Willys Questions..
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ****** Questions..
Buy both you can sell which ever one you dont like and probably make good
profit
"John D" <flper@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:WH%Ic.40125$Xb4.25241@nwrdny02.gnilink.net...
> Hello, I am new to jeeps, so please excuse any stupid ?'s
>
> I am in the market for a jeep cj. Mainly for hunting /offroad.
>
> I found 2 in my price range.
>
> fist one is a 1979 CJ5 6cyl 3 speed 67000 original miles. Interior is
nice,
> soft top is ok, no tears. Body is rough. Rear body mounts are rough also.
> $1500.00
>
> second one I found is 1961 or 63, owner not sure.******. It is a 4 cyl, 3
> speed with plow package. Not sure of the miles either. Has original hard
> top( fiberglass??). Body had some repairs made to it. Runs good. $2000
> neg.
>
> I think it would be cool to get the ******, smaller and can go more
places.
> Is there a soft top available for the ******.
>
> What one is the better choice. I would assume the ****** would hold its
> value more?
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
>
> John
>
>
profit
"John D" <flper@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:WH%Ic.40125$Xb4.25241@nwrdny02.gnilink.net...
> Hello, I am new to jeeps, so please excuse any stupid ?'s
>
> I am in the market for a jeep cj. Mainly for hunting /offroad.
>
> I found 2 in my price range.
>
> fist one is a 1979 CJ5 6cyl 3 speed 67000 original miles. Interior is
nice,
> soft top is ok, no tears. Body is rough. Rear body mounts are rough also.
> $1500.00
>
> second one I found is 1961 or 63, owner not sure.******. It is a 4 cyl, 3
> speed with plow package. Not sure of the miles either. Has original hard
> top( fiberglass??). Body had some repairs made to it. Runs good. $2000
> neg.
>
> I think it would be cool to get the ******, smaller and can go more
places.
> Is there a soft top available for the ******.
>
> What one is the better choice. I would assume the ****** would hold its
> value more?
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
>
> John
>
>
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ****** Questions..
Buy both you can sell which ever one you dont like and probably make good
profit
"John D" <flper@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:WH%Ic.40125$Xb4.25241@nwrdny02.gnilink.net...
> Hello, I am new to jeeps, so please excuse any stupid ?'s
>
> I am in the market for a jeep cj. Mainly for hunting /offroad.
>
> I found 2 in my price range.
>
> fist one is a 1979 CJ5 6cyl 3 speed 67000 original miles. Interior is
nice,
> soft top is ok, no tears. Body is rough. Rear body mounts are rough also.
> $1500.00
>
> second one I found is 1961 or 63, owner not sure.******. It is a 4 cyl, 3
> speed with plow package. Not sure of the miles either. Has original hard
> top( fiberglass??). Body had some repairs made to it. Runs good. $2000
> neg.
>
> I think it would be cool to get the ******, smaller and can go more
places.
> Is there a soft top available for the ******.
>
> What one is the better choice. I would assume the ****** would hold its
> value more?
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
>
> John
>
>
profit
"John D" <flper@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:WH%Ic.40125$Xb4.25241@nwrdny02.gnilink.net...
> Hello, I am new to jeeps, so please excuse any stupid ?'s
>
> I am in the market for a jeep cj. Mainly for hunting /offroad.
>
> I found 2 in my price range.
>
> fist one is a 1979 CJ5 6cyl 3 speed 67000 original miles. Interior is
nice,
> soft top is ok, no tears. Body is rough. Rear body mounts are rough also.
> $1500.00
>
> second one I found is 1961 or 63, owner not sure.******. It is a 4 cyl, 3
> speed with plow package. Not sure of the miles either. Has original hard
> top( fiberglass??). Body had some repairs made to it. Runs good. $2000
> neg.
>
> I think it would be cool to get the ******, smaller and can go more
places.
> Is there a soft top available for the ******.
>
> What one is the better choice. I would assume the ****** would hold its
> value more?
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
>
> John
>
>
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ****** Questions..
Buy both you can sell which ever one you dont like and probably make good
profit
"John D" <flper@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:WH%Ic.40125$Xb4.25241@nwrdny02.gnilink.net...
