I'll cut to the chase, my well-indoctrinated leftist, I used to be a liberal
Democrat until the lies & hypocrisy became too much to ignore. I register as
an independent and in '00 I voted for Nader. Given the crap the Democrats
are putting up as leaders, I'll vote for Bush this time for sure.

"Jonesy" <beelzebubba@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:73da2590.0310311214.f26d181@posting.google.co m...
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:<bnsm7511ag5@enews2.newsguy.com>...
> > This is the worst crop of candidates the Democrats have yet to put
forward.
>
> Wrong. 1988...
>
> > Worse, their attacks on the President and national policy coming at a
time
> > of war, articulated for personal partisan gain, are reprehensible and a
> > disgrace to the name of their political party.
>
> BWAHAHAHA! I love this particular brand of hypocrisy from
> right-wingers.
>
> > Never in history have we seen
> > a major political party so devoid of vision and so obstructionist in its
> > actions.
>
> Wrong. GOP, 1993.
>
> > None of them has even a remote chance of beating Bush in '04, but in the
> > process of all this they give true aid & comfort to the most despicable
of
> > enemies.
>
> Another bunch of BS from your typical right-winger.
>
> > The sad part is these ******** have nothing to put forward, except "tax
the
> > rich" (which really means tax anyone making enough to afford a roof over
> > their heads) and "cut & run", proving they're nothing but cowards at
heart.
>
> Hip deep. Maybe if you stopped listenen to your drug-addled pal on
> the radio, you might have a clue.
>
> > Imagine the total chaos in the middle east if we were to knee-jerk and
pull
> > out our troops at this time.
>
> Enlighten us - when did Clark say this? Dean? Kerry? Edwards?
>
> I guess when you don't have any real argument, you either call names
> or just make ---- up.
>
> > But, if they gained power in the process, what
> > would these selfish idiots care? Every Democrat since FDR has left a
major
> > world crisis for his successor to clean up.
>
> Truman? Nope.
>
> Carter? LOL. Nope.
>
> Clinton? Only for those folks who want to pin 9/11 on him. Yeah,
> those ----------hating GOPers really put the screws to Hezbollah in
> '83. Or to Libya in '86 ('88??) Kuwait '91? Yeah, if those cowards
> would have just done the job right the first time, none of it would
> have happened.
>
> > The Democrats have not articulated a inspirational, constructive vision
> > since Kennedy & Johnson. Indeed, they have not implemented anything
truly
> > effective (other than confiscating income) since the New Deal.
>
> Yeah, that "New Frontier" and all that man on the moon stuff was just
> a bunch of crap. I getcha. Died under a GOP admin, too.
>
> But really, the GOP hasn't even had a new idea since Lincoln.
>
> > Sad, but
> > unavoidable conclusion: they're so bound up in their special interest
> > obligations they can't step forward with anything coherent or relevant
to
> > lead their country.
>
> LOL. Yeah, that GOP sure is altruistic. You right-wingers crack me
> up.
>
> > As for Bush, Americans know a real leader when they see
> > one.
>
> And the Shrub ain't it. Real leaders know that charging into the guns
> isn't leadership unless you can get others to follow. Following one's
> convictions doesn't imply that the convictions are based on fact or
> are in any way moral. Remember that Bin Laden was following his
> convictions, too...
>
> > He may have his flaws, but after 9/11 he passed the test with flying
> > colors.
>
> Any monkey in a Brooks Brothers suit could have done the right thing
> after 9/11. It really was a no-brainer - just the perfect speed for
> this president.
>
> Jonesy

 

I'll cut to the chase, my well-indoctrinated leftist, I used to be a liberal
Democrat until the lies & hypocrisy became too much to ignore. I register as
an independent and in '00 I voted for Nader. Given the crap the Democrats
are putting up as leaders, I'll vote for Bush this time for sure.

