134a Refrigerant
#431
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42A66FE4.DA28A5B8@***.net...
> "L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
> >
> > I'm not going to try and educate you, that's for our schools, but
> > then Liberals can't be bothered with facts, it be just another waste of
> > tax payer's money.
> An Introduction to Physical Science:
>
http://college.hmco.com/physicalscie...udygoals/ch19/
>
No, I need School Vouchers! Nice link, btw... here's
a quote:
<>
The atmosphere makes it possible for life to exist on Earth. You should not
need any more reason than this to study the atmosphere, but if you are not
already impressed by its importance, consider the grandeur of atmospheric
phenomena such as rainbows, sunsets, and auroras. An ozone layer in the
atmosphere protects us from harmful ultraviolet radiation from the Sun. The
atmosphere also redistributes the heat supplied to our planet by the Sun,
thus providing temperate climate conditions over large areas of Earth's
surface that would be inhospitable to human life without this heat exchange.
Studying the composition and structure of the atmosphere helps us to
understand how complicated and vulnerable this large ocean of air really is.
Current interest in ecology demands that we take better care of our fragile
atmosphere. If we do not, it is likely that we will severely curtail our
long-term chances for survival as a species.
....
The atmosphere acts somewhat like a transparent filter that readily admits
sunlight and allows the heated surface of Earth to distribute energy to the
lower layers of the atmosphere by infrared emissions. This process is known
as the greenhouse effect. (See Figure 1 in the chapter's second Highlight.)
The amount of heat trapped by the greenhouse effect is influenced by the
composition of the atmosphere, which in turn is greatly affected by
pollution created by humans.
</>
It supports Global Warming!
__
Steve
..
#432
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42A66FE4.DA28A5B8@***.net...
> "L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
> >
> > I'm not going to try and educate you, that's for our schools, but
> > then Liberals can't be bothered with facts, it be just another waste of
> > tax payer's money.
> An Introduction to Physical Science:
>
http://college.hmco.com/physicalscie...udygoals/ch19/
>
No, I need School Vouchers! Nice link, btw... here's
a quote:
<>
The atmosphere makes it possible for life to exist on Earth. You should not
need any more reason than this to study the atmosphere, but if you are not
already impressed by its importance, consider the grandeur of atmospheric
phenomena such as rainbows, sunsets, and auroras. An ozone layer in the
atmosphere protects us from harmful ultraviolet radiation from the Sun. The
atmosphere also redistributes the heat supplied to our planet by the Sun,
thus providing temperate climate conditions over large areas of Earth's
surface that would be inhospitable to human life without this heat exchange.
Studying the composition and structure of the atmosphere helps us to
understand how complicated and vulnerable this large ocean of air really is.
Current interest in ecology demands that we take better care of our fragile
atmosphere. If we do not, it is likely that we will severely curtail our
long-term chances for survival as a species.
....
The atmosphere acts somewhat like a transparent filter that readily admits
sunlight and allows the heated surface of Earth to distribute energy to the
lower layers of the atmosphere by infrared emissions. This process is known
as the greenhouse effect. (See Figure 1 in the chapter's second Highlight.)
The amount of heat trapped by the greenhouse effect is influenced by the
composition of the atmosphere, which in turn is greatly affected by
pollution created by humans.
</>
It supports Global Warming!
__
Steve
..
#433
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42A66FE4.DA28A5B8@***.net...
> "L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
> >
> > I'm not going to try and educate you, that's for our schools, but
> > then Liberals can't be bothered with facts, it be just another waste of
> > tax payer's money.
> An Introduction to Physical Science:
>
http://college.hmco.com/physicalscie...udygoals/ch19/
>
No, I need School Vouchers! Nice link, btw... here's
a quote:
<>
The atmosphere makes it possible for life to exist on Earth. You should not
need any more reason than this to study the atmosphere, but if you are not
already impressed by its importance, consider the grandeur of atmospheric
phenomena such as rainbows, sunsets, and auroras. An ozone layer in the
atmosphere protects us from harmful ultraviolet radiation from the Sun. The
atmosphere also redistributes the heat supplied to our planet by the Sun,
thus providing temperate climate conditions over large areas of Earth's
surface that would be inhospitable to human life without this heat exchange.