> Hello, I am new to jeeps, so please excuse any stupid ?'s
>
> I am in the market for a jeep cj. Mainly for hunting /offroad.
>
> I found 2 in my price range.
>
> fist one is a 1979 CJ5 6cyl 3 speed 67000 original miles. Interior is
nice,
> soft top is ok, no tears. Body is rough. Rear body mounts are rough also.
> $1500.00
>
> second one I found is 1961 or 63, owner not sure.******. It is a 4 cyl, 3
> speed with plow package. Not sure of the miles either. Has original hard
> top( fiberglass??). Body had some repairs made to it. Runs good. $2000
> neg.
>
> I think it would be cool to get the ******, smaller and can go more
places.
> Is there a soft top available for the ******.
>
> What one is the better choice. I would assume the ****** would hold its
> value more?
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
>
> John
>
>
profit
"John D" <flper@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:WH%Ic.40125$Xb4.25241@nwrdny02.gnilink.net...
> Hello, I am new to jeeps, so please excuse any stupid ?'s
>
> I am in the market for a jeep cj. Mainly for hunting /offroad.
>
> I found 2 in my price range.
>
> fist one is a 1979 CJ5 6cyl 3 speed 67000 original miles. Interior is
nice,
> soft top is ok, no tears. Body is rough. Rear body mounts are rough also.
> $1500.00
>
> second one I found is 1961 or 63, owner not sure.******. It is a 4 cyl, 3
> speed with plow package. Not sure of the miles either. Has original hard
> top( fiberglass??). Body had some repairs made to it. Runs good. $2000
> neg.
>
> I think it would be cool to get the ******, smaller and can go more
places.
> Is there a soft top available for the ******.
>
> What one is the better choice. I would assume the ****** would hold its
> value more?
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
>
> John
>
>
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ****** Questions..
The '63 is low geared and good off road. The four cylinder doesn't
have tons of power so you won't be breaking stuff unless you drive
like a mad man. It will only run about 50 mph and the stock brakes
are kind of weak.
The '79 is also a good choice. This probably has T150 trans, Dana 20
t'case and rear end gearing in the 3.73 range. This will be more
challenging offroad but possible. It will run down the road at
highway speeds. With front discs it will stop well.
For the money, either would be a good deal. Parts are readily
available for both (www.jeepdoc.com for example). My preference woudl
be the '63. I like to offset differentials front and rear coupled
with the low gearing. If I had long highway drives, the '79 would be
the choice. BTW...the '79 is only 3" longer that the '63. I hope my
ramblings help.
"John D" <flper@verizon.net> wrote in message news:<WH%Ic.40125$Xb4.25241@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>. ..
> Hello, I am new to jeeps, so please excuse any stupid ?'s
>
> I am in the market for a jeep cj. Mainly for hunting /offroad.
>
> I found 2 in my price range.
>
> fist one is a 1979 CJ5 6cyl 3 speed 67000 original miles. Interior is nice,
> soft top is ok, no tears. Body is rough. Rear body mounts are rough also.
> $1500.00
>
> second one I found is 1961 or 63, owner not sure.******. It is a 4 cyl, 3
> speed with plow package. Not sure of the miles either. Has original hard
> top( fiberglass??). Body had some repairs made to it. Runs good. $2000
> neg.
>
> I think it would be cool to get the ******, smaller and can go more places.
> Is there a soft top available for the ******.
>
> What one is the better choice. I would assume the ****** would hold its
> value more?
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
>
> John
have tons of power so you won't be breaking stuff unless you drive
like a mad man. It will only run about 50 mph and the stock brakes
are kind of weak.
The '79 is also a good choice. This probably has T150 trans, Dana 20
t'case and rear end gearing in the 3.73 range. This will be more
challenging offroad but possible. It will run down the road at
highway speeds. With front discs it will stop well.
For the money, either would be a good deal. Parts are readily
available for both (www.jeepdoc.com for example). My preference woudl
be the '63. I like to offset differentials front and rear coupled
with the low gearing. If I had long highway drives, the '79 would be
the choice. BTW...the '79 is only 3" longer that the '63. I hope my
ramblings help.
"John D" <flper@verizon.net> wrote in message news:<WH%Ic.40125$Xb4.25241@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>. ..
