Air Bags
11-08-2005, 09:13 AM
#61
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Air Bags
As long as you bring up politics (I knew it wouldn't be long before you
did), what is it with you right-wing zealots, spinning the facts to fit your
agenda because you have to maintain the illusion that you are never wrong?
"The buck's rear legs were right at the center-mounted license plate, he
wrapped over the hood, glanced off the driver's side of the car taking the
mirror with him. Both airbags deployed. Peak change in velocity was 2.63mph,
but it showed 1.54 at the first data-point. "
Nowhere did the article state the car was going LESS than three miles per
hour. The figure you are citing is the change in velocity (in this case,
deceleration), not vehicle speed. The article doesn't state the vehicle
speed of this car at collision, but anyone with eyes can tell he was going
WAY more than 3mph by looking at the damage.
Have you ever seen a car that hit a deer? At three miles an hour, you
think a deer would wrap over the hood, glance off the driver's side, and
take out the mirror? http://mfes.com/gif/cdr_sunfire_deer.jpg Geez, the deer
can leisurely walk out of the way at that speed. Are you so bad a driver
that if you were driving three miles per hour, you couldn't move to avoid
hitting a deer? Sheesh.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43702713.9809B725@***.net...
> Matt, what is it with you bleeding heart liberals, not being able to
> understand facts! Anywhere did the article state the car was going
> faster than three miles an hour, when the bag exploded!
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> The only fact I can see is you're reading it wrong.
did), what is it with you right-wing zealots, spinning the facts to fit your
agenda because you have to maintain the illusion that you are never wrong?
"The buck's rear legs were right at the center-mounted license plate, he
wrapped over the hood, glanced off the driver's side of the car taking the
mirror with him. Both airbags deployed. Peak change in velocity was 2.63mph,
but it showed 1.54 at the first data-point. "
Nowhere did the article state the car was going LESS than three miles per
hour. The figure you are citing is the change in velocity (in this case,
deceleration), not vehicle speed. The article doesn't state the vehicle
speed of this car at collision, but anyone with eyes can tell he was going
WAY more than 3mph by looking at the damage.
Have you ever seen a car that hit a deer? At three miles an hour, you
think a deer would wrap over the hood, glance off the driver's side, and
take out the mirror? http://mfes.com/gif/cdr_sunfire_deer.jpg Geez, the deer
can leisurely walk out of the way at that speed. Are you so bad a driver
that if you were driving three miles per hour, you couldn't move to avoid
hitting a deer? Sheesh.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43702713.9809B725@***.net...
> Matt, what is it with you bleeding heart liberals, not being able to
> understand facts! Anywhere did the article state the car was going
> faster than three miles an hour, when the bag exploded!
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> The only fact I can see is you're reading it wrong.
11-08-2005, 12:57 PM
#62
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Air Bags
It's still a fact as verified by the little black box like the one
in your Ford. My Brother back in high school had three hundred dollars
worth of damage done by a dog that ran into the front of his '58 Ford.
Their home owner's insurance paid for it.
Yes, we all seen a car hit a deer:
http://www.nearlygood.com//files302201/hitdeer.wmv
http://www.snopes.com/photos/durango.asp
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> As long as you bring up politics (I knew it wouldn't be long before you
> did), what is it with you right-wing zealots, spinning the facts to fit your
> agenda because you have to maintain the illusion that you are never wrong?
>
> "The buck's rear legs were right at the center-mounted license plate, he
> wrapped over the hood, glanced off the driver's side of the car taking the
> mirror with him. Both airbags deployed. Peak change in velocity was 2.63mph,
> but it showed 1.54 at the first data-point. "
>
> Nowhere did the article state the car was going LESS than three miles per
> hour. The figure you are citing is the change in velocity (in this case,
> deceleration), not vehicle speed. The article doesn't state the vehicle
> speed of this car at collision, but anyone with eyes can tell he was going
> WAY more than 3mph by looking at the damage.
