bouncy front end
Guest
Posts: n/a
And again you fail to answer my question which was if you have
forgotten, is: Why do you think they are on all new straight axles if
you feel they are not needed?
And you being senile I will again quote my suggestion to this
thread: "A new steering stabilizer shock absorber will stop the shimmy:
http://www.bds-suspension.com/steeringstabilizer.html " Now again, what
is it you believe to be wrong with that statement?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> No one, not me, no one has said or recommended that it SHOULD be
> removed, only that it COULD be removed without problem if everything
> else in the front-end was working and set up as the factory designed it.
>
> Since you hadn't caught on to that nuance yet when this thread first
> started, many of us only tried to educate you that replacing the
> steering dampener would not help fix the bouncy front end as you
> suggested it would. Newbies and clueless old-farts are always
> suggesting replacing the steering dampener to fix problems that are
> really a result of some other problem that should actually be taken care
> of instead. The steering dampener, as it appears you have finally
> learned by now, only MASKS other problems... which if they are not
> there, the dampener does nothing but sit there. It won't fix a "bouncy"
> front-end problem though. Though it's not recommended to drive without
> one, you COULD drive without one without feeling anything different if
> everything else was working properly. The steering dampener is a
> BAND-AID fix that masks other problems... which you are apparently now
> trying to act like you have known all along. I deal with steering
> dampeners on a nearly daily basis and know precisely what they do and
> more importantly, what they CANNOT do. What they cannot and don't do is
> what you are apparently weak on.
forgotten, is: Why do you think they are on all new straight axles if
you feel they are not needed?
And you being senile I will again quote my suggestion to this
thread: "A new steering stabilizer shock absorber will stop the shimmy:
http://www.bds-suspension.com/steeringstabilizer.html " Now again, what
is it you believe to be wrong with that statement?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> No one, not me, no one has said or recommended that it SHOULD be
> removed, only that it COULD be removed without problem if everything
> else in the front-end was working and set up as the factory designed it.
>
> Since you hadn't caught on to that nuance yet when this thread first
> started, many of us only tried to educate you that replacing the
> steering dampener would not help fix the bouncy front end as you
> suggested it would. Newbies and clueless old-farts are always
> suggesting replacing the steering dampener to fix problems that are
> really a result of some other problem that should actually be taken care
> of instead. The steering dampener, as it appears you have finally
> learned by now, only MASKS other problems... which if they are not
> there, the dampener does nothing but sit there. It won't fix a "bouncy"
> front-end problem though. Though it's not recommended to drive without
> one, you COULD drive without one without feeling anything different if
> everything else was working properly. The steering dampener is a
> BAND-AID fix that masks other problems... which you are apparently now
> trying to act like you have known all along. I deal with steering
> dampeners on a nearly daily basis and know precisely what they do and
> more importantly, what they CANNOT do. What they cannot and don't do is
> what you are apparently weak on.
Guest
Posts: n/a
'89 was made by Daimler and not a Real Jeep by definition.
Take a picture of a picture, Geez, how do you think I make them?
So I have proved you are a liar again!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Bill, you are such a juvenile on such demands that I'm not bothering to
> go through any personal effort to satisfy your demand. Anyone else I
> wouldn't have any trouble doing that.. I'm not bothering to go through
> old scrap books to scan in a photo of our old '89 I've mentioned here
> several times over the years that I may not even have. I certainly have
> no digital photos since digital cameras weren't out then. My role in
> life is not to convince you of anything, nor is it to go to any extra
> effort to convince you I've owned more Jeeps than my '97 TJ.
Take a picture of a picture, Geez, how do you think I make them?
So I have proved you are a liar again!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Bill, you are such a juvenile on such demands that I'm not bothering to
> go through any personal effort to satisfy your demand. Anyone else I
> wouldn't have any trouble doing that.. I'm not bothering to go through
> old scrap books to scan in a photo of our old '89 I've mentioned here
> several times over the years that I may not even have. I certainly have
> no digital photos since digital cameras weren't out then. My role in
> life is not to convince you of anything, nor is it to go to any extra
> effort to convince you I've owned more Jeeps than my '97 TJ.