> Hello, I am new to jeeps, so please excuse any stupid ?'s
>
> I am in the market for a jeep cj. Mainly for hunting /offroad.
>
> I found 2 in my price range.
>
> fist one is a 1979 CJ5 6cyl 3 speed 67000 original miles. Interior is nice,
> soft top is ok, no tears. Body is rough. Rear body mounts are rough also.
> $1500.00
>
> second one I found is 1961 or 63, owner not sure.******. It is a 4 cyl, 3
> speed with plow package. Not sure of the miles either. Has original hard
> top( fiberglass??). Body had some repairs made to it. Runs good. $2000
> neg.
>
> I think it would be cool to get the ******, smaller and can go more places.
> Is there a soft top available for the ******.
>
> What one is the better choice. I would assume the ****** would hold its
> value more?
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
>
> John
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ****** Questions..
The '63 is low geared and good off road. The four cylinder doesn't
have tons of power so you won't be breaking stuff unless you drive
like a mad man. It will only run about 50 mph and the stock brakes
are kind of weak.
The '79 is also a good choice. This probably has T150 trans, Dana 20
t'case and rear end gearing in the 3.73 range. This will be more
challenging offroad but possible. It will run down the road at
highway speeds. With front discs it will stop well.
For the money, either would be a good deal. Parts are readily
available for both (www.jeepdoc.com for example). My preference woudl
be the '63. I like to offset differentials front and rear coupled
with the low gearing. If I had long highway drives, the '79 would be
the choice. BTW...the '79 is only 3" longer that the '63. I hope my
ramblings help.
"John D" <flper@verizon.net> wrote in message news:<WH%Ic.40125$Xb4.25241@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>. ..
> Hello, I am new to jeeps, so please excuse any stupid ?'s
>
> I am in the market for a jeep cj. Mainly for hunting /offroad.
>
> I found 2 in my price range.
>
> fist one is a 1979 CJ5 6cyl 3 speed 67000 original miles. Interior is nice,
> soft top is ok, no tears. Body is rough. Rear body mounts are rough also.
> $1500.00
>
> second one I found is 1961 or 63, owner not sure.******. It is a 4 cyl, 3
> speed with plow package. Not sure of the miles either. Has original hard
> top( fiberglass??). Body had some repairs made to it. Runs good. $2000
> neg.
>
> I think it would be cool to get the ******, smaller and can go more places.
> Is there a soft top available for the ******.
>
> What one is the better choice. I would assume the ****** would hold its
> value more?
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
>
> John
have tons of power so you won't be breaking stuff unless you drive
like a mad man. It will only run about 50 mph and the stock brakes
are kind of weak.
The '79 is also a good choice. This probably has T150 trans, Dana 20
t'case and rear end gearing in the 3.73 range. This will be more
challenging offroad but possible. It will run down the road at
highway speeds. With front discs it will stop well.
For the money, either would be a good deal. Parts are readily
available for both (www.jeepdoc.com for example). My preference woudl
be the '63. I like to offset differentials front and rear coupled
with the low gearing. If I had long highway drives, the '79 would be
the choice. BTW...the '79 is only 3" longer that the '63. I hope my
ramblings help.
"John D" <flper@verizon.net> wrote in message news:<WH%Ic.40125$Xb4.25241@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>. ..
> Hello, I am new to jeeps, so please excuse any stupid ?'s
>
> I am in the market for a jeep cj. Mainly for hunting /offroad.
>
> I found 2 in my price range.
>
> fist one is a 1979 CJ5 6cyl 3 speed 67000 original miles. Interior is nice,
> soft top is ok, no tears. Body is rough. Rear body mounts are rough also.
> $1500.00
>
> second one I found is 1961 or 63, owner not sure.******. It is a 4 cyl, 3
> speed with plow package. Not sure of the miles either. Has original hard
> top( fiberglass??). Body had some repairs made to it. Runs good. $2000
> neg.
>
> I think it would be cool to get the ******, smaller and can go more places.
> Is there a soft top available for the ******.
>
> What one is the better choice. I would assume the ****** would hold its
> value more?
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
>
> John
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ****** Questions..
The '63 is low geared and good off road. The four cylinder doesn't
have tons of power so you won't be breaking stuff unless you drive
like a mad man. It will only run about 50 mph and the stock brakes
are kind of weak.
