"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:boe58v$i0q$3@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <NDbqb.10704$9M3.5530@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink .net>,
> "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
> >> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
> >> >> You're still clutching onto the old "popular vote" complaint Lloyd.
We
> >> >didn't have a popular vote. There wasn't a popular election, so
there's
> >no
> >> >popular vote. Counting up the aggregate of individual state votes and
> >> >calling it a "popular vote" doesn't make it so. We've had this
argument
> >> >before and you always ignore this pertinent fact. >
> >> >
> >> >Well, first, Llyod prefers indictrination to facts. ;-) If we add up
the
> >> >poopular vote Gore is ALLEGED to have won by around 500,000. I say
> >alleged,
> >> >because the 2000 Presidential vote total was never verified.
> >>
> >> Each state certified its election returns.
> >>
> >>
> >> >Had we NOT had
> >> >an Elctoral College, as of course we do, that 500,000 represented
about
> >1/2
> >> >of 1 percent of the total vote, satistically insignificant and
therefore
> >it
> >> >would have necessitated a National recount. Given the corrupt Democrat
> >> >machines in the urban areas of the Country wher there political base
is,
> >> >it's doubtful those 500,000 votes would have survived.
> >>
> >> And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
> >>
> >
> >Not as many as Democratic. The counties Gore tried to Cherry-pick in
Florida
> >were Democratic strongholds. Do you think that was an accident?
> >
> >
> >> >
> >> >Nontheless, with the exception of Clinton's re-election in '96 the
> >Democrats
> >> >have lost every major campaign since '94 and are now out of power and
can
> >> >mount no effective opposition other than obstruction.
> >>
> >>
> >> Since there're been 2 "major campaigns" since 94, that makes both
parties
> >> batting .500.
> >>
> >> >Their recent hero,
> >> >Clinton, was a pragmatist and closet conservative, anything so long as
it
> >> >got him power. So, other than the biggest tax increase in history,
name
> >ONE
> >> >major liberal adgenda item he either championed or got signed into
law.
> >>
> >> Family leave, environmental protection, workplace safety, kept abortion
> >rights
> >> from being taken away, Brady Bill, assault weapon ban...
> >>
> >>
> >I can't fault FMLA, in itself its a good thing. Workplace safety
sometimes
> >goes to far the way the laws are written. Whether you like it or not
Lloyd
> >there is such a thing as over regulation. I think abortion is wrong, but
its
> >not for me or anyone else to legislate it, hence I don't think it should
be
> >an issue.
> >The Brady Bill and assault weapons ban are a joke, if you actually got
out
> >of that ivory tower you're holed up in you might realize it. If it were
up
> >to you I could think of three people off the top of my head who might be
> >dead at the moment if they didn't have a firearm handy.
> >An Atlanta police officer's wife who killed her would be rapist.
> >A man who shot a would be carjacker on the northside of Atlanta somewhere
in
> >a Wal-Fart parking lot.
> >A wal-Fart employee in Florida somewhere IIRC who was being stabbed by
some
> >nutcase who was foiled by an old lady w/ a pistol.
> >
> >
> >
> And for each of those, there are family members shot in anger or
accidentally,
> suicides with a handy gun, children shooting children with a gun found in
the
> house, shooting of a neighbor the homeowner thought was a burglar, etc.

And arrows. Specially the pointy ones ...

--
Certe, toto, sentio nos in kansate non iam adesse

 

"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:boe58v$i0q$3@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <NDbqb.10704$9M3.5530@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink .net>,
> "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
> >> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
> >> >> You're still clutching onto the old "popular vote" complaint Lloyd.
We
> >> >didn't have a popular vote. There wasn't a popular election, so
there's
> >no
> >> >popular vote. Counting up the aggregate of individual state votes and
> >> >calling it a "popular vote" doesn't make it so. We've had this
argument
> >> >before and you always ignore this pertinent fact. >
> >> >
> >> >Well, first, Llyod prefers indictrination to facts. ;-) If we add up
the
> >> >poopular vote Gore is ALLEGED to have won by around 500,000. I say
> >alleged,
> >> >because the 2000 Presidential vote total was never verified.
> >>
> >> Each state certified its election returns.
> >>
> >>
> >> >Had we NOT had
> >> >an Elctoral College, as of course we do, that 500,000 represented
about
> >1/2
> >> >of 1 percent of the total vote, satistically insignificant and
therefore
> >it
> >> >would have necessitated a National recount. Given the corrupt Democrat
> >> >machines in the urban areas of the Country wher there political base
is,
> >> >it's doubtful those 500,000 votes would have survived.
> >>
> >> And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
> >>
> >
> >Not as many as Democratic. The counties Gore tried to Cherry-pick in
Florida
> >were Democratic strongholds. Do you think that was an accident?
> >
> >
> >> >
> >> >Nontheless, with the exception of Clinton's re-election in '96 the
> >Democrats
> >> >have lost every major campaign since '94 and are now out of power and
can
> >> >mount no effective opposition other than obstruction.
> >>
> >>
> >> Since there're been 2 "major campaigns" since 94, that makes both
parties
> >> batting .500.
> >>
> >> >Their recent hero,
> >> >Clinton, was a pragmatist and closet conservative, anything so long as
it
> >> >got him power. So, other than the biggest tax increase in history,
name
> >ONE
> >> >major liberal adgenda item he either championed or got signed into
law.
> >>
> >> Family leave, environmental protection, workplace safety, kept abortion
> >rights
> >> from being taken away, Brady Bill, assault weapon ban...
> >>
> >>
> >I can't fault FMLA, in itself its a good thing. Workplace safety
sometimes
> >goes to far the way the laws are written. Whether you like it or not
Lloyd
> >there is such a thing as over regulation. I think abortion is wrong, but
its
> >not for me or anyone else to legislate it, hence I don't think it should
be
> >an issue.
> >The Brady Bill and assault weapons ban are a joke, if you actually got
out
> >of that ivory tower you're holed up in you might realize it. If it were
up
> >to you I could think of three people off the top of my head who might be
> >dead at the moment if they didn't have a firearm handy.
> >An Atlanta police officer's wife who killed her would be rapist.
> >A man who shot a would be carjacker on the northside of Atlanta somewhere
in
> >a Wal-Fart parking lot.
> >A wal-Fart employee in Florida somewhere IIRC who was being stabbed by
some
> >nutcase who was foiled by an old lady w/ a pistol.
> >
> >
> >
> And for each of those, there are family members shot in anger or
accidentally,
> suicides with a handy gun, children shooting children with a gun found in
the
> house, shooting of a neighbor the homeowner thought was a burglar, etc.

