134a Refrigerant
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11c6qb7be3bbv07@corp.supernews.com...
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:42C34245.E463E4BE@***.net...
> > Yep, you bleeding heart liberals have only smoke and mirrors, but
> > never any proof.
>
> i have nothing to add......youre just so damn right with that statement i
> felt it worthy of repost.
It's a mini-Repub convention! How to prove
something to someone that doesn't want it
proven to them... that's the big question.
You can try cramming the knowlege into
their heads... but it just bounces off.
Their eye-holes just won't open up
enough to see... and their ear-holes
shut at the first sound of an academic
talking.
If wilful ignorance is a blessing, then
you both are angels. We're not talking
about global warming, where the jury
is still out... this is CFC's and ozone,
where the science is decades old and
has influenced billions of dollars worth
of decisions taken on the highest levels
by bipartisan international legislation.
That your brains refuse to accommodate
this fact, and the science involved, is
a telling indicator of where this nation
is headed.
__
Steve
..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
I know someone who lives in suburbia has a difficult time understanding
the natural world, but from my perspective, environmentalism is not a
liberal/conservative pivot point. It is about conserving the environment
so that my children and grandchildren can hunt, fish, hike, camp and
perhaps through this, gain some measure of their place in the universe.
I grew up in western Pennsylvania at a time when strip mining was
destroying all the deer habitat and the acid run off from them destroyed
most of the trout streams. Indiscriminant use of DDT wiped out most of
the native large birds to the point where hunting turkey and duck were
not worth the effort. From the top of a hill it was easy to mark the
direction to Pittsburgh from the sooty gray plume. Now 35 years later,
due in large measure to laws such as the clean air act and clean water
act I see a marked change for the better. The deer herd has come back,
as have the fisheries. This morning I saw over a dozen turkeys in my
back yard and I have ducks living in my pond. For these reasons I have
no problem with some portion of my tax dollars going to fund the EPA.
Without them we would have one continuous Love Canal from coast to coast.
BTW, to answer your question in a manner that even the common layman can
understand: Wind is responsible for atmospheric mixing. Think about it
like a bottle of Italian salad dressing: In the cool quiet isolation of
your refrigerator it separates. The heavy chunky bits settle to the
bottom and the oil rises to the top. Shake it and it becomes a uniform
mixture. This act of shaking is akin to the normal atmospheric
turbulence called wind. Thermal kinetic energy imparts Brownian motion.
--
jeff
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> You still haven't made the connection between Chlorofluorocarbons
> and the ozone, like how does heavier than air rise to that height?
> Except by some bleeding heart liberal theory designed solely to suck
> government grant's tax payer money. Even the common layman can see it
> has no bases in fact! It is pure unadulterated bullsh*t! And you're a
> loser if can be lead by false statements!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Twist/Twist/Twist..... You sure like to grasp at straws don't you.
>>
>>The troposphere extends to between 5 and 9 miles up. Above that is the
>>stratosphere which extends to about 30 miles or so. FWIW, ozone forms at
>>about the mid point, say 20 miles up or so. My point was that tropical
>>cumulonimbus formations can easily extend upward of 8 to 9 miles, which
>>is reaching the stratosphere. Also, they routinely carry heavy
>>hailstones. If they can carry three pound ice *****, they are certainly
>>not going to have any problem with CFCs. In case you are counting, ice
>>has a specific gravity about 400 times that of air, and about 100 times
>>that of dichlordiflouromethane. Isn't it amazing how the wind can carry
>>ice, water, and all manner of debris and particulate matter, hundreds of
>>times denser than air, but freon is going to drop like a rock because
>>"it's heavier than air". It doesn't wash.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
the natural world, but from my perspective, environmentalism is not a
liberal/conservative pivot point. It is about conserving the environment
so that my children and grandchildren can hunt, fish, hike, camp and
perhaps through this, gain some measure of their place in the universe.
