Willys Questions..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ****** Questions..
>From: "John D"
>Went to look at the ****** today. It is a 1961 CJ3B, Has a PTO on it.
>There are 4 shifters on the floor. It is a 3 speed. It has a fiberglass
>top, no roll bar. It is an orange color. 70k original miles.
>I think I am going to hold out for a better looking CJ5
I dunno. If I were choosing between a CJ-3B and an older CJ-5, with the CJ-3B
being basically sound but in need of cosmetics and the "usual" repairs
necessary on an older jeep, I would go with the 3B every time. They are the
classic "real jeep." Although some think the 3B is the "ugly duckling," I
have always been partial to them. (Used to have a '54 CJ-3B.)
In fact, I've been keeping my eye open for a solid CJ-6 frame (101" wheelbase)
with the idea of lengthening a repro CJ-3B body to fit and using a Dana 44
front and Dana 60 rear axle with a 5.0 Ford motor and auto tranny. (I guess
you might call the end result a CJ-6B.)
Robert Bills
KG6LMV
Orange County CA
'83 CJ-7
'46 Bantam BT3C
'87 Ford F250 4x4 Diesel
http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
>Went to look at the ****** today. It is a 1961 CJ3B, Has a PTO on it.
>There are 4 shifters on the floor. It is a 3 speed. It has a fiberglass
>top, no roll bar. It is an orange color. 70k original miles.
>I think I am going to hold out for a better looking CJ5
I dunno. If I were choosing between a CJ-3B and an older CJ-5, with the CJ-3B
being basically sound but in need of cosmetics and the "usual" repairs
necessary on an older jeep, I would go with the 3B every time. They are the
classic "real jeep." Although some think the 3B is the "ugly duckling," I
have always been partial to them. (Used to have a '54 CJ-3B.)
In fact, I've been keeping my eye open for a solid CJ-6 frame (101" wheelbase)
with the idea of lengthening a repro CJ-3B body to fit and using a Dana 44
front and Dana 60 rear axle with a 5.0 Ford motor and auto tranny. (I guess
you might call the end result a CJ-6B.)
Robert Bills
KG6LMV
Orange County CA
'83 CJ-7
'46 Bantam BT3C
'87 Ford F250 4x4 Diesel
http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ****** Questions..
Hi John,
I put them up temporarily at: http://www.----------.com/JohnD/ as
my *** server wouldn't let me upload them in a bunch
I think it's worth $1500.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> John D wrote:
> >
> > Thanks again... The 79 pics are in the group...
> > enjoy
I put them up temporarily at: http://www.----------.com/JohnD/ as
my *** server wouldn't let me upload them in a bunch
I think it's worth $1500.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> John D wrote:
> >
> > Thanks again... The 79 pics are in the group...
> > enjoy
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ****** Questions..
Hi John,
I put them up temporarily at: http://www.----------.com/JohnD/ as
my *** server wouldn't let me upload them in a bunch
I think it's worth $1500.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> John D wrote:
> >
> > Thanks again... The 79 pics are in the group...
> > enjoy
I put them up temporarily at: http://www.----------.com/JohnD/ as
my *** server wouldn't let me upload them in a bunch
I think it's worth $1500.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> John D wrote:
> >
> > Thanks again... The 79 pics are in the group...
> > enjoy
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ****** Questions..
Hi John,
I put them up temporarily at: http://www.----------.com/JohnD/ as
my *** server wouldn't let me upload them in a bunch
I think it's worth $1500.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> John D wrote:
> >
> > Thanks again... The 79 pics are in the group...
> > enjoy
I put them up temporarily at: http://www.----------.com/JohnD/ as
my *** server wouldn't let me upload them in a bunch
I think it's worth $1500.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> John D wrote:
> >
> > Thanks again... The 79 pics are in the group...
> > enjoy
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ****** Questions..
Hi John,
I put them up temporarily at: http://www.----------.com/JohnD/ as
my *** server wouldn't let me upload them in a bunch
I think it's worth $1500.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> John D wrote:
> >
> > Thanks again... The 79 pics are in the group...
> > enjoy
I put them up temporarily at: http://www.----------.com/JohnD/ as
my *** server wouldn't let me upload them in a bunch
I think it's worth $1500.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> John D wrote:
> >
> > Thanks again... The 79 pics are in the group...
> > enjoy
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ****** Questions..