Studying the composition and structure of the atmosphere helps us to
understand how complicated and vulnerable this large ocean of air really is.
Current interest in ecology demands that we take better care of our fragile
atmosphere. If we do not, it is likely that we will severely curtail our
long-term chances for survival as a species.
....
The atmosphere acts somewhat like a transparent filter that readily admits
sunlight and allows the heated surface of Earth to distribute energy to the
lower layers of the atmosphere by infrared emissions. This process is known
as the greenhouse effect. (See Figure 1 in the chapter's second Highlight.)
The amount of heat trapped by the greenhouse effect is influenced by the
composition of the atmosphere, which in turn is greatly affected by
pollution created by humans.
</>
It supports Global Warming!
__
Steve
..
#434
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:RHupe.2218$%j7.145@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
>> ?? thats the SAME CRAP youve been posting! ill quote and capitalize my
>> point that removes the whole "conclusive" thing im asking for: "They have
>> found that the emissions of the human-produced halocarbons, plus the much
>> smaller contribution from natural sources, COULD account for all of the
>> stratospheric chlorine."
>> "could". nothing conclusive there.
>
> You won't be persuaded... we all realize this.
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide conclusive evidence, nate"
.......i already told you that! :-)
> It's one percent of the air
> we breathe
DUH! the concentration isnt high enough to cause a problem.
> How about if I tell you that I've been a tech
id have to ask you to prove it by showing your epa certification. id be
glad to show you mine.
> How about if I tell you that
> the effects of this vented refrigerant can't be
> hidden, and are cumulative?
i would ONCE AGAIN ask you for conclusive evidence.
> What do conservatives have, clusterf*cks?
realistic goals. :-)
> No, refrigerant is vented so freely because the tech is
> lazy... and doesn't give a damn.
i cant believe that it all boils down to laziness. sure some of it does,
but the majority knows better. ive never met another tech who believed that
refrigerant was hazardous to our environment. if i believed it were i would
take great precautions, and i know my fellow technicians would as well.
> Yeah, I go to cheeseball HVAC techs for my
> atmospheric science, just like you do... not.
you claimed the hvac industry agrees with your idealogy. i know better.
> kinda funny that it
> pisses you off, saving your descendants from
> skin cancer and all....
it doesnt "**** me off". i simply hate bad information, particulary when
its driven by ANY political agenda.
> Then why is it there in conjunction with CFC's?
show me something CONCLUSIVE that proves refrigerant cfc's are there. until
then ill continue to point out that youre spouting agenda driven speculation
and belief, but nothing factual or proven in any way.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:RHupe.2218$%j7.145@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
>> ?? thats the SAME CRAP youve been posting! ill quote and capitalize my
>> point that removes the whole "conclusive" thing im asking for: "They have
>> found that the emissions of the human-produced halocarbons, plus the much
>> smaller contribution from natural sources, COULD account for all of the
>> stratospheric chlorine."
>> "could". nothing conclusive there.
>
> You won't be persuaded... we all realize this.
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide conclusive evidence, nate"
.......i already told you that! :-)
> It's one percent of the air
> we breathe
DUH! the concentration isnt high enough to cause a problem.
> How about if I tell you that I've been a tech
id have to ask you to prove it by showing your epa certification. id be
glad to show you mine.
> How about if I tell you that
> the effects of this vented refrigerant can't be
> hidden, and are cumulative?
i would ONCE AGAIN ask you for conclusive evidence.
> What do conservatives have, clusterf*cks?
realistic goals. :-)
> No, refrigerant is vented so freely because the tech is
> lazy... and doesn't give a damn.
i cant believe that it all boils down to laziness. sure some of it does,
but the majority knows better. ive never met another tech who believed that
refrigerant was hazardous to our environment. if i believed it were i would
take great precautions, and i know my fellow technicians would as well.