"Jonesy" <beelzebubba@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:73da2590.0310311214.f26d181@posting.google.co m...
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:<bnsm7511ag5@enews2.newsguy.com>...
> > This is the worst crop of candidates the Democrats have yet to put
forward.
>
> Wrong. 1988...
>
> > Worse, their attacks on the President and national policy coming at a
time
> > of war, articulated for personal partisan gain, are reprehensible and a
> > disgrace to the name of their political party.
>
> BWAHAHAHA! I love this particular brand of hypocrisy from
> right-wingers.
>
> > Never in history have we seen
> > a major political party so devoid of vision and so obstructionist in its
> > actions.
>
> Wrong. GOP, 1993.
>
> > None of them has even a remote chance of beating Bush in '04, but in the
> > process of all this they give true aid & comfort to the most despicable
of
> > enemies.
>
> Another bunch of BS from your typical right-winger.
>
> > The sad part is these ******** have nothing to put forward, except "tax
the
> > rich" (which really means tax anyone making enough to afford a roof over
> > their heads) and "cut & run", proving they're nothing but cowards at
heart.
>
> Hip deep. Maybe if you stopped listenen to your drug-addled pal on
> the radio, you might have a clue.
>
> > Imagine the total chaos in the middle east if we were to knee-jerk and
pull
> > out our troops at this time.
>
> Enlighten us - when did Clark say this? Dean? Kerry? Edwards?
>
> I guess when you don't have any real argument, you either call names
> or just make ---- up.
>
> > But, if they gained power in the process, what
> > would these selfish idiots care? Every Democrat since FDR has left a
major
> > world crisis for his successor to clean up.
>
> Truman? Nope.
>
> Carter? LOL. Nope.
>
> Clinton? Only for those folks who want to pin 9/11 on him. Yeah,
> those ----------hating GOPers really put the screws to Hezbollah in
> '83. Or to Libya in '86 ('88??) Kuwait '91? Yeah, if those cowards
> would have just done the job right the first time, none of it would
> have happened.
>
> > The Democrats have not articulated a inspirational, constructive vision
> > since Kennedy & Johnson. Indeed, they have not implemented anything
truly
> > effective (other than confiscating income) since the New Deal.
>
> Yeah, that "New Frontier" and all that man on the moon stuff was just
> a bunch of crap. I getcha. Died under a GOP admin, too.
>
> But really, the GOP hasn't even had a new idea since Lincoln.
>
> > Sad, but
> > unavoidable conclusion: they're so bound up in their special interest
> > obligations they can't step forward with anything coherent or relevant
to
> > lead their country.
>
> LOL. Yeah, that GOP sure is altruistic. You right-wingers crack me
> up.
>
> > As for Bush, Americans know a real leader when they see
> > one.
>
> And the Shrub ain't it. Real leaders know that charging into the guns
> isn't leadership unless you can get others to follow. Following one's
> convictions doesn't imply that the convictions are based on fact or
> are in any way moral. Remember that Bin Laden was following his
> convictions, too...
>
> > He may have his flaws, but after 9/11 he passed the test with flying
> > colors.
>
> Any monkey in a Brooks Brothers suit could have done the right thing
> after 9/11. It really was a no-brainer - just the perfect speed for
> this president.
>
> Jonesy

 

I'll cut to the chase, my well-indoctrinated leftist, I used to be a liberal
Democrat until the lies & hypocrisy became too much to ignore. I register as
an independent and in '00 I voted for Nader. Given the crap the Democrats
are putting up as leaders, I'll vote for Bush this time for sure.

"Jonesy" <beelzebubba@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:73da2590.0310311214.f26d181@posting.google.co m...
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:<bnsm7511ag5@enews2.newsguy.com>...
> > This is the worst crop of candidates the Democrats have yet to put
forward.
>
> Wrong. 1988...
>
> > Worse, their attacks on the President and national policy coming at a
time
> > of war, articulated for personal partisan gain, are reprehensible and a
> > disgrace to the name of their political party.
>
> BWAHAHAHA! I love this particular brand of hypocrisy from
> right-wingers.
>
> > Never in history have we seen
> > a major political party so devoid of vision and so obstructionist in its
> > actions.
>
> Wrong. GOP, 1993.
>
> > None of them has even a remote chance of beating Bush in '04, but in the
> > process of all this they give true aid & comfort to the most despicable
of
> > enemies.
>
> Another bunch of BS from your typical right-winger.
>
> > The sad part is these ******** have nothing to put forward, except "tax
the
> > rich" (which really means tax anyone making enough to afford a roof over
> > their heads) and "cut & run", proving they're nothing but cowards at
heart.
>
> Hip deep. Maybe if you stopped listenen to your drug-addled pal on
> the radio, you might have a clue.
>
> > Imagine the total chaos in the middle east if we were to knee-jerk and
pull
> > out our troops at this time.
>
> Enlighten us - when did Clark say this? Dean? Kerry? Edwards?
>
> I guess when you don't have any real argument, you either call names
> or just make ---- up.
>
> > But, if they gained power in the process, what
> > would these selfish idiots care? Every Democrat since FDR has left a
major
> > world crisis for his successor to clean up.
>
> Truman? Nope.
>
> Carter? LOL. Nope.
>
> Clinton? Only for those folks who want to pin 9/11 on him. Yeah,
> those ----------hating GOPers really put the screws to Hezbollah in
> '83. Or to Libya in '86 ('88??) Kuwait '91? Yeah, if those cowards
> would have just done the job right the first time, none of it would
> have happened.
>
> > The Democrats have not articulated a inspirational, constructive vision
> > since Kennedy & Johnson. Indeed, they have not implemented anything
truly
> > effective (other than confiscating income) since the New Deal.
>
> Yeah, that "New Frontier" and all that man on the moon stuff was just
> a bunch of crap. I getcha. Died under a GOP admin, too.
>
> But really, the GOP hasn't even had a new idea since Lincoln.
>
> > Sad, but
> > unavoidable conclusion: they're so bound up in their special interest
> > obligations they can't step forward with anything coherent or relevant
to
> > lead their country.
>
> LOL. Yeah, that GOP sure is altruistic. You right-wingers crack me
> up.
>
> > As for Bush, Americans know a real leader when they see
> > one.
>
> And the Shrub ain't it. Real leaders know that charging into the guns
> isn't leadership unless you can get others to follow. Following one's
> convictions doesn't imply that the convictions are based on fact or
> are in any way moral. Remember that Bin Laden was following his
> convictions, too...
>
> > He may have his flaws, but after 9/11 he passed the test with flying
> > colors.
>
> Any monkey in a Brooks Brothers suit could have done the right thing
> after 9/11. It really was a no-brainer - just the perfect speed for
> this president.
>
> Jonesy