Guest
Posts: n/a
'89 was made by Daimler and not a Real Jeep by definition.
Take a picture of a picture, Geez, how do you think I make them?
So I have proved you are a liar again!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Bill, you are such a juvenile on such demands that I'm not bothering to
> go through any personal effort to satisfy your demand. Anyone else I
> wouldn't have any trouble doing that.. I'm not bothering to go through
> old scrap books to scan in a photo of our old '89 I've mentioned here
> several times over the years that I may not even have. I certainly have
> no digital photos since digital cameras weren't out then. My role in
> life is not to convince you of anything, nor is it to go to any extra
> effort to convince you I've owned more Jeeps than my '97 TJ.
Take a picture of a picture, Geez, how do you think I make them?
So I have proved you are a liar again!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Bill, you are such a juvenile on such demands that I'm not bothering to
> go through any personal effort to satisfy your demand. Anyone else I
> wouldn't have any trouble doing that.. I'm not bothering to go through
> old scrap books to scan in a photo of our old '89 I've mentioned here
> several times over the years that I may not even have. I certainly have
> no digital photos since digital cameras weren't out then. My role in
> life is not to convince you of anything, nor is it to go to any extra
> effort to convince you I've owned more Jeeps than my '97 TJ.
Guest
Posts: n/a
'89 was made by Daimler and not a Real Jeep by definition.
Take a picture of a picture, Geez, how do you think I make them?
So I have proved you are a liar again!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Bill, you are such a juvenile on such demands that I'm not bothering to
> go through any personal effort to satisfy your demand. Anyone else I
> wouldn't have any trouble doing that.. I'm not bothering to go through
> old scrap books to scan in a photo of our old '89 I've mentioned here
> several times over the years that I may not even have. I certainly have
> no digital photos since digital cameras weren't out then. My role in
> life is not to convince you of anything, nor is it to go to any extra
> effort to convince you I've owned more Jeeps than my '97 TJ.
Take a picture of a picture, Geez, how do you think I make them?
So I have proved you are a liar again!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Bill, you are such a juvenile on such demands that I'm not bothering to
> go through any personal effort to satisfy your demand. Anyone else I
> wouldn't have any trouble doing that.. I'm not bothering to go through
> old scrap books to scan in a photo of our old '89 I've mentioned here
> several times over the years that I may not even have. I certainly have
> no digital photos since digital cameras weren't out then. My role in
> life is not to convince you of anything, nor is it to go to any extra
> effort to convince you I've owned more Jeeps than my '97 TJ.
Guest
Posts: n/a
'89 was made by Daimler and not a Real Jeep by definition.
Take a picture of a picture, Geez, how do you think I make them?
So I have proved you are a liar again!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Bill, you are such a juvenile on such demands that I'm not bothering to
> go through any personal effort to satisfy your demand. Anyone else I
> wouldn't have any trouble doing that.. I'm not bothering to go through
> old scrap books to scan in a photo of our old '89 I've mentioned here
> several times over the years that I may not even have. I certainly have
> no digital photos since digital cameras weren't out then. My role in
> life is not to convince you of anything, nor is it to go to any extra
> effort to convince you I've owned more Jeeps than my '97 TJ.
Take a picture of a picture, Geez, how do you think I make them?
So I have proved you are a liar again!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Bill, you are such a juvenile on such demands that I'm not bothering to
> go through any personal effort to satisfy your demand. Anyone else I
> wouldn't have any trouble doing that.. I'm not bothering to go through
> old scrap books to scan in a photo of our old '89 I've mentioned here
> several times over the years that I may not even have. I certainly have
> no digital photos since digital cameras weren't out then. My role in
> life is not to convince you of anything, nor is it to go to any extra
> effort to convince you I've owned more Jeeps than my '97 TJ.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Since you have never proved me or anyone else here to be a liar, you
can't prove it again. Not that I care since I've never agreed with your
myopic view of what a "real" Jeep is since your Jeep came WAY after the
"real" Jeeps were introduced.. Bill, I think you verge on paranoia and
obsessiveness.