>
> Have you ever seen a car that hit a deer? At three miles an hour, you
> think a deer would wrap over the hood, glance off the driver's side, and
> take out the mirror? http://mfes.com/gif/cdr_sunfire_deer.jpg Geez, the deer
> can leisurely walk out of the way at that speed. Are you so bad a driver
> that if you were driving three miles per hour, you couldn't move to avoid
> hitting a deer? Sheesh.
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43702713.9809B725@***.net...
> > Matt, what is it with you bleeding heart liberals, not being able to
> > understand facts! Anywhere did the article state the car was going
> > faster than three miles an hour, when the bag exploded!
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >>
> >> The only fact I can see is you're reading it wrong.
in your Ford. My Brother back in high school had three hundred dollars
worth of damage done by a dog that ran into the front of his '58 Ford.
Their home owner's insurance paid for it.
Yes, we all seen a car hit a deer:
http://www.nearlygood.com//files302201/hitdeer.wmv
http://www.snopes.com/photos/durango.asp
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> As long as you bring up politics (I knew it wouldn't be long before you
> did), what is it with you right-wing zealots, spinning the facts to fit your
> agenda because you have to maintain the illusion that you are never wrong?
>
> "The buck's rear legs were right at the center-mounted license plate, he
> wrapped over the hood, glanced off the driver's side of the car taking the
> mirror with him. Both airbags deployed. Peak change in velocity was 2.63mph,
> but it showed 1.54 at the first data-point. "
>
> Nowhere did the article state the car was going LESS than three miles per
> hour. The figure you are citing is the change in velocity (in this case,
> deceleration), not vehicle speed. The article doesn't state the vehicle
> speed of this car at collision, but anyone with eyes can tell he was going
> WAY more than 3mph by looking at the damage.
>
> Have you ever seen a car that hit a deer? At three miles an hour, you
> think a deer would wrap over the hood, glance off the driver's side, and
> take out the mirror? http://mfes.com/gif/cdr_sunfire_deer.jpg Geez, the deer
> can leisurely walk out of the way at that speed. Are you so bad a driver
> that if you were driving three miles per hour, you couldn't move to avoid
> hitting a deer? Sheesh.
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43702713.9809B725@***.net...
> > Matt, what is it with you bleeding heart liberals, not being able to
> > understand facts! Anywhere did the article state the car was going
> > faster than three miles an hour, when the bag exploded!
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >>
> >> The only fact I can see is you're reading it wrong.
11-08-2005, 12:57 PM
#63
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Air Bags
It's still a fact as verified by the little black box like the one
in your Ford. My Brother back in high school had three hundred dollars
worth of damage done by a dog that ran into the front of his '58 Ford.
Their home owner's insurance paid for it.
Yes, we all seen a car hit a deer:
http://www.nearlygood.com//files302201/hitdeer.wmv
http://www.snopes.com/photos/durango.asp
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> As long as you bring up politics (I knew it wouldn't be long before you
> did), what is it with you right-wing zealots, spinning the facts to fit your
> agenda because you have to maintain the illusion that you are never wrong?
>
> "The buck's rear legs were right at the center-mounted license plate, he
> wrapped over the hood, glanced off the driver's side of the car taking the
> mirror with him. Both airbags deployed. Peak change in velocity was 2.63mph,
> but it showed 1.54 at the first data-point. "
>
> Nowhere did the article state the car was going LESS than three miles per
> hour. The figure you are citing is the change in velocity (in this case,
> deceleration), not vehicle speed. The article doesn't state the vehicle
> speed of this car at collision, but anyone with eyes can tell he was going
> WAY more than 3mph by looking at the damage.
>
> Have you ever seen a car that hit a deer? At three miles an hour, you
> think a deer would wrap over the hood, glance off the driver's side, and
> take out the mirror? http://mfes.com/gif/cdr_sunfire_deer.jpg Geez, the deer
> can leisurely walk out of the way at that speed. Are you so bad a driver
> that if you were driving three miles per hour, you couldn't move to avoid
> hitting a deer? Sheesh.
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43702713.9809B725@***.net...
> > Matt, what is it with you bleeding heart liberals, not being able to
> > understand facts! Anywhere did the article state the car was going
> > faster than three miles an hour, when the bag exploded!
