134a Refrigerant
#561
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42A74F9D.D43227F0@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > That's a huge margin! You're right, it was a complete
> > mandate from the American populace!
> >
> > How come abortion-on-demand is still legal? W
> > is well into his second term... hell, we don't even
> > have prayer in school!
> I'm beginning to wish your mother had used a coat hanger.
Good... I'm getting through!
__
Steve
..
#562
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11aednsr4870c36@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:1oCpe.2273$%j7.2016@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
> >> .....who do you call "mr president"? :-)
> >
> > Not W!
>
> go ahead and admit it. you are an anti-american socialist. you wear it,
> own it.
Oh, yes, comrade! Thanks so very much for outing
me!
> > I paid for those roads... you don't want to
> > pay for them, then don't use them!
>
> the depths of your ignorance are obvious. if you _really_ want to learn
> about libertarians see http://harrybrowne.org
I don't need no hairy brown to know that
Libertarians are just Anarchists in clown
suits.
> > http://www.sovereignty.org.uk/sitein...m/altview.html
>
> if youre going to consider blatent liberal publications as credible
sources
> of information than im going to start quoting rush. dont make me do it.
> :-)
Shoot the messenger... spin the message. Do you
deny the data? You got Afghanistan and Iraq
confused... just as the W-ites planned for you to.
You're controlled... owned.
> > As you can see, Nate.... there was no 'liberation of
> > Iraqi women'... they were free before.
>
> so are you saying that the dictators own sons really didnt drive around
> raping young virgin girls at will, or are you saying thats just part of
your
> socialist version of freedom? are saying that iraqi women really could be
> educated, or that they didnt need education in your socialist version of
> freedom?
Well, the young virgins were 'going to school'...
weren't they? Your tune is changing like Giant
Steps...
__
Steve
..
#563
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11aednsr4870c36@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:1oCpe.2273$%j7.2016@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
> >> .....who do you call "mr president"? :-)
> >
> > Not W!
>
> go ahead and admit it. you are an anti-american socialist. you wear it,
> own it.
Oh, yes, comrade! Thanks so very much for outing
me!
> > I paid for those roads... you don't want to
> > pay for them, then don't use them!
>
> the depths of your ignorance are obvious. if you _really_ want to learn
> about libertarians see http://harrybrowne.org
I don't need no hairy brown to know that
Libertarians are just Anarchists in clown
suits.
> > http://www.sovereignty.org.uk/sitein...m/altview.html
>
> if youre going to consider blatent liberal publications as credible
sources
> of information than im going to start quoting rush. dont make me do it.
> :-)
Shoot the messenger... spin the message. Do you
deny the data? You got Afghanistan and Iraq
confused... just as the W-ites planned for you to.
You're controlled... owned.
> > As you can see, Nate.... there was no 'liberation of
> > Iraqi women'... they were free before.
>
> so are you saying that the dictators own sons really didnt drive around
> raping young virgin girls at will, or are you saying thats just part of
your
> socialist version of freedom? are saying that iraqi women really could be
> educated, or that they didnt need education in your socialist version of
> freedom?
Well, the young virgins were 'going to school'...
weren't they? Your tune is changing like Giant
Steps...
__
Steve
..
#564
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11aednsr4870c36@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:1oCpe.2273$%j7.2016@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
> >> .....who do you call "mr president"? :-)
> >
> > Not W!
>
> go ahead and admit it. you are an anti-american socialist. you wear it,
> own it.
Oh, yes, comrade! Thanks so very much for outing
me!
> > I paid for those roads... you don't want to
> > pay for them, then don't use them!
>
> the depths of your ignorance are obvious. if you _really_ want to learn
> about libertarians see http://harrybrowne.org
I don't need no hairy brown to know that
Libertarians are just Anarchists in clown
suits.
> > http://www.sovereignty.org.uk/sitein...m/altview.html
>
> if youre going to consider blatent liberal publications as credible
sources
> of information than im going to start quoting rush. dont make me do it.
> :-)
Shoot the messenger... spin the message. Do you
deny the data? You got Afghanistan and Iraq
confused... just as the W-ites planned for you to.