> Yeah, I go to cheeseball HVAC techs for my
> atmospheric science, just like you do... not.
you claimed the hvac industry agrees with your idealogy. i know better.
> kinda funny that it
> pisses you off, saving your descendants from
> skin cancer and all....
it doesnt "**** me off". i simply hate bad information, particulary when
its driven by ANY political agenda.
> Then why is it there in conjunction with CFC's?
show me something CONCLUSIVE that proves refrigerant cfc's are there. until
then ill continue to point out that youre spouting agenda driven speculation
and belief, but nothing factual or proven in any way.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
#435
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:RHupe.2218$%j7.145@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
>> ?? thats the SAME CRAP youve been posting! ill quote and capitalize my
>> point that removes the whole "conclusive" thing im asking for: "They have
>> found that the emissions of the human-produced halocarbons, plus the much
>> smaller contribution from natural sources, COULD account for all of the
>> stratospheric chlorine."
>> "could". nothing conclusive there.
>
> You won't be persuaded... we all realize this.
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide conclusive evidence, nate"
.......i already told you that! :-)
> It's one percent of the air
> we breathe
DUH! the concentration isnt high enough to cause a problem.
> How about if I tell you that I've been a tech
id have to ask you to prove it by showing your epa certification. id be
glad to show you mine.
> How about if I tell you that
> the effects of this vented refrigerant can't be
> hidden, and are cumulative?
i would ONCE AGAIN ask you for conclusive evidence.
> What do conservatives have, clusterf*cks?
realistic goals. :-)
> No, refrigerant is vented so freely because the tech is
> lazy... and doesn't give a damn.
i cant believe that it all boils down to laziness. sure some of it does,
but the majority knows better. ive never met another tech who believed that
refrigerant was hazardous to our environment. if i believed it were i would
take great precautions, and i know my fellow technicians would as well.
> Yeah, I go to cheeseball HVAC techs for my
> atmospheric science, just like you do... not.
you claimed the hvac industry agrees with your idealogy. i know better.
> kinda funny that it
> pisses you off, saving your descendants from
> skin cancer and all....
it doesnt "**** me off". i simply hate bad information, particulary when
its driven by ANY political agenda.
> Then why is it there in conjunction with CFC's?
show me something CONCLUSIVE that proves refrigerant cfc's are there. until
then ill continue to point out that youre spouting agenda driven speculation
and belief, but nothing factual or proven in any way.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:RHupe.2218$%j7.145@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
>> ?? thats the SAME CRAP youve been posting! ill quote and capitalize my
>> point that removes the whole "conclusive" thing im asking for: "They have
>> found that the emissions of the human-produced halocarbons, plus the much
>> smaller contribution from natural sources, COULD account for all of the
>> stratospheric chlorine."
>> "could". nothing conclusive there.
>
> You won't be persuaded... we all realize this.
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide conclusive evidence, nate"
.......i already told you that! :-)
> It's one percent of the air
> we breathe
DUH! the concentration isnt high enough to cause a problem.
> How about if I tell you that I've been a tech
id have to ask you to prove it by showing your epa certification. id be
glad to show you mine.
> How about if I tell you that
> the effects of this vented refrigerant can't be
> hidden, and are cumulative?
i would ONCE AGAIN ask you for conclusive evidence.
> What do conservatives have, clusterf*cks?
realistic goals. :-)
> No, refrigerant is vented so freely because the tech is
> lazy... and doesn't give a damn.
i cant believe that it all boils down to laziness. sure some of it does,
but the majority knows better. ive never met another tech who believed that
refrigerant was hazardous to our environment. if i believed it were i would
take great precautions, and i know my fellow technicians would as well.
> Yeah, I go to cheeseball HVAC techs for my
> atmospheric science, just like you do... not.
you claimed the hvac industry agrees with your idealogy. i know better.
> kinda funny that it
> pisses you off, saving your descendants from
> skin cancer and all....
it doesnt "**** me off". i simply hate bad information, particulary when
its driven by ANY political agenda.