I grew up in western Pennsylvania at a time when strip mining was
destroying all the deer habitat and the acid run off from them destroyed
most of the trout streams. Indiscriminant use of DDT wiped out most of
the native large birds to the point where hunting turkey and duck were
not worth the effort. From the top of a hill it was easy to mark the
direction to Pittsburgh from the sooty gray plume. Now 35 years later,
due in large measure to laws such as the clean air act and clean water
act I see a marked change for the better. The deer herd has come back,
as have the fisheries. This morning I saw over a dozen turkeys in my
back yard and I have ducks living in my pond. For these reasons I have
no problem with some portion of my tax dollars going to fund the EPA.
Without them we would have one continuous Love Canal from coast to coast.
BTW, to answer your question in a manner that even the common layman can
understand: Wind is responsible for atmospheric mixing. Think about it
like a bottle of Italian salad dressing: In the cool quiet isolation of
your refrigerator it separates. The heavy chunky bits settle to the
bottom and the oil rises to the top. Shake it and it becomes a uniform
mixture. This act of shaking is akin to the normal atmospheric
turbulence called wind. Thermal kinetic energy imparts Brownian motion.
--
jeff
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> You still haven't made the connection between Chlorofluorocarbons
> and the ozone, like how does heavier than air rise to that height?
> Except by some bleeding heart liberal theory designed solely to suck
> government grant's tax payer money. Even the common layman can see it
> has no bases in fact! It is pure unadulterated bullsh*t! And you're a
> loser if can be lead by false statements!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Twist/Twist/Twist..... You sure like to grasp at straws don't you.
>>
>>The troposphere extends to between 5 and 9 miles up. Above that is the
>>stratosphere which extends to about 30 miles or so. FWIW, ozone forms at
>>about the mid point, say 20 miles up or so. My point was that tropical
>>cumulonimbus formations can easily extend upward of 8 to 9 miles, which
>>is reaching the stratosphere. Also, they routinely carry heavy
>>hailstones. If they can carry three pound ice *****, they are certainly
>>not going to have any problem with CFCs. In case you are counting, ice
>>has a specific gravity about 400 times that of air, and about 100 times
>>that of dichlordiflouromethane. Isn't it amazing how the wind can carry
>>ice, water, and all manner of debris and particulate matter, hundreds of
>>times denser than air, but freon is going to drop like a rock because
>>"it's heavier than air". It doesn't wash.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
I know someone who lives in suburbia has a difficult time understanding
the natural world, but from my perspective, environmentalism is not a
liberal/conservative pivot point. It is about conserving the environment
so that my children and grandchildren can hunt, fish, hike, camp and
perhaps through this, gain some measure of their place in the universe.
I grew up in western Pennsylvania at a time when strip mining was
destroying all the deer habitat and the acid run off from them destroyed
most of the trout streams. Indiscriminant use of DDT wiped out most of
the native large birds to the point where hunting turkey and duck were
not worth the effort. From the top of a hill it was easy to mark the
direction to Pittsburgh from the sooty gray plume. Now 35 years later,
due in large measure to laws such as the clean air act and clean water
act I see a marked change for the better. The deer herd has come back,
as have the fisheries. This morning I saw over a dozen turkeys in my
back yard and I have ducks living in my pond. For these reasons I have
no problem with some portion of my tax dollars going to fund the EPA.
Without them we would have one continuous Love Canal from coast to coast.
BTW, to answer your question in a manner that even the common layman can
understand: Wind is responsible for atmospheric mixing. Think about it
like a bottle of Italian salad dressing: In the cool quiet isolation of
your refrigerator it separates. The heavy chunky bits settle to the
bottom and the oil rises to the top. Shake it and it becomes a uniform
mixture. This act of shaking is akin to the normal atmospheric
turbulence called wind. Thermal kinetic energy imparts Brownian motion.
--
jeff
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> You still haven't made the connection between Chlorofluorocarbons
> and the ozone, like how does heavier than air rise to that height?
> Except by some bleeding heart liberal theory designed solely to suck
> government grant's tax payer money. Even the common layman can see it
> has no bases in fact! It is pure unadulterated bullsh*t! And you're a
> loser if can be lead by false statements!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Twist/Twist/Twist..... You sure like to grasp at straws don't you.
