134a Refrigerant
06-08-2005, 02:20 PM
#511
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:1oCpe.2273$%j7.2016@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
>> .....who do you call "mr president"? :-)
>
> Not W!
go ahead and admit it. you are an anti-american socialist. you wear it,
own it.
> I paid for those roads... you don't want to
> pay for them, then don't use them!
the depths of your ignorance are obvious. if you _really_ want to learn
about libertarians see http://harrybrowne.org
> http://www.sovereignty.org.uk/sitein...m/altview.html
if youre going to consider blatent liberal publications as credible sources
of information than im going to start quoting rush. dont make me do it.
:-)
> As you can see, Nate.... there was no 'liberation of
> Iraqi women'... they were free before.
so are you saying that the dictators own sons really didnt drive around
raping young virgin girls at will, or are you saying thats just part of your
socialist version of freedom? are saying that iraqi women really could be
educated, or that they didnt need education in your socialist version of
freedom?
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:1oCpe.2273$%j7.2016@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
>> .....who do you call "mr president"? :-)
>
> Not W!
go ahead and admit it. you are an anti-american socialist. you wear it,
own it.
> I paid for those roads... you don't want to
> pay for them, then don't use them!
the depths of your ignorance are obvious. if you _really_ want to learn
about libertarians see http://harrybrowne.org
> http://www.sovereignty.org.uk/sitein...m/altview.html
if youre going to consider blatent liberal publications as credible sources
of information than im going to start quoting rush. dont make me do it.
:-)
> As you can see, Nate.... there was no 'liberation of
> Iraqi women'... they were free before.
so are you saying that the dictators own sons really didnt drive around
raping young virgin girls at will, or are you saying thats just part of your
socialist version of freedom? are saying that iraqi women really could be
educated, or that they didnt need education in your socialist version of
freedom?
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
06-08-2005, 02:20 PM
#512
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:1oCpe.2273$%j7.2016@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
>> .....who do you call "mr president"? :-)
>
> Not W!
go ahead and admit it. you are an anti-american socialist. you wear it,
own it.
> I paid for those roads... you don't want to
> pay for them, then don't use them!
the depths of your ignorance are obvious. if you _really_ want to learn
about libertarians see http://harrybrowne.org
> http://www.sovereignty.org.uk/sitein...m/altview.html
if youre going to consider blatent liberal publications as credible sources
of information than im going to start quoting rush. dont make me do it.
:-)
> As you can see, Nate.... there was no 'liberation of
> Iraqi women'... they were free before.
so are you saying that the dictators own sons really didnt drive around
raping young virgin girls at will, or are you saying thats just part of your
socialist version of freedom? are saying that iraqi women really could be
educated, or that they didnt need education in your socialist version of
freedom?
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:1oCpe.2273$%j7.2016@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
>> .....who do you call "mr president"? :-)
>
> Not W!
go ahead and admit it. you are an anti-american socialist. you wear it,
own it.
> I paid for those roads... you don't want to
> pay for them, then don't use them!
the depths of your ignorance are obvious. if you _really_ want to learn
about libertarians see http://harrybrowne.org
> http://www.sovereignty.org.uk/sitein...m/altview.html
if youre going to consider blatent liberal publications as credible sources
of information than im going to start quoting rush. dont make me do it.
:-)
> As you can see, Nate.... there was no 'liberation of
> Iraqi women'... they were free before.
so are you saying that the dictators own sons really didnt drive around
raping young virgin girls at will, or are you saying thats just part of your
socialist version of freedom? are saying that iraqi women really could be
educated, or that they didnt need education in your socialist version of
freedom?
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
06-08-2005, 02:20 PM
#513
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:1oCpe.2273$%j7.2016@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
>> .....who do you call "mr president"? :-)
>
> Not W!
go ahead and admit it. you are an anti-american socialist. you wear it,
own it.
