Lemon LAW?
11-21-2003, 12:25 AM
#41
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Lemon LAW?
> A freakin' car salesman complaining about lawyers who protect consumers
from recalcitrant car dealers. <
I don't and never did sell cars, I ran customer service operations for a
Euro luxury mfr.
> Jerry, did you ever stop to consider that if every car dealer and
manufacturer did the right thing on a lemon law claim, there would be no
need for lemon laws or lemon law lawyers? <
The laws are fine, it's the bottom-feeder lawyers who prey on consumers, who
don't need their services and end up caost ALL of us millions in unnecessary
costs, just so they can keep their greens fees paid.
> I don't represent lemon law claimants, but I do defend car dealers in
lemon law lawsuits. Seldom are these lawsuits totally frivolous. <
Oh, HORSE ----! Dealers are rarely involved in lemon law or consumer product
lawsuits. Your dealer buddies and their associations made sure they did not
have to be responsible when their incompetent techs (who they refuse to
train) completely hose multiple repairs on some porr bastards car.
> Most of the plaintiff's lawyers I have encountered in these cases are
competent and ethical, and much more qualified to advocate their client's
cases than their clients could on their own. <
The clients don't need lawyers to get them what they can easily get onn
their own. The bottom-feeder lawyers just need quick sources of case to keep
the yacht payments up. All these bastards do is have a secretary print out a
boiler plate letter ans send it to the mfr, then they charge the poor
consumer $2,000. I saw this so many times the thought makes me sick.
> I think it is good advice to consult with a lawyer at the inception of a
lemon law claim. <
It's a complete waste of the consumers time & money, all they have to do is
contact the mfr's. consumer affiars dept using the info contimed in their
owners literature.
> Consider it a tutoring session to better equip the consumer to
negotiate a fair settlement. <
Consider it a complete clip job by bottom-feeder attorneys neededing some
quick cash to make the Mercedes payment.
They don't have to negotiate anything, all they have to do is contact
consumer affiars, tell them the car qualifies, produce the documentation and
they're on their way. The law spells it out in plain English what they're
entitiled to, particularly in places like Florida. The lemon law in Calif.
is known as the "attorneys annuity" becuase it's so simple a kid can do it,
but the douche-bag lawyers muscle their way into these very simple
transactions, fill in numbers a grade school kid could handle and then send
a bill for $10k to the mfr!
> Also, not every consumer is adept at negotiation, and many get so
emotionally involved with their claim that they become ineffective. These
people will benefit greatly from the services of a good attorney. >
There's nothing to negotiate! The consumer gets a new car or their money
back, less usage and any unreasonable damages.
> And if you call lawyers "scum-suckers" again, I'm going to find out where
you live and come kick your ***. ;-)~ <
Ok, how about SCUM-SUCKING PIGS, punchy!!!!
from recalcitrant car dealers. <
I don't and never did sell cars, I ran customer service operations for a
Euro luxury mfr.
> Jerry, did you ever stop to consider that if every car dealer and
manufacturer did the right thing on a lemon law claim, there would be no
need for lemon laws or lemon law lawyers? <
The laws are fine, it's the bottom-feeder lawyers who prey on consumers, who
don't need their services and end up caost ALL of us millions in unnecessary
costs, just so they can keep their greens fees paid.
> I don't represent lemon law claimants, but I do defend car dealers in
lemon law lawsuits. Seldom are these lawsuits totally frivolous. <
Oh, HORSE ----! Dealers are rarely involved in lemon law or consumer product
lawsuits. Your dealer buddies and their associations made sure they did not
have to be responsible when their incompetent techs (who they refuse to
train) completely hose multiple repairs on some porr bastards car.
