bouncy front end
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: bouncy front end
So are you going to answer my question, or just blow them off as
you don't have no idea how your front end geometry works?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Since you have never proved me or anyone else here to be a liar, you
> can't prove it again. Not that I care since I've never agreed with your
> myopic view of what a "real" Jeep is since your Jeep came WAY after the
> "real" Jeeps were introduced.. Bill, I think you verge on paranoia and
> obsessiveness.
you don't have no idea how your front end geometry works?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Since you have never proved me or anyone else here to be a liar, you
> can't prove it again. Not that I care since I've never agreed with your
> myopic view of what a "real" Jeep is since your Jeep came WAY after the
> "real" Jeeps were introduced.. Bill, I think you verge on paranoia and
> obsessiveness.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: bouncy front end
So are you going to answer my question, or just blow them off as
you don't have no idea how your front end geometry works?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Since you have never proved me or anyone else here to be a liar, you
> can't prove it again. Not that I care since I've never agreed with your
> myopic view of what a "real" Jeep is since your Jeep came WAY after the
> "real" Jeeps were introduced.. Bill, I think you verge on paranoia and
> obsessiveness.
you don't have no idea how your front end geometry works?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Since you have never proved me or anyone else here to be a liar, you
> can't prove it again. Not that I care since I've never agreed with your
> myopic view of what a "real" Jeep is since your Jeep came WAY after the
> "real" Jeeps were introduced.. Bill, I think you verge on paranoia and
> obsessiveness.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: bouncy front end
So are you going to answer my question, or just blow them off as
you don't have no idea how your front end geometry works?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Since you have never proved me or anyone else here to be a liar, you
> can't prove it again. Not that I care since I've never agreed with your
> myopic view of what a "real" Jeep is since your Jeep came WAY after the
> "real" Jeeps were introduced.. Bill, I think you verge on paranoia and
> obsessiveness.
you don't have no idea how your front end geometry works?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Since you have never proved me or anyone else here to be a liar, you
> can't prove it again. Not that I care since I've never agreed with your
> myopic view of what a "real" Jeep is since your Jeep came WAY after the
> "real" Jeeps were introduced.. Bill, I think you verge on paranoia and
> obsessiveness.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: bouncy front end
Except his "point" was already pointed out by others. Strange how when
supporting evidence starts to surface he tries to twist it around and make
it his own.
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:7wuie.34211$G8.15569@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
> a fair point, won't argue with you on that.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:428A72D0.F6C832D0@***.net...
> > Hi Dave,
> > Another reason Ford, GM, and Daimler uses a dampener on their
> > products with straight axles is without it the wheel will deliver a
> > direct shot at the steering box, from a glancing obstacle suck as an
> > immovable rock.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Dave Milne wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't have to imagine - it's there to mitigate against worn bushes
and
> > > joints. Mine aren't worn, therefore it isn't needed. When they do get
> worn,
> > > they will be replaced, and it still won't be needed. A properly setup
> front
> > > end doesn't need a damper, and a badly set up front end needs more
than
> a
> > > damper !
> > >
> > > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
>
supporting evidence starts to surface he tries to twist it around and make
it his own.
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:7wuie.34211$G8.15569@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
> a fair point, won't argue with you on that.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:428A72D0.F6C832D0@***.net...
> > Hi Dave,
> > Another reason Ford, GM, and Daimler uses a dampener on their
> > products with straight axles is without it the wheel will deliver a
> > direct shot at the steering box, from a glancing obstacle suck as an
> > immovable rock.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Dave Milne wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't have to imagine - it's there to mitigate against worn bushes
and
> > > joints. Mine aren't worn, therefore it isn't needed. When they do get
> worn,
> > > they will be replaced, and it still won't be needed. A properly setup
> front
> > > end doesn't need a damper, and a badly set up front end needs more
than
> a
> > > damper !
> > >
> > > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: bouncy front end
Except his "point" was already pointed out by others. Strange how when
supporting evidence starts to surface he tries to twist it around and make
it his own.
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:7wuie.34211$G8.15569@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
> a fair point, won't argue with you on that.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:428A72D0.F6C832D0@***.net...