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >>
> >> The only fact I can see is you're reading it wrong.
in your Ford. My Brother back in high school had three hundred dollars
worth of damage done by a dog that ran into the front of his '58 Ford.
Their home owner's insurance paid for it.
Yes, we all seen a car hit a deer:
http://www.nearlygood.com//files302201/hitdeer.wmv
http://www.snopes.com/photos/durango.asp
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> As long as you bring up politics (I knew it wouldn't be long before you
> did), what is it with you right-wing zealots, spinning the facts to fit your
> agenda because you have to maintain the illusion that you are never wrong?
>
> "The buck's rear legs were right at the center-mounted license plate, he
> wrapped over the hood, glanced off the driver's side of the car taking the
> mirror with him. Both airbags deployed. Peak change in velocity was 2.63mph,
> but it showed 1.54 at the first data-point. "
>
> Nowhere did the article state the car was going LESS than three miles per
> hour. The figure you are citing is the change in velocity (in this case,
> deceleration), not vehicle speed. The article doesn't state the vehicle
> speed of this car at collision, but anyone with eyes can tell he was going
> WAY more than 3mph by looking at the damage.
>
> Have you ever seen a car that hit a deer? At three miles an hour, you
> think a deer would wrap over the hood, glance off the driver's side, and
> take out the mirror? http://mfes.com/gif/cdr_sunfire_deer.jpg Geez, the deer
> can leisurely walk out of the way at that speed. Are you so bad a driver
> that if you were driving three miles per hour, you couldn't move to avoid
> hitting a deer? Sheesh.
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43702713.9809B725@***.net...
> > Matt, what is it with you bleeding heart liberals, not being able to
> > understand facts! Anywhere did the article state the car was going
> > faster than three miles an hour, when the bag exploded!
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >>
> >> The only fact I can see is you're reading it wrong.
11-08-2005, 12:57 PM
#64
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Air Bags
It's still a fact as verified by the little black box like the one
in your Ford. My Brother back in high school had three hundred dollars
worth of damage done by a dog that ran into the front of his '58 Ford.
Their home owner's insurance paid for it.
Yes, we all seen a car hit a deer:
http://www.nearlygood.com//files302201/hitdeer.wmv
http://www.snopes.com/photos/durango.asp
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> As long as you bring up politics (I knew it wouldn't be long before you
> did), what is it with you right-wing zealots, spinning the facts to fit your
> agenda because you have to maintain the illusion that you are never wrong?
>
> "The buck's rear legs were right at the center-mounted license plate, he
> wrapped over the hood, glanced off the driver's side of the car taking the
> mirror with him. Both airbags deployed. Peak change in velocity was 2.63mph,
> but it showed 1.54 at the first data-point. "
>
> Nowhere did the article state the car was going LESS than three miles per
> hour. The figure you are citing is the change in velocity (in this case,
> deceleration), not vehicle speed. The article doesn't state the vehicle
> speed of this car at collision, but anyone with eyes can tell he was going
> WAY more than 3mph by looking at the damage.
>
> Have you ever seen a car that hit a deer? At three miles an hour, you
> think a deer would wrap over the hood, glance off the driver's side, and
> take out the mirror? http://mfes.com/gif/cdr_sunfire_deer.jpg Geez, the deer
> can leisurely walk out of the way at that speed. Are you so bad a driver
> that if you were driving three miles per hour, you couldn't move to avoid
> hitting a deer? Sheesh.
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43702713.9809B725@***.net...
> > Matt, what is it with you bleeding heart liberals, not being able to
> > understand facts! Anywhere did the article state the car was going
> > faster than three miles an hour, when the bag exploded!
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >>
> >> The only fact I can see is you're reading it wrong.
in your Ford. My Brother back in high school had three hundred dollars
worth of damage done by a dog that ran into the front of his '58 Ford.
Their home owner's insurance paid for it.
Yes, we all seen a car hit a deer:
http://www.nearlygood.com//files302201/hitdeer.wmv
http://www.snopes.com/photos/durango.asp
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> As long as you bring up politics (I knew it wouldn't be long before you
> did), what is it with you right-wing zealots, spinning the facts to fit your
> agenda because you have to maintain the illusion that you are never wrong?
