And if I were monitor, YOU'd be banned from this group, all you do
is attack me, without backing it up with one iota of good information.
YOu're a loser!
I guess you're of the opinion law enforcement's not scared on the
job, WRONG again! That here back up's not a physically weaker, because
they are a women, WRONG again!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> It's too bad this isn't a web based forum, you'd have just been
> permanently banned for that kind of -------- reply. Bill you just went
> over the edge, you are just THE complete fawking -------. You are a
> fawking DISGRACE, I don't care if you are a veteren, I'm embarassed now
> that you are. What a sick reply to a cop who risks his life to protect
> undeserving ******** lik you. Bill you should be on everyone's -------
> list now, those few you weren't on.
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > Maybe, that's why you're so fearful, your buddies just blew away
> > another civilian here in Vista, California, last night before he could
> > raise his hands. Maybe you could lead by using your address and being
> > listed in the phone book. Of course, if your back up is a -----, then I
> > guess I can see why.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

 

You know, I'd swear the poster named "L.W. blah blah" was 12 year old kid.
He can't carry on a conversation with someone of a differing opinion without
resorting to gradeschool playground language which is REALLY quite sad given
his age. The bad part for him is that the more his lips move, the more
people here are going to see him for what he really is. I think the only
people impressed with Bill these days are the new people and occasional
posters who don't see his rants on a daily basis. Most of the time people
like him are just water off my back, but for some reason he managed to get
under my skin which I am sure tickles him to no end, considering his
mentality.

Drifter wrote a reply that could in no way be considered rude. There is no
name calling, no resorting to vulgarity, no childish jabs, etc and the only
thing Bill can think to do is bring up a shooting in Cali that has no
relevance and to call somebody a -----. If it wasn't so sad, it would be
laughable. What's next? My dad can beat up your dad?


"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
news:jlIie.7354$Db6.3620@okepread05...
> It's too bad this isn't a web based forum, you'd have just been
> permanently banned for that kind of -------- reply. Bill you just went
> over the edge, you are just THE complete fawking -------. You are a
> fawking DISGRACE, I don't care if you are a veteren, I'm embarassed now
> that you are. What a sick reply to a cop who risks his life to protect
> undeserving ******** lik you. Bill you should be on everyone's -------
> list now, those few you weren't on.
>

 

You know, I'd swear the poster named "L.W. blah blah" was 12 year old kid.
He can't carry on a conversation with someone of a differing opinion without
resorting to gradeschool playground language which is REALLY quite sad given
his age. The bad part for him is that the more his lips move, the more
people here are going to see him for what he really is. I think the only
people impressed with Bill these days are the new people and occasional
posters who don't see his rants on a daily basis. Most of the time people
like him are just water off my back, but for some reason he managed to get
under my skin which I am sure tickles him to no end, considering his
mentality.

Drifter wrote a reply that could in no way be considered rude. There is no
name calling, no resorting to vulgarity, no childish jabs, etc and the only
thing Bill can think to do is bring up a shooting in Cali that has no
relevance and to call somebody a -----. If it wasn't so sad, it would be
laughable. What's next? My dad can beat up your dad?


"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
news:jlIie.7354$Db6.3620@okepread05...
> It's too bad this isn't a web based forum, you'd have just been
> permanently banned for that kind of -------- reply. Bill you just went
> over the edge, you are just THE complete fawking -------. You are a
> fawking DISGRACE, I don't care if you are a veteren, I'm embarassed now
> that you are. What a sick reply to a cop who risks his life to protect
> undeserving ******** lik you. Bill you should be on everyone's -------
> list now, those few you weren't on.
>

 

You know, I'd swear the poster named "L.W. blah blah" was 12 year old kid.
He can't carry on a conversation with someone of a differing opinion without
resorting to gradeschool playground language which is REALLY quite sad given
his age. The bad part for him is that the more his lips move, the more
people here are going to see him for what he really is. I think the only
people impressed with Bill these days are the new people and occasional
posters who don't see his rants on a daily basis. Most of the time people
like him are just water off my back, but for some reason he managed to get
under my skin which I am sure tickles him to no end, considering his
mentality.

