134a Refrigerant
Guest
Posts: n/a
Earle Horton wrote:
> "Note that the profile is bimolal at low pressures indicating a possible
> contamination problem."
>
> When one is talking about parts per trillion (ppt) then a "possible
> contamination problem" could account for the whole graph. I worked in a lab
> once, where a master's degree candidate's thesis research results were
> determined to be artifact. The degree granting process was rushed through,
> before anyone on the committee read the relevant articles, because "It is
> just a master's thesis". This is so much more important, a debate on
> Usenet, and you are obligated to be more careful.
>
> "The gaps indicate regions where the pumps were turned off because of
> overheating." Or maybe gaps exist, because there was no detectable CFC-11
> at those altitudes? I am afraid that this page doesn't show much, except
> for the presence of dots on a graph. Do you have any higher quality data?
>
Yea,I saw that low pressure out-gassing as well, but noted it
disappeared at higher pressures as would be expected. How about the
first science run: http://www.cmdl.noaa.gov/hats/airborne/lace/lace11.html
BTW, the AC in my 2000 Cherokee works great with R134a, and my Wrangler
doesn't need AC since it rarely has a top on in the summer. My kids are
much more important to me than saving a couple of bucks on a recharge or
retrofit.
--
jeff
> "Note that the profile is bimolal at low pressures indicating a possible
> contamination problem."
>
> When one is talking about parts per trillion (ppt) then a "possible
> contamination problem" could account for the whole graph. I worked in a lab
> once, where a master's degree candidate's thesis research results were
> determined to be artifact. The degree granting process was rushed through,
> before anyone on the committee read the relevant articles, because "It is
> just a master's thesis". This is so much more important, a debate on
> Usenet, and you are obligated to be more careful.
>
> "The gaps indicate regions where the pumps were turned off because of
> overheating." Or maybe gaps exist, because there was no detectable CFC-11
> at those altitudes? I am afraid that this page doesn't show much, except
> for the presence of dots on a graph. Do you have any higher quality data?
>
Yea,I saw that low pressure out-gassing as well, but noted it
disappeared at higher pressures as would be expected. How about the
first science run: http://www.cmdl.noaa.gov/hats/airborne/lace/lace11.html
BTW, the AC in my 2000 Cherokee works great with R134a, and my Wrangler
doesn't need AC since it rarely has a top on in the summer. My kids are
much more important to me than saving a couple of bucks on a recharge or
retrofit.
--
jeff
Guest
Posts: n/a
Earle Horton wrote:
> "Note that the profile is bimolal at low pressures indicating a possible
> contamination problem."
>
> When one is talking about parts per trillion (ppt) then a "possible
> contamination problem" could account for the whole graph. I worked in a lab
> once, where a master's degree candidate's thesis research results were
> determined to be artifact. The degree granting process was rushed through,
> before anyone on the committee read the relevant articles, because "It is
> just a master's thesis". This is so much more important, a debate on
> Usenet, and you are obligated to be more careful.
>
> "The gaps indicate regions where the pumps were turned off because of
> overheating." Or maybe gaps exist, because there was no detectable CFC-11
> at those altitudes? I am afraid that this page doesn't show much, except
> for the presence of dots on a graph. Do you have any higher quality data?
>
Yea,I saw that low pressure out-gassing as well, but noted it
disappeared at higher pressures as would be expected. How about the
first science run: http://www.cmdl.noaa.gov/hats/airborne/lace/lace11.html
BTW, the AC in my 2000 Cherokee works great with R134a, and my Wrangler
doesn't need AC since it rarely has a top on in the summer. My kids are
much more important to me than saving a couple of bucks on a recharge or
retrofit.
--
jeff
> "Note that the profile is bimolal at low pressures indicating a possible
> contamination problem."
>
> When one is talking about parts per trillion (ppt) then a "possible
> contamination problem" could account for the whole graph. I worked in a lab
> once, where a master's degree candidate's thesis research results were
> determined to be artifact. The degree granting process was rushed through,
> before anyone on the committee read the relevant articles, because "It is
> just a master's thesis". This is so much more important, a debate on
> Usenet, and you are obligated to be more careful.
>
> "The gaps indicate regions where the pumps were turned off because of
> overheating." Or maybe gaps exist, because there was no detectable CFC-11
> at those altitudes? I am afraid that this page doesn't show much, except
> for the presence of dots on a graph. Do you have any higher quality data?
>
Yea,I saw that low pressure out-gassing as well, but noted it
disappeared at higher pressures as would be expected. How about the
first science run: http://www.cmdl.noaa.gov/hats/airborne/lace/lace11.html
BTW, the AC in my 2000 Cherokee works great with R134a, and my Wrangler
doesn't need AC since it rarely has a top on in the summer. My kids are
much more important to me than saving a couple of bucks on a recharge or
retrofit.
--
jeff
Guest
Posts: n/a
Earle Horton wrote:
> "Note that the profile is bimolal at low pressures indicating a possible
> contamination problem."
