Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Guest
Posts: n/a
Bill Putney <bputney@kinez.net> wrote in message news:<3FADC066.361957AB@kinez.net>...
> > Were you offended? I wasn't.
>
> No - I'm part of the other 5%. I can do that since I take nothing he
> says seriously.
Were you actually offended by what Howard Dean said?
> > Were you offended? I wasn't.
>
> No - I'm part of the other 5%. I can do that since I take nothing he
> says seriously.
Were you actually offended by what Howard Dean said?
Guest
Posts: n/a
> > Were you offended? I wasn't. Speak for youself, lest you become a
> > "Sharpton" of your own.
>
> No - I'm part of the other 5%. I can do that since I take nothing he
> says seriously. Sharpton of my own? What the heck does that mean?
So you weren't offended by what he said, yet you feel free to point
out that "some people" were offended on the basis of Al Sharpton's
assertions.
Are you a follower of Al Sharpton?
Do you seriously think that Al Sharpton was offended by Dean?
> > "Sharpton" of your own.
>
> No - I'm part of the other 5%. I can do that since I take nothing he
> says seriously. Sharpton of my own? What the heck does that mean?
So you weren't offended by what he said, yet you feel free to point
out that "some people" were offended on the basis of Al Sharpton's
assertions.
Are you a follower of Al Sharpton?
Do you seriously think that Al Sharpton was offended by Dean?
Guest
Posts: n/a
> > Were you offended? I wasn't. Speak for youself, lest you become a
> > "Sharpton" of your own.
>
> No - I'm part of the other 5%. I can do that since I take nothing he
> says seriously. Sharpton of my own? What the heck does that mean?
So you weren't offended by what he said, yet you feel free to point
out that "some people" were offended on the basis of Al Sharpton's
assertions.
Are you a follower of Al Sharpton?
Do you seriously think that Al Sharpton was offended by Dean?
> > "Sharpton" of your own.
>
> No - I'm part of the other 5%. I can do that since I take nothing he
> says seriously. Sharpton of my own? What the heck does that mean?
So you weren't offended by what he said, yet you feel free to point
out that "some people" were offended on the basis of Al Sharpton's
assertions.
Are you a follower of Al Sharpton?
Do you seriously think that Al Sharpton was offended by Dean?
Guest
Posts: n/a
> > Were you offended? I wasn't. Speak for youself, lest you become a
> > "Sharpton" of your own.
>
> No - I'm part of the other 5%. I can do that since I take nothing he
> says seriously. Sharpton of my own? What the heck does that mean?
So you weren't offended by what he said, yet you feel free to point
out that "some people" were offended on the basis of Al Sharpton's
assertions.
Are you a follower of Al Sharpton?
Do you seriously think that Al Sharpton was offended by Dean?
> > "Sharpton" of your own.
>
> No - I'm part of the other 5%. I can do that since I take nothing he
> says seriously. Sharpton of my own? What the heck does that mean?
So you weren't offended by what he said, yet you feel free to point
out that "some people" were offended on the basis of Al Sharpton's
assertions.
Are you a follower of Al Sharpton?
Do you seriously think that Al Sharpton was offended by Dean?
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 09:39:14 -0500, Me <srhi@comcast.net> wrote:
>If I want information about a problem with the environment that has the
>potential to wipe out life on this planet, I will go to scientists who
>spend their lives investigating the environment. I will certainly not go
>to rec.driving.autos for such information.
Another liberal missing the point?
Nobody is expecting you to think these newsgroups are doing the
research. What some are telling you though is that what you do
believe isn't coming from an unbiased source and you should seek out
the unbiased research. It is out there and it isn't what you hear
about in the mainstream media.
Matt
99 V-10 Super Duty, Super Cab 4x4
>If I want information about a problem with the environment that has the
>potential to wipe out life on this planet, I will go to scientists who
>spend their lives investigating the environment. I will certainly not go
>to rec.driving.autos for such information.
Another liberal missing the point?
Nobody is expecting you to think these newsgroups are doing the
research. What some are telling you though is that what you do
believe isn't coming from an unbiased source and you should seek out
the unbiased research. It is out there and it isn't what you hear
about in the mainstream media.
Matt
99 V-10 Super Duty, Super Cab 4x4
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 09:39:14 -0500, Me <srhi@comcast.net> wrote:
>If I want information about a problem with the environment that has the
>potential to wipe out life on this planet, I will go to scientists who
>spend their lives investigating the environment. I will certainly not go
>to rec.driving.autos for such information.
Another liberal missing the point?
Nobody is expecting you to think these newsgroups are doing the
research. What some are telling you though is that what you do
believe isn't coming from an unbiased source and you should seek out
the unbiased research. It is out there and it isn't what you hear
about in the mainstream media.
