>
>It would make sense for Chrysler to finally dump the tired, old inline-6

My 4.0L is not tired! Great engine. You must own a Libby.

-jeff

 

Bill likes to bring that pic out as if it is fact when this question comes
up. Check out the spec list for the '05 Rubicon in another thread.

"stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:b15a3f2e.0406101852.722ddc95@posting.google.c om...
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:<40C8C19B.3D698F99@***.net>...
> > http://www.----------.com/05wrangler.jpg
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:--------------------
> >
> >
>
> That's an old pic from years ago. But don't tell me that's the fate
> of the Wrangler. That's f'ugly as hell.

 

Bill likes to bring that pic out as if it is fact when this question comes
up. Check out the spec list for the '05 Rubicon in another thread.

"stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:b15a3f2e.0406101852.722ddc95@posting.google.c om...
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:<40C8C19B.3D698F99@***.net>...
> > http://www.----------.com/05wrangler.jpg
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:--------------------
> >
> >
>
> That's an old pic from years ago. But don't tell me that's the fate
> of the Wrangler. That's f'ugly as hell.

 

Bill likes to bring that pic out as if it is fact when this question comes
up. Check out the spec list for the '05 Rubicon in another thread.

"stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:b15a3f2e.0406101852.722ddc95@posting.google.c om...
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:<40C8C19B.3D698F99@***.net>...
> > http://www.----------.com/05wrangler.jpg
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:--------------------
> >
> >
>
> That's an old pic from years ago. But don't tell me that's the fate
> of the Wrangler. That's f'ugly as hell.

 

Bill likes to bring that pic out as if it is fact when this question comes
up. Check out the spec list for the '05 Rubicon in another thread.

"stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:b15a3f2e.0406101852.722ddc95@posting.google.c om...
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:<40C8C19B.3D698F99@***.net>...
> > http://www.----------.com/05wrangler.jpg
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:--------------------
> >
> >
>
> That's an old pic from years ago. But don't tell me that's the fate
> of the Wrangler. That's f'ugly as hell.

 

In article <bd-dnTidntTwbVXdRVn-vw@comcast.com>,
j carter <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote:
>BMW's six isn't tired and old.

It also wouldn't be able to pull as much as the old iron. That
being said, the BMWs and Benz's are the highest Lemon
Law vehicles around. Why would this be a good thing?

>
>
>"jasonp" <hick@up.com> wrote in message
>news:%c0yc.18365$8R6.9983@clgrps12...
>> I am by no means a guru, but if the inline 6 is such a "neanderthal", why
>do
>> BMW and others still use this type of engine?
>>
>>
>> "Jack Carter" <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:acGdnfjV6c75GlXdRVn-hQ@comcast.com...
>> > It would make sense for Chrysler to finally dump the tired, old inline-6
>> > since Daimler doesn't use that neanderthal in any other vehicle.
>> >
>> >
>> > "stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>> > news:b15a3f2e.0406100702.aba171@posting.google.com ...
>> > > I've been holding out trading/selling my 98 TJ to see what the new
>> > > wrangler will have. Is there any news about this, and is it still
>> > > gonna be redone for '06?
>> > >
>> > > It'd be nice if it had a more fuel effecient engine, but I'm not sure
>> > > what else I'd want to change. I just wouldn't want to miss out.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>


--
Jeeps and dubs and everything's nice...
Replace nospam with jetta for e-mail

 

In article <bd-dnTidntTwbVXdRVn-vw@comcast.com>,
j carter <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote:
>BMW's six isn't tired and old.

It also wouldn't be able to pull as much as the old iron. That
being said, the BMWs and Benz's are the highest Lemon
Law vehicles around. Why would this be a good thing?

>
>
>"jasonp" <hick@up.com> wrote in message
>news:%c0yc.18365$8R6.9983@clgrps12...
>> I am by no means a guru, but if the inline 6 is such a "neanderthal", why
>do
>> BMW and others still use this type of engine?
>>
>>
>> "Jack Carter" <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:acGdnfjV6c75GlXdRVn-hQ@comcast.com...
>> > It would make sense for Chrysler to finally dump the tired, old inline-6
>> > since Daimler doesn't use that neanderthal in any other vehicle.
>> >
>> >
>> > "stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>> > news:b15a3f2e.0406100702.aba171@posting.google.com ...
>> > > I've been holding out trading/selling my 98 TJ to see what the new
>> > > wrangler will have. Is there any news about this, and is it still
>> > > gonna be redone for '06?
>> > >
>> > > It'd be nice if it had a more fuel effecient engine, but I'm not sure
>> > > what else I'd want to change. I just wouldn't want to miss out.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>


--
Jeeps and dubs and everything's nice...
Replace nospam with jetta for e-mail

 

In article <bd-dnTidntTwbVXdRVn-vw@comcast.com>,
j carter <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote:
>BMW's six isn't tired and old.

It also wouldn't be able to pull as much as the old iron. That
being said, the BMWs and Benz's are the highest Lemon
Law vehicles around. Why would this be a good thing?

>
>
>"jasonp" <hick@up.com> wrote in message
>news:%c0yc.18365$8R6.9983@clgrps12...
>> I am by no means a guru, but if the inline 6 is such a "neanderthal", why
>do
>> BMW and others still use this type of engine?
>>
>>
>> "Jack Carter" <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:acGdnfjV6c75GlXdRVn-hQ@comcast.com...
>> > It would make sense for Chrysler to finally dump the tired, old inline-6
>> > since Daimler doesn't use that neanderthal in any other vehicle.
>> >
>> >
>> > "stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>> > news:b15a3f2e.0406100702.aba171@posting.google.com ...
>> > > I've been holding out trading/selling my 98 TJ to see what the new
>> > > wrangler will have. Is there any news about this, and is it still
>> > > gonna be redone for '06?
>> > >
>> > > It'd be nice if it had a more fuel effecient engine, but I'm not sure
>> > > what else I'd want to change. I just wouldn't want to miss out.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>


--
Jeeps and dubs and everything's nice...
Replace nospam with jetta for e-mail

 

In article <bd-dnTidntTwbVXdRVn-vw@comcast.com>,
j carter <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote:
>BMW's six isn't tired and old.

It also wouldn't be able to pull as much as the old iron. That
being said, the BMWs and Benz's are the highest Lemon
Law vehicles around. Why would this be a good thing?

>
>
>"jasonp" <hick@up.com> wrote in message
>news:%c0yc.18365$8R6.9983@clgrps12...
>> I am by no means a guru, but if the inline 6 is such a "neanderthal", why
>do
>> BMW and others still use this type of engine?
>>
>>
>> "Jack Carter" <jcarter10@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:acGdnfjV6c75GlXdRVn-hQ@comcast.com...
>> > It would make sense for Chrysler to finally dump the tired, old inline-6
>> > since Daimler doesn't use that neanderthal in any other vehicle.
>> >
>> >
>> > "stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>> > news:b15a3f2e.0406100702.aba171@posting.google.com ...
>> > > I've been holding out trading/selling my 98 TJ to see what the new
>> > > wrangler will have. Is there any news about this, and is it still
>> > > gonna be redone for '06?
>> > >
>> > > It'd be nice if it had a more fuel effecient engine, but I'm not sure
>> > > what else I'd want to change. I just wouldn't want to miss out.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>


--
Jeeps and dubs and everything's nice...
Replace nospam with jetta for e-mail