The '79 is also a good choice. This probably has T150 trans, Dana 20
t'case and rear end gearing in the 3.73 range. This will be more
challenging offroad but possible. It will run down the road at
highway speeds. With front discs it will stop well.
For the money, either would be a good deal. Parts are readily
available for both (www.jeepdoc.com for example). My preference woudl
be the '63. I like to offset differentials front and rear coupled
with the low gearing. If I had long highway drives, the '79 would be
the choice. BTW...the '79 is only 3" longer that the '63. I hope my
ramblings help.
"John D" <flper@verizon.net> wrote in message news:<WH%Ic.40125$Xb4.25241@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>. ..
> Hello, I am new to jeeps, so please excuse any stupid ?'s
>
> I am in the market for a jeep cj. Mainly for hunting /offroad.
>
> I found 2 in my price range.
>
> fist one is a 1979 CJ5 6cyl 3 speed 67000 original miles. Interior is nice,
> soft top is ok, no tears. Body is rough. Rear body mounts are rough also.
> $1500.00
>
> second one I found is 1961 or 63, owner not sure.******. It is a 4 cyl, 3
> speed with plow package. Not sure of the miles either. Has original hard
> top( fiberglass??). Body had some repairs made to it. Runs good. $2000
> neg.
>
> I think it would be cool to get the ******, smaller and can go more places.
> Is there a soft top available for the ******.
>
> What one is the better choice. I would assume the ****** would hold its
> value more?
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
>
> John
have tons of power so you won't be breaking stuff unless you drive
like a mad man. It will only run about 50 mph and the stock brakes
are kind of weak.
The '79 is also a good choice. This probably has T150 trans, Dana 20
t'case and rear end gearing in the 3.73 range. This will be more
challenging offroad but possible. It will run down the road at
highway speeds. With front discs it will stop well.
For the money, either would be a good deal. Parts are readily
available for both (www.jeepdoc.com for example). My preference woudl
be the '63. I like to offset differentials front and rear coupled
with the low gearing. If I had long highway drives, the '79 would be
the choice. BTW...the '79 is only 3" longer that the '63. I hope my
ramblings help.
"John D" <flper@verizon.net> wrote in message news:<WH%Ic.40125$Xb4.25241@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>. ..
> Hello, I am new to jeeps, so please excuse any stupid ?'s
>
> I am in the market for a jeep cj. Mainly for hunting /offroad.
>
> I found 2 in my price range.
>
> fist one is a 1979 CJ5 6cyl 3 speed 67000 original miles. Interior is nice,
> soft top is ok, no tears. Body is rough. Rear body mounts are rough also.
> $1500.00
>
> second one I found is 1961 or 63, owner not sure.******. It is a 4 cyl, 3
> speed with plow package. Not sure of the miles either. Has original hard
> top( fiberglass??). Body had some repairs made to it. Runs good. $2000
> neg.
>
> I think it would be cool to get the ******, smaller and can go more places.
> Is there a soft top available for the ******.
>
> What one is the better choice. I would assume the ****** would hold its
> value more?
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
>
> John
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ****** Questions..
The '63 is low geared and good off road. The four cylinder doesn't
have tons of power so you won't be breaking stuff unless you drive
like a mad man. It will only run about 50 mph and the stock brakes
are kind of weak.
The '79 is also a good choice. This probably has T150 trans, Dana 20
t'case and rear end gearing in the 3.73 range. This will be more
challenging offroad but possible. It will run down the road at
highway speeds. With front discs it will stop well.
For the money, either would be a good deal. Parts are readily
available for both (www.jeepdoc.com for example). My preference woudl
be the '63. I like to offset differentials front and rear coupled
with the low gearing. If I had long highway drives, the '79 would be
the choice. BTW...the '79 is only 3" longer that the '63. I hope my
ramblings help.
"John D" <flper@verizon.net> wrote in message news:<WH%Ic.40125$Xb4.25241@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>. ..
> Hello, I am new to jeeps, so please excuse any stupid ?'s
>
> I am in the market for a jeep cj. Mainly for hunting /offroad.
>
> I found 2 in my price range.
>
> fist one is a 1979 CJ5 6cyl 3 speed 67000 original miles. Interior is nice,
> soft top is ok, no tears. Body is rough. Rear body mounts are rough also.