You're controlled... owned.
> > As you can see, Nate.... there was no 'liberation of
> > Iraqi women'... they were free before.
>
> so are you saying that the dictators own sons really didnt drive around
> raping young virgin girls at will, or are you saying thats just part of
your
> socialist version of freedom? are saying that iraqi women really could be
> educated, or that they didnt need education in your socialist version of
> freedom?
Well, the young virgins were 'going to school'...
weren't they? Your tune is changing like Giant
Steps...
__
Steve
..
#565
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11aednsr4870c36@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:1oCpe.2273$%j7.2016@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
> >> .....who do you call "mr president"? :-)
> >
> > Not W!
>
> go ahead and admit it. you are an anti-american socialist. you wear it,
> own it.
Oh, yes, comrade! Thanks so very much for outing
me!
> > I paid for those roads... you don't want to
> > pay for them, then don't use them!
>
> the depths of your ignorance are obvious. if you _really_ want to learn
> about libertarians see http://harrybrowne.org
I don't need no hairy brown to know that
Libertarians are just Anarchists in clown
suits.
> > http://www.sovereignty.org.uk/sitein...m/altview.html
>
> if youre going to consider blatent liberal publications as credible
sources
> of information than im going to start quoting rush. dont make me do it.
> :-)
Shoot the messenger... spin the message. Do you
deny the data? You got Afghanistan and Iraq
confused... just as the W-ites planned for you to.
You're controlled... owned.
> > As you can see, Nate.... there was no 'liberation of
> > Iraqi women'... they were free before.
>
> so are you saying that the dictators own sons really didnt drive around
> raping young virgin girls at will, or are you saying thats just part of
your
> socialist version of freedom? are saying that iraqi women really could be
> educated, or that they didnt need education in your socialist version of
> freedom?
Well, the young virgins were 'going to school'...
weren't they? Your tune is changing like Giant
Steps...
__
Steve
..
#566
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11aee7461fioc2a@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:0GCpe.2280$%j7.1930@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
> > You won't be persuaded... we all realize this.
>
> TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide conclusive evidence, nate"
>
> > You want it both ways.... Chlorine can't rise, because it's
> > heavier than air.
>
> sure it can be blown around in the wind but it wont reach the
stratosphere.
> not without a volcanic push.
Then why is it measured there? Along with CFC? The
CFC is coming from space? Volcanos spew CFC?
>
> > Argon doesn't fall, because it's concentration
> > is small.
>
> i hope youre just changing what i say to fit your argument, and that you
> really arent that dense. i never said that it doesnt fall. i said that
its
> concentration wasnt enough to cause a problem.
If the atmosphere layered out like you said it
should, we'd all be dead from it... do the math.
>
>
> > I didnt' say a 'licensed' tech...
>
> TRANSLATION --> "im full of ----, nate". :-)
Did you have physics in high school or college, Nate?
> > You already asserted that you follow the rules...
> > were you lying *then*, or are you lying *now*?
>
> i stated that i follow the rules. HOWEVER, if i thought that what i did
was
> harmful to the environment i stated that i would take greater precautions
> (such as low loss hose fittings which arent required under the current
> rules). now, unless youre trolling you shouldnt try so hard to be an ***
> and actually try to read what someone says.
I've already posted links from reputable scientific
organizations, as well as HVAC industry periodicals,
supporting my assertion. Nothing I could post would
convince you... I've shown that CFCs are found in the
stratosphere, in amounts commensurate with the reactions
going on. You don't agree... you can't agree, since it
would cause you guilt for all the crap you've released
into the atmosphere. Your beliefs are convenient...
why bother to change?
> >> you claimed the hvac industry agrees with your idealogy. i know
better.
> >
> > Cite, or smoke crack.
>
> you yourself admitted to hearing the tech vent in your garage. on the
> surface the hvac industry has to play the game but in the field its
another
> matter entirely.
Yes... we're beginning to see the problem.
> > I posted stuff from scientists
>
> lol and you think that gives your statements ANY credibility at all? :-)
> once upon a time your "scientists" thought the earth was flat! for every
> liberal scientist there is a conservative scientist who knows better.