>>
>>The troposphere extends to between 5 and 9 miles up. Above that is the
>>stratosphere which extends to about 30 miles or so. FWIW, ozone forms at
>>about the mid point, say 20 miles up or so. My point was that tropical
>>cumulonimbus formations can easily extend upward of 8 to 9 miles, which
>>is reaching the stratosphere. Also, they routinely carry heavy
>>hailstones. If they can carry three pound ice *****, they are certainly
>>not going to have any problem with CFCs. In case you are counting, ice
>>has a specific gravity about 400 times that of air, and about 100 times
>>that of dichlordiflouromethane. Isn't it amazing how the wind can carry
>>ice, water, and all manner of debris and particulate matter, hundreds of
>>times denser than air, but freon is going to drop like a rock because
>>"it's heavier than air". It doesn't wash.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
the natural world, but from my perspective, environmentalism is not a
liberal/conservative pivot point. It is about conserving the environment
so that my children and grandchildren can hunt, fish, hike, camp and
perhaps through this, gain some measure of their place in the universe.
I grew up in western Pennsylvania at a time when strip mining was
destroying all the deer habitat and the acid run off from them destroyed
most of the trout streams. Indiscriminant use of DDT wiped out most of
the native large birds to the point where hunting turkey and duck were
not worth the effort. From the top of a hill it was easy to mark the
direction to Pittsburgh from the sooty gray plume. Now 35 years later,
due in large measure to laws such as the clean air act and clean water
act I see a marked change for the better. The deer herd has come back,
as have the fisheries. This morning I saw over a dozen turkeys in my
back yard and I have ducks living in my pond. For these reasons I have
no problem with some portion of my tax dollars going to fund the EPA.
Without them we would have one continuous Love Canal from coast to coast.
BTW, to answer your question in a manner that even the common layman can
understand: Wind is responsible for atmospheric mixing. Think about it
like a bottle of Italian salad dressing: In the cool quiet isolation of
your refrigerator it separates. The heavy chunky bits settle to the
bottom and the oil rises to the top. Shake it and it becomes a uniform
mixture. This act of shaking is akin to the normal atmospheric
turbulence called wind. Thermal kinetic energy imparts Brownian motion.
--
jeff
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> You still haven't made the connection between Chlorofluorocarbons
> and the ozone, like how does heavier than air rise to that height?
> Except by some bleeding heart liberal theory designed solely to suck
> government grant's tax payer money. Even the common layman can see it
> has no bases in fact! It is pure unadulterated bullsh*t! And you're a
> loser if can be lead by false statements!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Twist/Twist/Twist..... You sure like to grasp at straws don't you.
>>
>>The troposphere extends to between 5 and 9 miles up. Above that is the
>>stratosphere which extends to about 30 miles or so. FWIW, ozone forms at
>>about the mid point, say 20 miles up or so. My point was that tropical
>>cumulonimbus formations can easily extend upward of 8 to 9 miles, which
>>is reaching the stratosphere. Also, they routinely carry heavy
>>hailstones. If they can carry three pound ice *****, they are certainly
>>not going to have any problem with CFCs. In case you are counting, ice
>>has a specific gravity about 400 times that of air, and about 100 times
>>that of dichlordiflouromethane. Isn't it amazing how the wind can carry
>>ice, water, and all manner of debris and particulate matter, hundreds of
>>times denser than air, but freon is going to drop like a rock because
>>"it's heavier than air". It doesn't wash.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
I know someone who lives in suburbia has a difficult time understanding
the natural world, but from my perspective, environmentalism is not a
liberal/conservative pivot point. It is about conserving the environment
so that my children and grandchildren can hunt, fish, hike, camp and
perhaps through this, gain some measure of their place in the universe.
I grew up in western Pennsylvania at a time when strip mining was
destroying all the deer habitat and the acid run off from them destroyed
most of the trout streams. Indiscriminant use of DDT wiped out most of
the native large birds to the point where hunting turkey and duck were
not worth the effort. From the top of a hill it was easy to mark the
direction to Pittsburgh from the sooty gray plume. Now 35 years later,
due in large measure to laws such as the clean air act and clean water
act I see a marked change for the better. The deer herd has come back,
as have the fisheries. This morning I saw over a dozen turkeys in my
back yard and I have ducks living in my pond. For these reasons I have
no problem with some portion of my tax dollars going to fund the EPA.