> Most of the plaintiff's lawyers I have encountered in these cases are
competent and ethical, and much more qualified to advocate their client's
cases than their clients could on their own. <
The clients don't need lawyers to get them what they can easily get onn
their own. The bottom-feeder lawyers just need quick sources of case to keep
the yacht payments up. All these bastards do is have a secretary print out a
boiler plate letter ans send it to the mfr, then they charge the poor
consumer $2,000. I saw this so many times the thought makes me sick.
> I think it is good advice to consult with a lawyer at the inception of a
lemon law claim. <
It's a complete waste of the consumers time & money, all they have to do is
contact the mfr's. consumer affiars dept using the info contimed in their
owners literature.
> Consider it a tutoring session to better equip the consumer to
negotiate a fair settlement. <
Consider it a complete clip job by bottom-feeder attorneys neededing some
quick cash to make the Mercedes payment.
They don't have to negotiate anything, all they have to do is contact
consumer affiars, tell them the car qualifies, produce the documentation and
they're on their way. The law spells it out in plain English what they're
entitiled to, particularly in places like Florida. The lemon law in Calif.
is known as the "attorneys annuity" becuase it's so simple a kid can do it,
but the douche-bag lawyers muscle their way into these very simple
transactions, fill in numbers a grade school kid could handle and then send
a bill for $10k to the mfr!
> Also, not every consumer is adept at negotiation, and many get so
emotionally involved with their claim that they become ineffective. These
people will benefit greatly from the services of a good attorney. >
There's nothing to negotiate! The consumer gets a new car or their money
back, less usage and any unreasonable damages.
> And if you call lawyers "scum-suckers" again, I'm going to find out where
you live and come kick your ***. ;-)~ <
Ok, how about SCUM-SUCKING PIGS, punchy!!!!
11-21-2003, 12:25 AM
#42
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Lemon LAW?
> A freakin' car salesman complaining about lawyers who protect consumers
from recalcitrant car dealers. <
I don't and never did sell cars, I ran customer service operations for a
Euro luxury mfr.
> Jerry, did you ever stop to consider that if every car dealer and
manufacturer did the right thing on a lemon law claim, there would be no
need for lemon laws or lemon law lawyers? <
The laws are fine, it's the bottom-feeder lawyers who prey on consumers, who
don't need their services and end up caost ALL of us millions in unnecessary
costs, just so they can keep their greens fees paid.
> I don't represent lemon law claimants, but I do defend car dealers in
lemon law lawsuits. Seldom are these lawsuits totally frivolous. <
Oh, HORSE ----! Dealers are rarely involved in lemon law or consumer product
lawsuits. Your dealer buddies and their associations made sure they did not
have to be responsible when their incompetent techs (who they refuse to
train) completely hose multiple repairs on some porr bastards car.
> Most of the plaintiff's lawyers I have encountered in these cases are
competent and ethical, and much more qualified to advocate their client's
cases than their clients could on their own. <
The clients don't need lawyers to get them what they can easily get onn
their own. The bottom-feeder lawyers just need quick sources of case to keep
the yacht payments up. All these bastards do is have a secretary print out a
boiler plate letter ans send it to the mfr, then they charge the poor
consumer $2,000. I saw this so many times the thought makes me sick.
> I think it is good advice to consult with a lawyer at the inception of a
lemon law claim. <
It's a complete waste of the consumers time & money, all they have to do is
contact the mfr's. consumer affiars dept using the info contimed in their
owners literature.
> Consider it a tutoring session to better equip the consumer to
negotiate a fair settlement. <
Consider it a complete clip job by bottom-feeder attorneys neededing some
quick cash to make the Mercedes payment.
They don't have to negotiate anything, all they have to do is contact
consumer affiars, tell them the car qualifies, produce the documentation and
they're on their way. The law spells it out in plain English what they're
entitiled to, particularly in places like Florida. The lemon law in Calif.
is known as the "attorneys annuity" becuase it's so simple a kid can do it,
but the douche-bag lawyers muscle their way into these very simple
transactions, fill in numbers a grade school kid could handle and then send
a bill for $10k to the mfr!