> > Hi Dave,
> > Another reason Ford, GM, and Daimler uses a dampener on their
> > products with straight axles is without it the wheel will deliver a
> > direct shot at the steering box, from a glancing obstacle suck as an
> > immovable rock.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Dave Milne wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't have to imagine - it's there to mitigate against worn bushes
and
> > > joints. Mine aren't worn, therefore it isn't needed. When they do get
> worn,
> > > they will be replaced, and it still won't be needed. A properly setup
> front
> > > end doesn't need a damper, and a badly set up front end needs more
than
> a
> > > damper !
> > >
> > > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
>
supporting evidence starts to surface he tries to twist it around and make
it his own.
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:7wuie.34211$G8.15569@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
> a fair point, won't argue with you on that.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:428A72D0.F6C832D0@***.net...
> > Hi Dave,
> > Another reason Ford, GM, and Daimler uses a dampener on their
> > products with straight axles is without it the wheel will deliver a
> > direct shot at the steering box, from a glancing obstacle suck as an
> > immovable rock.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Dave Milne wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't have to imagine - it's there to mitigate against worn bushes
and
> > > joints. Mine aren't worn, therefore it isn't needed. When they do get
> worn,
> > > they will be replaced, and it still won't be needed. A properly setup
> front
> > > end doesn't need a damper, and a badly set up front end needs more
than
> a
> > > damper !
> > >
> > > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: bouncy front end
Except his "point" was already pointed out by others. Strange how when
supporting evidence starts to surface he tries to twist it around and make
it his own.
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:7wuie.34211$G8.15569@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
> a fair point, won't argue with you on that.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:428A72D0.F6C832D0@***.net...
> > Hi Dave,
> > Another reason Ford, GM, and Daimler uses a dampener on their
> > products with straight axles is without it the wheel will deliver a
> > direct shot at the steering box, from a glancing obstacle suck as an
> > immovable rock.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Dave Milne wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't have to imagine - it's there to mitigate against worn bushes
and
> > > joints. Mine aren't worn, therefore it isn't needed. When they do get
> worn,
> > > they will be replaced, and it still won't be needed. A properly setup
> front
> > > end doesn't need a damper, and a badly set up front end needs more
than
> a
> > > damper !
> > >
> > > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
>
supporting evidence starts to surface he tries to twist it around and make
it his own.
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:7wuie.34211$G8.15569@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
> a fair point, won't argue with you on that.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:428A72D0.F6C832D0@***.net...
> > Hi Dave,
> > Another reason Ford, GM, and Daimler uses a dampener on their
> > products with straight axles is without it the wheel will deliver a
> > direct shot at the steering box, from a glancing obstacle suck as an
> > immovable rock.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Dave Milne wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't have to imagine - it's there to mitigate against worn bushes
and
> > > joints. Mine aren't worn, therefore it isn't needed. When they do get
> worn,
> > > they will be replaced, and it still won't be needed. A properly setup
> front
> > > end doesn't need a damper, and a badly set up front end needs more
than
> a
> > > damper !
> > >
> > > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: bouncy front end
Except his "point" was already pointed out by others. Strange how when
supporting evidence starts to surface he tries to twist it around and make
it his own.
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:7wuie.34211$G8.15569@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
> a fair point, won't argue with you on that.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:428A72D0.F6C832D0@***.net...
> > Hi Dave,
> > Another reason Ford, GM, and Daimler uses a dampener on their
> > products with straight axles is without it the wheel will deliver a
> > direct shot at the steering box, from a glancing obstacle suck as an
> > immovable rock.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Dave Milne wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't have to imagine - it's there to mitigate against worn bushes
and
> > > joints. Mine aren't worn, therefore it isn't needed. When they do get
> worn,
> > > they will be replaced, and it still won't be needed. A properly setup
> front
> > > end doesn't need a damper, and a badly set up front end needs more
than
> a
> > > damper !
> > >
> > > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
>
supporting evidence starts to surface he tries to twist it around and make
it his own.
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:7wuie.34211$G8.15569@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
> a fair point, won't argue with you on that.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:428A72D0.F6C832D0@***.net...
> > Hi Dave,
> > Another reason Ford, GM, and Daimler uses a dampener on their
> > products with straight axles is without it the wheel will deliver a
> > direct shot at the steering box, from a glancing obstacle suck as an
> > immovable rock.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Dave Milne wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't have to imagine - it's there to mitigate against worn bushes
and
> > > joints. Mine aren't worn, therefore it isn't needed. When they do get
> worn,
> > > they will be replaced, and it still won't be needed. A properly setup
> front
> > > end doesn't need a damper, and a badly set up front end needs more
than
> a
> > > damper !