Drifter wrote a reply that could in no way be considered rude. There is no
name calling, no resorting to vulgarity, no childish jabs, etc and the only
thing Bill can think to do is bring up a shooting in Cali that has no
relevance and to call somebody a -----. If it wasn't so sad, it would be
laughable. What's next? My dad can beat up your dad?


"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
news:jlIie.7354$Db6.3620@okepread05...
> It's too bad this isn't a web based forum, you'd have just been
> permanently banned for that kind of -------- reply. Bill you just went
> over the edge, you are just THE complete fawking -------. You are a
> fawking DISGRACE, I don't care if you are a veteren, I'm embarassed now
> that you are. What a sick reply to a cop who risks his life to protect
> undeserving ******** lik you. Bill you should be on everyone's -------
> list now, those few you weren't on.
>

 

You know, I'd swear the poster named "L.W. blah blah" was 12 year old kid.
He can't carry on a conversation with someone of a differing opinion without
resorting to gradeschool playground language which is REALLY quite sad given
his age. The bad part for him is that the more his lips move, the more
people here are going to see him for what he really is. I think the only
people impressed with Bill these days are the new people and occasional
posters who don't see his rants on a daily basis. Most of the time people
like him are just water off my back, but for some reason he managed to get
under my skin which I am sure tickles him to no end, considering his
mentality.

Drifter wrote a reply that could in no way be considered rude. There is no
name calling, no resorting to vulgarity, no childish jabs, etc and the only
thing Bill can think to do is bring up a shooting in Cali that has no
relevance and to call somebody a -----. If it wasn't so sad, it would be
laughable. What's next? My dad can beat up your dad?


"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
news:jlIie.7354$Db6.3620@okepread05...
> It's too bad this isn't a web based forum, you'd have just been
> permanently banned for that kind of -------- reply. Bill you just went
> over the edge, you are just THE complete fawking -------. You are a
> fawking DISGRACE, I don't care if you are a veteren, I'm embarassed now
> that you are. What a sick reply to a cop who risks his life to protect
> undeserving ******** lik you. Bill you should be on everyone's -------
> list now, those few you weren't on.
>

 

Next time read with comprehension. I indicated his back may be a
-----, referring the women on the force that can't carry their own
weight. That's one reason law enforcement may feel they must shoot
first, because the know without the physical strength they will lose a
fist fight and maybe their life.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Tom Greening wrote:
>
> You know, I'd swear the poster named "L.W. blah blah" was 12 year old kid.
> He can't carry on a conversation with someone of a differing opinion without
> resorting to gradeschool playground language which is REALLY quite sad given
> his age. The bad part for him is that the more his lips move, the more
> people here are going to see him for what he really is. I think the only
> people impressed with Bill these days are the new people and occasional
> posters who don't see his rants on a daily basis. Most of the time people
> like him are just water off my back, but for some reason he managed to get
> under my skin which I am sure tickles him to no end, considering his
> mentality.
>
> Drifter wrote a reply that could in no way be considered rude. There is no
> name calling, no resorting to vulgarity, no childish jabs, etc and the only
> thing Bill can think to do is bring up a shooting in Cali that has no
> relevance and to call somebody a -----. If it wasn't so sad, it would be
> laughable. What's next? My dad can beat up your dad?

 

Next time read with comprehension. I indicated his back may be a
-----, referring the women on the force that can't carry their own
weight. That's one reason law enforcement may feel they must shoot
first, because the know without the physical strength they will lose a
fist fight and maybe their life.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Tom Greening wrote:
>
> You know, I'd swear the poster named "L.W. blah blah" was 12 year old kid.
> He can't carry on a conversation with someone of a differing opinion without
> resorting to gradeschool playground language which is REALLY quite sad given
> his age. The bad part for him is that the more his lips move, the more
> people here are going to see him for what he really is. I think the only
> people impressed with Bill these days are the new people and occasional
> posters who don't see his rants on a daily basis. Most of the time people
> like him are just water off my back, but for some reason he managed to get
> under my skin which I am sure tickles him to no end, considering his
> mentality.
>
> Drifter wrote a reply that could in no way be considered rude. There is no
> name calling, no resorting to vulgarity, no childish jabs, etc and the only
> thing Bill can think to do is bring up a shooting in Cali that has no
> relevance and to call somebody a -----. If it wasn't so sad, it would be
> laughable. What's next? My dad can beat up your dad?