> $1500.00
>
> second one I found is 1961 or 63, owner not sure.******. It is a 4 cyl, 3
> speed with plow package. Not sure of the miles either. Has original hard
> top( fiberglass??). Body had some repairs made to it. Runs good. $2000
> neg.
>
> I think it would be cool to get the ******, smaller and can go more places.
> Is there a soft top available for the ******.
>
> What one is the better choice. I would assume the ****** would hold its
> value more?
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
>
> John
have tons of power so you won't be breaking stuff unless you drive
like a mad man. It will only run about 50 mph and the stock brakes
are kind of weak.
The '79 is also a good choice. This probably has T150 trans, Dana 20
t'case and rear end gearing in the 3.73 range. This will be more
challenging offroad but possible. It will run down the road at
highway speeds. With front discs it will stop well.
For the money, either would be a good deal. Parts are readily
available for both (www.jeepdoc.com for example). My preference woudl
be the '63. I like to offset differentials front and rear coupled
with the low gearing. If I had long highway drives, the '79 would be
the choice. BTW...the '79 is only 3" longer that the '63. I hope my
ramblings help.
"John D" <flper@verizon.net> wrote in message news:<WH%Ic.40125$Xb4.25241@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>. ..
> Hello, I am new to jeeps, so please excuse any stupid ?'s
>
> I am in the market for a jeep cj. Mainly for hunting /offroad.
>
> I found 2 in my price range.
>
> fist one is a 1979 CJ5 6cyl 3 speed 67000 original miles. Interior is nice,
> soft top is ok, no tears. Body is rough. Rear body mounts are rough also.
> $1500.00
>
> second one I found is 1961 or 63, owner not sure.******. It is a 4 cyl, 3
> speed with plow package. Not sure of the miles either. Has original hard
> top( fiberglass??). Body had some repairs made to it. Runs good. $2000
> neg.
>
> I think it would be cool to get the ******, smaller and can go more places.
> Is there a soft top available for the ******.
>
> What one is the better choice. I would assume the ****** would hold its
> value more?
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
>
> John
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ****** Questions..
Thank you to everyone who has helped clear my head. I do have pictures of
the 79 if anyone wants to them. Didn't know if I could post them here or
not..
"John D" <flper@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:WH%Ic.40125$Xb4.25241@nwrdny02.gnilink.net...
> Hello, I am new to jeeps, so please excuse any stupid ?'s
>
> I am in the market for a jeep cj. Mainly for hunting /offroad.
>
> I found 2 in my price range.
>
> fist one is a 1979 CJ5 6cyl 3 speed 67000 original miles. Interior is
nice,
> soft top is ok, no tears. Body is rough. Rear body mounts are rough also.
> $1500.00
>
> second one I found is 1961 or 63, owner not sure.******. It is a 4 cyl, 3
> speed with plow package. Not sure of the miles either. Has original hard
> top( fiberglass??). Body had some repairs made to it. Runs good. $2000
> neg.
>
> I think it would be cool to get the ******, smaller and can go more
places.
> Is there a soft top available for the ******.
>
> What one is the better choice. I would assume the ****** would hold its
> value more?
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
>
> John
>
>
the 79 if anyone wants to them. Didn't know if I could post them here or
not..
"John D" <flper@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:WH%Ic.40125$Xb4.25241@nwrdny02.gnilink.net...
> Hello, I am new to jeeps, so please excuse any stupid ?'s
>
> I am in the market for a jeep cj. Mainly for hunting /offroad.
>
> I found 2 in my price range.
>
> fist one is a 1979 CJ5 6cyl 3 speed 67000 original miles. Interior is
nice,
> soft top is ok, no tears. Body is rough. Rear body mounts are rough also.
> $1500.00
>
> second one I found is 1961 or 63, owner not sure.******. It is a 4 cyl, 3
> speed with plow package. Not sure of the miles either. Has original hard
> top( fiberglass??). Body had some repairs made to it. Runs good. $2000
> neg.
>
> I think it would be cool to get the ******, smaller and can go more
places.
> Is there a soft top available for the ******.
>
> What one is the better choice. I would assume the ****** would hold its
> value more?
