1993 YJ transfer case question
05-02-2004, 01:34 AM
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1993 YJ transfer case question
Jerry, you're not trying to tell anyone here that NP 231 is as strong as
a gear driven Dana 300, 20 or 18 are you? Which of course never used
anything, but a bolted on yoke!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry McG wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> Don't listen to this old goat, he still thinks points and condenser are high
> tech!
>
> YJs are fine and their transmissions & transfer cases last as long or longer
> than any other Jeep. Look for a YJ NP231, they were sold in the hundreds of
> thousands and you're bound to find one at a good price. A buddy of mine just
> got one for his '93, with SYE already installed for $350.
a gear driven Dana 300, 20 or 18 are you? Which of course never used
anything, but a bolted on yoke!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry McG wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> Don't listen to this old goat, he still thinks points and condenser are high
> tech!
>
> YJs are fine and their transmissions & transfer cases last as long or longer
> than any other Jeep. Look for a YJ NP231, they were sold in the hundreds of
> thousands and you're bound to find one at a good price. A buddy of mine just
> got one for his '93, with SYE already installed for $350.
05-02-2004, 01:34 AM
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1993 YJ transfer case question
Jerry, you're not trying to tell anyone here that NP 231 is as strong as
a gear driven Dana 300, 20 or 18 are you? Which of course never used
anything, but a bolted on yoke!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry McG wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> Don't listen to this old goat, he still thinks points and condenser are high
> tech!
>
> YJs are fine and their transmissions & transfer cases last as long or longer
> than any other Jeep. Look for a YJ NP231, they were sold in the hundreds of
> thousands and you're bound to find one at a good price. A buddy of mine just
> got one for his '93, with SYE already installed for $350.
a gear driven Dana 300, 20 or 18 are you? Which of course never used
anything, but a bolted on yoke!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry McG wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> Don't listen to this old goat, he still thinks points and condenser are high
> tech!
>
> YJs are fine and their transmissions & transfer cases last as long or longer
> than any other Jeep. Look for a YJ NP231, they were sold in the hundreds of
> thousands and you're bound to find one at a good price. A buddy of mine just
> got one for his '93, with SYE already installed for $350.
05-02-2004, 01:34 AM
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1993 YJ transfer case question
Jerry, you're not trying to tell anyone here that NP 231 is as strong as
a gear driven Dana 300, 20 or 18 are you? Which of course never used
anything, but a bolted on yoke!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry McG wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> Don't listen to this old goat, he still thinks points and condenser are high
> tech!
>
> YJs are fine and their transmissions & transfer cases last as long or longer
> than any other Jeep. Look for a YJ NP231, they were sold in the hundreds of
> thousands and you're bound to find one at a good price. A buddy of mine just
> got one for his '93, with SYE already installed for $350.
a gear driven Dana 300, 20 or 18 are you? Which of course never used
anything, but a bolted on yoke!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry McG wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> Don't listen to this old goat, he still thinks points and condenser are high
> tech!
>
> YJs are fine and their transmissions & transfer cases last as long or longer
> than any other Jeep. Look for a YJ NP231, they were sold in the hundreds of
> thousands and you're bound to find one at a good price. A buddy of mine just
> got one for his '93, with SYE already installed for $350.
05-02-2004, 05:00 AM
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1993 YJ transfer case question
The stupid slip yoke notwithstanding, just like the older gear driven boxes,
NP231s have been around for nearly two decades and have proven themselves
time and again to be extremely durable. Further, at 2.72:1, they're far
better crawlers than 2.0:1 D20s & 18s.
As for me, hey, I've got an Atlas II AND a D20, no sissy chain driven stuff
around here....except for the one in the Grand Cherokee.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40948880.98627532@***.net...
> Jerry, you're not trying to tell anyone here that NP 231 is as strong as
> a gear driven Dana 300, 20 or 18 are you? Which of course never used
> anything, but a bolted on yoke!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> >
> > Chris,
> >
> > Don't listen to this old goat, he still thinks points and condenser are
high
> > tech!
> >
> > YJs are fine and their transmissions & transfer cases last as long or
longer
> > than any other Jeep. Look for a YJ NP231, they were sold in the hundreds
of
> > thousands and you're bound to find one at a good price. A buddy of mine
just
> > got one for his '93, with SYE already installed for $350.
NP231s have been around for nearly two decades and have proven themselves
time and again to be extremely durable. Further, at 2.72:1, they're far
better crawlers than 2.0:1 D20s & 18s.
As for me, hey, I've got an Atlas II AND a D20, no sissy chain driven stuff
around here....except for the one in the Grand Cherokee.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40948880.98627532@***.net...
> Jerry, you're not trying to tell anyone here that NP 231 is as strong as
> a gear driven Dana 300, 20 or 18 are you? Which of course never used
> anything, but a bolted on yoke!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> >
> > Chris,
> >
> > Don't listen to this old goat, he still thinks points and condenser are
high
> > tech!
> >
> > YJs are fine and their transmissions & transfer cases last as long or
longer
> > than any other Jeep. Look for a YJ NP231, they were sold in the hundreds
of
> > thousands and you're bound to find one at a good price. A buddy of mine
just
> > got one for his '93, with SYE already installed for $350.
