Re: Front U-joints
On Feb 17, 6:24 am, "Garth Almgren" <nos...@v6stang.com> wrote:
> On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" > > > <billhug...@cox.net> wrote: > > > Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street. > > >Of course, even you could pretend: > > >http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/ > > > Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on > > a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks. > > The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of > the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the > frame... You know, looking at the second front end picture closer I think I'll take the "properly" part back. It appears that the jack stands themselves are about 7.5 inches up on some wooden cribbing made out of 2x4s. I don't know how much I'd trust a setup like that, knowing how soft 2x4s can be. -- ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5 { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ" |
Re: Front U-joints
On Feb 17, 6:24 am, "Garth Almgren" <nos...@v6stang.com> wrote:
> On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" > > > <billhug...@cox.net> wrote: > > > Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street. > > >Of course, even you could pretend: > > >http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/ > > > Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on > > a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks. > > The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of > the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the > frame... You know, looking at the second front end picture closer I think I'll take the "properly" part back. It appears that the jack stands themselves are about 7.5 inches up on some wooden cribbing made out of 2x4s. I don't know how much I'd trust a setup like that, knowing how soft 2x4s can be. -- ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5 { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ" |
Re: Front U-joints
On Feb 17, 6:24 am, "Garth Almgren" <nos...@v6stang.com> wrote:
> On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" > > > <billhug...@cox.net> wrote: > > > Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street. > > >Of course, even you could pretend: > > >http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/ > > > Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on > > a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks. > > The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of > the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the > frame... You know, looking at the second front end picture closer I think I'll take the "properly" part back. It appears that the jack stands themselves are about 7.5 inches up on some wooden cribbing made out of 2x4s. I don't know how much I'd trust a setup like that, knowing how soft 2x4s can be. -- ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5 { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ" |
Re: Front U-joints
The 2x4 setup is not the best (base should be wider) but still MUCH
better than the concrete block trick. I popped for the 6 ton jack stands that go to 24". You don't need the weight capacity for the jeep but the frame is so high up you need the extra height. $18 a pair seemed like a fine price. Garth Almgren wrote: > On Feb 17, 6:24 am, "Garth Almgren" <nos...@v6stang.com> wrote: > >>On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >>>On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" >> >>><billhug...@cox.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street. >>>>Of course, even you could pretend: >>>>http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/ >> >>>Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on >>>a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks. >> >>The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of >>the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the >>frame... > > > You know, looking at the second front end picture closer I think I'll > take the "properly" part back. It appears that the jack stands > themselves are about 7.5 inches up on some wooden cribbing made out of > 2x4s. I don't know how much I'd trust a setup like that, knowing how > soft 2x4s can be. > > > -- > ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5 > { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ" > > |
Re: Front U-joints
The 2x4 setup is not the best (base should be wider) but still MUCH
better than the concrete block trick. I popped for the 6 ton jack stands that go to 24". You don't need the weight capacity for the jeep but the frame is so high up you need the extra height. $18 a pair seemed like a fine price. Garth Almgren wrote: > On Feb 17, 6:24 am, "Garth Almgren" <nos...@v6stang.com> wrote: > >>On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >>>On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" >> >>><billhug...@cox.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street. >>>>Of course, even you could pretend: >>>>http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/ >> >>>Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on >>>a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks. >> >>The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of >>the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the >>frame... > > > You know, looking at the second front end picture closer I think I'll > take the "properly" part back. It appears that the jack stands > themselves are about 7.5 inches up on some wooden cribbing made out of > 2x4s. I don't know how much I'd trust a setup like that, knowing how > soft 2x4s can be. > > > -- > ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5 > { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ" > > |
Re: Front U-joints
The 2x4 setup is not the best (base should be wider) but still MUCH
better than the concrete block trick. I popped for the 6 ton jack stands that go to 24". You don't need the weight capacity for the jeep but the frame is so high up you need the extra height. $18 a pair seemed like a fine price. Garth Almgren wrote: > On Feb 17, 6:24 am, "Garth Almgren" <nos...@v6stang.com> wrote: > >>On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >>>On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" >> >>><billhug...@cox.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street. >>>>Of course, even you could pretend: >>>>http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/ >> >>>Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on >>>a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks. >> >>The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of >>the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the >>frame... > > > You know, looking at the second front end picture closer I think I'll > take the "properly" part back. It appears that the jack stands > themselves are about 7.5 inches up on some wooden cribbing made out of > 2x4s. I don't know how much I'd trust a setup like that, knowing how > soft 2x4s can be. > > > -- > ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5 > { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ" > > |
Re: Front U-joints
The 2x4 setup is not the best (base should be wider) but still MUCH
better than the concrete block trick. I popped for the 6 ton jack stands that go to 24". You don't need the weight capacity for the jeep but the frame is so high up you need the extra height. $18 a pair seemed like a fine price. Garth Almgren wrote: > On Feb 17, 6:24 am, "Garth Almgren" <nos...@v6stang.com> wrote: > >>On Feb 17, 4:32 am, Old Crow <wallisc...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >>>On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:48:33 -0800, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" >> >>><billhug...@cox.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, until they are converted to Civilian Jeeps to drive on the street. >>>>Of course, even you could pretend: >>>>http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/axle/yjwarnaxle/ >> >>>Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on >>>a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks. >> >>The axle is the only thing being lifted on the two jacks; the rest of >>the Jeep appears to be properly supported by jack stands under the >>frame... > > > You know, looking at the second front end picture closer I think I'll > take the "properly" part back. It appears that the jack stands > themselves are about 7.5 inches up on some wooden cribbing made out of > 2x4s. I don't know how much I'd trust a setup like that, knowing how > soft 2x4s can be. > > > -- > ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5 > { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ" > > |
Re: Front U-joints
Real Jeeps don't use no stinkin' jacks:
http://www.----------.com/jeepWorkonSide.jpg God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0 mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ "Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:ndtdt2haegfdq6o624u6bustethahgl416@4ax.com > > Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on > a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks. > -- > Old Crow "Yol Bolsun!" > '82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl" > '74 XLH chopper(gone but not forgotten) > BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM > > > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Re: Front U-joints
Real Jeeps don't use no stinkin' jacks:
http://www.----------.com/jeepWorkonSide.jpg God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0 mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ "Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:ndtdt2haegfdq6o624u6bustethahgl416@4ax.com > > Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on > a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks. > -- > Old Crow "Yol Bolsun!" > '82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl" > '74 XLH chopper(gone but not forgotten) > BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM > > > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Re: Front U-joints
Real Jeeps don't use no stinkin' jacks:
http://www.----------.com/jeepWorkonSide.jpg God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0 mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ "Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:ndtdt2haegfdq6o624u6bustethahgl416@4ax.com > > Not sure how I'd feel following instructions from a guy that works on > a Jeep lifted on two floor jacks. > -- > Old Crow "Yol Bolsun!" > '82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl" > '74 XLH chopper(gone but not forgotten) > BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM > > > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:27 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands