Re: Front U-joints
 

Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
Of course, even you could pretend:
http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/

God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:woidnXp0vt4jNU7YnZ2dnUVZ_tOmnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> I guess that makes factory MB's/GPW's fake, and YJ's real.







--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Front U-joints
 

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
<----------@cox.net> wrote:

> Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
>Of course, even you could pretend:
>http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/

Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
--
Old Crow "Yol Bolsun!"
'82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl"
'74 XLH chopper(gone but not forgotten)
BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Front U-joints
 

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
<----------@cox.net> wrote:

> Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
>Of course, even you could pretend:
>http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/

Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
--
Old Crow "Yol Bolsun!"
'82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl"
'74 XLH chopper(gone but not forgotten)
BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Front U-joints
 

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
<----------@cox.net> wrote:

> Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
>Of course, even you could pretend:
>http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/

Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
--
Old Crow "Yol Bolsun!"
'82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl"
'74 XLH chopper(gone but not forgotten)
BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Front U-joints
 

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
<----------@cox.net> wrote:

> Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
>Of course, even you could pretend:
>http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/

Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
--
Old Crow "Yol Bolsun!"
'82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl"
'74 XLH chopper(gone but not forgotten)
BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Front U-joints
 

On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
>
> <billhug...@cox.net> wrote:
> > Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
> >Of course, even you could pretend:
> >http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/
>
> Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
> a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.

The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of
the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the
frame...




(Apologies in advance if this double posts - I hate Google Groups!)
--
~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5
{ }|||||||{ } "MukYJ"

Re: Front U-joints
 

On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
>
> <billhug...@cox.net> wrote:
> > Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
> >Of course, even you could pretend:
> >http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/
>
> Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
> a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.

The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of
the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the
frame...




(Apologies in advance if this double posts - I hate Google Groups!)
--
~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5
{ }|||||||{ } "MukYJ"

Re: Front U-joints
 

On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
>
> <billhug...@cox.net> wrote:
> > Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
> >Of course, even you could pretend:
> >http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/
>
> Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
> a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.

The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of
the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the
frame...




(Apologies in advance if this double posts - I hate Google Groups!)
--
~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5
{ }|||||||{ } "MukYJ"

Re: Front U-joints
 

On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
>
> <billhug...@cox.net> wrote:
> > Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
> >Of course, even you could pretend:
> >http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/
>
> Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
> a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.

The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of
the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the
frame...




(Apologies in advance if this double posts - I hate Google Groups!)
--
~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5
{ }|||||||{ } "MukYJ"

Re: Front U-joints
 

On Feb 17, 6:24 am, "Garth Almgren" <nos...@v6stang.com> wrote:
> On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
>
> > <billhug...@cox.net> wrote:
> > > Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street.
> > >Of course, even you could pretend:
> > >http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/
>
> > Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on
> > a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks.
>
> The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of
> the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the
> frame...

You know, looking at the second front end picture closer I think I'll
take the "properly" part back. It appears that the jack stands
themselves are about 7.5 inches up on some wooden cribbing made out of
2x4s. I don't know how much I'd trust a setup like that, knowing how
soft 2x4s can be.


--
~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5
{ }|||||||{ } "MukYJ"