> Also, not every consumer is adept at negotiation, and many get so
emotionally involved with their claim that they become ineffective. These
people will benefit greatly from the services of a good attorney. >
There's nothing to negotiate! The consumer gets a new car or their money
back, less usage and any unreasonable damages.
> And if you call lawyers "scum-suckers" again, I'm going to find out where
you live and come kick your ***. ;-)~ <
Ok, how about SCUM-SUCKING PIGS, punchy!!!!
from recalcitrant car dealers. <
I don't and never did sell cars, I ran customer service operations for a
Euro luxury mfr.
> Jerry, did you ever stop to consider that if every car dealer and
manufacturer did the right thing on a lemon law claim, there would be no
need for lemon laws or lemon law lawyers? <
The laws are fine, it's the bottom-feeder lawyers who prey on consumers, who
don't need their services and end up caost ALL of us millions in unnecessary
costs, just so they can keep their greens fees paid.
> I don't represent lemon law claimants, but I do defend car dealers in
lemon law lawsuits. Seldom are these lawsuits totally frivolous. <
Oh, HORSE ----! Dealers are rarely involved in lemon law or consumer product
lawsuits. Your dealer buddies and their associations made sure they did not
have to be responsible when their incompetent techs (who they refuse to
train) completely hose multiple repairs on some porr bastards car.
> Most of the plaintiff's lawyers I have encountered in these cases are
competent and ethical, and much more qualified to advocate their client's
cases than their clients could on their own. <
The clients don't need lawyers to get them what they can easily get onn
their own. The bottom-feeder lawyers just need quick sources of case to keep
the yacht payments up. All these bastards do is have a secretary print out a
boiler plate letter ans send it to the mfr, then they charge the poor
consumer $2,000. I saw this so many times the thought makes me sick.
> I think it is good advice to consult with a lawyer at the inception of a
lemon law claim. <
It's a complete waste of the consumers time & money, all they have to do is
contact the mfr's. consumer affiars dept using the info contimed in their
owners literature.
> Consider it a tutoring session to better equip the consumer to
negotiate a fair settlement. <
Consider it a complete clip job by bottom-feeder attorneys neededing some
quick cash to make the Mercedes payment.
They don't have to negotiate anything, all they have to do is contact
consumer affiars, tell them the car qualifies, produce the documentation and
they're on their way. The law spells it out in plain English what they're
entitiled to, particularly in places like Florida. The lemon law in Calif.
is known as the "attorneys annuity" becuase it's so simple a kid can do it,
but the douche-bag lawyers muscle their way into these very simple
transactions, fill in numbers a grade school kid could handle and then send
a bill for $10k to the mfr!
> Also, not every consumer is adept at negotiation, and many get so
emotionally involved with their claim that they become ineffective. These
people will benefit greatly from the services of a good attorney. >
There's nothing to negotiate! The consumer gets a new car or their money
back, less usage and any unreasonable damages.
> And if you call lawyers "scum-suckers" again, I'm going to find out where
you live and come kick your ***. ;-)~ <
Ok, how about SCUM-SUCKING PIGS, punchy!!!!
11-21-2003, 12:25 AM
#43
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Lemon LAW?
> A freakin' car salesman complaining about lawyers who protect consumers
from recalcitrant car dealers. <
I don't and never did sell cars, I ran customer service operations for a
Euro luxury mfr.
> Jerry, did you ever stop to consider that if every car dealer and
manufacturer did the right thing on a lemon law claim, there would be no
need for lemon laws or lemon law lawyers? <
The laws are fine, it's the bottom-feeder lawyers who prey on consumers, who
don't need their services and end up caost ALL of us millions in unnecessary
costs, just so they can keep their greens fees paid.
> I don't represent lemon law claimants, but I do defend car dealers in
lemon law lawsuits. Seldom are these lawsuits totally frivolous. <
Oh, HORSE ----! Dealers are rarely involved in lemon law or consumer product
lawsuits. Your dealer buddies and their associations made sure they did not
have to be responsible when their incompetent techs (who they refuse to
train) completely hose multiple repairs on some porr bastards car.