Conservative scientists know the earth is flat? Well, then
you should be able to post me a link, then, right, Nate?
Well do it, and quit screwing around. C'mon, Nate...
Conservative Science! I need a good belly laugh...
__
Steve
..
#567
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11aee7461fioc2a@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:0GCpe.2280$%j7.1930@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
> > You won't be persuaded... we all realize this.
>
> TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide conclusive evidence, nate"
>
> > You want it both ways.... Chlorine can't rise, because it's
> > heavier than air.
>
> sure it can be blown around in the wind but it wont reach the
stratosphere.
> not without a volcanic push.
Then why is it measured there? Along with CFC? The
CFC is coming from space? Volcanos spew CFC?
>
> > Argon doesn't fall, because it's concentration
> > is small.
>
> i hope youre just changing what i say to fit your argument, and that you
> really arent that dense. i never said that it doesnt fall. i said that
its
> concentration wasnt enough to cause a problem.
If the atmosphere layered out like you said it
should, we'd all be dead from it... do the math.
>
>
> > I didnt' say a 'licensed' tech...
>
> TRANSLATION --> "im full of ----, nate". :-)
Did you have physics in high school or college, Nate?
> > You already asserted that you follow the rules...
> > were you lying *then*, or are you lying *now*?
>
> i stated that i follow the rules. HOWEVER, if i thought that what i did
was
> harmful to the environment i stated that i would take greater precautions
> (such as low loss hose fittings which arent required under the current
> rules). now, unless youre trolling you shouldnt try so hard to be an ***
> and actually try to read what someone says.
I've already posted links from reputable scientific
organizations, as well as HVAC industry periodicals,
supporting my assertion. Nothing I could post would
convince you... I've shown that CFCs are found in the
stratosphere, in amounts commensurate with the reactions
going on. You don't agree... you can't agree, since it
would cause you guilt for all the crap you've released
into the atmosphere. Your beliefs are convenient...
why bother to change?
> >> you claimed the hvac industry agrees with your idealogy. i know
better.
> >
> > Cite, or smoke crack.
>
> you yourself admitted to hearing the tech vent in your garage. on the
> surface the hvac industry has to play the game but in the field its
another
> matter entirely.
Yes... we're beginning to see the problem.
> > I posted stuff from scientists
>
> lol and you think that gives your statements ANY credibility at all? :-)
> once upon a time your "scientists" thought the earth was flat! for every
> liberal scientist there is a conservative scientist who knows better.
Conservative scientists know the earth is flat? Well, then
you should be able to post me a link, then, right, Nate?
Well do it, and quit screwing around. C'mon, Nate...
Conservative Science! I need a good belly laugh...
__
Steve
..
#568
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11aee7461fioc2a@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:0GCpe.2280$%j7.1930@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
> > You won't be persuaded... we all realize this.
>
> TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide conclusive evidence, nate"
>
> > You want it both ways.... Chlorine can't rise, because it's
> > heavier than air.
>
> sure it can be blown around in the wind but it wont reach the
stratosphere.
> not without a volcanic push.
Then why is it measured there? Along with CFC? The
CFC is coming from space? Volcanos spew CFC?
>
> > Argon doesn't fall, because it's concentration
> > is small.
>
> i hope youre just changing what i say to fit your argument, and that you
> really arent that dense. i never said that it doesnt fall. i said that
its
> concentration wasnt enough to cause a problem.
If the atmosphere layered out like you said it
should, we'd all be dead from it... do the math.
>
>
> > I didnt' say a 'licensed' tech...
>
> TRANSLATION --> "im full of ----, nate". :-)
Did you have physics in high school or college, Nate?
> > You already asserted that you follow the rules...
> > were you lying *then*, or are you lying *now*?
>
> i stated that i follow the rules. HOWEVER, if i thought that what i did
was
> harmful to the environment i stated that i would take greater precautions
> (such as low loss hose fittings which arent required under the current
> rules). now, unless youre trolling you shouldnt try so hard to be an ***
> and actually try to read what someone says.
