"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11c6pbskcnfd0c7@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:jhrwe.714$U61.475@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > Just like the argon pool we're drowning in! Help!
>
> see http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=concentration although i dont
> expect you to let fact stand in the way of your argument.

Argon is heavier than air, right? So it should
all fall out! There should be no argon in
the upper atmosphere, where we find
the Nitrogen Layer, the Helium Layer, etc...
oh, you say this doesn't happen? Why
not? CONCENTRATION, he says, like
it means anything. If Freon falls, then
argon falls. You can't measure a concentration
unless the gas is mixed... the atmosphere
is a mixed gas. We can go around again
if you like... everyone here loves it.
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11c6pbskcnfd0c7@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:jhrwe.714$U61.475@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > Just like the argon pool we're drowning in! Help!
>
> see http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=concentration although i dont
> expect you to let fact stand in the way of your argument.

Argon is heavier than air, right? So it should
all fall out! There should be no argon in
the upper atmosphere, where we find
the Nitrogen Layer, the Helium Layer, etc...
oh, you say this doesn't happen? Why
not? CONCENTRATION, he says, like
it means anything. If Freon falls, then
argon falls. You can't measure a concentration
unless the gas is mixed... the atmosphere
is a mixed gas. We can go around again
if you like... everyone here loves it.
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11c6pbskcnfd0c7@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:jhrwe.714$U61.475@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
> > Just like the argon pool we're drowning in! Help!
>
> see http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=concentration although i dont
> expect you to let fact stand in the way of your argument.

Argon is heavier than air, right? So it should
all fall out! There should be no argon in
the upper atmosphere, where we find
the Nitrogen Layer, the Helium Layer, etc...
oh, you say this doesn't happen? Why
not? CONCENTRATION, he says, like
it means anything. If Freon falls, then
argon falls. You can't measure a concentration
unless the gas is mixed... the atmosphere
is a mixed gas. We can go around again
if you like... everyone here loves it.
__
Steve
..

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:%eMwe.1067$U61.80@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
> There should be no argon in
> the upper atmosphere

so prove the presence and the source.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:%eMwe.1067$U61.80@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
> There should be no argon in
> the upper atmosphere

so prove the presence and the source.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:%eMwe.1067$U61.80@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
> There should be no argon in
> the upper atmosphere

so prove the presence and the source.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:%eMwe.1067$U61.80@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com. ..
> There should be no argon in
> the upper atmosphere

so prove the presence and the source.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11c6qb7be3bbv07@corp.supernews.com...
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:42C34245.E463E4BE@***.net...
> > Yep, you bleeding heart liberals have only smoke and mirrors, but
> > never any proof.
>
> i have nothing to add......youre just so damn right with that statement i
> felt it worthy of repost.

It's a mini-Repub convention! How to prove
something to someone that doesn't want it
proven to them... that's the big question.
You can try cramming the knowlege into
their heads... but it just bounces off.
Their eye-holes just won't open up
enough to see... and their ear-holes
shut at the first sound of an academic
talking.

If wilful ignorance is a blessing, then
you both are angels. We're not talking
about global warming, where the jury
is still out... this is CFC's and ozone,
where the science is decades old and
has influenced billions of dollars worth
of decisions taken on the highest levels
by bipartisan international legislation.
That your brains refuse to accommodate
this fact, and the science involved, is
a telling indicator of where this nation
is headed.
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11c6qb7be3bbv07@corp.supernews.com...
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:42C34245.E463E4BE@***.net...
> > Yep, you bleeding heart liberals have only smoke and mirrors, but
> > never any proof.
>
> i have nothing to add......youre just so damn right with that statement i
> felt it worthy of repost.

It's a mini-Repub convention! How to prove
something to someone that doesn't want it
proven to them... that's the big question.
You can try cramming the knowlege into
their heads... but it just bounces off.
Their eye-holes just won't open up
enough to see... and their ear-holes
shut at the first sound of an academic
talking.

If wilful ignorance is a blessing, then
you both are angels. We're not talking
about global warming, where the jury
is still out... this is CFC's and ozone,
where the science is decades old and
has influenced billions of dollars worth
of decisions taken on the highest levels
by bipartisan international legislation.
That your brains refuse to accommodate
this fact, and the science involved, is
a telling indicator of where this nation
is headed.
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11c6qb7be3bbv07@corp.supernews.com...
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:42C34245.E463E4BE@***.net...
> > Yep, you bleeding heart liberals have only smoke and mirrors, but
> > never any proof.
>
> i have nothing to add......youre just so damn right with that statement i
> felt it worthy of repost.

It's a mini-Repub convention! How to prove
something to someone that doesn't want it
proven to them... that's the big question.
You can try cramming the knowlege into
their heads... but it just bounces off.
Their eye-holes just won't open up
enough to see... and their ear-holes
shut at the first sound of an academic
talking.

If wilful ignorance is a blessing, then
you both are angels. We're not talking
about global warming, where the jury
is still out... this is CFC's and ozone,
where the science is decades old and
has influenced billions of dollars worth
of decisions taken on the highest levels
by bipartisan international legislation.
That your brains refuse to accommodate
this fact, and the science involved, is
a telling indicator of where this nation
is headed.
__
Steve
..