2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Over Head Cam worked OK, at over six hundred horse power, stock '65
Mustang Factory X:
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/fea...2phr_afxstang/ But, they
did break parts, that were very expensive compared to the create price
of twenty three hundred at the time:
http://automotivemileposts.com/autobrevity/ford427.html The '69 Boss 429
OHC was a true hemi: http://www.cia.com.au/seale/stangeng.html Uncle
Sam, called me during those years so I didn't get to play with them,
then marriage and other things began to take priority.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon wrote:
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
Mustang Factory X:
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/fea...2phr_afxstang/ But, they
did break parts, that were very expensive compared to the create price
of twenty three hundred at the time:
http://automotivemileposts.com/autobrevity/ford427.html The '69 Boss 429
OHC was a true hemi: http://www.cia.com.au/seale/stangeng.html Uncle
Sam, called me during those years so I didn't get to play with them,
then marriage and other things began to take priority.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon wrote:
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Over Head Cam worked OK, at over six hundred horse power, stock '65
Mustang Factory X:
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/fea...2phr_afxstang/ But, they
did break parts, that were very expensive compared to the create price
of twenty three hundred at the time:
http://automotivemileposts.com/autobrevity/ford427.html The '69 Boss 429
OHC was a true hemi: http://www.cia.com.au/seale/stangeng.html Uncle
Sam, called me during those years so I didn't get to play with them,
then marriage and other things began to take priority.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon wrote:
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
Mustang Factory X:
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/fea...2phr_afxstang/ But, they
did break parts, that were very expensive compared to the create price
of twenty three hundred at the time:
http://automotivemileposts.com/autobrevity/ford427.html The '69 Boss 429
OHC was a true hemi: http://www.cia.com.au/seale/stangeng.html Uncle
Sam, called me during those years so I didn't get to play with them,
then marriage and other things began to take priority.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon wrote:
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Over Head Cam worked OK, at over six hundred horse power, stock '65
Mustang Factory X:
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/fea...2phr_afxstang/ But, they
did break parts, that were very expensive compared to the create price
of twenty three hundred at the time:
http://automotivemileposts.com/autobrevity/ford427.html The '69 Boss 429
OHC was a true hemi: http://www.cia.com.au/seale/stangeng.html Uncle
Sam, called me during those years so I didn't get to play with them,
then marriage and other things began to take priority.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon wrote:
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
Mustang Factory X:
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/fea...2phr_afxstang/ But, they
did break parts, that were very expensive compared to the create price
of twenty three hundred at the time:
http://automotivemileposts.com/autobrevity/ford427.html The '69 Boss 429
OHC was a true hemi: http://www.cia.com.au/seale/stangeng.html Uncle
Sam, called me during those years so I didn't get to play with them,
then marriage and other things began to take priority.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon wrote:
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Hi Dave,
Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
it though, it'll just never develope the horse power like the engines
from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> why's that Lon ?
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
it though, it'll just never develope the horse power like the engines
from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> why's that Lon ?
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Hi Dave,
Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
it though, it'll just never develope the horse power like the engines
from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> why's that Lon ?
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
it though, it'll just never develope the horse power like the engines
from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> why's that Lon ?
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Hi Dave,
Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
it though, it'll just never develope the horse power like the engines
from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> why's that Lon ?
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
it though, it'll just never develope the horse power like the engines
from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> why's that Lon ?
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Hi Dave,
Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
it though, it'll just never develope the horse power like the engines
from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> why's that Lon ?
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
Because to get the valves to point at each other in the
hemispherical dome design, the rockers have got to take some weird
angles: http://www.classichemi.com/pattern.jpg The new little Hemi wiped
it though, it'll just never develope the horse power like the engines
from the sixties: http://members.aol.com/franangrenteria/frankRam.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> why's that Lon ?
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Hi Lon,
Over Head Cam worked OK, at over six hundred horse power, stock '67
Mustang Factory X:
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/fea...2phr_afxstang/ But, they
did break parts, that were very expensive compared to the create price
of twenty three hundred at the time:
http://automotivemileposts.com/autobrevity/ford427.html The '69 Boss 429
OHC was a true hemi: http://www.cia.com.au/seale/stangeng.html Uncle
Sam, called me during those years so I didn't get to play with them,
then marriage and other things began to take priority.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon wrote:
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
Over Head Cam worked OK, at over six hundred horse power, stock '67
Mustang Factory X:
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/fea...2phr_afxstang/ But, they
did break parts, that were very expensive compared to the create price
of twenty three hundred at the time:
http://automotivemileposts.com/autobrevity/ford427.html The '69 Boss 429
OHC was a true hemi: http://www.cia.com.au/seale/stangeng.html Uncle
Sam, called me during those years so I didn't get to play with them,
then marriage and other things began to take priority.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon wrote:
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Hi Lon,
Over Head Cam worked OK, at over six hundred horse power, stock '67
Mustang Factory X:
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/fea...2phr_afxstang/ But, they
did break parts, that were very expensive compared to the create price
of twenty three hundred at the time:
http://automotivemileposts.com/autobrevity/ford427.html The '69 Boss 429
OHC was a true hemi: http://www.cia.com.au/seale/stangeng.html Uncle
Sam, called me during those years so I didn't get to play with them,
then marriage and other things began to take priority.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon wrote:
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
Over Head Cam worked OK, at over six hundred horse power, stock '67
Mustang Factory X:
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/fea...2phr_afxstang/ But, they
did break parts, that were very expensive compared to the create price
of twenty three hundred at the time:
http://automotivemileposts.com/autobrevity/ford427.html The '69 Boss 429
OHC was a true hemi: http://www.cia.com.au/seale/stangeng.html Uncle
Sam, called me during those years so I didn't get to play with them,
then marriage and other things began to take priority.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon wrote:
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Hi Lon,
Over Head Cam worked OK, at over six hundred horse power, stock '67
Mustang Factory X:
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/fea...2phr_afxstang/ But, they
did break parts, that were very expensive compared to the create price
of twenty three hundred at the time:
http://automotivemileposts.com/autobrevity/ford427.html The '69 Boss 429
OHC was a true hemi: http://www.cia.com.au/seale/stangeng.html Uncle
Sam, called me during those years so I didn't get to play with them,
then marriage and other things began to take priority.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon wrote:
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
Over Head Cam worked OK, at over six hundred horse power, stock '67
Mustang Factory X:
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/fea...2phr_afxstang/ But, they
did break parts, that were very expensive compared to the create price
of twenty three hundred at the time:
http://automotivemileposts.com/autobrevity/ford427.html The '69 Boss 429
OHC was a true hemi: http://www.cia.com.au/seale/stangeng.html Uncle
Sam, called me during those years so I didn't get to play with them,
then marriage and other things began to take priority.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon wrote:
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