05-02-2004, 05:00 AM
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1993 YJ transfer case question
The stupid slip yoke notwithstanding, just like the older gear driven boxes,
NP231s have been around for nearly two decades and have proven themselves
time and again to be extremely durable. Further, at 2.72:1, they're far
better crawlers than 2.0:1 D20s & 18s.
As for me, hey, I've got an Atlas II AND a D20, no sissy chain driven stuff
around here....except for the one in the Grand Cherokee.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40948880.98627532@***.net...
> Jerry, you're not trying to tell anyone here that NP 231 is as strong as
> a gear driven Dana 300, 20 or 18 are you? Which of course never used
> anything, but a bolted on yoke!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> >
> > Chris,
> >
> > Don't listen to this old goat, he still thinks points and condenser are
high
> > tech!
> >
> > YJs are fine and their transmissions & transfer cases last as long or
longer
> > than any other Jeep. Look for a YJ NP231, they were sold in the hundreds
of
> > thousands and you're bound to find one at a good price. A buddy of mine
just
> > got one for his '93, with SYE already installed for $350.
NP231s have been around for nearly two decades and have proven themselves
time and again to be extremely durable. Further, at 2.72:1, they're far
better crawlers than 2.0:1 D20s & 18s.
As for me, hey, I've got an Atlas II AND a D20, no sissy chain driven stuff
around here....except for the one in the Grand Cherokee.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40948880.98627532@***.net...
> Jerry, you're not trying to tell anyone here that NP 231 is as strong as
> a gear driven Dana 300, 20 or 18 are you? Which of course never used
> anything, but a bolted on yoke!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> >
> > Chris,
> >
> > Don't listen to this old goat, he still thinks points and condenser are
high
> > tech!
> >
> > YJs are fine and their transmissions & transfer cases last as long or
longer
> > than any other Jeep. Look for a YJ NP231, they were sold in the hundreds
of
> > thousands and you're bound to find one at a good price. A buddy of mine
just
> > got one for his '93, with SYE already installed for $350.
05-02-2004, 05:00 AM
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1993 YJ transfer case question
The stupid slip yoke notwithstanding, just like the older gear driven boxes,
NP231s have been around for nearly two decades and have proven themselves
time and again to be extremely durable. Further, at 2.72:1, they're far
better crawlers than 2.0:1 D20s & 18s.
As for me, hey, I've got an Atlas II AND a D20, no sissy chain driven stuff
around here....except for the one in the Grand Cherokee.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40948880.98627532@***.net...
> Jerry, you're not trying to tell anyone here that NP 231 is as strong as
> a gear driven Dana 300, 20 or 18 are you? Which of course never used
> anything, but a bolted on yoke!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> >
> > Chris,
> >
> > Don't listen to this old goat, he still thinks points and condenser are
high
> > tech!
> >
> > YJs are fine and their transmissions & transfer cases last as long or
longer
> > than any other Jeep. Look for a YJ NP231, they were sold in the hundreds
of
> > thousands and you're bound to find one at a good price. A buddy of mine
just
> > got one for his '93, with SYE already installed for $350.
NP231s have been around for nearly two decades and have proven themselves
time and again to be extremely durable. Further, at 2.72:1, they're far
better crawlers than 2.0:1 D20s & 18s.
As for me, hey, I've got an Atlas II AND a D20, no sissy chain driven stuff
around here....except for the one in the Grand Cherokee.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40948880.98627532@***.net...
> Jerry, you're not trying to tell anyone here that NP 231 is as strong as
> a gear driven Dana 300, 20 or 18 are you? Which of course never used
> anything, but a bolted on yoke!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> >
> > Chris,
> >
> > Don't listen to this old goat, he still thinks points and condenser are
high
> > tech!
> >
> > YJs are fine and their transmissions & transfer cases last as long or
longer
> > than any other Jeep. Look for a YJ NP231, they were sold in the hundreds
of
> > thousands and you're bound to find one at a good price. A buddy of mine
just
> > got one for his '93, with SYE already installed for $350.
05-02-2004, 05:00 AM
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1993 YJ transfer case question
The stupid slip yoke notwithstanding, just like the older gear driven boxes,
NP231s have been around for nearly two decades and have proven themselves
time and again to be extremely durable. Further, at 2.72:1, they're far
better crawlers than 2.0:1 D20s & 18s.
As for me, hey, I've got an Atlas II AND a D20, no sissy chain driven stuff
around here....except for the one in the Grand Cherokee.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40948880.98627532@***.net...
> Jerry, you're not trying to tell anyone here that NP 231 is as strong as
> a gear driven Dana 300, 20 or 18 are you? Which of course never used
> anything, but a bolted on yoke!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> >
> > Chris,
> >
> > Don't listen to this old goat, he still thinks points and condenser are
high
> > tech!
> >
> > YJs are fine and their transmissions & transfer cases last as long or
longer
> > than any other Jeep. Look for a YJ NP231, they were sold in the hundreds
of
> > thousands and you're bound to find one at a good price. A buddy of mine
just
> > got one for his '93, with SYE already installed for $350.
