Probably is, war steel was pretty crap.

Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42E566F2.287EB637@***.net...
> So did it tweak you?
> Of course, you're welcome to tell me it's stronger than a 1946 Dana
> 44.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Steve wrote:
> >
http://groups.google.ca/group/rec.au...88a44976a9c21f

 

I think that depends on what the metallurgist designed the metal to
do, transport Daimler/Japanese crap, or fly tourist around Los Angeles:
http://www.centercomp.com/cgi-bin/dc3/gallery?1902 Jeepers are using
Rockwell differentials straight out a W.W.II Deuces:
http://www.jpmagazine.com/techarticl...on/index1.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Probably is, war steel was pretty crap.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ

 

I think that depends on what the metallurgist designed the metal to
do, transport Daimler/Japanese crap, or fly tourist around Los Angeles:
http://www.centercomp.com/cgi-bin/dc3/gallery?1902 Jeepers are using
Rockwell differentials straight out a W.W.II Deuces:
http://www.jpmagazine.com/techarticl...on/index1.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Probably is, war steel was pretty crap.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ

 

I think that depends on what the metallurgist designed the metal to
do, transport Daimler/Japanese crap, or fly tourist around Los Angeles:
http://www.centercomp.com/cgi-bin/dc3/gallery?1902 Jeepers are using
Rockwell differentials straight out a W.W.II Deuces:
http://www.jpmagazine.com/techarticl...on/index1.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Probably is, war steel was pretty crap.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ

 

I think that depends on what the metallurgist designed the metal to
do, transport Daimler/Japanese crap, or fly tourist around Los Angeles:
http://www.centercomp.com/cgi-bin/dc3/gallery?1902 Jeepers are using
Rockwell differentials straight out a W.W.II Deuces:
http://www.jpmagazine.com/techarticl...on/index1.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Probably is, war steel was pretty crap.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ

 

FWIW, the Jeep engineers said "We tried them all and the Jap one was the
only one we couldn't break"
n.

"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42E16309.7BE4A77A@***.net...
> Hi Steve,
> Geez, I didn't catch the tooth change the last time you showed me
> this Japanese crap.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Steve wrote:
>>
>> Mr. Strickland is correct. The Rubicon Dana 44 TruLok carrier is an odd
>> duck with a 'thick' ring gear (no carrier break), hence a smaller 10
>> tooth pinion on a 41 tooth ring:
>>
>> http://xjeep.dyndns.org/trulok/slides/IMG_7878.html
>>
>> Steve
>> http://xjeep.dyndns.org

 

FWIW, the Jeep engineers said "We tried them all and the Jap one was the
only one we couldn't break"
n.

"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42E16309.7BE4A77A@***.net...
> Hi Steve,
> Geez, I didn't catch the tooth change the last time you showed me
> this Japanese crap.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Steve wrote:
>>
>> Mr. Strickland is correct. The Rubicon Dana 44 TruLok carrier is an odd
>> duck with a 'thick' ring gear (no carrier break), hence a smaller 10
>> tooth pinion on a 41 tooth ring:
>>
>> http://xjeep.dyndns.org/trulok/slides/IMG_7878.html
>>
>> Steve
>> http://xjeep.dyndns.org

 

FWIW, the Jeep engineers said "We tried them all and the Jap one was the
only one we couldn't break"
n.

"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42E16309.7BE4A77A@***.net...
> Hi Steve,
> Geez, I didn't catch the tooth change the last time you showed me
> this Japanese crap.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Steve wrote:
>>
>> Mr. Strickland is correct. The Rubicon Dana 44 TruLok carrier is an odd
>> duck with a 'thick' ring gear (no carrier break), hence a smaller 10
>> tooth pinion on a 41 tooth ring:
>>
>> http://xjeep.dyndns.org/trulok/slides/IMG_7878.html
>>
>> Steve
>> http://xjeep.dyndns.org

 

FWIW, the Jeep engineers said "We tried them all and the Jap one was the
only one we couldn't break"
n.

"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42E16309.7BE4A77A@***.net...
> Hi Steve,
> Geez, I didn't catch the tooth change the last time you showed me
> this Japanese crap.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Steve wrote:
>>
>> Mr. Strickland is correct. The Rubicon Dana 44 TruLok carrier is an odd
>> duck with a 'thick' ring gear (no carrier break), hence a smaller 10
>> tooth pinion on a 41 tooth ring:
>>
>> http://xjeep.dyndns.org/trulok/slides/IMG_7878.html
>>
>> Steve
>> http://xjeep.dyndns.org

 

Would these be the same engineers that OK'd the Dana 35c?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Nathan Otis wrote:
>
> FWIW, the Jeep engineers said "We tried them all and the Jap one was the
> only one we couldn't break"
> n.