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
>
> John
>
>
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ****** Questions..
Thank you to everyone who has helped clear my head. I do have pictures of
the 79 if anyone wants to them. Didn't know if I could post them here or
not..
"John D" <flper@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:WH%Ic.40125$Xb4.25241@nwrdny02.gnilink.net...
> Hello, I am new to jeeps, so please excuse any stupid ?'s
>
> I am in the market for a jeep cj. Mainly for hunting /offroad.
>
> I found 2 in my price range.
>
> fist one is a 1979 CJ5 6cyl 3 speed 67000 original miles. Interior is
nice,
> soft top is ok, no tears. Body is rough. Rear body mounts are rough also.
> $1500.00
>
> second one I found is 1961 or 63, owner not sure.******. It is a 4 cyl, 3
> speed with plow package. Not sure of the miles either. Has original hard
> top( fiberglass??). Body had some repairs made to it. Runs good. $2000
> neg.
>
> I think it would be cool to get the ******, smaller and can go more
places.
> Is there a soft top available for the ******.
>
> What one is the better choice. I would assume the ****** would hold its
> value more?
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
>
> John
>
>
the 79 if anyone wants to them. Didn't know if I could post them here or
not..
"John D" <flper@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:WH%Ic.40125$Xb4.25241@nwrdny02.gnilink.net...
> Hello, I am new to jeeps, so please excuse any stupid ?'s
>
> I am in the market for a jeep cj. Mainly for hunting /offroad.
>
> I found 2 in my price range.
>
> fist one is a 1979 CJ5 6cyl 3 speed 67000 original miles. Interior is
nice,
> soft top is ok, no tears. Body is rough. Rear body mounts are rough also.
> $1500.00
>
> second one I found is 1961 or 63, owner not sure.******. It is a 4 cyl, 3
> speed with plow package. Not sure of the miles either. Has original hard
> top( fiberglass??). Body had some repairs made to it. Runs good. $2000
> neg.
>
> I think it would be cool to get the ******, smaller and can go more
places.
> Is there a soft top available for the ******.
>
> What one is the better choice. I would assume the ****** would hold its
> value more?
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
>
> John
>
>
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ****** Questions..
Thank you to everyone who has helped clear my head. I do have pictures of
the 79 if anyone wants to them. Didn't know if I could post them here or
not..
"John D" <flper@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:WH%Ic.40125$Xb4.25241@nwrdny02.gnilink.net...
> Hello, I am new to jeeps, so please excuse any stupid ?'s
>
> I am in the market for a jeep cj. Mainly for hunting /offroad.
>
> I found 2 in my price range.
>
> fist one is a 1979 CJ5 6cyl 3 speed 67000 original miles. Interior is
nice,
> soft top is ok, no tears. Body is rough. Rear body mounts are rough also.
> $1500.00
>
> second one I found is 1961 or 63, owner not sure.******. It is a 4 cyl, 3
> speed with plow package. Not sure of the miles either. Has original hard
> top( fiberglass??). Body had some repairs made to it. Runs good. $2000
> neg.
>
> I think it would be cool to get the ******, smaller and can go more
places.
> Is there a soft top available for the ******.
>
> What one is the better choice. I would assume the ****** would hold its
> value more?
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
>
> John
>
>
the 79 if anyone wants to them. Didn't know if I could post them here or
not..
"John D" <flper@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:WH%Ic.40125$Xb4.25241@nwrdny02.gnilink.net...
> Hello, I am new to jeeps, so please excuse any stupid ?'s
>
> I am in the market for a jeep cj. Mainly for hunting /offroad.
>
> I found 2 in my price range.
>
> fist one is a 1979 CJ5 6cyl 3 speed 67000 original miles. Interior is
nice,
> soft top is ok, no tears. Body is rough. Rear body mounts are rough also.
> $1500.00
>
> second one I found is 1961 or 63, owner not sure.******. It is a 4 cyl, 3
> speed with plow package. Not sure of the miles either. Has original hard
> top( fiberglass??). Body had some repairs made to it. Runs good. $2000
> neg.
>
> I think it would be cool to get the ******, smaller and can go more
places.
> Is there a soft top available for the ******.
>
> What one is the better choice. I would assume the ****** would hold its
> value more?
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
>
> John
>
>