Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Brent P wrote:
>
> In article <9327eab3.0310291827.631fffde@posting.google.com >, tortrix wrote:
> > "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote in message news:<bnp3rl0vi8@enews3.newsguy.com>...
> >
> ><fanatical anti-socialist, anti-communist crap snipped>
> >
> >> The bottom line is, CO2 is a non-poisonous, life-sustaining gas.
>
> > Tell that to the Apollo 13 astronauts.
> > What biology course did YOU take? I got two A's in biology.
> > I saw NOWHERE that humans breathe CO2.
> > Get a clue: even chemical engineering and chemistry departments
> > teach us that ANY chemical is toxic enough in high enough doses:
> > even O2 for humans and CO2 for deciduous trees.
>
> Someone is playing usenet games. Nobody is talking about "high enough
> doses" in a closed box. In the global environnment he is correct so
> long as one considers that plants are alive. CO2 is needed for life
> on this planet, it is not poisonous in the levels being discussed (in
> the atmosphere). If you think it's poisonous you shouldn't be in the
> same room with yourself. Because you spew it every momement of every
> day.
>
> > How about the freedom to live in a world with a few trees left,
> > some clean air and water, some privacy free of overpopulation,
> > and where the quality of life is better than death?
>
> Then why do developing nations get a pass? Why is the environmental movement
> not *DEMANDING* that the developing world use known methods of
> protecting the environment? Why is the environmental movement supporting
> policies that will relocate factories from the USA and western europe
> where the environment is protected to nations where it is not protected?
>
> I want a clean world where the environment is protected and not destroyed.
> This is why I try to buy products made in nations with at least a decent
> level of regulation to achieve that goal. However the environmental
> movement doesn't stand for that. They stand for some political and social
> agenda where the USA is considered evil and the standard of living must
> be knocked down several pegs. The environment is being used for an
> excuse and it sickens me.
>
> And then guess what happens when someone decides to build a wind farm
> near the homes of some rich liberals? They throw a hissy fit.
And they'll badmouth mean old big business for moving their operations
offshore to survive. Guess that's a flaw in their plan they didn't
anticipate - but I'm sure they're working on plugging that "loophole" as
we speak to make the knocking down of our standard of living that you
speak of more robust.
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
The Ancient One wrote:
> ...until they are proven destroyed, which even the UN said they had NOT been,.
> (You need to read the news once in awhile Lloyd) then it must be assumed
> they still exist and are an imminent threat to US and World security.
Lloyd was absent the day they taught the law of the conservation of
mass/matter.
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
The Ancient One wrote:
> ...until they are proven destroyed, which even the UN said they had NOT been,.
> (You need to read the news once in awhile Lloyd) then it must be assumed
> they still exist and are an imminent threat to US and World security.
Lloyd was absent the day they taught the law of the conservation of
mass/matter.
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
The Ancient One wrote:
> ...until they are proven destroyed, which even the UN said they had NOT been,.
> (You need to read the news once in awhile Lloyd) then it must be assumed
> they still exist and are an imminent threat to US and World security.
Lloyd was absent the day they taught the law of the conservation of
mass/matter.
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Jonesy wrote:
>
> ...Remember that Bin Laden was following his
> convictions, too...
Just having convictions isn't enough. Just because someone has
convictions doesn't mean I respect them. Hitler had convictions.
I'd say that it makes a heck of a lot of difference **WHAT** those
convictions are. Bin Laden? Bush? - yeah, I'll take Bush any day.
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Jonesy wrote:
>
> ...Remember that Bin Laden was following his
> convictions, too...
Just having convictions isn't enough. Just because someone has
convictions doesn't mean I respect them. Hitler had convictions.
I'd say that it makes a heck of a lot of difference **WHAT** those
convictions are. Bin Laden? Bush? - yeah, I'll take Bush any day.
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Jonesy wrote:
>
> ...Remember that Bin Laden was following his
> convictions, too...
Just having convictions isn't enough. Just because someone has
convictions doesn't mean I respect them. Hitler had convictions.
I'd say that it makes a heck of a lot of difference **WHAT** those
convictions are. Bin Laden? Bush? - yeah, I'll take Bush any day.
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
The Ancient One wrote:
>
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> news:bntnbk$k15$13@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> > ...You're assuming he didn't destroy them. Prove it.
>
> Irrelevant. It was up to Saddam, as per the UN resolution which every nation
> signed, to prove he had indeed destroyed them. He failed to do so, no
> further justification is required.
Unless the UN and their resolutions are meaningless. Oh wait -
apparently they are by their lack of followup!
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
The Ancient One wrote:
>
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> news:bntnbk$k15$13@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> > ...You're assuming he didn't destroy them. Prove it.
>
> Irrelevant. It was up to Saddam, as per the UN resolution which every nation
> signed, to prove he had indeed destroyed them. He failed to do so, no
> further justification is required.
Unless the UN and their resolutions are meaningless. Oh wait -
apparently they are by their lack of followup!
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
The Ancient One wrote:
>
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> news:bntnbk$k15$13@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> > ...You're assuming he didn't destroy them. Prove it.
>
> Irrelevant. It was up to Saddam, as per the UN resolution which every nation
> signed, to prove he had indeed destroyed them. He failed to do so, no
> further justification is required.
Unless the UN and their resolutions are meaningless. Oh wait -
apparently they are by their lack of followup!
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----