Without them we would have one continuous Love Canal from coast to coast.
BTW, to answer your question in a manner that even the common layman can
understand: Wind is responsible for atmospheric mixing. Think about it
like a bottle of Italian salad dressing: In the cool quiet isolation of
your refrigerator it separates. The heavy chunky bits settle to the
bottom and the oil rises to the top. Shake it and it becomes a uniform
mixture. This act of shaking is akin to the normal atmospheric
turbulence called wind. Thermal kinetic energy imparts Brownian motion.
--
jeff
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> You still haven't made the connection between Chlorofluorocarbons
> and the ozone, like how does heavier than air rise to that height?
> Except by some bleeding heart liberal theory designed solely to suck
> government grant's tax payer money. Even the common layman can see it
> has no bases in fact! It is pure unadulterated bullsh*t! And you're a
> loser if can be lead by false statements!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Twist/Twist/Twist..... You sure like to grasp at straws don't you.
>>
>>The troposphere extends to between 5 and 9 miles up. Above that is the
>>stratosphere which extends to about 30 miles or so. FWIW, ozone forms at
>>about the mid point, say 20 miles up or so. My point was that tropical
>>cumulonimbus formations can easily extend upward of 8 to 9 miles, which
>>is reaching the stratosphere. Also, they routinely carry heavy
>>hailstones. If they can carry three pound ice *****, they are certainly
>>not going to have any problem with CFCs. In case you are counting, ice
>>has a specific gravity about 400 times that of air, and about 100 times
>>that of dichlordiflouromethane. Isn't it amazing how the wind can carry
>>ice, water, and all manner of debris and particulate matter, hundreds of
>>times denser than air, but freon is going to drop like a rock because
>>"it's heavier than air". It doesn't wash.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
the natural world, but from my perspective, environmentalism is not a
liberal/conservative pivot point. It is about conserving the environment
so that my children and grandchildren can hunt, fish, hike, camp and
perhaps through this, gain some measure of their place in the universe.
I grew up in western Pennsylvania at a time when strip mining was
destroying all the deer habitat and the acid run off from them destroyed
most of the trout streams. Indiscriminant use of DDT wiped out most of
the native large birds to the point where hunting turkey and duck were
not worth the effort. From the top of a hill it was easy to mark the
direction to Pittsburgh from the sooty gray plume. Now 35 years later,
due in large measure to laws such as the clean air act and clean water
act I see a marked change for the better. The deer herd has come back,
as have the fisheries. This morning I saw over a dozen turkeys in my
back yard and I have ducks living in my pond. For these reasons I have
no problem with some portion of my tax dollars going to fund the EPA.
Without them we would have one continuous Love Canal from coast to coast.
BTW, to answer your question in a manner that even the common layman can
understand: Wind is responsible for atmospheric mixing. Think about it
like a bottle of Italian salad dressing: In the cool quiet isolation of
your refrigerator it separates. The heavy chunky bits settle to the
bottom and the oil rises to the top. Shake it and it becomes a uniform
mixture. This act of shaking is akin to the normal atmospheric
turbulence called wind. Thermal kinetic energy imparts Brownian motion.
--
jeff
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> You still haven't made the connection between Chlorofluorocarbons
> and the ozone, like how does heavier than air rise to that height?
> Except by some bleeding heart liberal theory designed solely to suck
> government grant's tax payer money. Even the common layman can see it
> has no bases in fact! It is pure unadulterated bullsh*t! And you're a
> loser if can be lead by false statements!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Twist/Twist/Twist..... You sure like to grasp at straws don't you.