>
> "The buck's rear legs were right at the center-mounted license plate, he
> wrapped over the hood, glanced off the driver's side of the car taking the
> mirror with him. Both airbags deployed. Peak change in velocity was 2.63mph,
> but it showed 1.54 at the first data-point. "
>
> Nowhere did the article state the car was going LESS than three miles per
> hour. The figure you are citing is the change in velocity (in this case,
> deceleration), not vehicle speed. The article doesn't state the vehicle
> speed of this car at collision, but anyone with eyes can tell he was going
> WAY more than 3mph by looking at the damage.
>
> Have you ever seen a car that hit a deer? At three miles an hour, you
> think a deer would wrap over the hood, glance off the driver's side, and
> take out the mirror? http://mfes.com/gif/cdr_sunfire_deer.jpg Geez, the deer
> can leisurely walk out of the way at that speed. Are you so bad a driver
> that if you were driving three miles per hour, you couldn't move to avoid
> hitting a deer? Sheesh.
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43702713.9809B725@***.net...
> > Matt, what is it with you bleeding heart liberals, not being able to
> > understand facts! Anywhere did the article state the car was going
> > faster than three miles an hour, when the bag exploded!
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >>
> >> The only fact I can see is you're reading it wrong.
11-08-2005, 01:17 PM
#65
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Air Bags
His car was stopped at the time of collision.
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> It's still a fact as verified by the little black box like the one
> in your Ford. My Brother back in high school had three hundred dollars
> worth of damage done by a dog that ran into the front of his '58 Ford.
> Their home owner's insurance paid for it.
> Yes, we all seen a car hit a deer:
> http://www.nearlygood.com//files302201/hitdeer.wmv
> http://www.snopes.com/photos/durango.asp
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> It's still a fact as verified by the little black box like the one
> in your Ford. My Brother back in high school had three hundred dollars
> worth of damage done by a dog that ran into the front of his '58 Ford.
> Their home owner's insurance paid for it.
> Yes, we all seen a car hit a deer:
> http://www.nearlygood.com//files302201/hitdeer.wmv
> http://www.snopes.com/photos/durango.asp
11-08-2005, 01:17 PM
#66
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Air Bags
His car was stopped at the time of collision.
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> It's still a fact as verified by the little black box like the one
> in your Ford. My Brother back in high school had three hundred dollars
> worth of damage done by a dog that ran into the front of his '58 Ford.
> Their home owner's insurance paid for it.
> Yes, we all seen a car hit a deer:
> http://www.nearlygood.com//files302201/hitdeer.wmv
> http://www.snopes.com/photos/durango.asp
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> It's still a fact as verified by the little black box like the one
> in your Ford. My Brother back in high school had three hundred dollars
> worth of damage done by a dog that ran into the front of his '58 Ford.
> Their home owner's insurance paid for it.
> Yes, we all seen a car hit a deer:
> http://www.nearlygood.com//files302201/hitdeer.wmv
> http://www.snopes.com/photos/durango.asp
11-08-2005, 01:17 PM
#67
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Air Bags
His car was stopped at the time of collision.
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> It's still a fact as verified by the little black box like the one
> in your Ford. My Brother back in high school had three hundred dollars
> worth of damage done by a dog that ran into the front of his '58 Ford.
> Their home owner's insurance paid for it.
> Yes, we all seen a car hit a deer:
> http://www.nearlygood.com//files302201/hitdeer.wmv
> http://www.snopes.com/photos/durango.asp
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> It's still a fact as verified by the little black box like the one
> in your Ford. My Brother back in high school had three hundred dollars
> worth of damage done by a dog that ran into the front of his '58 Ford.
> Their home owner's insurance paid for it.
> Yes, we all seen a car hit a deer:
> http://www.nearlygood.com//files302201/hitdeer.wmv
> http://www.snopes.com/photos/durango.asp
11-08-2005, 05:59 PM
#68
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Air Bags
Your train of thought derailed again.
Was the '58 Ford doing less than three mph?
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4370E70E.E1AC602D@***.net...