> Most of the plaintiff's lawyers I have encountered in these cases are
competent and ethical, and much more qualified to advocate their client's
cases than their clients could on their own. <
The clients don't need lawyers to get them what they can easily get onn
their own. The bottom-feeder lawyers just need quick sources of case to keep
the yacht payments up. All these bastards do is have a secretary print out a
boiler plate letter ans send it to the mfr, then they charge the poor
consumer $2,000. I saw this so many times the thought makes me sick.
> I think it is good advice to consult with a lawyer at the inception of a
lemon law claim. <
It's a complete waste of the consumers time & money, all they have to do is
contact the mfr's. consumer affiars dept using the info contimed in their
owners literature.
> Consider it a tutoring session to better equip the consumer to
negotiate a fair settlement. <
Consider it a complete clip job by bottom-feeder attorneys neededing some
quick cash to make the Mercedes payment.
They don't have to negotiate anything, all they have to do is contact
consumer affiars, tell them the car qualifies, produce the documentation and
they're on their way. The law spells it out in plain English what they're
entitiled to, particularly in places like Florida. The lemon law in Calif.
is known as the "attorneys annuity" becuase it's so simple a kid can do it,
but the douche-bag lawyers muscle their way into these very simple
transactions, fill in numbers a grade school kid could handle and then send
a bill for $10k to the mfr!
> Also, not every consumer is adept at negotiation, and many get so
emotionally involved with their claim that they become ineffective. These
people will benefit greatly from the services of a good attorney. >
There's nothing to negotiate! The consumer gets a new car or their money
back, less usage and any unreasonable damages.
> And if you call lawyers "scum-suckers" again, I'm going to find out where
you live and come kick your ***. ;-)~ <
Ok, how about SCUM-SUCKING PIGS, punchy!!!!
from recalcitrant car dealers. <
I don't and never did sell cars, I ran customer service operations for a
Euro luxury mfr.
> Jerry, did you ever stop to consider that if every car dealer and
manufacturer did the right thing on a lemon law claim, there would be no
need for lemon laws or lemon law lawyers? <
The laws are fine, it's the bottom-feeder lawyers who prey on consumers, who
don't need their services and end up caost ALL of us millions in unnecessary
costs, just so they can keep their greens fees paid.
> I don't represent lemon law claimants, but I do defend car dealers in
lemon law lawsuits. Seldom are these lawsuits totally frivolous. <
Oh, HORSE ----! Dealers are rarely involved in lemon law or consumer product
lawsuits. Your dealer buddies and their associations made sure they did not
have to be responsible when their incompetent techs (who they refuse to
train) completely hose multiple repairs on some porr bastards car.
> Most of the plaintiff's lawyers I have encountered in these cases are
competent and ethical, and much more qualified to advocate their client's
cases than their clients could on their own. <
The clients don't need lawyers to get them what they can easily get onn
their own. The bottom-feeder lawyers just need quick sources of case to keep
the yacht payments up. All these bastards do is have a secretary print out a
boiler plate letter ans send it to the mfr, then they charge the poor
consumer $2,000. I saw this so many times the thought makes me sick.
> I think it is good advice to consult with a lawyer at the inception of a
lemon law claim. <
It's a complete waste of the consumers time & money, all they have to do is
contact the mfr's. consumer affiars dept using the info contimed in their
owners literature.
> Consider it a tutoring session to better equip the consumer to
negotiate a fair settlement. <
Consider it a complete clip job by bottom-feeder attorneys neededing some
quick cash to make the Mercedes payment.