>>
>>The troposphere extends to between 5 and 9 miles up. Above that is the
>>stratosphere which extends to about 30 miles or so. FWIW, ozone forms at
>>about the mid point, say 20 miles up or so. My point was that tropical
>>cumulonimbus formations can easily extend upward of 8 to 9 miles, which
>>is reaching the stratosphere. Also, they routinely carry heavy
>>hailstones. If they can carry three pound ice *****, they are certainly
>>not going to have any problem with CFCs. In case you are counting, ice
>>has a specific gravity about 400 times that of air, and about 100 times
>>that of dichlordiflouromethane. Isn't it amazing how the wind can carry
>>ice, water, and all manner of debris and particulate matter, hundreds of
>>times denser than air, but freon is going to drop like a rock because
>>"it's heavier than air". It doesn't wash.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
I know someone who lives in suburbia has a difficult time understanding
the natural world, but from my perspective, environmentalism is not a
liberal/conservative pivot point. It is about conserving the environment
so that my children and grandchildren can hunt, fish, hike, camp and
perhaps through this, gain some measure of their place in the universe.
I grew up in western Pennsylvania at a time when strip mining was
destroying all the deer habitat and the acid run off from them destroyed
most of the trout streams. Indiscriminant use of DDT wiped out most of
the native large birds to the point where hunting turkey and duck were
not worth the effort. From the top of a hill it was easy to mark the
direction to Pittsburgh from the sooty gray plume. Now 35 years later,
due in large measure to laws such as the clean air act and clean water
act I see a marked change for the better. The deer herd has come back,
as have the fisheries. This morning I saw over a dozen turkeys in my
back yard and I have ducks living in my pond. For these reasons I have
no problem with some portion of my tax dollars going to fund the EPA.
Without them we would have one continuous Love Canal from coast to coast.
BTW, to answer your question in a manner that even the common layman can
understand: Wind is responsible for atmospheric mixing. Think about it
like a bottle of Italian salad dressing: In the cool quiet isolation of
your refrigerator it separates. The heavy chunky bits settle to the
bottom and the oil rises to the top. Shake it and it becomes a uniform
mixture. This act of shaking is akin to the normal atmospheric
turbulence called wind. Thermal kinetic energy imparts Brownian motion.
--
jeff
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> You still haven't made the connection between Chlorofluorocarbons
> and the ozone, like how does heavier than air rise to that height?
> Except by some bleeding heart liberal theory designed solely to suck
> government grant's tax payer money. Even the common layman can see it
> has no bases in fact! It is pure unadulterated bullsh*t! And you're a
> loser if can be lead by false statements!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Twist/Twist/Twist..... You sure like to grasp at straws don't you.
>>
>>The troposphere extends to between 5 and 9 miles up. Above that is the
>>stratosphere which extends to about 30 miles or so. FWIW, ozone forms at
>>about the mid point, say 20 miles up or so. My point was that tropical
>>cumulonimbus formations can easily extend upward of 8 to 9 miles, which
>>is reaching the stratosphere. Also, they routinely carry heavy
>>hailstones. If they can carry three pound ice *****, they are certainly
>>not going to have any problem with CFCs. In case you are counting, ice
>>has a specific gravity about 400 times that of air, and about 100 times
>>that of dichlordiflouromethane. Isn't it amazing how the wind can carry
>>ice, water, and all manner of debris and particulate matter, hundreds of
>>times denser than air, but freon is going to drop like a rock because
>>"it's heavier than air". It doesn't wash.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
the natural world, but from my perspective, environmentalism is not a
liberal/conservative pivot point. It is about conserving the environment
so that my children and grandchildren can hunt, fish, hike, camp and
perhaps through this, gain some measure of their place in the universe.
I grew up in western Pennsylvania at a time when strip mining was
destroying all the deer habitat and the acid run off from them destroyed
most of the trout streams. Indiscriminant use of DDT wiped out most of
the native large birds to the point where hunting turkey and duck were
not worth the effort. From the top of a hill it was easy to mark the
direction to Pittsburgh from the sooty gray plume. Now 35 years later,
due in large measure to laws such as the clean air act and clean water
act I see a marked change for the better. The deer herd has come back,
as have the fisheries. This morning I saw over a dozen turkeys in my
back yard and I have ducks living in my pond. For these reasons I have
no problem with some portion of my tax dollars going to fund the EPA.