> > >
> > > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: bouncy front end
On Wed, 18 May 2005 01:48:17 GMT, "Tom Greening" <tgreen@yohmama.com>
wrote:
>Except his "point" was already pointed out by others. Strange how when
>supporting evidence starts to surface he tries to twist it around and make
>it his own.
---snip---
I got tired of him firing potshots in my direction and just killfiled
him a while back. He seems to have a need to be right and anyone with
a different opinion is "full of ----" or "unamerican/not a real
American" etc.
While it was amusing (for a while) to watch him shooting in the wrong
direction, I simply have a lot better things to do with my time than
beat my head on the wall of his stubbornness and while I support his
freedom of speech, I'm also glad I also have the freedom to ignore
him.
Drifter
"I've been here, I've been there..."
wrote:
>Except his "point" was already pointed out by others. Strange how when
>supporting evidence starts to surface he tries to twist it around and make
>it his own.
---snip---
I got tired of him firing potshots in my direction and just killfiled
him a while back. He seems to have a need to be right and anyone with
a different opinion is "full of ----" or "unamerican/not a real
American" etc.
While it was amusing (for a while) to watch him shooting in the wrong
direction, I simply have a lot better things to do with my time than
beat my head on the wall of his stubbornness and while I support his
freedom of speech, I'm also glad I also have the freedom to ignore
him.
Drifter
"I've been here, I've been there..."
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: bouncy front end
On Wed, 18 May 2005 01:48:17 GMT, "Tom Greening" <tgreen@yohmama.com>
wrote:
>Except his "point" was already pointed out by others. Strange how when
>supporting evidence starts to surface he tries to twist it around and make
>it his own.
---snip---
I got tired of him firing potshots in my direction and just killfiled
him a while back. He seems to have a need to be right and anyone with
a different opinion is "full of ----" or "unamerican/not a real
American" etc.
While it was amusing (for a while) to watch him shooting in the wrong
direction, I simply have a lot better things to do with my time than
beat my head on the wall of his stubbornness and while I support his
freedom of speech, I'm also glad I also have the freedom to ignore
him.
Drifter
"I've been here, I've been there..."
wrote:
>Except his "point" was already pointed out by others. Strange how when
>supporting evidence starts to surface he tries to twist it around and make
>it his own.
---snip---
I got tired of him firing potshots in my direction and just killfiled
him a while back. He seems to have a need to be right and anyone with
a different opinion is "full of ----" or "unamerican/not a real
American" etc.
While it was amusing (for a while) to watch him shooting in the wrong
direction, I simply have a lot better things to do with my time than
beat my head on the wall of his stubbornness and while I support his
freedom of speech, I'm also glad I also have the freedom to ignore
him.
Drifter
"I've been here, I've been there..."
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: bouncy front end
On Wed, 18 May 2005 01:48:17 GMT, "Tom Greening" <tgreen@yohmama.com>
wrote:
>Except his "point" was already pointed out by others. Strange how when
>supporting evidence starts to surface he tries to twist it around and make
>it his own.
---snip---
I got tired of him firing potshots in my direction and just killfiled
him a while back. He seems to have a need to be right and anyone with
a different opinion is "full of ----" or "unamerican/not a real
American" etc.
While it was amusing (for a while) to watch him shooting in the wrong
direction, I simply have a lot better things to do with my time than
beat my head on the wall of his stubbornness and while I support his
freedom of speech, I'm also glad I also have the freedom to ignore
him.
Drifter
"I've been here, I've been there..."
wrote:
>Except his "point" was already pointed out by others. Strange how when
>supporting evidence starts to surface he tries to twist it around and make
>it his own.
---snip---
I got tired of him firing potshots in my direction and just killfiled
him a while back. He seems to have a need to be right and anyone with
a different opinion is "full of ----" or "unamerican/not a real
American" etc.
While it was amusing (for a while) to watch him shooting in the wrong
direction, I simply have a lot better things to do with my time than
beat my head on the wall of his stubbornness and while I support his
freedom of speech, I'm also glad I also have the freedom to ignore
him.
Drifter
"I've been here, I've been there..."