I'm with ya. And there's some pretty ones at:
http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/Index.html And you know there frames
don't rust out, and their Dana 25, and 44 are much stronger.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Robert Bills wrote:
>
> I dunno. If I were choosing between a CJ-3B and an older CJ-5, with the CJ-3B
> being basically sound but in need of cosmetics and the "usual" repairs
> necessary on an older jeep, I would go with the 3B every time. They are the
> classic "real jeep." Although some think the 3B is the "ugly duckling," I
> have always been partial to them. (Used to have a '54 CJ-3B.)
>
> In fact, I've been keeping my eye open for a solid CJ-6 frame (101" wheelbase)
> with the idea of lengthening a repro CJ-3B body to fit and using a Dana 44
> front and Dana 60 rear axle with a 5.0 Ford motor and auto tranny. (I guess
> you might call the end result a CJ-6B.)
>
>
> Robert Bills
> KG6LMV
> Orange County CA
>
> '83 CJ-7
> '46 Bantam BT3C
> '87 Ford F250 4x4 Diesel
> http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/Index.html And you know there frames
don't rust out, and their Dana 25, and 44 are much stronger.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Robert Bills wrote:
>
> I dunno. If I were choosing between a CJ-3B and an older CJ-5, with the CJ-3B
> being basically sound but in need of cosmetics and the "usual" repairs
> necessary on an older jeep, I would go with the 3B every time. They are the
> classic "real jeep." Although some think the 3B is the "ugly duckling," I
> have always been partial to them. (Used to have a '54 CJ-3B.)
>
> In fact, I've been keeping my eye open for a solid CJ-6 frame (101" wheelbase)
> with the idea of lengthening a repro CJ-3B body to fit and using a Dana 44
> front and Dana 60 rear axle with a 5.0 Ford motor and auto tranny. (I guess
> you might call the end result a CJ-6B.)
>
>
> Robert Bills
> KG6LMV
> Orange County CA
>
> '83 CJ-7
> '46 Bantam BT3C
> '87 Ford F250 4x4 Diesel
> http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ****** Questions..
I'm with ya. And there's some pretty ones at:
http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/Index.html And you know there frames
don't rust out, and their Dana 25, and 44 are much stronger.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Robert Bills wrote:
>
> I dunno. If I were choosing between a CJ-3B and an older CJ-5, with the CJ-3B
> being basically sound but in need of cosmetics and the "usual" repairs
> necessary on an older jeep, I would go with the 3B every time. They are the
> classic "real jeep." Although some think the 3B is the "ugly duckling," I
> have always been partial to them. (Used to have a '54 CJ-3B.)
>
> In fact, I've been keeping my eye open for a solid CJ-6 frame (101" wheelbase)
> with the idea of lengthening a repro CJ-3B body to fit and using a Dana 44
> front and Dana 60 rear axle with a 5.0 Ford motor and auto tranny. (I guess
> you might call the end result a CJ-6B.)
>
>
> Robert Bills
> KG6LMV
> Orange County CA
>
> '83 CJ-7
> '46 Bantam BT3C
> '87 Ford F250 4x4 Diesel
> http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/Index.html And you know there frames
don't rust out, and their Dana 25, and 44 are much stronger.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Robert Bills wrote:
>
> I dunno. If I were choosing between a CJ-3B and an older CJ-5, with the CJ-3B
> being basically sound but in need of cosmetics and the "usual" repairs
> necessary on an older jeep, I would go with the 3B every time. They are the
> classic "real jeep." Although some think the 3B is the "ugly duckling," I
> have always been partial to them. (Used to have a '54 CJ-3B.)
>
> In fact, I've been keeping my eye open for a solid CJ-6 frame (101" wheelbase)
> with the idea of lengthening a repro CJ-3B body to fit and using a Dana 44
> front and Dana 60 rear axle with a 5.0 Ford motor and auto tranny. (I guess
> you might call the end result a CJ-6B.)
>
>
> Robert Bills
> KG6LMV
> Orange County CA
>
> '83 CJ-7
> '46 Bantam BT3C
> '87 Ford F250 4x4 Diesel
> http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ****** Questions..
I'm with ya. And there's some pretty ones at:
http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/Index.html And you know there frames
don't rust out, and their Dana 25, and 44 are much stronger.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Robert Bills wrote:
>
> I dunno. If I were choosing between a CJ-3B and an older CJ-5, with the CJ-3B
> being basically sound but in need of cosmetics and the "usual" repairs
> necessary on an older jeep, I would go with the 3B every time. They are the
> classic "real jeep." Although some think the 3B is the "ugly duckling," I
> have always been partial to them. (Used to have a '54 CJ-3B.)