> I paid for those roads... you don't want to
> pay for them, then don't use them!
the depths of your ignorance are obvious. if you _really_ want to learn
about libertarians see http://harrybrowne.org
> http://www.sovereignty.org.uk/sitein...m/altview.html
if youre going to consider blatent liberal publications as credible sources
of information than im going to start quoting rush. dont make me do it.
:-)
> As you can see, Nate.... there was no 'liberation of
> Iraqi women'... they were free before.
so are you saying that the dictators own sons really didnt drive around
raping young virgin girls at will, or are you saying thats just part of your
socialist version of freedom? are saying that iraqi women really could be
educated, or that they didnt need education in your socialist version of
freedom?
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:1oCpe.2273$%j7.2016@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
>> .....who do you call "mr president"? :-)
>
> Not W!
go ahead and admit it. you are an anti-american socialist. you wear it,
own it.
> I paid for those roads... you don't want to
> pay for them, then don't use them!
the depths of your ignorance are obvious. if you _really_ want to learn
about libertarians see http://harrybrowne.org
> http://www.sovereignty.org.uk/sitein...m/altview.html
if youre going to consider blatent liberal publications as credible sources
of information than im going to start quoting rush. dont make me do it.
:-)
> As you can see, Nate.... there was no 'liberation of
> Iraqi women'... they were free before.
so are you saying that the dictators own sons really didnt drive around
raping young virgin girls at will, or are you saying thats just part of your
socialist version of freedom? are saying that iraqi women really could be
educated, or that they didnt need education in your socialist version of
freedom?
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
06-08-2005, 02:28 PM
#514
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:0GCpe.2280$%j7.1930@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
> You won't be persuaded... we all realize this.
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide conclusive evidence, nate"
> You want it both ways.... Chlorine can't rise, because it's
> heavier than air.
sure it can be blown around in the wind but it wont reach the stratosphere.
not without a volcanic push.
> Argon doesn't fall, because it's concentration
> is small.
i hope youre just changing what i say to fit your argument, and that you
really arent that dense. i never said that it doesnt fall. i said that its
concentration wasnt enough to cause a problem.
> I didnt' say a 'licensed' tech...
TRANSLATION --> "im full of ----, nate". :-)
> You already asserted that you follow the rules...
> were you lying *then*, or are you lying *now*?
i stated that i follow the rules. HOWEVER, if i thought that what i did was
harmful to the environment i stated that i would take greater precautions
(such as low loss hose fittings which arent required under the current
rules). now, unless youre trolling you shouldnt try so hard to be an ***
and actually try to read what someone says.
>> you claimed the hvac industry agrees with your idealogy. i know better.
>
> Cite, or smoke crack.
you yourself admitted to hearing the tech vent in your garage. on the
surface the hvac industry has to play the game but in the field its another
matter entirely.
> I posted stuff from scientists
lol and you think that gives your statements ANY credibility at all? :-)
once upon a time your "scientists" thought the earth was flat! for every
liberal scientist there is a conservative scientist who knows better.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:0GCpe.2280$%j7.1930@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
> You won't be persuaded... we all realize this.
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide conclusive evidence, nate"
> You want it both ways.... Chlorine can't rise, because it's
> heavier than air.
sure it can be blown around in the wind but it wont reach the stratosphere.
not without a volcanic push.
> Argon doesn't fall, because it's concentration
> is small.
i hope youre just changing what i say to fit your argument, and that you
really arent that dense. i never said that it doesnt fall. i said that its
concentration wasnt enough to cause a problem.
> I didnt' say a 'licensed' tech...
TRANSLATION --> "im full of ----, nate". :-)
> You already asserted that you follow the rules...
> were you lying *then*, or are you lying *now*?
i stated that i follow the rules. HOWEVER, if i thought that what i did was
harmful to the environment i stated that i would take greater precautions
(such as low loss hose fittings which arent required under the current
rules). now, unless youre trolling you shouldnt try so hard to be an ***
and actually try to read what someone says.