And arrows. Specially the pointy ones ...

--
Certe, toto, sentio nos in kansate non iam adesse

 

> I am sure you know of many cases where the collective wisdom of the
scientists of the day proved to be wrong. <

Yeah, like in 1975 when they all said we were heading for the new ice age
due to, guess what, human industrial emissions ...we've been down this
(yawn) road before. See, Lloyd knows full well the "greenhous gas (bag)"
theorists are just that, however the THEORY suits the social revisonist
philosophy of him and his leftist buddies. So what if they're worng if they
can conficate more wealth and reengineer sociaty to suit their leftist
ideals.

 

> I am sure you know of many cases where the collective wisdom of the
scientists of the day proved to be wrong. <

Yeah, like in 1975 when they all said we were heading for the new ice age
due to, guess what, human industrial emissions ...we've been down this
(yawn) road before. See, Lloyd knows full well the "greenhous gas (bag)"
theorists are just that, however the THEORY suits the social revisonist
philosophy of him and his leftist buddies. So what if they're worng if they
can conficate more wealth and reengineer sociaty to suit their leftist
ideals.

 

> I am sure you know of many cases where the collective wisdom of the
scientists of the day proved to be wrong. <

Yeah, like in 1975 when they all said we were heading for the new ice age
due to, guess what, human industrial emissions ...we've been down this
(yawn) road before. See, Lloyd knows full well the "greenhous gas (bag)"
theorists are just that, however the THEORY suits the social revisonist
philosophy of him and his leftist buddies. So what if they're worng if they
can conficate more wealth and reengineer sociaty to suit their leftist
ideals.

 

and just incase you were wondering, i still hope you die a slow miserable
death as the cholesterol that wraps your obese heart chokes the life out of
you. i read the atlanta journal online daily hoping to find "obese
homosexual professor dies due to massive blood loss when the gerbil he
shoved up his *** worked the tape from his claws". only a matter of time,
feltcher. :-) <

Tell us how you REALLY feel, Nate!

 

and just incase you were wondering, i still hope you die a slow miserable
death as the cholesterol that wraps your obese heart chokes the life out of
you. i read the atlanta journal online daily hoping to find "obese
homosexual professor dies due to massive blood loss when the gerbil he
shoved up his *** worked the tape from his claws". only a matter of time,
feltcher. :-) <

Tell us how you REALLY feel, Nate!

 

and just incase you were wondering, i still hope you die a slow miserable
death as the cholesterol that wraps your obese heart chokes the life out of
you. i read the atlanta journal online daily hoping to find "obese
homosexual professor dies due to massive blood loss when the gerbil he
shoved up his *** worked the tape from his claws". only a matter of time,
feltcher. :-) <

Tell us how you REALLY feel, Nate!

 

"Nathan Collier" <JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote in message
news:2mPqb.90063$IA2.3093658@twister.southeast.rr. com...
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> news:bogbf1$44t$30@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> > Yeah, tell them about your scientific qualifications to judge me too.
>
> lol......its nice to see youre still the same idiot loser twit youve
always
> been. the same ignorant *** that claimed rear wheel only engine braking
was
> just as effective as 4 wheel engine braking off road on steep slick
declines
> because of some "scientific" reasoning you read in a magazine. it doesnt
> take any "scientific qualifications" to know youre a idiot lloyd. you
speak
> for yourself rather well.
>
> and just incase you were wondering, i still hope you die a slow miserable
> death as the cholesterol that wraps your obese heart chokes the life out
of
> you. i read the atlanta journal online daily hoping to find "obese
> homosexual professor dies due to massive blood loss when the gerbil he
> shoved up his *** worked the tape from his claws". only a matter of time,
> feltcher. :-)
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
>
>
>

Well, why don't you, like, get emotional about it.

--
Certe, toto, sentio nos in kansate non iam adesse

 

"Nathan Collier" <JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote in message
news:2mPqb.90063$IA2.3093658@twister.southeast.rr. com...
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> news:bogbf1$44t$30@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> > Yeah, tell them about your scientific qualifications to judge me too.
>
> lol......its nice to see youre still the same idiot loser twit youve
always
> been. the same ignorant *** that claimed rear wheel only engine braking
was
> just as effective as 4 wheel engine braking off road on steep slick
declines
> because of some "scientific" reasoning you read in a magazine. it doesnt
> take any "scientific qualifications" to know youre a idiot lloyd. you
speak
> for yourself rather well.
>
> and just incase you were wondering, i still hope you die a slow miserable
> death as the cholesterol that wraps your obese heart chokes the life out
of
> you. i read the atlanta journal online daily hoping to find "obese
> homosexual professor dies due to massive blood loss when the gerbil he
> shoved up his *** worked the tape from his claws". only a matter of time,
> feltcher. :-)
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
>
>
>

Well, why don't you, like, get emotional about it.

--
Certe, toto, sentio nos in kansate non iam adesse