They don't have to negotiate anything, all they have to do is contact
consumer affiars, tell them the car qualifies, produce the documentation and
they're on their way. The law spells it out in plain English what they're
entitiled to, particularly in places like Florida. The lemon law in Calif.
is known as the "attorneys annuity" becuase it's so simple a kid can do it,
but the douche-bag lawyers muscle their way into these very simple
transactions, fill in numbers a grade school kid could handle and then send
a bill for $10k to the mfr!
> Also, not every consumer is adept at negotiation, and many get so
emotionally involved with their claim that they become ineffective. These
people will benefit greatly from the services of a good attorney. >
There's nothing to negotiate! The consumer gets a new car or their money
back, less usage and any unreasonable damages.
> And if you call lawyers "scum-suckers" again, I'm going to find out where
you live and come kick your ***. ;-)~ <
Ok, how about SCUM-SUCKING PIGS, punchy!!!!
11-21-2003, 12:31 AM
#44
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Lemon LAW?
> I have experience in Texas. MFR offered a MSRP to MSRP swap as settlement.
I took it, and got a new vehicle...not as nice as the lemon, but 2 years
newer and got 0% finance as opposed to the 7+% on the first.>
See, and no bottom-feeder lawyer wetting his beak to the tune of $15k for
doing nothing, either!
Who was the MFR, if I might ask?
I took it, and got a new vehicle...not as nice as the lemon, but 2 years
newer and got 0% finance as opposed to the 7+% on the first.>
See, and no bottom-feeder lawyer wetting his beak to the tune of $15k for
doing nothing, either!
Who was the MFR, if I might ask?
11-21-2003, 12:31 AM
#45
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Lemon LAW?
> I have experience in Texas. MFR offered a MSRP to MSRP swap as settlement.
I took it, and got a new vehicle...not as nice as the lemon, but 2 years
newer and got 0% finance as opposed to the 7+% on the first.>
See, and no bottom-feeder lawyer wetting his beak to the tune of $15k for
doing nothing, either!
Who was the MFR, if I might ask?
I took it, and got a new vehicle...not as nice as the lemon, but 2 years
newer and got 0% finance as opposed to the 7+% on the first.>
See, and no bottom-feeder lawyer wetting his beak to the tune of $15k for
doing nothing, either!
Who was the MFR, if I might ask?
11-21-2003, 12:31 AM
#46
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Lemon LAW?
> I have experience in Texas. MFR offered a MSRP to MSRP swap as settlement.
I took it, and got a new vehicle...not as nice as the lemon, but 2 years
newer and got 0% finance as opposed to the 7+% on the first.>
See, and no bottom-feeder lawyer wetting his beak to the tune of $15k for
doing nothing, either!
Who was the MFR, if I might ask?
I took it, and got a new vehicle...not as nice as the lemon, but 2 years
newer and got 0% finance as opposed to the 7+% on the first.>
See, and no bottom-feeder lawyer wetting his beak to the tune of $15k for
doing nothing, either!
Who was the MFR, if I might ask?
11-21-2003, 09:38 AM
#47
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Lemon LAW?
In article <bpju5f0jr0@enews2.newsguy.com>, "Jerry McGeorge"
<gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> writes:
>One thing for sure, keep driving it, and keep complaining about the issue.
>They have to comply but the burden of proof's on you, you must have copies
>of the ro's and any documentation you gave the dealer describing the
>problem (letter, note to service advisor, etc.)
>
Done and done. We have every piece of paper regarding this vehicle. When it
went in the 3rd time to have the shortblock replaced, we had asked that they
replace the vehicle, hoping they would do the right thing then. Then afterward
when it continued to leak, they claimed they couldn't find the leak.
>Look, don;t get me wrong, if all else fails find an atty and sue them, but
>be sure you can prove what's going on.
Like I said before, we're in the settlement negotiation phase. A rep from
American Honda has inspected the vehicle for the suit purposes and has
confirmed the leak. Of course, *now* they've offer a new vehicle 9 months after
we asked for one, but we don't want another Honda product because of what
they've put us through. We just want them to buy out the lease and reimburse us
for what we've paid/attorneys fees.