NP231s have been around for nearly two decades and have proven themselves
time and again to be extremely durable. Further, at 2.72:1, they're far
better crawlers than 2.0:1 D20s & 18s.
As for me, hey, I've got an Atlas II AND a D20, no sissy chain driven stuff
around here....except for the one in the Grand Cherokee.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40948880.98627532@***.net...
> Jerry, you're not trying to tell anyone here that NP 231 is as strong as
> a gear driven Dana 300, 20 or 18 are you? Which of course never used
> anything, but a bolted on yoke!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> >
> > Chris,
> >
> > Don't listen to this old goat, he still thinks points and condenser are
high
> > tech!
> >
> > YJs are fine and their transmissions & transfer cases last as long or
longer
> > than any other Jeep. Look for a YJ NP231, they were sold in the hundreds
of
> > thousands and you're bound to find one at a good price. A buddy of mine
just
> > got one for his '93, with SYE already installed for $350.
05-02-2004, 02:50 PM
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1993 YJ transfer case question
Jerry, why the f**k are you defending Daimler's use of the NP231 forget
the bicycle chain the sun and planetary are smaller than anything used
in an America automatic transmission. Tails of them exploding are all
over the internet:
http://www.amghummer.com/features/Va...BrokenCase.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry McG wrote:
>
> The stupid slip yoke notwithstanding, just like the older gear driven boxes,
> NP231s have been around for nearly two decades and have proven themselves
> time and again to be extremely durable. Further, at 2.72:1, they're far
> better crawlers than 2.0:1 D20s & 18s.
>
> As for me, hey, I've got an Atlas II AND a D20, no sissy chain driven stuff
> around here....except for the one in the Grand Cherokee.
the bicycle chain the sun and planetary are smaller than anything used
in an America automatic transmission. Tails of them exploding are all
over the internet:
http://www.amghummer.com/features/Va...BrokenCase.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry McG wrote:
>
> The stupid slip yoke notwithstanding, just like the older gear driven boxes,
> NP231s have been around for nearly two decades and have proven themselves
> time and again to be extremely durable. Further, at 2.72:1, they're far
> better crawlers than 2.0:1 D20s & 18s.
>
> As for me, hey, I've got an Atlas II AND a D20, no sissy chain driven stuff
> around here....except for the one in the Grand Cherokee.
05-02-2004, 02:50 PM
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1993 YJ transfer case question
Jerry, why the f**k are you defending Daimler's use of the NP231 forget
the bicycle chain the sun and planetary are smaller than anything used
in an America automatic transmission. Tails of them exploding are all
over the internet:
http://www.amghummer.com/features/Va...BrokenCase.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry McG wrote:
>
> The stupid slip yoke notwithstanding, just like the older gear driven boxes,
> NP231s have been around for nearly two decades and have proven themselves
> time and again to be extremely durable. Further, at 2.72:1, they're far
> better crawlers than 2.0:1 D20s & 18s.
>
> As for me, hey, I've got an Atlas II AND a D20, no sissy chain driven stuff
> around here....except for the one in the Grand Cherokee.
the bicycle chain the sun and planetary are smaller than anything used
in an America automatic transmission. Tails of them exploding are all
over the internet:
http://www.amghummer.com/features/Va...BrokenCase.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry McG wrote:
>
> The stupid slip yoke notwithstanding, just like the older gear driven boxes,
> NP231s have been around for nearly two decades and have proven themselves
> time and again to be extremely durable. Further, at 2.72:1, they're far
> better crawlers than 2.0:1 D20s & 18s.
>
> As for me, hey, I've got an Atlas II AND a D20, no sissy chain driven stuff
> around here....except for the one in the Grand Cherokee.
05-02-2004, 02:50 PM
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 1993 YJ transfer case question
Jerry, why the f**k are you defending Daimler's use of the NP231 forget
the bicycle chain the sun and planetary are smaller than anything used
in an America automatic transmission. Tails of them exploding are all
over the internet:
http://www.amghummer.com/features/Va...BrokenCase.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry McG wrote:
>
> The stupid slip yoke notwithstanding, just like the older gear driven boxes,
> NP231s have been around for nearly two decades and have proven themselves
> time and again to be extremely durable. Further, at 2.72:1, they're far
> better crawlers than 2.0:1 D20s & 18s.
>
> As for me, hey, I've got an Atlas II AND a D20, no sissy chain driven stuff
> around here....except for the one in the Grand Cherokee.
the bicycle chain the sun and planetary are smaller than anything used
in an America automatic transmission. Tails of them exploding are all
over the internet:
http://www.amghummer.com/features/Va...BrokenCase.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jerry McG wrote:
>
> The stupid slip yoke notwithstanding, just like the older gear driven boxes,
> NP231s have been around for nearly two decades and have proven themselves
> time and again to be extremely durable. Further, at 2.72:1, they're far
> better crawlers than 2.0:1 D20s & 18s.
>
> As for me, hey, I've got an Atlas II AND a D20, no sissy chain driven stuff
> around here....except for the one in the Grand Cherokee.