> It's still a fact as verified by the little black box like the one
> in your Ford. My Brother back in high school had three hundred dollars
> worth of damage done by a dog that ran into the front of his '58 Ford.
> Their home owner's insurance paid for it.
> Yes, we all seen a car hit a deer:
> http://www.nearlygood.com//files302201/hitdeer.wmv
> http://www.snopes.com/photos/durango.asp
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> As long as you bring up politics (I knew it wouldn't be long before you
>> did), what is it with you right-wing zealots, spinning the facts to fit
>> your
>> agenda because you have to maintain the illusion that you are never
>> wrong?
>>
>> "The buck's rear legs were right at the center-mounted license plate, he
>> wrapped over the hood, glanced off the driver's side of the car taking
>> the
>> mirror with him. Both airbags deployed. Peak change in velocity was
>> 2.63mph,
>> but it showed 1.54 at the first data-point. "
>>
>> Nowhere did the article state the car was going LESS than three miles per
>> hour. The figure you are citing is the change in velocity (in this case,
>> deceleration), not vehicle speed. The article doesn't state the vehicle
>> speed of this car at collision, but anyone with eyes can tell he was
>> going
>> WAY more than 3mph by looking at the damage.
>>
>> Have you ever seen a car that hit a deer? At three miles an hour, you
>> think a deer would wrap over the hood, glance off the driver's side, and
>> take out the mirror? http://mfes.com/gif/cdr_sunfire_deer.jpg Geez, the
>> deer
>> can leisurely walk out of the way at that speed. Are you so bad a driver
>> that if you were driving three miles per hour, you couldn't move to avoid
>> hitting a deer? Sheesh.
>>
>> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:43702713.9809B725@***.net...
>> > Matt, what is it with you bleeding heart liberals, not being able to
>> > understand facts! Anywhere did the article state the car was going
>> > faster than three miles an hour, when the bag exploded!
>> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>> >
>> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The only fact I can see is you're reading it wrong.
Was the '58 Ford doing less than three mph?
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4370E70E.E1AC602D@***.net...
> It's still a fact as verified by the little black box like the one
> in your Ford. My Brother back in high school had three hundred dollars
> worth of damage done by a dog that ran into the front of his '58 Ford.
> Their home owner's insurance paid for it.
> Yes, we all seen a car hit a deer:
> http://www.nearlygood.com//files302201/hitdeer.wmv
> http://www.snopes.com/photos/durango.asp
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> As long as you bring up politics (I knew it wouldn't be long before you
>> did), what is it with you right-wing zealots, spinning the facts to fit
>> your
>> agenda because you have to maintain the illusion that you are never
>> wrong?
>>
>> "The buck's rear legs were right at the center-mounted license plate, he
>> wrapped over the hood, glanced off the driver's side of the car taking
>> the
>> mirror with him. Both airbags deployed. Peak change in velocity was
>> 2.63mph,
>> but it showed 1.54 at the first data-point. "
>>
>> Nowhere did the article state the car was going LESS than three miles per
>> hour. The figure you are citing is the change in velocity (in this case,
>> deceleration), not vehicle speed. The article doesn't state the vehicle
>> speed of this car at collision, but anyone with eyes can tell he was
>> going
>> WAY more than 3mph by looking at the damage.
>>
>> Have you ever seen a car that hit a deer? At three miles an hour, you
>> think a deer would wrap over the hood, glance off the driver's side, and
>> take out the mirror? http://mfes.com/gif/cdr_sunfire_deer.jpg Geez, the
>> deer
>> can leisurely walk out of the way at that speed. Are you so bad a driver
>> that if you were driving three miles per hour, you couldn't move to avoid
>> hitting a deer? Sheesh.
>>
>> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:43702713.9809B725@***.net...
>> > Matt, what is it with you bleeding heart liberals, not being able to
>> > understand facts! Anywhere did the article state the car was going
>> > faster than three miles an hour, when the bag exploded!
>> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>> >
>> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The only fact I can see is you're reading it wrong.
11-08-2005, 05:59 PM
#69
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Air Bags
Your train of thought derailed again.
Was the '58 Ford doing less than three mph?