I'm kind of surprised at this, becaus
>eHonda's rep is that they're very customer oriented....maybe times have
>changed since I kicked back!
Me too. My wife's mother has purchased a new Accord every 2 years for the last
10, but she said she will never buy another Honda again, as well...they lost 2
customers over this.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
<gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> writes:
>One thing for sure, keep driving it, and keep complaining about the issue.
>They have to comply but the burden of proof's on you, you must have copies
>of the ro's and any documentation you gave the dealer describing the
>problem (letter, note to service advisor, etc.)
>
Done and done. We have every piece of paper regarding this vehicle. When it
went in the 3rd time to have the shortblock replaced, we had asked that they
replace the vehicle, hoping they would do the right thing then. Then afterward
when it continued to leak, they claimed they couldn't find the leak.
>Look, don;t get me wrong, if all else fails find an atty and sue them, but
>be sure you can prove what's going on.
Like I said before, we're in the settlement negotiation phase. A rep from
American Honda has inspected the vehicle for the suit purposes and has
confirmed the leak. Of course, *now* they've offer a new vehicle 9 months after
we asked for one, but we don't want another Honda product because of what
they've put us through. We just want them to buy out the lease and reimburse us
for what we've paid/attorneys fees.
I'm kind of surprised at this, becaus
>eHonda's rep is that they're very customer oriented....maybe times have
>changed since I kicked back!
Me too. My wife's mother has purchased a new Accord every 2 years for the last
10, but she said she will never buy another Honda again, as well...they lost 2
customers over this.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
11-21-2003, 09:38 AM
#48
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Lemon LAW?
In article <bpju5f0jr0@enews2.newsguy.com>, "Jerry McGeorge"
<gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> writes:
>One thing for sure, keep driving it, and keep complaining about the issue.
>They have to comply but the burden of proof's on you, you must have copies
>of the ro's and any documentation you gave the dealer describing the
>problem (letter, note to service advisor, etc.)
>
Done and done. We have every piece of paper regarding this vehicle. When it
went in the 3rd time to have the shortblock replaced, we had asked that they
replace the vehicle, hoping they would do the right thing then. Then afterward
when it continued to leak, they claimed they couldn't find the leak.
>Look, don;t get me wrong, if all else fails find an atty and sue them, but
>be sure you can prove what's going on.
Like I said before, we're in the settlement negotiation phase. A rep from
American Honda has inspected the vehicle for the suit purposes and has
confirmed the leak. Of course, *now* they've offer a new vehicle 9 months after
we asked for one, but we don't want another Honda product because of what
they've put us through. We just want them to buy out the lease and reimburse us
for what we've paid/attorneys fees.
I'm kind of surprised at this, becaus
>eHonda's rep is that they're very customer oriented....maybe times have
>changed since I kicked back!
Me too. My wife's mother has purchased a new Accord every 2 years for the last
10, but she said she will never buy another Honda again, as well...they lost 2
customers over this.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
<gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> writes:
>One thing for sure, keep driving it, and keep complaining about the issue.
>They have to comply but the burden of proof's on you, you must have copies
>of the ro's and any documentation you gave the dealer describing the
>problem (letter, note to service advisor, etc.)
>
Done and done. We have every piece of paper regarding this vehicle. When it
went in the 3rd time to have the shortblock replaced, we had asked that they
replace the vehicle, hoping they would do the right thing then. Then afterward
when it continued to leak, they claimed they couldn't find the leak.
>Look, don;t get me wrong, if all else fails find an atty and sue them, but
>be sure you can prove what's going on.
Like I said before, we're in the settlement negotiation phase. A rep from
American Honda has inspected the vehicle for the suit purposes and has
confirmed the leak. Of course, *now* they've offer a new vehicle 9 months after
we asked for one, but we don't want another Honda product because of what
they've put us through. We just want them to buy out the lease and reimburse us
for what we've paid/attorneys fees.