 

"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:bnumob02jak@enews1.newsguy.com...
> I'll cut to the chase, my well-indoctrinated leftist, I used to be a
liberal
> Democrat until the lies & hypocrisy became too much to ignore. I register
as
> an independent and in '00 I voted for Nader. Given the crap the Democrats
> are putting up as leaders, I'll vote for Bush this time for sure.
>

A conservative is merely a liberal that has learned to read.

Welcome aboard.

 

"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:bnumob02jak@enews1.newsguy.com...
> I'll cut to the chase, my well-indoctrinated leftist, I used to be a
liberal
> Democrat until the lies & hypocrisy became too much to ignore. I register
as
> an independent and in '00 I voted for Nader. Given the crap the Democrats
> are putting up as leaders, I'll vote for Bush this time for sure.
>

A conservative is merely a liberal that has learned to read.

Welcome aboard.

 

"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:bnumob02jak@enews1.newsguy.com...
> I'll cut to the chase, my well-indoctrinated leftist, I used to be a
liberal
> Democrat until the lies & hypocrisy became too much to ignore. I register
as
> an independent and in '00 I voted for Nader. Given the crap the Democrats
> are putting up as leaders, I'll vote for Bush this time for sure.
>

A conservative is merely a liberal that has learned to read.

Welcome aboard.

 

Or, an idealist who gets his first pay check and realizes he's just spent
50% of his time working for the Government.

"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vq5pv01jt2ra95@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote in message
> news:bnumob02jak@enews1.newsguy.com...
> > I'll cut to the chase, my well-indoctrinated leftist, I used to be a
> liberal
> > Democrat until the lies & hypocrisy became too much to ignore. I
register
> as
> > an independent and in '00 I voted for Nader. Given the crap the
Democrats
> > are putting up as leaders, I'll vote for Bush this time for sure.
> >
>
> A conservative is merely a liberal that has learned to read.
>
> Welcome aboard.
>

 

Or, an idealist who gets his first pay check and realizes he's just spent
50% of his time working for the Government.

"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vq5pv01jt2ra95@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote in message
> news:bnumob02jak@enews1.newsguy.com...
> > I'll cut to the chase, my well-indoctrinated leftist, I used to be a
> liberal
> > Democrat until the lies & hypocrisy became too much to ignore. I
register
> as
> > an independent and in '00 I voted for Nader. Given the crap the
Democrats
> > are putting up as leaders, I'll vote for Bush this time for sure.
> >
>
> A conservative is merely a liberal that has learned to read.
>
> Welcome aboard.
>

 

Or, an idealist who gets his first pay check and realizes he's just spent
50% of his time working for the Government.

"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vq5pv01jt2ra95@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote in message
> news:bnumob02jak@enews1.newsguy.com...
> > I'll cut to the chase, my well-indoctrinated leftist, I used to be a
> liberal
> > Democrat until the lies & hypocrisy became too much to ignore. I
register
> as
> > an independent and in '00 I voted for Nader. Given the crap the
Democrats
> > are putting up as leaders, I'll vote for Bush this time for sure.
> >
>
> A conservative is merely a liberal that has learned to read.
>
> Welcome aboard.
>

 

"The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bnm54u$nk9$13@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <vprkhgchpgi642@corp.supernews.com>,
>> "Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> >news:bnjeoi$b81$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> >> In article <vpof02qkahoq17@corp.supernews.com>,
>> >> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >
>> >> >> Sure, got to make sure. But the UN couldn't find them, and 150,000
>US
>> >> >troops
>> >> >> haven't found them.
>> >> >
>> >> >Bingo, The UN couldn't find them, although it is well documented that
>> >they
>> >> >existed.
>> >>
>> >> Not in 2003.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >That is why they were still looking, that is why we are still
>> >> >looking. We haven't found Saddam yet either, but we know he exists as
>> >well.
>> >> >Or do you think that is also a lie?
>> >>
>> >> Is he as big as the WMD?
>> >
>> >You do realize Saddam had twelve years in which to hide them. Where is
>Jimmy
>> >Hoffa?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> We claimed direct evidence and knowledge that WMD were there in 2003.
>
>No, we asked for proof of where they were and if they had been destroyed, as
>per the UN Mandate. Saddam refused to provide said proof. You really are
>dumb aren't you.

And we asserted that the only reason he wouldn't prove they didn't exist
was because he still had them. We were wrong.

Marc
For email, remove the first "y" of "whineryy"