L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III

Geez Chris! Learn what CO stands for! Then read it from a chart they
hope to restrict their pollution in the future to:
http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/light.html Then compare it to my
twenty five year old Bronco tests: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg I
know what a diesel is good for I've hauled eighty thousand pounds over a
million miles, but passenger cars are not one of them, thank God all but
a few VWs are outlawed here in California.
PLEASE EDUCATE YOURSELF!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

Chris Galvin wrote:
>
> Diesels are far more energy efficient, producing less carbon emmissions than
> a petrol vehicle; most people would say this is the primary environmental
> problem of our times. The only issue with diesels is the particulate
> emmissions which is pretty much solved with the latest filters. The current
> American Scientific has a major article on this issue if your interested;
> seems the new hydrogen fuel cells are a disaster environmentally.
> Chris.

Matt Osborn

On Wed, 5 May 2004 16:34:35 +0100, "Pet Lover" <xxxx@xxxx.com> wrote:

>That's choice from someone who lives in a country that has 3% of the worlds
>population and creates 12% of the worlds polution and refuses to sign the
>international treaty. When you produce the same levels of pulution as
>Europe, then you can have an opinion.

And those 3% of the worlds people produce what percentage of the
world's goods?

Matt Osborn

On Wed, 5 May 2004 16:34:35 +0100, "Pet Lover" <xxxx@xxxx.com> wrote:

>That's choice from someone who lives in a country that has 3% of the worlds
>population and creates 12% of the worlds polution and refuses to sign the
>international treaty. When you produce the same levels of pulution as
>Europe, then you can have an opinion.

And those 3% of the worlds people produce what percentage of the
world's goods?

Matt Osborn

On Wed, 5 May 2004 16:34:35 +0100, "Pet Lover" <xxxx@xxxx.com> wrote:

>That's choice from someone who lives in a country that has 3% of the worlds
>population and creates 12% of the worlds polution and refuses to sign the
>international treaty. When you produce the same levels of pulution as
>Europe, then you can have an opinion.

And those 3% of the worlds people produce what percentage of the
world's goods?

Matt Osborn

On Wed, 5 May 2004 16:34:35 +0100, "Pet Lover" <xxxx@xxxx.com> wrote:

>That's choice from someone who lives in a country that has 3% of the worlds
>population and creates 12% of the worlds polution and refuses to sign the
>international treaty. When you produce the same levels of pulution as
>Europe, then you can have an opinion.

And those 3% of the worlds people produce what percentage of the
world's goods?

Bill

> I hope that polluter only goes to Europe.

Oh and how would your "real jeep" fair compaired to today's
emission standards...?

Bill

> I hope that polluter only goes to Europe.

Oh and how would your "real jeep" fair compaired to today's
emission standards...?

Bill

> I hope that polluter only goes to Europe.

Oh and how would your "real jeep" fair compaired to today's
emission standards...?

Bill

> I hope that polluter only goes to Europe.

Oh and how would your "real jeep" fair compaired to today's
emission standards...?

L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III

Very well against a diesel, thank you. I've never seen anything
come out my exhaust like that Mercedes across the street. And probably
clearer than any SMOGed vehicle on the street, if I can keep my foot out
of it.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Bill wrote:
>
> Oh and how would your "real jeep" fair compaired to today's
> emission standards...?