> Then why is it there in conjunction with CFC's?
show me something CONCLUSIVE that proves refrigerant cfc's are there. until
then ill continue to point out that youre spouting agenda driven speculation
and belief, but nothing factual or proven in any way.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
#436
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:RHupe.2218$%j7.145@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
>> ?? thats the SAME CRAP youve been posting! ill quote and capitalize my
>> point that removes the whole "conclusive" thing im asking for: "They have
>> found that the emissions of the human-produced halocarbons, plus the much
>> smaller contribution from natural sources, COULD account for all of the
>> stratospheric chlorine."
>> "could". nothing conclusive there.
>
> You won't be persuaded... we all realize this.
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide conclusive evidence, nate"
.......i already told you that! :-)
> It's one percent of the air
> we breathe
DUH! the concentration isnt high enough to cause a problem.
> How about if I tell you that I've been a tech
id have to ask you to prove it by showing your epa certification. id be
glad to show you mine.
> How about if I tell you that
> the effects of this vented refrigerant can't be
> hidden, and are cumulative?
i would ONCE AGAIN ask you for conclusive evidence.
> What do conservatives have, clusterf*cks?
realistic goals. :-)
> No, refrigerant is vented so freely because the tech is
> lazy... and doesn't give a damn.
i cant believe that it all boils down to laziness. sure some of it does,
but the majority knows better. ive never met another tech who believed that
refrigerant was hazardous to our environment. if i believed it were i would
take great precautions, and i know my fellow technicians would as well.
> Yeah, I go to cheeseball HVAC techs for my
> atmospheric science, just like you do... not.
you claimed the hvac industry agrees with your idealogy. i know better.
> kinda funny that it
> pisses you off, saving your descendants from
> skin cancer and all....
it doesnt "**** me off". i simply hate bad information, particulary when
its driven by ANY political agenda.
> Then why is it there in conjunction with CFC's?
show me something CONCLUSIVE that proves refrigerant cfc's are there. until
then ill continue to point out that youre spouting agenda driven speculation
and belief, but nothing factual or proven in any way.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:RHupe.2218$%j7.145@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
>> ?? thats the SAME CRAP youve been posting! ill quote and capitalize my
>> point that removes the whole "conclusive" thing im asking for: "They have
>> found that the emissions of the human-produced halocarbons, plus the much
>> smaller contribution from natural sources, COULD account for all of the
>> stratospheric chlorine."
>> "could". nothing conclusive there.
>
> You won't be persuaded... we all realize this.
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide conclusive evidence, nate"
.......i already told you that! :-)
> It's one percent of the air
> we breathe
DUH! the concentration isnt high enough to cause a problem.
> How about if I tell you that I've been a tech
id have to ask you to prove it by showing your epa certification. id be
glad to show you mine.
> How about if I tell you that
> the effects of this vented refrigerant can't be
> hidden, and are cumulative?
i would ONCE AGAIN ask you for conclusive evidence.
> What do conservatives have, clusterf*cks?
realistic goals. :-)
> No, refrigerant is vented so freely because the tech is
> lazy... and doesn't give a damn.
i cant believe that it all boils down to laziness. sure some of it does,
but the majority knows better. ive never met another tech who believed that
refrigerant was hazardous to our environment. if i believed it were i would
take great precautions, and i know my fellow technicians would as well.
> Yeah, I go to cheeseball HVAC techs for my
> atmospheric science, just like you do... not.
you claimed the hvac industry agrees with your idealogy. i know better.
> kinda funny that it
> pisses you off, saving your descendants from
> skin cancer and all....
it doesnt "**** me off". i simply hate bad information, particulary when
its driven by ANY political agenda.
> Then why is it there in conjunction with CFC's?
show me something CONCLUSIVE that proves refrigerant cfc's are there. until
then ill continue to point out that youre spouting agenda driven speculation
and belief, but nothing factual or proven in any way.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
#437
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:RHupe.2218$%j7.145@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
>> ?? thats the SAME CRAP youve been posting! ill quote and capitalize my
>> point that removes the whole "conclusive" thing im asking for: "They have
>> found that the emissions of the human-produced halocarbons, plus the much
>> smaller contribution from natural sources, COULD account for all of the
>> stratospheric chlorine."