>> you claimed the hvac industry agrees with your idealogy. i know better.
>
> Cite, or smoke crack.
you yourself admitted to hearing the tech vent in your garage. on the
surface the hvac industry has to play the game but in the field its another
matter entirely.
> I posted stuff from scientists
lol and you think that gives your statements ANY credibility at all? :-)
once upon a time your "scientists" thought the earth was flat! for every
liberal scientist there is a conservative scientist who knows better.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
06-08-2005, 02:28 PM
#515
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:0GCpe.2280$%j7.1930@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
> You won't be persuaded... we all realize this.
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide conclusive evidence, nate"
> You want it both ways.... Chlorine can't rise, because it's
> heavier than air.
sure it can be blown around in the wind but it wont reach the stratosphere.
not without a volcanic push.
> Argon doesn't fall, because it's concentration
> is small.
i hope youre just changing what i say to fit your argument, and that you
really arent that dense. i never said that it doesnt fall. i said that its
concentration wasnt enough to cause a problem.
> I didnt' say a 'licensed' tech...
TRANSLATION --> "im full of ----, nate". :-)
> You already asserted that you follow the rules...
> were you lying *then*, or are you lying *now*?
i stated that i follow the rules. HOWEVER, if i thought that what i did was
harmful to the environment i stated that i would take greater precautions
(such as low loss hose fittings which arent required under the current
rules). now, unless youre trolling you shouldnt try so hard to be an ***
and actually try to read what someone says.
>> you claimed the hvac industry agrees with your idealogy. i know better.
>
> Cite, or smoke crack.
you yourself admitted to hearing the tech vent in your garage. on the
surface the hvac industry has to play the game but in the field its another
matter entirely.
> I posted stuff from scientists
lol and you think that gives your statements ANY credibility at all? :-)
once upon a time your "scientists" thought the earth was flat! for every
liberal scientist there is a conservative scientist who knows better.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:0GCpe.2280$%j7.1930@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
> You won't be persuaded... we all realize this.
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide conclusive evidence, nate"
> You want it both ways.... Chlorine can't rise, because it's
> heavier than air.
sure it can be blown around in the wind but it wont reach the stratosphere.
not without a volcanic push.
> Argon doesn't fall, because it's concentration
> is small.
i hope youre just changing what i say to fit your argument, and that you
really arent that dense. i never said that it doesnt fall. i said that its
concentration wasnt enough to cause a problem.
> I didnt' say a 'licensed' tech...
TRANSLATION --> "im full of ----, nate". :-)
> You already asserted that you follow the rules...
> were you lying *then*, or are you lying *now*?
i stated that i follow the rules. HOWEVER, if i thought that what i did was
harmful to the environment i stated that i would take greater precautions
(such as low loss hose fittings which arent required under the current
rules). now, unless youre trolling you shouldnt try so hard to be an ***
and actually try to read what someone says.
>> you claimed the hvac industry agrees with your idealogy. i know better.
>
> Cite, or smoke crack.
you yourself admitted to hearing the tech vent in your garage. on the
surface the hvac industry has to play the game but in the field its another
matter entirely.
> I posted stuff from scientists
lol and you think that gives your statements ANY credibility at all? :-)
once upon a time your "scientists" thought the earth was flat! for every
liberal scientist there is a conservative scientist who knows better.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
06-08-2005, 02:28 PM
#516
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:0GCpe.2280$%j7.1930@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
> You won't be persuaded... we all realize this.
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide conclusive evidence, nate"
> You want it both ways.... Chlorine can't rise, because it's
> heavier than air.
sure it can be blown around in the wind but it wont reach the stratosphere.
not without a volcanic push.
> Argon doesn't fall, because it's concentration
> is small.
i hope youre just changing what i say to fit your argument, and that you
really arent that dense. i never said that it doesnt fall. i said that its
concentration wasnt enough to cause a problem.