I'm kind of surprised at this, becaus
>eHonda's rep is that they're very customer oriented....maybe times have
>changed since I kicked back!
Me too. My wife's mother has purchased a new Accord every 2 years for the last
10, but she said she will never buy another Honda again, as well...they lost 2
customers over this.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
11-21-2003, 09:38 AM
#49
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Lemon LAW?
In article <bpju5f0jr0@enews2.newsguy.com>, "Jerry McGeorge"
<gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> writes:
>One thing for sure, keep driving it, and keep complaining about the issue.
>They have to comply but the burden of proof's on you, you must have copies
>of the ro's and any documentation you gave the dealer describing the
>problem (letter, note to service advisor, etc.)
>
Done and done. We have every piece of paper regarding this vehicle. When it
went in the 3rd time to have the shortblock replaced, we had asked that they
replace the vehicle, hoping they would do the right thing then. Then afterward
when it continued to leak, they claimed they couldn't find the leak.
>Look, don;t get me wrong, if all else fails find an atty and sue them, but
>be sure you can prove what's going on.
Like I said before, we're in the settlement negotiation phase. A rep from
American Honda has inspected the vehicle for the suit purposes and has
confirmed the leak. Of course, *now* they've offer a new vehicle 9 months after
we asked for one, but we don't want another Honda product because of what
they've put us through. We just want them to buy out the lease and reimburse us
for what we've paid/attorneys fees.
I'm kind of surprised at this, becaus
>eHonda's rep is that they're very customer oriented....maybe times have
>changed since I kicked back!
Me too. My wife's mother has purchased a new Accord every 2 years for the last
10, but she said she will never buy another Honda again, as well...they lost 2
customers over this.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
<gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> writes:
>One thing for sure, keep driving it, and keep complaining about the issue.
>They have to comply but the burden of proof's on you, you must have copies
>of the ro's and any documentation you gave the dealer describing the
>problem (letter, note to service advisor, etc.)
>
Done and done. We have every piece of paper regarding this vehicle. When it
went in the 3rd time to have the shortblock replaced, we had asked that they
replace the vehicle, hoping they would do the right thing then. Then afterward
when it continued to leak, they claimed they couldn't find the leak.
>Look, don;t get me wrong, if all else fails find an atty and sue them, but
>be sure you can prove what's going on.
Like I said before, we're in the settlement negotiation phase. A rep from
American Honda has inspected the vehicle for the suit purposes and has
confirmed the leak. Of course, *now* they've offer a new vehicle 9 months after
we asked for one, but we don't want another Honda product because of what
they've put us through. We just want them to buy out the lease and reimburse us
for what we've paid/attorneys fees.
I'm kind of surprised at this, becaus
>eHonda's rep is that they're very customer oriented....maybe times have
>changed since I kicked back!
Me too. My wife's mother has purchased a new Accord every 2 years for the last
10, but she said she will never buy another Honda again, as well...they lost 2
customers over this.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
11-21-2003, 09:52 AM
#50
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Lemon LAW?
In article <bpk7pu017o7@enews4.newsguy.com>, "Jerry McG"
<gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> writes:
>The laws are fine, it's the bottom-feeder lawyers who prey on consumers, who
>don't need their services and end up caost ALL of us millions in unnecessary
>costs, just so they can keep their greens fees paid.
Your job at a high-end Euroluxury manufacturer notwithstanding, the fact
remains not all manufacturers will do this voluntarily, regardless of what the
law says.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
<gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> writes:
>The laws are fine, it's the bottom-feeder lawyers who prey on consumers, who
>don't need their services and end up caost ALL of us millions in unnecessary
>costs, just so they can keep their greens fees paid.
Your job at a high-end Euroluxury manufacturer notwithstanding, the fact
remains not all manufacturers will do this voluntarily, regardless of what the
law says.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