Without them we would have one continuous Love Canal from coast to coast.
BTW, to answer your question in a manner that even the common layman can
understand: Wind is responsible for atmospheric mixing. Think about it
like a bottle of Italian salad dressing: In the cool quiet isolation of
your refrigerator it separates. The heavy chunky bits settle to the
bottom and the oil rises to the top. Shake it and it becomes a uniform
mixture. This act of shaking is akin to the normal atmospheric
turbulence called wind. Thermal kinetic energy imparts Brownian motion.
--
jeff
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> You still haven't made the connection between Chlorofluorocarbons
> and the ozone, like how does heavier than air rise to that height?
> Except by some bleeding heart liberal theory designed solely to suck
> government grant's tax payer money. Even the common layman can see it
> has no bases in fact! It is pure unadulterated bullsh*t! And you're a
> loser if can be lead by false statements!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
>
>>Twist/Twist/Twist..... You sure like to grasp at straws don't you.
>>
>>The troposphere extends to between 5 and 9 miles up. Above that is the
>>stratosphere which extends to about 30 miles or so. FWIW, ozone forms at
>>about the mid point, say 20 miles up or so. My point was that tropical
>>cumulonimbus formations can easily extend upward of 8 to 9 miles, which
>>is reaching the stratosphere. Also, they routinely carry heavy
>>hailstones. If they can carry three pound ice *****, they are certainly
>>not going to have any problem with CFCs. In case you are counting, ice
>>has a specific gravity about 400 times that of air, and about 100 times
>>that of dichlordiflouromethane. Isn't it amazing how the wind can carry
>>ice, water, and all manner of debris and particulate matter, hundreds of
>>times denser than air, but freon is going to drop like a rock because
>>"it's heavier than air". It doesn't wash.
>>
>>--
>>jeff
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11c74j4oo0ror16@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:%eMwe.1067$U61.80@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > There should be no argon in
> > the upper atmosphere
>
> so prove the presence and the source.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_atmosphere
<>
Heterosphere
Below an altitude of about 100 km, the Earth's atmosphere has a more-or-less uniform composition (apart from water vapor) as described above. However, above about 100 km, the Earth's atmosphere begins to have a composition which varies with altitude. This is essentially because, in the absence of mixing, the density of a gas falls off exponentially with increasing altitude, but at a rate which depends on the molecular mass. Thus higher mass constituents, such as oxygen and nitrogen, fall off more quickly than lighter constituents such as helium, molecular hydrogen, and atomic hydrogen. Thus there is a layer, called the heterosphere, in which the earth's atmosphere has varying composition. As the altitude increases, the atmosphere is dominated successively by helium, molecular hydrogen, and atomic hydrogen. The precise altitude of the heterosphere and the layers it contains varies significantly with temperature.[2]
</>
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionar...+layer&x=0&y=0
<>
Main Entry: ozone layer
Function: noun
: an atmospheric layer at heights of about 20 to 30 miles (32 to 48 kilometers) that is normally characterized by high ozone content which blocks most solar ultraviolet radiation from entry into the lower atmosphere
</>
I'm not going to expect you to believe this stuff...
you don't have a history of that. Here it is,
nonetheless.
__
Steve
..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11c74j4oo0ror16@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:%eMwe.1067$U61.80@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > There should be no argon in
> > the upper atmosphere
>
> so prove the presence and the source.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_atmosphere
<>
Heterosphere
Below an altitude of about 100 km, the Earth's atmosphere has a more-or-less uniform composition (apart from water vapor) as described above. However, above about 100 km, the Earth's atmosphere begins to have a composition which varies with altitude. This is essentially because, in the absence of mixing, the density of a gas falls off exponentially with increasing altitude, but at a rate which depends on the molecular mass. Thus higher mass constituents, such as oxygen and nitrogen, fall off more quickly than lighter constituents such as helium, molecular hydrogen, and atomic hydrogen. Thus there is a layer, called the heterosphere, in which the earth's atmosphere has varying composition. As the altitude increases, the atmosphere is dominated successively by helium, molecular hydrogen, and atomic hydrogen. The precise altitude of the heterosphere and the layers it contains varies significantly with temperature.[2]
</>
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionar...+layer&x=0&y=0
<>
Main Entry: ozone layer
Function: noun
: an atmospheric layer at heights of about 20 to 30 miles (32 to 48 kilometers) that is normally characterized by high ozone content which blocks most solar ultraviolet radiation from entry into the lower atmosphere
</>
I'm not going to expect you to believe this stuff...
you don't have a history of that. Here it is,
nonetheless.
