
>And probably clearer than any SMOGed vehicle on the street, if I can keep my foot out
>of it.
You can't seriously belive your "real jeep" would be able to meet the
same fuel economy\emissions requirements as a new vehicle of today..
Despite having your foot stuck where you keep putting it...
>of it.
You can't seriously belive your "real jeep" would be able to meet the
same fuel economy\emissions requirements as a new vehicle of today..
Despite having your foot stuck where you keep putting it...
#67
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Libert Diesel...Nov 04 or early 05?
>And probably clearer than any SMOGed vehicle on the street, if I can keep my foot out
>of it.
You can't seriously belive your "real jeep" would be able to meet the
same fuel economy\emissions requirements as a new vehicle of today..
Despite having your foot stuck where you keep putting it...
>of it.
You can't seriously belive your "real jeep" would be able to meet the
same fuel economy\emissions requirements as a new vehicle of today..
Despite having your foot stuck where you keep putting it...
#68
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Libert Diesel...Nov 04 or early 05?
>And probably clearer than any SMOGed vehicle on the street, if I can keep my foot out
>of it.
You can't seriously belive your "real jeep" would be able to meet the
same fuel economy\emissions requirements as a new vehicle of today..
Despite having your foot stuck where you keep putting it...
>of it.
You can't seriously belive your "real jeep" would be able to meet the
same fuel economy\emissions requirements as a new vehicle of today..
Despite having your foot stuck where you keep putting it...
#69
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Libert Diesel...Nov 04 or early 05?
>And probably clearer than any SMOGed vehicle on the street, if I can keep my foot out
>of it.
You can't seriously belive your "real jeep" would be able to meet the
same fuel economy\emissions requirements as a new vehicle of today..
Despite having your foot stuck where you keep putting it...
>of it.
You can't seriously belive your "real jeep" would be able to meet the
same fuel economy\emissions requirements as a new vehicle of today..
Despite having your foot stuck where you keep putting it...
#70
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Libert Diesel...Nov 04 or early 05?
Chris, you gave me another Bull Sh*t site with not one actual figure
like commonly used parts per million. You know, my full size Thunderbird
gets thirty miles to the gallon I bet you don't get much worst, so why
have these tax payers subsidized government grant hybrid automobiles, do
you have any idea how environmental hazardous their batteries are, look
at the back of your cell. And like the your phone they only last a
couple of years at a cost of four to five thousand dollars. That'll buy
a lot of gas! Do you really think I could get forty miles to the gallon
driving a hybrid at highway speeds though my mountainous Southern
California? <ROTFLMAO> God, there's bleeding heart liberal greenies down
there too. Come back when you have some facts.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Chris Galvin wrote:
>
> http://money.cnn.com/2004/03/25/pf/autos/diesels/
>
> Not that I expect this to change a closed mind.
like commonly used parts per million. You know, my full size Thunderbird
gets thirty miles to the gallon I bet you don't get much worst, so why
have these tax payers subsidized government grant hybrid automobiles, do
you have any idea how environmental hazardous their batteries are, look
at the back of your cell. And like the your phone they only last a
couple of years at a cost of four to five thousand dollars. That'll buy
a lot of gas! Do you really think I could get forty miles to the gallon
driving a hybrid at highway speeds though my mountainous Southern
California? <ROTFLMAO> God, there's bleeding heart liberal greenies down
there too. Come back when you have some facts.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Chris Galvin wrote:
>
> http://money.cnn.com/2004/03/25/pf/autos/diesels/
>
> Not that I expect this to change a closed mind.