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4370E70E.E1AC602D@***.net...
> It's still a fact as verified by the little black box like the one
> in your Ford. My Brother back in high school had three hundred dollars
> worth of damage done by a dog that ran into the front of his '58 Ford.
> Their home owner's insurance paid for it.
> Yes, we all seen a car hit a deer:
> http://www.nearlygood.com//files302201/hitdeer.wmv
> http://www.snopes.com/photos/durango.asp
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> As long as you bring up politics (I knew it wouldn't be long before you
>> did), what is it with you right-wing zealots, spinning the facts to fit
>> your
>> agenda because you have to maintain the illusion that you are never
>> wrong?
>>
>> "The buck's rear legs were right at the center-mounted license plate, he
>> wrapped over the hood, glanced off the driver's side of the car taking
>> the
>> mirror with him. Both airbags deployed. Peak change in velocity was
>> 2.63mph,
>> but it showed 1.54 at the first data-point. "
>>
>> Nowhere did the article state the car was going LESS than three miles per
>> hour. The figure you are citing is the change in velocity (in this case,
>> deceleration), not vehicle speed. The article doesn't state the vehicle
>> speed of this car at collision, but anyone with eyes can tell he was
>> going
>> WAY more than 3mph by looking at the damage.
>>
>> Have you ever seen a car that hit a deer? At three miles an hour, you
>> think a deer would wrap over the hood, glance off the driver's side, and
>> take out the mirror? http://mfes.com/gif/cdr_sunfire_deer.jpg Geez, the
>> deer
>> can leisurely walk out of the way at that speed. Are you so bad a driver
>> that if you were driving three miles per hour, you couldn't move to avoid
>> hitting a deer? Sheesh.
>>
>> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:43702713.9809B725@***.net...
>> > Matt, what is it with you bleeding heart liberals, not being able to
>> > understand facts! Anywhere did the article state the car was going
>> > faster than three miles an hour, when the bag exploded!
>> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>> >
>> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The only fact I can see is you're reading it wrong.
Was the '58 Ford doing less than three mph?
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4370E70E.E1AC602D@***.net...
> It's still a fact as verified by the little black box like the one
> in your Ford. My Brother back in high school had three hundred dollars
> worth of damage done by a dog that ran into the front of his '58 Ford.
> Their home owner's insurance paid for it.
> Yes, we all seen a car hit a deer:
> http://www.nearlygood.com//files302201/hitdeer.wmv
> http://www.snopes.com/photos/durango.asp
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> As long as you bring up politics (I knew it wouldn't be long before you
>> did), what is it with you right-wing zealots, spinning the facts to fit
>> your
>> agenda because you have to maintain the illusion that you are never
>> wrong?
>>
>> "The buck's rear legs were right at the center-mounted license plate, he
>> wrapped over the hood, glanced off the driver's side of the car taking
>> the
>> mirror with him. Both airbags deployed. Peak change in velocity was
>> 2.63mph,
>> but it showed 1.54 at the first data-point. "
>>
>> Nowhere did the article state the car was going LESS than three miles per
>> hour. The figure you are citing is the change in velocity (in this case,
>> deceleration), not vehicle speed. The article doesn't state the vehicle
>> speed of this car at collision, but anyone with eyes can tell he was
>> going
>> WAY more than 3mph by looking at the damage.
>>
>> Have you ever seen a car that hit a deer? At three miles an hour, you
>> think a deer would wrap over the hood, glance off the driver's side, and
>> take out the mirror? http://mfes.com/gif/cdr_sunfire_deer.jpg Geez, the
>> deer
>> can leisurely walk out of the way at that speed. Are you so bad a driver
>> that if you were driving three miles per hour, you couldn't move to avoid
>> hitting a deer? Sheesh.
>>
>> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:43702713.9809B725@***.net...
>> > Matt, what is it with you bleeding heart liberals, not being able to
>> > understand facts! Anywhere did the article state the car was going
>> > faster than three miles an hour, when the bag exploded!
>> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>> >
>> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The only fact I can see is you're reading it wrong.
11-08-2005, 05:59 PM
#70
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Air Bags
Your train of thought derailed again.