>> "could". nothing conclusive there.
>
> You won't be persuaded... we all realize this.
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide conclusive evidence, nate"
.......i already told you that! :-)
> It's one percent of the air
> we breathe
DUH! the concentration isnt high enough to cause a problem.
> How about if I tell you that I've been a tech
id have to ask you to prove it by showing your epa certification. id be
glad to show you mine.
> How about if I tell you that
> the effects of this vented refrigerant can't be
> hidden, and are cumulative?
i would ONCE AGAIN ask you for conclusive evidence.
> What do conservatives have, clusterf*cks?
realistic goals. :-)
> No, refrigerant is vented so freely because the tech is
> lazy... and doesn't give a damn.
i cant believe that it all boils down to laziness. sure some of it does,
but the majority knows better. ive never met another tech who believed that
refrigerant was hazardous to our environment. if i believed it were i would
take great precautions, and i know my fellow technicians would as well.
> Yeah, I go to cheeseball HVAC techs for my
> atmospheric science, just like you do... not.
you claimed the hvac industry agrees with your idealogy. i know better.
> kinda funny that it
> pisses you off, saving your descendants from
> skin cancer and all....
it doesnt "**** me off". i simply hate bad information, particulary when
its driven by ANY political agenda.
> Then why is it there in conjunction with CFC's?
show me something CONCLUSIVE that proves refrigerant cfc's are there. until
then ill continue to point out that youre spouting agenda driven speculation
and belief, but nothing factual or proven in any way.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:RHupe.2218$%j7.145@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
>> ?? thats the SAME CRAP youve been posting! ill quote and capitalize my
>> point that removes the whole "conclusive" thing im asking for: "They have
>> found that the emissions of the human-produced halocarbons, plus the much
>> smaller contribution from natural sources, COULD account for all of the
>> stratospheric chlorine."
>> "could". nothing conclusive there.
>
> You won't be persuaded... we all realize this.
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot provide conclusive evidence, nate"
.......i already told you that! :-)
> It's one percent of the air
> we breathe
DUH! the concentration isnt high enough to cause a problem.
> How about if I tell you that I've been a tech
id have to ask you to prove it by showing your epa certification. id be
glad to show you mine.
> How about if I tell you that
> the effects of this vented refrigerant can't be
> hidden, and are cumulative?
i would ONCE AGAIN ask you for conclusive evidence.
> What do conservatives have, clusterf*cks?
realistic goals. :-)
> No, refrigerant is vented so freely because the tech is
> lazy... and doesn't give a damn.
i cant believe that it all boils down to laziness. sure some of it does,
but the majority knows better. ive never met another tech who believed that
refrigerant was hazardous to our environment. if i believed it were i would
take great precautions, and i know my fellow technicians would as well.
> Yeah, I go to cheeseball HVAC techs for my
> atmospheric science, just like you do... not.
you claimed the hvac industry agrees with your idealogy. i know better.
> kinda funny that it
> pisses you off, saving your descendants from
> skin cancer and all....
it doesnt "**** me off". i simply hate bad information, particulary when
its driven by ANY political agenda.
> Then why is it there in conjunction with CFC's?
show me something CONCLUSIVE that proves refrigerant cfc's are there. until
then ill continue to point out that youre spouting agenda driven speculation
and belief, but nothing factual or proven in any way.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
#438
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11acsf9rcqu7r9f@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:Yfupe.2206$%j7.2094@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
> > which the Bush
> > administration
> > opposes
>
> ah i see. if he doesnt agree with your idealogy his head is in the sand?
> well then consider mine there also.
You're a little late with that one...
>suck it up stephen, your side LOST.
> our side owes your side NOTHING. we dont have to share your views. in
fact
> it is our opposing views that WON.
What refrigerant is in your late-model car?
>
> while im libertarian, bush comes a hell of a lot closer to my beliefs than
> your guy.
