Any info on redesigned Wrangler for '06?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any info on redesigned Wrangler for '06?
L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:<40C8C19B.3D698F99@***.net>...
> http://www.----------.com/05wrangler.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
>
That's an old pic from years ago. But don't tell me that's the fate
of the Wrangler. That's f'ugly as hell.
> http://www.----------.com/05wrangler.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
>
That's an old pic from years ago. But don't tell me that's the fate
of the Wrangler. That's f'ugly as hell.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any info on redesigned Wrangler for '06?
L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:<40C8C19B.3D698F99@***.net>...
> http://www.----------.com/05wrangler.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
>
That's an old pic from years ago. But don't tell me that's the fate
of the Wrangler. That's f'ugly as hell.
> http://www.----------.com/05wrangler.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
>
That's an old pic from years ago. But don't tell me that's the fate
of the Wrangler. That's f'ugly as hell.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any info on redesigned Wrangler for '06?
L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:<40C8C19B.3D698F99@***.net>...
> http://www.----------.com/05wrangler.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
>
That's an old pic from years ago. But don't tell me that's the fate
of the Wrangler. That's f'ugly as hell.
> http://www.----------.com/05wrangler.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
>
That's an old pic from years ago. But don't tell me that's the fate
of the Wrangler. That's f'ugly as hell.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any info on redesigned Wrangler for '06?
"stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:b15a3f2e.0406101852.722ddc95@posting.google.c om...
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:<40C8C19B.3D698F99@***.net>...
> > http://www.----------.com/05wrangler.jpg
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:--------------------
> >
> >
>
> That's an old pic from years ago. But don't tell me that's the fate
> of the Wrangler. That's f'ugly as hell.
Unfortunately there's a very good chance the '06 TJ replacement will use the
Liberty's independent front end. They'll BS their way through it if this
happens, but in my view that will be the end of Jeep as we've known it.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any info on redesigned Wrangler for '06?
"stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:b15a3f2e.0406101852.722ddc95@posting.google.c om...
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:<40C8C19B.3D698F99@***.net>...
> > http://www.----------.com/05wrangler.jpg
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:--------------------
> >
> >
>
> That's an old pic from years ago. But don't tell me that's the fate
> of the Wrangler. That's f'ugly as hell.
Unfortunately there's a very good chance the '06 TJ replacement will use the
Liberty's independent front end. They'll BS their way through it if this
happens, but in my view that will be the end of Jeep as we've known it.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any info on redesigned Wrangler for '06?
"stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:b15a3f2e.0406101852.722ddc95@posting.google.c om...
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:<40C8C19B.3D698F99@***.net>...
> > http://www.----------.com/05wrangler.jpg
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:--------------------
> >
> >
>
> That's an old pic from years ago. But don't tell me that's the fate
> of the Wrangler. That's f'ugly as hell.
Unfortunately there's a very good chance the '06 TJ replacement will use the
Liberty's independent front end. They'll BS their way through it if this
happens, but in my view that will be the end of Jeep as we've known it.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any info on redesigned Wrangler for '06?
"stephjeff" <bag@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:b15a3f2e.0406101852.722ddc95@posting.google.c om...
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:<40C8C19B.3D698F99@***.net>...
> > http://www.----------.com/05wrangler.jpg
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:--------------------
> >
> >
>
> That's an old pic from years ago. But don't tell me that's the fate
> of the Wrangler. That's f'ugly as hell.
Unfortunately there's a very good chance the '06 TJ replacement will use the
Liberty's independent front end. They'll BS their way through it if this
happens, but in my view that will be the end of Jeep as we've known it.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any info on redesigned Wrangler for '06?
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:43:16 UTC "Jerry McG"
<gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote:
>
> "trailboss" <trailboss@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:_a0yc.8742$Il2.1700072@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.ne t...
> > that "tired, old inline 6" is one of the best engines EVER made....>
>
> Just like solid axles, the automotive press thinks an old inline iron 6cyl
> is a dog. Problem is the millions on the road running faithfully for
> hundreds of thousands of miles, whereas the potyential aluminum V6
> replacements are junk at low mileages, and cost a fortune to rebuild.
Oh, I can see the real argument they will make: weight. Compare the
weight of an aluminum V6 to the inline 6 tractor engine. Every ounce
they cut (theoretically) will boost the gas mileage. Same
rationalization for all the plastic and little bitty gas tanks. I'm
sure that many will agree that with proper maitainance and driving
patterns we could probably do just as well but it's like the carb
engines - who knows how to really tweek a carb anymore (and I never
did find one that wasn't a running battle over time).
Functionality is the last thing on the design sheet...
--
Will Honea
<gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote:
>
> "trailboss" <trailboss@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:_a0yc.8742$Il2.1700072@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.ne t...