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> '89 was made by Daimler and not a Real Jeep by definition.
> Take a picture of a picture, Geez, how do you think I make them?
> So I have proved you are a liar again!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
>>Bill, you are such a juvenile on such demands that I'm not bothering to
>>go through any personal effort to satisfy your demand. Anyone else I
>>wouldn't have any trouble doing that.. I'm not bothering to go through
>>old scrap books to scan in a photo of our old '89 I've mentioned here
>>several times over the years that I may not even have. I certainly have
>>no digital photos since digital cameras weren't out then. My role in
>>life is not to convince you of anything, nor is it to go to any extra
>>effort to convince you I've owned more Jeeps than my '97 TJ.
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
can't prove it again. Not that I care since I've never agreed with your
myopic view of what a "real" Jeep is since your Jeep came WAY after the
"real" Jeeps were introduced.. Bill, I think you verge on paranoia and
obsessiveness.
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> '89 was made by Daimler and not a Real Jeep by definition.
> Take a picture of a picture, Geez, how do you think I make them?
> So I have proved you are a liar again!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
>>Bill, you are such a juvenile on such demands that I'm not bothering to
>>go through any personal effort to satisfy your demand. Anyone else I
>>wouldn't have any trouble doing that.. I'm not bothering to go through
>>old scrap books to scan in a photo of our old '89 I've mentioned here
>>several times over the years that I may not even have. I certainly have
>>no digital photos since digital cameras weren't out then. My role in
>>life is not to convince you of anything, nor is it to go to any extra
>>effort to convince you I've owned more Jeeps than my '97 TJ.
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Since you have never proved me or anyone else here to be a liar, you
can't prove it again. Not that I care since I've never agreed with your
myopic view of what a "real" Jeep is since your Jeep came WAY after the
"real" Jeeps were introduced.. Bill, I think you verge on paranoia and
obsessiveness.
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> '89 was made by Daimler and not a Real Jeep by definition.
> Take a picture of a picture, Geez, how do you think I make them?
> So I have proved you are a liar again!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
>>Bill, you are such a juvenile on such demands that I'm not bothering to
>>go through any personal effort to satisfy your demand. Anyone else I
>>wouldn't have any trouble doing that.. I'm not bothering to go through
>>old scrap books to scan in a photo of our old '89 I've mentioned here
>>several times over the years that I may not even have. I certainly have
>>no digital photos since digital cameras weren't out then. My role in
>>life is not to convince you of anything, nor is it to go to any extra
>>effort to convince you I've owned more Jeeps than my '97 TJ.
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
can't prove it again. Not that I care since I've never agreed with your
myopic view of what a "real" Jeep is since your Jeep came WAY after the
"real" Jeeps were introduced.. Bill, I think you verge on paranoia and
obsessiveness.
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> '89 was made by Daimler and not a Real Jeep by definition.
> Take a picture of a picture, Geez, how do you think I make them?
> So I have proved you are a liar again!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
>>Bill, you are such a juvenile on such demands that I'm not bothering to
>>go through any personal effort to satisfy your demand. Anyone else I
>>wouldn't have any trouble doing that.. I'm not bothering to go through
>>old scrap books to scan in a photo of our old '89 I've mentioned here
>>several times over the years that I may not even have. I certainly have
>>no digital photos since digital cameras weren't out then. My role in
>>life is not to convince you of anything, nor is it to go to any extra
>>effort to convince you I've owned more Jeeps than my '97 TJ.
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Since you have never proved me or anyone else here to be a liar, you
can't prove it again. Not that I care since I've never agreed with your
myopic view of what a "real" Jeep is since your Jeep came WAY after the
"real" Jeeps were introduced.. Bill, I think you verge on paranoia and
obsessiveness.
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> '89 was made by Daimler and not a Real Jeep by definition.
> Take a picture of a picture, Geez, how do you think I make them?
