Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Bill Putney wrote:
> I always am skeptical of people who pretentiously refer to the Earth as
> if it were a person saying "Earth" instead of "the Earth" as any normal
> person (at least in the U.S.) would do
Have you looked through a telescope lately and seen the Mars, the Saturn,
the Venus, the Jupiter, the Neptune, the Pluto...?
Looks like you're talking out of (the) Uranus.
DS
> I always am skeptical of people who pretentiously refer to the Earth as
> if it were a person saying "Earth" instead of "the Earth" as any normal
> person (at least in the U.S.) would do
Have you looked through a telescope lately and seen the Mars, the Saturn,
the Venus, the Jupiter, the Neptune, the Pluto...?
Looks like you're talking out of (the) Uranus.
DS
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Bill Putney wrote:
> I always am skeptical of people who pretentiously refer to the Earth as
> if it were a person saying "Earth" instead of "the Earth" as any normal
> person (at least in the U.S.) would do
Have you looked through a telescope lately and seen the Mars, the Saturn,
the Venus, the Jupiter, the Neptune, the Pluto...?
Looks like you're talking out of (the) Uranus.
DS
> I always am skeptical of people who pretentiously refer to the Earth as
> if it were a person saying "Earth" instead of "the Earth" as any normal
> person (at least in the U.S.) would do
Have you looked through a telescope lately and seen the Mars, the Saturn,
the Venus, the Jupiter, the Neptune, the Pluto...?
Looks like you're talking out of (the) Uranus.
DS
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <3FAC2B7F.579695AE@kinez.net>, Bill Putney wrote:
>
>
> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>
>> Science tells up CO2 absorbs heat, science tells us the earth is warming,
>> science tells us CO2 has increased along with temperature, science tells us
>> human activities produce CO2.
>
> Soil absorbs heat. Air absorbs heat. Water absorbs heat. Just making
> a statement like "CO2 absorbs heat" tells us nothing.
What parker should have wrote, is that CO2 acts to retain heat. It's
a slight, but important difference.
>
>
> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>
>> Science tells up CO2 absorbs heat, science tells us the earth is warming,
>> science tells us CO2 has increased along with temperature, science tells us
>> human activities produce CO2.
>
> Soil absorbs heat. Air absorbs heat. Water absorbs heat. Just making
> a statement like "CO2 absorbs heat" tells us nothing.
What parker should have wrote, is that CO2 acts to retain heat. It's
a slight, but important difference.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <3FAC2B7F.579695AE@kinez.net>, Bill Putney wrote:
>
>
> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>
>> Science tells up CO2 absorbs heat, science tells us the earth is warming,
>> science tells us CO2 has increased along with temperature, science tells us
>> human activities produce CO2.
>
> Soil absorbs heat. Air absorbs heat. Water absorbs heat. Just making
> a statement like "CO2 absorbs heat" tells us nothing.
What parker should have wrote, is that CO2 acts to retain heat. It's
a slight, but important difference.
>
>
> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>
>> Science tells up CO2 absorbs heat, science tells us the earth is warming,
>> science tells us CO2 has increased along with temperature, science tells us
>> human activities produce CO2.
>
> Soil absorbs heat. Air absorbs heat. Water absorbs heat. Just making
> a statement like "CO2 absorbs heat" tells us nothing.
What parker should have wrote, is that CO2 acts to retain heat. It's
a slight, but important difference.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <3FAC2B7F.579695AE@kinez.net>, Bill Putney wrote:
>
>
> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>
>> Science tells up CO2 absorbs heat, science tells us the earth is warming,
>> science tells us CO2 has increased along with temperature, science tells us
>> human activities produce CO2.
>
> Soil absorbs heat. Air absorbs heat. Water absorbs heat. Just making
> a statement like "CO2 absorbs heat" tells us nothing.
What parker should have wrote, is that CO2 acts to retain heat. It's
a slight, but important difference.
>
>
> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>
>> Science tells up CO2 absorbs heat, science tells us the earth is warming,
>> science tells us CO2 has increased along with temperature, science tells us
>> human activities produce CO2.
>
> Soil absorbs heat. Air absorbs heat. Water absorbs heat. Just making
> a statement like "CO2 absorbs heat" tells us nothing.
What parker should have wrote, is that CO2 acts to retain heat. It's
a slight, but important difference.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:RGXqb.100665$mZ5.656765@attbi_s54...
> In article <3FAC2B7F.579695AE@kinez.net>, Bill Putney wrote:
> >
> >
> > Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >>
> >> Science tells up CO2 absorbs heat, science tells us the earth is
warming,
> >> science tells us CO2 has increased along with temperature, science
tells us
> >> human activities produce CO2.