>
> When one is talking about parts per trillion (ppt) then a "possible
> contamination problem" could account for the whole graph. I worked in a lab
> once, where a master's degree candidate's thesis research results were
> determined to be artifact. The degree granting process was rushed through,
> before anyone on the committee read the relevant articles, because "It is
> just a master's thesis". This is so much more important, a debate on
> Usenet, and you are obligated to be more careful.
>
> "The gaps indicate regions where the pumps were turned off because of
> overheating." Or maybe gaps exist, because there was no detectable CFC-11
> at those altitudes? I am afraid that this page doesn't show much, except
> for the presence of dots on a graph. Do you have any higher quality data?
>
Yea,I saw that low pressure out-gassing as well, but noted it
disappeared at higher pressures as would be expected. How about the
first science run: http://www.cmdl.noaa.gov/hats/airborne/lace/lace11.html
BTW, the AC in my 2000 Cherokee works great with R134a, and my Wrangler
doesn't need AC since it rarely has a top on in the summer. My kids are
much more important to me than saving a couple of bucks on a recharge or
retrofit.
--
jeff
> "Note that the profile is bimolal at low pressures indicating a possible
> contamination problem."
>
> When one is talking about parts per trillion (ppt) then a "possible
> contamination problem" could account for the whole graph. I worked in a lab
> once, where a master's degree candidate's thesis research results were
> determined to be artifact. The degree granting process was rushed through,
> before anyone on the committee read the relevant articles, because "It is
> just a master's thesis". This is so much more important, a debate on
> Usenet, and you are obligated to be more careful.
>
> "The gaps indicate regions where the pumps were turned off because of
> overheating." Or maybe gaps exist, because there was no detectable CFC-11
> at those altitudes? I am afraid that this page doesn't show much, except
> for the presence of dots on a graph. Do you have any higher quality data?
>
Yea,I saw that low pressure out-gassing as well, but noted it
disappeared at higher pressures as would be expected. How about the
first science run: http://www.cmdl.noaa.gov/hats/airborne/lace/lace11.html
BTW, the AC in my 2000 Cherokee works great with R134a, and my Wrangler
doesn't need AC since it rarely has a top on in the summer. My kids are
much more important to me than saving a couple of bucks on a recharge or
retrofit.
--
jeff
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:QxMwe.1069$U61.566@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> has influenced billions of dollars worth
> of decisions
NOW youre onto something. duponts patent runs out, immediately its "bad for
the environment".
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:QxMwe.1069$U61.566@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> has influenced billions of dollars worth
> of decisions
NOW youre onto something. duponts patent runs out, immediately its "bad for
the environment".
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:QxMwe.1069$U61.566@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> has influenced billions of dollars worth
> of decisions
NOW youre onto something. duponts patent runs out, immediately its "bad for
the environment".
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:QxMwe.1069$U61.566@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> has influenced billions of dollars worth
> of decisions
NOW youre onto something. duponts patent runs out, immediately its "bad for
the environment".
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:QxMwe.1069$U61.566@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> has influenced billions of dollars worth
> of decisions
NOW youre onto something. duponts patent runs out, immediately its "bad for
the environment".
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:QxMwe.1069$U61.566@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> has influenced billions of dollars worth
> of decisions
NOW youre onto something. duponts patent runs out, immediately its "bad for
the environment".
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:QxMwe.1069$U61.566@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> has influenced billions of dollars worth
> of decisions
NOW youre onto something. duponts patent runs out, immediately its "bad for
the environment".
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:QxMwe.1069$U61.566@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> has influenced billions of dollars worth
> of decisions
NOW youre onto something. duponts patent runs out, immediately its "bad for
the environment".
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:HtSwe.1210$U61.536@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> Thus higher mass constituents, such as oxygen and nitrogen, fall off more
> quickly than lighter constituents
thanks for making my point stephen. heavier falls, lighter rises. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:HtSwe.1210$U61.536@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> Thus higher mass constituents, such as oxygen and nitrogen, fall off more
> quickly than lighter constituents
thanks for making my point stephen. heavier falls, lighter rises. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:HtSwe.1210$U61.536@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> Thus higher mass constituents, such as oxygen and nitrogen, fall off more
> quickly than lighter constituents
thanks for making my point stephen. heavier falls, lighter rises. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:HtSwe.1210$U61.536@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> Thus higher mass constituents, such as oxygen and nitrogen, fall off more
> quickly than lighter constituents
thanks for making my point stephen. heavier falls, lighter rises. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:HtSwe.1210$U61.536@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> Thus higher mass constituents, such as oxygen and nitrogen, fall off more
> quickly than lighter constituents
thanks for making my point stephen. heavier falls, lighter rises. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:HtSwe.1210$U61.536@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com ...
> Thus higher mass constituents, such as oxygen and nitrogen, fall off more
> quickly than lighter constituents
thanks for making my point stephen. heavier falls, lighter rises. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com


