On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 15:49:05 -0500, "C. E. White"
<cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote:

>
>
>Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
>> Humans put out more CO2 than nature by several orders of magnitude.
>
>This is simply not true. In fact it is wrong my many orders of magnitude.
>According to a report from the Congressional Research Service, natural emission
>are at least 700 billion tons. Emissions related to human activity are only about
>24 billion tons.
>
>Regards,
>
>Ed White

You should know better than to respond to lloyd the moron.

 

On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 11:11:10 -0500, "C. E. White"
<cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote:

>> For half a million years, CO2 was around 280 ppm, without much variation. In
>> the last 120 years, it's increased to 350 ppm.
>
>Can you site a source that agrees with this. There is lot of conflicting
>information available, but none of it shows the concentration as being stable. The

First, maybe he can tell me who took the measurements.

Let's see, we will measure current levels with ultra sensitive
instruments, and we will simply make up data for before we had any
instruments...

 

On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 11:11:10 -0500, "C. E. White"
<cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote:

>> For half a million years, CO2 was around 280 ppm, without much variation. In
>> the last 120 years, it's increased to 350 ppm.
>
>Can you site a source that agrees with this. There is lot of conflicting
>information available, but none of it shows the concentration as being stable. The

First, maybe he can tell me who took the measurements.

Let's see, we will measure current levels with ultra sensitive
instruments, and we will simply make up data for before we had any
instruments...

 

On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 11:11:10 -0500, "C. E. White"
<cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote:

>> For half a million years, CO2 was around 280 ppm, without much variation. In
>> the last 120 years, it's increased to 350 ppm.
>
>Can you site a source that agrees with this. There is lot of conflicting
>information available, but none of it shows the concentration as being stable. The

First, maybe he can tell me who took the measurements.

Let's see, we will measure current levels with ultra sensitive
instruments, and we will simply make up data for before we had any
instruments...

 

> First, maybe he can tell me who took the measurements.

Let's see, we will measure current levels with ultra sensitive instruments,
and we will simply make up data for before we had any instruments... <

You're being VERY politically incorrect by trying to use common sense and
logic rather than just going along with this scam like a good little green
lemming.....

 

> First, maybe he can tell me who took the measurements.

Let's see, we will measure current levels with ultra sensitive instruments,
and we will simply make up data for before we had any instruments... <

You're being VERY politically incorrect by trying to use common sense and
logic rather than just going along with this scam like a good little green
lemming.....

 

> First, maybe he can tell me who took the measurements.

Let's see, we will measure current levels with ultra sensitive instruments,
and we will simply make up data for before we had any instruments... <

You're being VERY politically incorrect by trying to use common sense and
logic rather than just going along with this scam like a good little green
lemming.....

 

"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:SOiqb.11748$9M3.11131@newsread2.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> Hello??? LLLLLOYD are you published in your field of expertise?? I am,
are
> you?????

Is MAD Magazine still in publication? He might still have a chance. ;-)

 

"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:SOiqb.11748$9M3.11131@newsread2.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> Hello??? LLLLLOYD are you published in your field of expertise?? I am,
are
> you?????

Is MAD Magazine still in publication? He might still have a chance. ;-)

 

"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:SOiqb.11748$9M3.11131@newsread2.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> Hello??? LLLLLOYD are you published in your field of expertise?? I am,
are
> you?????

Is MAD Magazine still in publication? He might still have a chance. ;-)