> >
> > Soil absorbs heat. Air absorbs heat. Water absorbs heat. Just making
> > a statement like "CO2 absorbs heat" tells us nothing.
>
> What parker should have wrote, is that CO2 acts to retain heat. It's
> a slight, but important difference.
>
It's over his head, he only understands pseudo-science.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:RGXqb.100665$mZ5.656765@attbi_s54...
> In article <3FAC2B7F.579695AE@kinez.net>, Bill Putney wrote:
> >
> >
> > Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >>
> >> Science tells up CO2 absorbs heat, science tells us the earth is
warming,
> >> science tells us CO2 has increased along with temperature, science
tells us
> >> human activities produce CO2.
> >
> > Soil absorbs heat. Air absorbs heat. Water absorbs heat. Just making
> > a statement like "CO2 absorbs heat" tells us nothing.
>
> What parker should have wrote, is that CO2 acts to retain heat. It's
> a slight, but important difference.
>
It's over his head, he only understands pseudo-science.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:RGXqb.100665$mZ5.656765@attbi_s54...
> In article <3FAC2B7F.579695AE@kinez.net>, Bill Putney wrote:
> >
> >
> > Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >>
> >> Science tells up CO2 absorbs heat, science tells us the earth is
warming,
> >> science tells us CO2 has increased along with temperature, science
tells us
> >> human activities produce CO2.
> >
> > Soil absorbs heat. Air absorbs heat. Water absorbs heat. Just making
> > a statement like "CO2 absorbs heat" tells us nothing.
>
> What parker should have wrote, is that CO2 acts to retain heat. It's
> a slight, but important difference.
>
It's over his head, he only understands pseudo-science.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bogbdb$44t$29@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vqm2cs5v8alnf1@corp.supernews.com>,
> "Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:boe616$i0q$17@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <vqjdrv6m9dlk0a@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> "Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> >news:vCiqb.11714$9M3.10456@newsread2.news.atl.ear thlink.net...
> >> >> "And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas?
Florida?"
> >> >> Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the
> >results
> >> >of
> >> >> Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
> >> >
> >> >And what the Dems never acknowledge is the fact that Floridas votes
were
> >> >recounted again after Bush was declared the winner, every vote was
> >counted,
> >> >no matter how poorly marked, and it gave Bush more votes than the
final
> >> >official count had given him.
> >>
> >> Wrong. As the media reported, depending on how the votes were counted
> >> (strictly, loosely), Bush would win some recounts and Gore would win
some.
> >
> >Read what I wrote LP, they counted EVERY vote, not just the proper ones,
> >EVERY vote, and Bush won by a larger margin than the official vote gave
him.
>
> http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/flo...ries/main.html
>
Remember what you always say about CNN whenever someone uses it against you
Lloyd? :p
> >You are wrong once again, which is at least normal for you.
> >And I saw the ballots in question, they were very simple to use, I've
voted
> >with them myself before, and Chicago used the same ballot in the same
> >election without a problem.
> >
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >> >> news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> >> > In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
> >> >> > "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
> >> >> <snip>
> >> >> > And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas?
Florida?
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bogbdb$44t$29@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vqm2cs5v8alnf1@corp.supernews.com>,
> "Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:boe616$i0q$17@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <vqjdrv6m9dlk0a@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> "Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> >news:vCiqb.11714$9M3.10456@newsread2.news.atl.ear thlink.net...
> >> >> "And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas?
Florida?"
> >> >> Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the
> >results
> >> >of
> >> >> Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
> >> >
> >> >And what the Dems never acknowledge is the fact that Floridas votes
were
> >> >recounted again after Bush was declared the winner, every vote was
> >counted,
> >> >no matter how poorly marked, and it gave Bush more votes than the
final
> >> >official count had given him.
> >>
> >> Wrong. As the media reported, depending on how the votes were counted
> >> (strictly, loosely), Bush would win some recounts and Gore would win
some.
> >
> >Read what I wrote LP, they counted EVERY vote, not just the proper ones,
> >EVERY vote, and Bush won by a larger margin than the official vote gave
him.
>
> http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/flo...ries/main.html
>
Remember what you always say about CNN whenever someone uses it against you
Lloyd? :p
> >You are wrong once again, which is at least normal for you.
> >And I saw the ballots in question, they were very simple to use, I've
voted
> >with them myself before, and Chicago used the same ballot in the same
> >election without a problem.
> >
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >> >> news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> >> > In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
> >> >> > "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
> >> >> <snip>
> >> >> > And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas?
Florida?
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