__
Steve
..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11c74j4oo0ror16@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:%eMwe.1067$U61.80@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > There should be no argon in
> > the upper atmosphere
>
> so prove the presence and the source.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_atmosphere
<>
Heterosphere
Below an altitude of about 100 km, the Earth's atmosphere has a more-or-less uniform composition (apart from water vapor) as described above. However, above about 100 km, the Earth's atmosphere begins to have a composition which varies with altitude. This is essentially because, in the absence of mixing, the density of a gas falls off exponentially with increasing altitude, but at a rate which depends on the molecular mass. Thus higher mass constituents, such as oxygen and nitrogen, fall off more quickly than lighter constituents such as helium, molecular hydrogen, and atomic hydrogen. Thus there is a layer, called the heterosphere, in which the earth's atmosphere has varying composition. As the altitude increases, the atmosphere is dominated successively by helium, molecular hydrogen, and atomic hydrogen. The precise altitude of the heterosphere and the layers it contains varies significantly with temperature.[2]
</>
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionar...+layer&x=0&y=0
<>
Main Entry: ozone layer
Function: noun
: an atmospheric layer at heights of about 20 to 30 miles (32 to 48 kilometers) that is normally characterized by high ozone content which blocks most solar ultraviolet radiation from entry into the lower atmosphere
</>
I'm not going to expect you to believe this stuff...
you don't have a history of that. Here it is,
nonetheless.
__
Steve
..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11c74j4oo0ror16@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:%eMwe.1067$U61.80@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > There should be no argon in
> > the upper atmosphere
>
> so prove the presence and the source.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_atmosphere
<>
Heterosphere
Below an altitude of about 100 km, the Earth's atmosphere has a more-or-less uniform composition (apart from water vapor) as described above. However, above about 100 km, the Earth's atmosphere begins to have a composition which varies with altitude. This is essentially because, in the absence of mixing, the density of a gas falls off exponentially with increasing altitude, but at a rate which depends on the molecular mass. Thus higher mass constituents, such as oxygen and nitrogen, fall off more quickly than lighter constituents such as helium, molecular hydrogen, and atomic hydrogen. Thus there is a layer, called the heterosphere, in which the earth's atmosphere has varying composition. As the altitude increases, the atmosphere is dominated successively by helium, molecular hydrogen, and atomic hydrogen. The precise altitude of the heterosphere and the layers it contains varies significantly with temperature.[2]
</>
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionar...+layer&x=0&y=0
<>
Main Entry: ozone layer
Function: noun
: an atmospheric layer at heights of about 20 to 30 miles (32 to 48 kilometers) that is normally characterized by high ozone content which blocks most solar ultraviolet radiation from entry into the lower atmosphere
</>
I'm not going to expect you to believe this stuff...
you don't have a history of that. Here it is,
nonetheless.
__
Steve
..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11c6qkrhookcq8f@corp.supernews.com...
> "Earle Horton" <earle-NOSPAM-horton@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:1120054909.f7baf65f4de983f8220a2dfab9072b23@t eranews...
> > I don't know why the rest of you boys insist on
> > playing with him.
>
> its not even a valid debate anymore. at this point im just toying with him.
> hes a seminar liberal, taught to ALWAYS get the last word at any expense and
> its funny watching him crumble as he realizes thats just not possible here.
Funny how I'm crumbling with my foot on your
neck... yeah, I always crumble that way. What
was it Newt said? Oh yeah... "Go negative early,
don't give up". He's my mentor!
__
Steve
..