 

Next time read with comprehension. I indicated his back may be a
-----, referring the women on the force that can't carry their own
weight. That's one reason law enforcement may feel they must shoot
first, because the know without the physical strength they will lose a
fist fight and maybe their life.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Tom Greening wrote:
>
> You know, I'd swear the poster named "L.W. blah blah" was 12 year old kid.
> He can't carry on a conversation with someone of a differing opinion without
> resorting to gradeschool playground language which is REALLY quite sad given
> his age. The bad part for him is that the more his lips move, the more
> people here are going to see him for what he really is. I think the only
> people impressed with Bill these days are the new people and occasional
> posters who don't see his rants on a daily basis. Most of the time people
> like him are just water off my back, but for some reason he managed to get
> under my skin which I am sure tickles him to no end, considering his
> mentality.
>
> Drifter wrote a reply that could in no way be considered rude. There is no
> name calling, no resorting to vulgarity, no childish jabs, etc and the only
> thing Bill can think to do is bring up a shooting in Cali that has no
> relevance and to call somebody a -----. If it wasn't so sad, it would be
> laughable. What's next? My dad can beat up your dad?

 

Next time read with comprehension. I indicated his back may be a
-----, referring the women on the force that can't carry their own
weight. That's one reason law enforcement may feel they must shoot
first, because the know without the physical strength they will lose a
fist fight and maybe their life.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Tom Greening wrote:
>
> You know, I'd swear the poster named "L.W. blah blah" was 12 year old kid.
> He can't carry on a conversation with someone of a differing opinion without
> resorting to gradeschool playground language which is REALLY quite sad given
> his age. The bad part for him is that the more his lips move, the more
> people here are going to see him for what he really is. I think the only
> people impressed with Bill these days are the new people and occasional
> posters who don't see his rants on a daily basis. Most of the time people
> like him are just water off my back, but for some reason he managed to get
> under my skin which I am sure tickles him to no end, considering his
> mentality.
>
> Drifter wrote a reply that could in no way be considered rude. There is no
> name calling, no resorting to vulgarity, no childish jabs, etc and the only
> thing Bill can think to do is bring up a shooting in Cali that has no
> relevance and to call somebody a -----. If it wasn't so sad, it would be
> laughable. What's next? My dad can beat up your dad?

 

Tom, Bill the ------- is just digging his hole even deeper now. He's
gone from downright wrong Jeep advice to where he's now being critical
of cops because he accused a cop (because he didn't post his real name
and email address of all asinine grounds!) of being unpatriotic, not
serving his country, and other such --------.

L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Next time read with comprehension. I indicated his back may be a
> -----, referring the women on the force that can't carry their own
> weight. That's one reason law enforcement may feel they must shoot
> first, because the know without the physical strength they will lose a
> fist fight and maybe their life.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Tom Greening wrote:
>
>>You know, I'd swear the poster named "L.W. blah blah" was 12 year old kid.
>>He can't carry on a conversation with someone of a differing opinion without
>>resorting to gradeschool playground language which is REALLY quite sad given
>>his age. The bad part for him is that the more his lips move, the more
>>people here are going to see him for what he really is. I think the only
>>people impressed with Bill these days are the new people and occasional
>>posters who don't see his rants on a daily basis. Most of the time people
>>like him are just water off my back, but for some reason he managed to get
>>under my skin which I am sure tickles him to no end, considering his
>>mentality.
>>
>>Drifter wrote a reply that could in no way be considered rude. There is no
>>name calling, no resorting to vulgarity, no childish jabs, etc and the only
>>thing Bill can think to do is bring up a shooting in Cali that has no
>>relevance and to call somebody a -----. If it wasn't so sad, it would be
>>laughable. What's next? My dad can beat up your dad?

--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/