I've already posted links from reputable scientific
organizations, as well as HVAC industry periodicals,
supporting my assertion. Nothing I could post would
convince you... I've shown that CFCs are found in the
stratosphere, in amounts commensurate with the reactions
going on. You don't agree... you can't agree, since it
would cause you guilt for all the crap you've released
into the atmosphere. Your beliefs are convenient...
why bother to change?
> >> you claimed the hvac industry agrees with your idealogy. i know
better.
> >
> > Cite, or smoke crack.
>
> you yourself admitted to hearing the tech vent in your garage. on the
> surface the hvac industry has to play the game but in the field its
another
> matter entirely.
Yes... we're beginning to see the problem.
> > I posted stuff from scientists
>
> lol and you think that gives your statements ANY credibility at all? :-)
> once upon a time your "scientists" thought the earth was flat! for every
> liberal scientist there is a conservative scientist who knows better.
Conservative scientists know the earth is flat? Well, then
you should be able to post me a link, then, right, Nate?
Well do it, and quit screwing around. C'mon, Nate...
Conservative Science! I need a good belly laugh...
__
Steve
..
#569
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11aee7461fioc2a@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:0GCpe.2280$%j7.1930@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
> > You won't be persuaded... we all realize this.
>
> TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide conclusive evidence, nate"
>
> > You want it both ways.... Chlorine can't rise, because it's
> > heavier than air.
>
> sure it can be blown around in the wind but it wont reach the
stratosphere.
> not without a volcanic push.
Then why is it measured there? Along with CFC? The
CFC is coming from space? Volcanos spew CFC?
>
> > Argon doesn't fall, because it's concentration
> > is small.
>
> i hope youre just changing what i say to fit your argument, and that you
> really arent that dense. i never said that it doesnt fall. i said that
its
> concentration wasnt enough to cause a problem.
If the atmosphere layered out like you said it
should, we'd all be dead from it... do the math.
>
>
> > I didnt' say a 'licensed' tech...
>
> TRANSLATION --> "im full of ----, nate". :-)
Did you have physics in high school or college, Nate?
> > You already asserted that you follow the rules...
> > were you lying *then*, or are you lying *now*?
>
> i stated that i follow the rules. HOWEVER, if i thought that what i did
was
> harmful to the environment i stated that i would take greater precautions
> (such as low loss hose fittings which arent required under the current
> rules). now, unless youre trolling you shouldnt try so hard to be an ***
> and actually try to read what someone says.
I've already posted links from reputable scientific
organizations, as well as HVAC industry periodicals,
supporting my assertion. Nothing I could post would
convince you... I've shown that CFCs are found in the
stratosphere, in amounts commensurate with the reactions
going on. You don't agree... you can't agree, since it
would cause you guilt for all the crap you've released
into the atmosphere. Your beliefs are convenient...
why bother to change?
> >> you claimed the hvac industry agrees with your idealogy. i know
better.
> >
> > Cite, or smoke crack.
>
> you yourself admitted to hearing the tech vent in your garage. on the
> surface the hvac industry has to play the game but in the field its
another
> matter entirely.
Yes... we're beginning to see the problem.
> > I posted stuff from scientists
>
> lol and you think that gives your statements ANY credibility at all? :-)
> once upon a time your "scientists" thought the earth was flat! for every
> liberal scientist there is a conservative scientist who knows better.
Conservative scientists know the earth is flat? Well, then
you should be able to post me a link, then, right, Nate?
Well do it, and quit screwing around. C'mon, Nate...
Conservative Science! I need a good belly laugh...
__
Steve
..
#570
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:_9-dnX5N7IbvpjrfRVn-hQ@comcast.com...
> And your point is? Really Stephen, you aren't going to change any minds
> here, and the more you try the more of an ------- you become. You've
become
> what you love to hate...most Conservatives resort to personal attacks when
> they can't win an argument on facts.
>
> Buh-bye. (plonk)
>
> >
> > Top-posting *and* bottom posting... that's a new one on me!
> >
> > Matt, when you can hang with the big dogs, come back...
> > otherwise, just get back on the porch.
You see what I mean...
__
Steve
..