> So I have proved you are a liar again!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
>>Bill, you are such a juvenile on such demands that I'm not bothering to
>>go through any personal effort to satisfy your demand. Anyone else I
>>wouldn't have any trouble doing that.. I'm not bothering to go through
>>old scrap books to scan in a photo of our old '89 I've mentioned here
>>several times over the years that I may not even have. I certainly have
>>no digital photos since digital cameras weren't out then. My role in
>>life is not to convince you of anything, nor is it to go to any extra
>>effort to convince you I've owned more Jeeps than my '97 TJ.
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
can't prove it again. Not that I care since I've never agreed with your
myopic view of what a "real" Jeep is since your Jeep came WAY after the
"real" Jeeps were introduced.. Bill, I think you verge on paranoia and
obsessiveness.
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> '89 was made by Daimler and not a Real Jeep by definition.
> Take a picture of a picture, Geez, how do you think I make them?
> So I have proved you are a liar again!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
>>Bill, you are such a juvenile on such demands that I'm not bothering to
>>go through any personal effort to satisfy your demand. Anyone else I
>>wouldn't have any trouble doing that.. I'm not bothering to go through
>>old scrap books to scan in a photo of our old '89 I've mentioned here
>>several times over the years that I may not even have. I certainly have
>>no digital photos since digital cameras weren't out then. My role in
>>life is not to convince you of anything, nor is it to go to any extra
>>effort to convince you I've owned more Jeeps than my '97 TJ.
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Since you have never proved me or anyone else here to be a liar, you
can't prove it again. Not that I care since I've never agreed with your
myopic view of what a "real" Jeep is since your Jeep came WAY after the
"real" Jeeps were introduced.. Bill, I think you verge on paranoia and
obsessiveness.
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> '89 was made by Daimler and not a Real Jeep by definition.
> Take a picture of a picture, Geez, how do you think I make them?
> So I have proved you are a liar again!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
>>Bill, you are such a juvenile on such demands that I'm not bothering to
>>go through any personal effort to satisfy your demand. Anyone else I
>>wouldn't have any trouble doing that.. I'm not bothering to go through
>>old scrap books to scan in a photo of our old '89 I've mentioned here
>>several times over the years that I may not even have. I certainly have
>>no digital photos since digital cameras weren't out then. My role in
>>life is not to convince you of anything, nor is it to go to any extra
>>effort to convince you I've owned more Jeeps than my '97 TJ.
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
can't prove it again. Not that I care since I've never agreed with your
myopic view of what a "real" Jeep is since your Jeep came WAY after the
"real" Jeeps were introduced.. Bill, I think you verge on paranoia and
obsessiveness.
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> '89 was made by Daimler and not a Real Jeep by definition.
> Take a picture of a picture, Geez, how do you think I make them?
> So I have proved you are a liar again!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
>>Bill, you are such a juvenile on such demands that I'm not bothering to
>>go through any personal effort to satisfy your demand. Anyone else I
>>wouldn't have any trouble doing that.. I'm not bothering to go through
>>old scrap books to scan in a photo of our old '89 I've mentioned here
>>several times over the years that I may not even have. I certainly have
>>no digital photos since digital cameras weren't out then. My role in
>>life is not to convince you of anything, nor is it to go to any extra
>>effort to convince you I've owned more Jeeps than my '97 TJ.
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
Guest
Posts: n/a
So are you going to answer my question, or just blow them off as
you don't have no idea how your front end geometry works?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Since you have never proved me or anyone else here to be a liar, you
> can't prove it again. Not that I care since I've never agreed with your
> myopic view of what a "real" Jeep is since your Jeep came WAY after the
> "real" Jeeps were introduced.. Bill, I think you verge on paranoia and
> obsessiveness.
you don't have no idea how your front end geometry works?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry Bransford wrote:
>
> Since you have never proved me or anyone else here to be a liar, you
> can't prove it again. Not that I care since I've never agreed with your
> myopic view of what a "real" Jeep is since your Jeep came WAY after the
> "real" Jeeps were introduced.. Bill, I think you verge on paranoia and
> obsessiveness.