You really believe all that Babylon crap?
I'll admit, I'd *damn* sure have rather
skipped out on that whole Vietnam thing...
you'd certainly have found me closer to
Bush than Kerry then!
Oh, if you're Libertarian... get off my damn
roads!
> > Or you can take the current debacle
> > in Iraq as 'head in the sand'... that would be appropriate
> > too.
>
> debacle? i love how you liberals (who claim to stand for human rights)
> overlook that iraq is free from tyranny. iraqi women are now allowed to
GO
> TO SCHOOL, to hold jobs, to live as equal citizens. no stephen, id say
iraq
> has been an overwhelming success to date. that could change tomorrow, but
> as it is right now with bush leading the way iraq is a success.
Don't you think we could have made more
points that way by invading Sudan?
That's why we went to Iraq? To free
their women? Well, I guess Saudi
Arabia's next!
"Overwhelming success"... I'll agree on
the 'overwhelming' part.
__
Steve
..
#439
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11acsf9rcqu7r9f@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:Yfupe.2206$%j7.2094@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
> > which the Bush
> > administration
> > opposes
>
> ah i see. if he doesnt agree with your idealogy his head is in the sand?
> well then consider mine there also.
You're a little late with that one...
>suck it up stephen, your side LOST.
> our side owes your side NOTHING. we dont have to share your views. in
fact
> it is our opposing views that WON.
What refrigerant is in your late-model car?
>
> while im libertarian, bush comes a hell of a lot closer to my beliefs than
> your guy.
You really believe all that Babylon crap?
I'll admit, I'd *damn* sure have rather
skipped out on that whole Vietnam thing...
you'd certainly have found me closer to
Bush than Kerry then!
Oh, if you're Libertarian... get off my damn
roads!
> > Or you can take the current debacle
> > in Iraq as 'head in the sand'... that would be appropriate
> > too.
>
> debacle? i love how you liberals (who claim to stand for human rights)
> overlook that iraq is free from tyranny. iraqi women are now allowed to
GO
> TO SCHOOL, to hold jobs, to live as equal citizens. no stephen, id say
iraq
> has been an overwhelming success to date. that could change tomorrow, but
> as it is right now with bush leading the way iraq is a success.
Don't you think we could have made more
points that way by invading Sudan?
That's why we went to Iraq? To free
their women? Well, I guess Saudi
Arabia's next!
"Overwhelming success"... I'll agree on
the 'overwhelming' part.
__
Steve
..
#440
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11acsf9rcqu7r9f@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:Yfupe.2206$%j7.2094@newssvr11.news.prodigy.co m...
> > which the Bush
> > administration
> > opposes
>
> ah i see. if he doesnt agree with your idealogy his head is in the sand?
> well then consider mine there also.
You're a little late with that one...
>suck it up stephen, your side LOST.
> our side owes your side NOTHING. we dont have to share your views. in
fact
> it is our opposing views that WON.
What refrigerant is in your late-model car?
>
> while im libertarian, bush comes a hell of a lot closer to my beliefs than
> your guy.
You really believe all that Babylon crap?
I'll admit, I'd *damn* sure have rather
skipped out on that whole Vietnam thing...
you'd certainly have found me closer to
Bush than Kerry then!
Oh, if you're Libertarian... get off my damn
roads!
> > Or you can take the current debacle
> > in Iraq as 'head in the sand'... that would be appropriate
> > too.
>
> debacle? i love how you liberals (who claim to stand for human rights)
> overlook that iraq is free from tyranny. iraqi women are now allowed to
GO
> TO SCHOOL, to hold jobs, to live as equal citizens. no stephen, id say
iraq
> has been an overwhelming success to date. that could change tomorrow, but
> as it is right now with bush leading the way iraq is a success.
Don't you think we could have made more
points that way by invading Sudan?
That's why we went to Iraq? To free
their women? Well, I guess Saudi
Arabia's next!
"Overwhelming success"... I'll agree on
the 'overwhelming' part.
__
Steve
..