> I didnt' say a 'licensed' tech...
TRANSLATION --> "im full of ----, nate". :-)
> You already asserted that you follow the rules...
> were you lying *then*, or are you lying *now*?
i stated that i follow the rules. HOWEVER, if i thought that what i did was
harmful to the environment i stated that i would take greater precautions
(such as low loss hose fittings which arent required under the current
rules). now, unless youre trolling you shouldnt try so hard to be an ***
and actually try to read what someone says.
>> you claimed the hvac industry agrees with your idealogy. i know better.
>
> Cite, or smoke crack.
you yourself admitted to hearing the tech vent in your garage. on the
surface the hvac industry has to play the game but in the field its another
matter entirely.
> I posted stuff from scientists
lol and you think that gives your statements ANY credibility at all? :-)
once upon a time your "scientists" thought the earth was flat! for every
liberal scientist there is a conservative scientist who knows better.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:0GCpe.2280$%j7.1930@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
> You won't be persuaded... we all realize this.
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide conclusive evidence, nate"
> You want it both ways.... Chlorine can't rise, because it's
> heavier than air.
sure it can be blown around in the wind but it wont reach the stratosphere.
not without a volcanic push.
> Argon doesn't fall, because it's concentration
> is small.
i hope youre just changing what i say to fit your argument, and that you
really arent that dense. i never said that it doesnt fall. i said that its
concentration wasnt enough to cause a problem.
> I didnt' say a 'licensed' tech...
TRANSLATION --> "im full of ----, nate". :-)
> You already asserted that you follow the rules...
> were you lying *then*, or are you lying *now*?
i stated that i follow the rules. HOWEVER, if i thought that what i did was
harmful to the environment i stated that i would take greater precautions
(such as low loss hose fittings which arent required under the current
rules). now, unless youre trolling you shouldnt try so hard to be an ***
and actually try to read what someone says.
>> you claimed the hvac industry agrees with your idealogy. i know better.
>
> Cite, or smoke crack.
you yourself admitted to hearing the tech vent in your garage. on the
surface the hvac industry has to play the game but in the field its another
matter entirely.
> I posted stuff from scientists
lol and you think that gives your statements ANY credibility at all? :-)
once upon a time your "scientists" thought the earth was flat! for every
liberal scientist there is a conservative scientist who knows better.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
06-08-2005, 02:28 PM
#517
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:0GCpe.2280$%j7.1930@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
> You won't be persuaded... we all realize this.
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide conclusive evidence, nate"
> You want it both ways.... Chlorine can't rise, because it's
> heavier than air.
sure it can be blown around in the wind but it wont reach the stratosphere.
not without a volcanic push.
> Argon doesn't fall, because it's concentration
> is small.
i hope youre just changing what i say to fit your argument, and that you
really arent that dense. i never said that it doesnt fall. i said that its
concentration wasnt enough to cause a problem.
> I didnt' say a 'licensed' tech...
TRANSLATION --> "im full of ----, nate". :-)
> You already asserted that you follow the rules...
> were you lying *then*, or are you lying *now*?
i stated that i follow the rules. HOWEVER, if i thought that what i did was
harmful to the environment i stated that i would take greater precautions
(such as low loss hose fittings which arent required under the current
rules). now, unless youre trolling you shouldnt try so hard to be an ***
and actually try to read what someone says.
>> you claimed the hvac industry agrees with your idealogy. i know better.
>
> Cite, or smoke crack.
you yourself admitted to hearing the tech vent in your garage. on the
surface the hvac industry has to play the game but in the field its another
matter entirely.
> I posted stuff from scientists
lol and you think that gives your statements ANY credibility at all? :-)
once upon a time your "scientists" thought the earth was flat! for every
liberal scientist there is a conservative scientist who knows better.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:0GCpe.2280$%j7.1930@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
> You won't be persuaded... we all realize this.