Was the '58 Ford doing less than three mph?
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4370E70E.E1AC602D@***.net...
> It's still a fact as verified by the little black box like the one
> in your Ford. My Brother back in high school had three hundred dollars
> worth of damage done by a dog that ran into the front of his '58 Ford.
> Their home owner's insurance paid for it.
> Yes, we all seen a car hit a deer:
> http://www.nearlygood.com//files302201/hitdeer.wmv
> http://www.snopes.com/photos/durango.asp
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> As long as you bring up politics (I knew it wouldn't be long before you
>> did), what is it with you right-wing zealots, spinning the facts to fit
>> your
>> agenda because you have to maintain the illusion that you are never
>> wrong?
>>
>> "The buck's rear legs were right at the center-mounted license plate, he
>> wrapped over the hood, glanced off the driver's side of the car taking
>> the
>> mirror with him. Both airbags deployed. Peak change in velocity was
>> 2.63mph,
>> but it showed 1.54 at the first data-point. "
>>
>> Nowhere did the article state the car was going LESS than three miles per
>> hour. The figure you are citing is the change in velocity (in this case,
>> deceleration), not vehicle speed. The article doesn't state the vehicle
>> speed of this car at collision, but anyone with eyes can tell he was
>> going
>> WAY more than 3mph by looking at the damage.
>>
>> Have you ever seen a car that hit a deer? At three miles an hour, you
>> think a deer would wrap over the hood, glance off the driver's side, and
>> take out the mirror? http://mfes.com/gif/cdr_sunfire_deer.jpg Geez, the
>> deer
>> can leisurely walk out of the way at that speed. Are you so bad a driver
>> that if you were driving three miles per hour, you couldn't move to avoid
>> hitting a deer? Sheesh.
>>
>> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:43702713.9809B725@***.net...
>> > Matt, what is it with you bleeding heart liberals, not being able to
>> > understand facts! Anywhere did the article state the car was going
>> > faster than three miles an hour, when the bag exploded!
>> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>> >
>> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The only fact I can see is you're reading it wrong.
Was the '58 Ford doing less than three mph?
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4370E70E.E1AC602D@***.net...
> It's still a fact as verified by the little black box like the one
> in your Ford. My Brother back in high school had three hundred dollars
> worth of damage done by a dog that ran into the front of his '58 Ford.
> Their home owner's insurance paid for it.
> Yes, we all seen a car hit a deer:
> http://www.nearlygood.com//files302201/hitdeer.wmv
> http://www.snopes.com/photos/durango.asp
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> As long as you bring up politics (I knew it wouldn't be long before you
>> did), what is it with you right-wing zealots, spinning the facts to fit
>> your
>> agenda because you have to maintain the illusion that you are never
>> wrong?
>>
>> "The buck's rear legs were right at the center-mounted license plate, he
>> wrapped over the hood, glanced off the driver's side of the car taking
>> the
>> mirror with him. Both airbags deployed. Peak change in velocity was
>> 2.63mph,
>> but it showed 1.54 at the first data-point. "
>>
>> Nowhere did the article state the car was going LESS than three miles per
>> hour. The figure you are citing is the change in velocity (in this case,
>> deceleration), not vehicle speed. The article doesn't state the vehicle
>> speed of this car at collision, but anyone with eyes can tell he was
>> going
>> WAY more than 3mph by looking at the damage.
>>
>> Have you ever seen a car that hit a deer? At three miles an hour, you
>> think a deer would wrap over the hood, glance off the driver's side, and
>> take out the mirror? http://mfes.com/gif/cdr_sunfire_deer.jpg Geez, the
>> deer
>> can leisurely walk out of the way at that speed. Are you so bad a driver
>> that if you were driving three miles per hour, you couldn't move to avoid
>> hitting a deer? Sheesh.
>>
>> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:43702713.9809B725@***.net...
>> > Matt, what is it with you bleeding heart liberals, not being able to
>> > understand facts! Anywhere did the article state the car was going
>> > faster than three miles an hour, when the bag exploded!
>> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>> >
>> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The only fact I can see is you're reading it wrong.
