2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
07-22-2004, 01:29 PM
#61
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
That's why if we want to go fast, or quick in the quarter mile we
choose a 1955 designed push rod engine.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> The technology has advanced quite a bit since then.
choose a 1955 designed push rod engine.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> The technology has advanced quite a bit since then.
07-22-2004, 11:25 PM
#62
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
of comparable performance.
L.W.(ßill) ------ III proclaimed:
> That's why if we want to go fast, or quick in the quarter mile we
> choose a 1955 designed push rod engine.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
>>The technology has advanced quite a bit since then.
07-22-2004, 11:25 PM
#63
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
of comparable performance.
L.W.(ßill) ------ III proclaimed:
> That's why if we want to go fast, or quick in the quarter mile we
> choose a 1955 designed push rod engine.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
>>The technology has advanced quite a bit since then.
07-22-2004, 11:25 PM
#64
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
of comparable performance.
L.W.(ßill) ------ III proclaimed:
> That's why if we want to go fast, or quick in the quarter mile we
> choose a 1955 designed push rod engine.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
>>The technology has advanced quite a bit since then.
07-22-2004, 11:25 PM
#65
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
of comparable performance.
L.W.(ßill) ------ III proclaimed:
> That's why if we want to go fast, or quick in the quarter mile we
> choose a 1955 designed push rod engine.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
>>The technology has advanced quite a bit since then.
07-23-2004, 03:11 AM
#66
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
why's that Lon ?
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:8z%Lc.145305$%_6.58094@attbi_s01...
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
>
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III proclaimed:
>
> > That's why if we want to go fast, or quick in the quarter mile we
> > choose a 1955 designed push rod engine.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> >>The technology has advanced quite a bit since then.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:8z%Lc.145305$%_6.58094@attbi_s01...
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
>
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III proclaimed:
>
> > That's why if we want to go fast, or quick in the quarter mile we
> > choose a 1955 designed push rod engine.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> >>The technology has advanced quite a bit since then.
07-23-2004, 03:11 AM
#67
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
why's that Lon ?
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:8z%Lc.145305$%_6.58094@attbi_s01...
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
>
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III proclaimed:
>
> > That's why if we want to go fast, or quick in the quarter mile we
> > choose a 1955 designed push rod engine.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> >>The technology has advanced quite a bit since then.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:8z%Lc.145305$%_6.58094@attbi_s01...
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
>
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III proclaimed:
>
> > That's why if we want to go fast, or quick in the quarter mile we
> > choose a 1955 designed push rod engine.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> >>The technology has advanced quite a bit since then.
07-23-2004, 03:11 AM
#68
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
why's that Lon ?
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:8z%Lc.145305$%_6.58094@attbi_s01...
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
>
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III proclaimed:
>
> > That's why if we want to go fast, or quick in the quarter mile we
> > choose a 1955 designed push rod engine.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> >>The technology has advanced quite a bit since then.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:8z%Lc.145305$%_6.58094@attbi_s01...
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
>
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III proclaimed:
>
> > That's why if we want to go fast, or quick in the quarter mile we
> > choose a 1955 designed push rod engine.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> >>The technology has advanced quite a bit since then.
07-23-2004, 03:11 AM
#69
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
why's that Lon ?
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:8z%Lc.145305$%_6.58094@attbi_s01...
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
>
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III proclaimed:
>
> > That's why if we want to go fast, or quick in the quarter mile we
> > choose a 1955 designed push rod engine.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> >>The technology has advanced quite a bit since then.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:8z%Lc.145305$%_6.58094@attbi_s01...
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
>
>
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III proclaimed:
>
> > That's why if we want to go fast, or quick in the quarter mile we
> > choose a 1955 designed push rod engine.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> >>The technology has advanced quite a bit since then.
07-23-2004, 03:41 AM
#70
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 JGC as described by TrailerLife Mag
Over Head Cam worked OK, at over six hundred horse power, stock '65
Mustang Factory X:
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/fea...2phr_afxstang/ But, they
did break parts, that were very expensive compared to the create price
of twenty three hundred at the time:
http://automotivemileposts.com/autobrevity/ford427.html The '69 Boss 429
OHC was a true hemi: http://www.cia.com.au/seale/stangeng.html Uncle
Sam, called me during those years so I didn't get to play with them,
then marriage and other things began to take priority.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon wrote:
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.
Mustang Factory X:
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/fea...2phr_afxstang/ But, they
did break parts, that were very expensive compared to the create price
of twenty three hundred at the time:
http://automotivemileposts.com/autobrevity/ford427.html The '69 Boss 429
OHC was a true hemi: http://www.cia.com.au/seale/stangeng.html Uncle
Sam, called me during those years so I didn't get to play with them,
then marriage and other things began to take priority.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon wrote:
>
> Plus the trick used on the hemi to change displacement won't work
> that well without the pushrod design. And a pushrod with modern
> fuel systems tends to be smaller vertically than a overhead cammer
> of comparable performance.