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide conclusive evidence, nate"
> You want it both ways.... Chlorine can't rise, because it's
> heavier than air.
sure it can be blown around in the wind but it wont reach the stratosphere.
not without a volcanic push.
> Argon doesn't fall, because it's concentration
> is small.
i hope youre just changing what i say to fit your argument, and that you
really arent that dense. i never said that it doesnt fall. i said that its
concentration wasnt enough to cause a problem.
> I didnt' say a 'licensed' tech...
TRANSLATION --> "im full of ----, nate". :-)
> You already asserted that you follow the rules...
> were you lying *then*, or are you lying *now*?
i stated that i follow the rules. HOWEVER, if i thought that what i did was
harmful to the environment i stated that i would take greater precautions
(such as low loss hose fittings which arent required under the current
rules). now, unless youre trolling you shouldnt try so hard to be an ***
and actually try to read what someone says.
>> you claimed the hvac industry agrees with your idealogy. i know better.
>
> Cite, or smoke crack.
you yourself admitted to hearing the tech vent in your garage. on the
surface the hvac industry has to play the game but in the field its another
matter entirely.
> I posted stuff from scientists
lol and you think that gives your statements ANY credibility at all? :-)
once upon a time your "scientists" thought the earth was flat! for every
liberal scientist there is a conservative scientist who knows better.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
06-08-2005, 02:41 PM
#518
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
And your point is? Really Stephen, you aren't going to change any minds
here, and the more you try the more of an ------- you become. You've become
what you love to hate...most Conservatives resort to personal attacks when
they can't win an argument on facts.
Buh-bye. (plonk)
>
> Top-posting *and* bottom posting... that's a new one on me!
>
> Matt, when you can hang with the big dogs, come back...
> otherwise, just get back on the porch.
> __
> Steve
> .
>
>
here, and the more you try the more of an ------- you become. You've become
what you love to hate...most Conservatives resort to personal attacks when
they can't win an argument on facts.
Buh-bye. (plonk)
>
> Top-posting *and* bottom posting... that's a new one on me!
>
> Matt, when you can hang with the big dogs, come back...
> otherwise, just get back on the porch.
> __
> Steve
> .
>
>
06-08-2005, 02:41 PM
#519
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
And your point is? Really Stephen, you aren't going to change any minds
here, and the more you try the more of an ------- you become. You've become
what you love to hate...most Conservatives resort to personal attacks when
they can't win an argument on facts.
Buh-bye. (plonk)
>
> Top-posting *and* bottom posting... that's a new one on me!
>
> Matt, when you can hang with the big dogs, come back...
> otherwise, just get back on the porch.
> __
> Steve
> .
>
>
here, and the more you try the more of an ------- you become. You've become
what you love to hate...most Conservatives resort to personal attacks when
they can't win an argument on facts.
Buh-bye. (plonk)
>
> Top-posting *and* bottom posting... that's a new one on me!
>
> Matt, when you can hang with the big dogs, come back...
> otherwise, just get back on the porch.
> __
> Steve
> .
>
>
06-08-2005, 02:41 PM
#520
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
And your point is? Really Stephen, you aren't going to change any minds
here, and the more you try the more of an ------- you become. You've become
what you love to hate...most Conservatives resort to personal attacks when
they can't win an argument on facts.
Buh-bye. (plonk)
>
> Top-posting *and* bottom posting... that's a new one on me!
>
> Matt, when you can hang with the big dogs, come back...
> otherwise, just get back on the porch.
> __
> Steve
> .
>
>
here, and the more you try the more of an ------- you become. You've become
what you love to hate...most Conservatives resort to personal attacks when
they can't win an argument on facts.
Buh-bye. (plonk)
>
> Top-posting *and* bottom posting... that's a new one on me!
>
> Matt, when you can hang with the big dogs, come back...
> otherwise, just get back on the porch.
> __
> Steve
> .
>
>