>
> In fact, I've been keeping my eye open for a solid CJ-6 frame (101" wheelbase)
> with the idea of lengthening a repro CJ-3B body to fit and using a Dana 44
> front and Dana 60 rear axle with a 5.0 Ford motor and auto tranny. (I guess
> you might call the end result a CJ-6B.)
>
>
> Robert Bills
> KG6LMV
> Orange County CA
>
> '83 CJ-7
> '46 Bantam BT3C
> '87 Ford F250 4x4 Diesel
> http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/Index.html And you know there frames
don't rust out, and their Dana 25, and 44 are much stronger.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Robert Bills wrote:
>
> I dunno. If I were choosing between a CJ-3B and an older CJ-5, with the CJ-3B
> being basically sound but in need of cosmetics and the "usual" repairs
> necessary on an older jeep, I would go with the 3B every time. They are the
> classic "real jeep." Although some think the 3B is the "ugly duckling," I
> have always been partial to them. (Used to have a '54 CJ-3B.)
>
> In fact, I've been keeping my eye open for a solid CJ-6 frame (101" wheelbase)
> with the idea of lengthening a repro CJ-3B body to fit and using a Dana 44
> front and Dana 60 rear axle with a 5.0 Ford motor and auto tranny. (I guess
> you might call the end result a CJ-6B.)
>
>
> Robert Bills
> KG6LMV
> Orange County CA
>
> '83 CJ-7
> '46 Bantam BT3C
> '87 Ford F250 4x4 Diesel
> http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ****** Questions..
I'm with ya. And there's some pretty ones at:
http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/Index.html And you know there frames
don't rust out, and their Dana 25, and 44 are much stronger.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Robert Bills wrote:
>
> I dunno. If I were choosing between a CJ-3B and an older CJ-5, with the CJ-3B
> being basically sound but in need of cosmetics and the "usual" repairs
> necessary on an older jeep, I would go with the 3B every time. They are the
> classic "real jeep." Although some think the 3B is the "ugly duckling," I
> have always been partial to them. (Used to have a '54 CJ-3B.)
>
> In fact, I've been keeping my eye open for a solid CJ-6 frame (101" wheelbase)
> with the idea of lengthening a repro CJ-3B body to fit and using a Dana 44
> front and Dana 60 rear axle with a 5.0 Ford motor and auto tranny. (I guess
> you might call the end result a CJ-6B.)
>
>
> Robert Bills
> KG6LMV
> Orange County CA
>
> '83 CJ-7
> '46 Bantam BT3C
> '87 Ford F250 4x4 Diesel
> http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/Index.html And you know there frames
don't rust out, and their Dana 25, and 44 are much stronger.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Robert Bills wrote:
>
> I dunno. If I were choosing between a CJ-3B and an older CJ-5, with the CJ-3B
> being basically sound but in need of cosmetics and the "usual" repairs
> necessary on an older jeep, I would go with the 3B every time. They are the
> classic "real jeep." Although some think the 3B is the "ugly duckling," I
> have always been partial to them. (Used to have a '54 CJ-3B.)
>
> In fact, I've been keeping my eye open for a solid CJ-6 frame (101" wheelbase)
> with the idea of lengthening a repro CJ-3B body to fit and using a Dana 44
> front and Dana 60 rear axle with a 5.0 Ford motor and auto tranny. (I guess
> you might call the end result a CJ-6B.)
>
>
> Robert Bills
> KG6LMV
> Orange County CA
>
> '83 CJ-7
> '46 Bantam BT3C
> '87 Ford F250 4x4 Diesel
> http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ****** Questions..
>I'm with ya. And there's some pretty ones at:
>http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/Index.html
Great site. Its been a resource for my Bantam trailer rehab.
Robert Bills
KG6LMV
Orange County CA
'83 CJ-7
'46 Bantam BT3C
'87 Ford F250 4x4 Diesel
http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
>http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/Index.html
Great site. Its been a resource for my Bantam trailer rehab.
Robert Bills
KG6LMV
Orange County CA
'83 CJ-7
'46 Bantam BT3C
'87 Ford F250 4x4 Diesel
http://www.outdoorwire.com/4x4/jeep/...p-l/billsr.htm