Matt
99 V-10 Super Duty, Super Cab 4x4
>If I want information about a problem with the environment that has the
>potential to wipe out life on this planet, I will go to scientists who
>spend their lives investigating the environment. I will certainly not go
>to rec.driving.autos for such information.
Another liberal missing the point?
Nobody is expecting you to think these newsgroups are doing the
research. What some are telling you though is that what you do
believe isn't coming from an unbiased source and you should seek out
the unbiased research. It is out there and it isn't what you hear
about in the mainstream media.
Matt
99 V-10 Super Duty, Super Cab 4x4
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 09:39:14 -0500, Me <srhi@comcast.net> wrote:
>If I want information about a problem with the environment that has the
>potential to wipe out life on this planet, I will go to scientists who
>spend their lives investigating the environment. I will certainly not go
>to rec.driving.autos for such information.
Another liberal missing the point?
Nobody is expecting you to think these newsgroups are doing the
research. What some are telling you though is that what you do
believe isn't coming from an unbiased source and you should seek out
the unbiased research. It is out there and it isn't what you hear
about in the mainstream media.
Matt
99 V-10 Super Duty, Super Cab 4x4
>If I want information about a problem with the environment that has the
>potential to wipe out life on this planet, I will go to scientists who
>spend their lives investigating the environment. I will certainly not go
>to rec.driving.autos for such information.
Another liberal missing the point?
Nobody is expecting you to think these newsgroups are doing the
research. What some are telling you though is that what you do
believe isn't coming from an unbiased source and you should seek out
the unbiased research. It is out there and it isn't what you hear
about in the mainstream media.
Matt
99 V-10 Super Duty, Super Cab 4x4
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Matt Mead wrote:
> Nobody is expecting you to think these newsgroups are doing the
> research. What some are telling you though is that what you do
> believe isn't coming from an unbiased source and you should seek out
> the unbiased research. It is out there and it isn't what you hear
> about in the mainstream media.
Well...no. There is no "unbiased research" sitting on a dark shelf
somewhere waiting to be sought out. It's up to the reader to look at a
broad enough range of research to get an idea of the variety of hypotheses
and experimental results and do the homework of finding out who paid for
each study, then make up his own mind.
DS
> Nobody is expecting you to think these newsgroups are doing the
> research. What some are telling you though is that what you do
> believe isn't coming from an unbiased source and you should seek out
> the unbiased research. It is out there and it isn't what you hear
> about in the mainstream media.
Well...no. There is no "unbiased research" sitting on a dark shelf
somewhere waiting to be sought out. It's up to the reader to look at a
broad enough range of research to get an idea of the variety of hypotheses
and experimental results and do the homework of finding out who paid for
each study, then make up his own mind.
DS
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Matt Mead wrote:
> Nobody is expecting you to think these newsgroups are doing the
> research. What some are telling you though is that what you do
> believe isn't coming from an unbiased source and you should seek out
> the unbiased research. It is out there and it isn't what you hear
> about in the mainstream media.
Well...no. There is no "unbiased research" sitting on a dark shelf
somewhere waiting to be sought out. It's up to the reader to look at a
broad enough range of research to get an idea of the variety of hypotheses
and experimental results and do the homework of finding out who paid for
each study, then make up his own mind.
DS
> Nobody is expecting you to think these newsgroups are doing the
> research. What some are telling you though is that what you do
> believe isn't coming from an unbiased source and you should seek out
> the unbiased research. It is out there and it isn't what you hear
> about in the mainstream media.
Well...no. There is no "unbiased research" sitting on a dark shelf
somewhere waiting to be sought out. It's up to the reader to look at a
broad enough range of research to get an idea of the variety of hypotheses
and experimental results and do the homework of finding out who paid for
each study, then make up his own mind.
DS
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Matt Mead wrote:
> Nobody is expecting you to think these newsgroups are doing the
> research. What some are telling you though is that what you do
> believe isn't coming from an unbiased source and you should seek out
> the unbiased research. It is out there and it isn't what you hear
> about in the mainstream media.
Well...no. There is no "unbiased research" sitting on a dark shelf
somewhere waiting to be sought out. It's up to the reader to look at a
broad enough range of research to get an idea of the variety of hypotheses
and experimental results and do the homework of finding out who paid for
each study, then make up his own mind.
DS
> Nobody is expecting you to think these newsgroups are doing the
> research. What some are telling you though is that what you do
> believe isn't coming from an unbiased source and you should seek out
> the unbiased research. It is out there and it isn't what you hear
> about in the mainstream media.
Well...no. There is no "unbiased research" sitting on a dark shelf
somewhere waiting to be sought out. It's up to the reader to look at a
broad enough range of research to get an idea of the variety of hypotheses
and experimental results and do the homework of finding out who paid for
each study, then make up his own mind.
DS