> > that "tired, old inline 6" is one of the best engines EVER made....>
>
> Just like solid axles, the automotive press thinks an old inline iron 6cyl
> is a dog. Problem is the millions on the road running faithfully for
> hundreds of thousands of miles, whereas the potyential aluminum V6
> replacements are junk at low mileages, and cost a fortune to rebuild.
Oh, I can see the real argument they will make: weight. Compare the
weight of an aluminum V6 to the inline 6 tractor engine. Every ounce
they cut (theoretically) will boost the gas mileage. Same
rationalization for all the plastic and little bitty gas tanks. I'm
sure that many will agree that with proper maitainance and driving
patterns we could probably do just as well but it's like the carb
engines - who knows how to really tweek a carb anymore (and I never
did find one that wasn't a running battle over time).
Functionality is the last thing on the design sheet...
--
Will Honea
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any info on redesigned Wrangler for '06?
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:43:16 UTC "Jerry McG"
<gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote:
>
> "trailboss" <trailboss@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:_a0yc.8742$Il2.1700072@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.ne t...
> > that "tired, old inline 6" is one of the best engines EVER made....>
>
> Just like solid axles, the automotive press thinks an old inline iron 6cyl
> is a dog. Problem is the millions on the road running faithfully for
> hundreds of thousands of miles, whereas the potyential aluminum V6
> replacements are junk at low mileages, and cost a fortune to rebuild.
Oh, I can see the real argument they will make: weight. Compare the
weight of an aluminum V6 to the inline 6 tractor engine. Every ounce
they cut (theoretically) will boost the gas mileage. Same
rationalization for all the plastic and little bitty gas tanks. I'm
sure that many will agree that with proper maitainance and driving
patterns we could probably do just as well but it's like the carb
engines - who knows how to really tweek a carb anymore (and I never
did find one that wasn't a running battle over time).
Functionality is the last thing on the design sheet...
--
Will Honea
<gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote:
>
> "trailboss" <trailboss@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:_a0yc.8742$Il2.1700072@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.ne t...
> > that "tired, old inline 6" is one of the best engines EVER made....>
>
> Just like solid axles, the automotive press thinks an old inline iron 6cyl
> is a dog. Problem is the millions on the road running faithfully for
> hundreds of thousands of miles, whereas the potyential aluminum V6
> replacements are junk at low mileages, and cost a fortune to rebuild.
Oh, I can see the real argument they will make: weight. Compare the
weight of an aluminum V6 to the inline 6 tractor engine. Every ounce
they cut (theoretically) will boost the gas mileage. Same
rationalization for all the plastic and little bitty gas tanks. I'm
sure that many will agree that with proper maitainance and driving
patterns we could probably do just as well but it's like the carb
engines - who knows how to really tweek a carb anymore (and I never
did find one that wasn't a running battle over time).
Functionality is the last thing on the design sheet...
--
Will Honea
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Any info on redesigned Wrangler for '06?
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:43:16 UTC "Jerry McG"
<gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote:
>
> "trailboss" <trailboss@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:_a0yc.8742$Il2.1700072@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.ne t...
> > that "tired, old inline 6" is one of the best engines EVER made....>
>
> Just like solid axles, the automotive press thinks an old inline iron 6cyl
> is a dog. Problem is the millions on the road running faithfully for
> hundreds of thousands of miles, whereas the potyential aluminum V6
> replacements are junk at low mileages, and cost a fortune to rebuild.
Oh, I can see the real argument they will make: weight. Compare the
weight of an aluminum V6 to the inline 6 tractor engine. Every ounce
they cut (theoretically) will boost the gas mileage. Same
rationalization for all the plastic and little bitty gas tanks. I'm
sure that many will agree that with proper maitainance and driving
patterns we could probably do just as well but it's like the carb
engines - who knows how to really tweek a carb anymore (and I never
did find one that wasn't a running battle over time).
Functionality is the last thing on the design sheet...
--
Will Honea
<gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote:
>
> "trailboss" <trailboss@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:_a0yc.8742$Il2.1700072@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.ne t...
> > that "tired, old inline 6" is one of the best engines EVER made....>
>
> Just like solid axles, the automotive press thinks an old inline iron 6cyl
> is a dog. Problem is the millions on the road running faithfully for
> hundreds of thousands of miles, whereas the potyential aluminum V6
> replacements are junk at low mileages, and cost a fortune to rebuild.
Oh, I can see the real argument they will make: weight. Compare the
weight of an aluminum V6 to the inline 6 tractor engine. Every ounce
they cut (theoretically) will boost the gas mileage. Same
rationalization for all the plastic and little bitty gas tanks. I'm
sure that many will agree that with proper maitainance and driving
patterns we could probably do just as well but it's like the carb
engines - who knows how to really tweek a carb anymore (and I never
did find one that wasn't a running battle over time).
Functionality is the last thing on the design sheet...
--
Will Honea