Warning!! Dangerous design flaw in the 2006 Jeep Wranglers!!
#211
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Warning!! Dangerous design flaw in the 2006 Jeep Wranglers!!
The rod itself was made of plastic? Interesting. I have an '05 TJL.
The clutch master cylinder actuator rod in this model is made of steel,
with a nylon swivel fitting swedged to the end where it hooks up to the
pedal pivot pin. IMO, the pivot fitting should be redesigned using all
metal parts that would include lubricated ball-bearings and seals, just
like Semi's use.
Inquirie about the new part they plan to use. Insist that they use the
metal-rod design --it may be a mid-year spec update. I can't see a
plastic actuator rod being reliable enough for anyone, and I doubt they
want to see you come back with the same problem.
-JD
#212
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Warning!! Dangerous design flaw in the 2006 Jeep Wranglers!!
The rod itself was made of plastic? Interesting. I have an '05 TJL.
The clutch master cylinder actuator rod in this model is made of steel,
with a nylon swivel fitting swedged to the end where it hooks up to the
pedal pivot pin. IMO, the pivot fitting should be redesigned using all
metal parts that would include lubricated ball-bearings and seals, just
like Semi's use.
Inquirie about the new part they plan to use. Insist that they use the
metal-rod design --it may be a mid-year spec update. I can't see a
plastic actuator rod being reliable enough for anyone, and I doubt they
want to see you come back with the same problem.
-JD
#213
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Warning!! Dangerous design flaw in the 2006 Jeep Wranglers!!
My error, There are some circumstances where you have to add the fuse
to the panel to bypass the clutch switch on the new Jeeps. If the rod
to the MC breaks.
You still can bypass the switch using the factory bypass in the fuse
panel. The older TJ's had a slot marked 'auto' for this, the new ones
use fuse hole 28. It is in the owners manual.
Mike
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> I have issues with your statement "The clutch safety switch would not
> allow me to restart the engine".
>
> Either Jeep has radically changed the design or you just don't know how
> the clutch works.
>
> The clutch switch is on the pedal. Push the pedal down and no matter
> what shape the linkage is in, the engine 'Will' try to turn over.
>
> If you want to complain about the cheap part, then at least do the
> homework so you aren't giving out bad or totally wrong information.
>
> It is very possible to drive a Jeep with broken clutch linkage. You
> would have people believe they are screwed if this happens. They
> aren't. The Jeep can be put into gear, the clutch pedal depressed and
> the engine will start the Jeep in gear.
>
> No disagreement about DC going cheap....
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
>
> uboat27 wrote:
> >
> <snip>
to the panel to bypass the clutch switch on the new Jeeps. If the rod
to the MC breaks.
You still can bypass the switch using the factory bypass in the fuse
panel. The older TJ's had a slot marked 'auto' for this, the new ones
use fuse hole 28. It is in the owners manual.
Mike
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> I have issues with your statement "The clutch safety switch would not
> allow me to restart the engine".
>
> Either Jeep has radically changed the design or you just don't know how
> the clutch works.
>
> The clutch switch is on the pedal. Push the pedal down and no matter
> what shape the linkage is in, the engine 'Will' try to turn over.
>
> If you want to complain about the cheap part, then at least do the
> homework so you aren't giving out bad or totally wrong information.
>
> It is very possible to drive a Jeep with broken clutch linkage. You
> would have people believe they are screwed if this happens. They
> aren't. The Jeep can be put into gear, the clutch pedal depressed and
> the engine will start the Jeep in gear.
>
> No disagreement about DC going cheap....
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
>
> uboat27 wrote:
> >
> <snip>
#214
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Warning!! Dangerous design flaw in the 2006 Jeep Wranglers!!
My error, There are some circumstances where you have to add the fuse
to the panel to bypass the clutch switch on the new Jeeps. If the rod
to the MC breaks.
You still can bypass the switch using the factory bypass in the fuse
panel. The older TJ's had a slot marked 'auto' for this, the new ones
use fuse hole 28. It is in the owners manual.
Mike
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> I have issues with your statement "The clutch safety switch would not
> allow me to restart the engine".
>
> Either Jeep has radically changed the design or you just don't know how
> the clutch works.
>
> The clutch switch is on the pedal. Push the pedal down and no matter
> what shape the linkage is in, the engine 'Will' try to turn over.
>
> If you want to complain about the cheap part, then at least do the
> homework so you aren't giving out bad or totally wrong information.
>
> It is very possible to drive a Jeep with broken clutch linkage. You
> would have people believe they are screwed if this happens. They
> aren't. The Jeep can be put into gear, the clutch pedal depressed and
> the engine will start the Jeep in gear.
>
> No disagreement about DC going cheap....
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
>
> uboat27 wrote:
> >
> <snip>
to the panel to bypass the clutch switch on the new Jeeps. If the rod
to the MC breaks.
You still can bypass the switch using the factory bypass in the fuse
panel. The older TJ's had a slot marked 'auto' for this, the new ones
use fuse hole 28. It is in the owners manual.
Mike
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> I have issues with your statement "The clutch safety switch would not
> allow me to restart the engine".
>
> Either Jeep has radically changed the design or you just don't know how
> the clutch works.
>
> The clutch switch is on the pedal. Push the pedal down and no matter
> what shape the linkage is in, the engine 'Will' try to turn over.
>
> If you want to complain about the cheap part, then at least do the
> homework so you aren't giving out bad or totally wrong information.
>
> It is very possible to drive a Jeep with broken clutch linkage. You
> would have people believe they are screwed if this happens. They
> aren't. The Jeep can be put into gear, the clutch pedal depressed and
> the engine will start the Jeep in gear.
>
> No disagreement about DC going cheap....
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
>
> uboat27 wrote:
> >
> <snip>
#215
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Warning!! Dangerous design flaw in the 2006 Jeep Wranglers!!
My error, There are some circumstances where you have to add the fuse
to the panel to bypass the clutch switch on the new Jeeps. If the rod
to the MC breaks.
You still can bypass the switch using the factory bypass in the fuse
panel. The older TJ's had a slot marked 'auto' for this, the new ones
use fuse hole 28. It is in the owners manual.
Mike
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> I have issues with your statement "The clutch safety switch would not
> allow me to restart the engine".
>
> Either Jeep has radically changed the design or you just don't know how
> the clutch works.
>
> The clutch switch is on the pedal. Push the pedal down and no matter
> what shape the linkage is in, the engine 'Will' try to turn over.
>
> If you want to complain about the cheap part, then at least do the
> homework so you aren't giving out bad or totally wrong information.
>
> It is very possible to drive a Jeep with broken clutch linkage. You
> would have people believe they are screwed if this happens. They
> aren't. The Jeep can be put into gear, the clutch pedal depressed and
> the engine will start the Jeep in gear.
>
> No disagreement about DC going cheap....
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
>
> uboat27 wrote:
> >
> <snip>
to the panel to bypass the clutch switch on the new Jeeps. If the rod
to the MC breaks.
You still can bypass the switch using the factory bypass in the fuse
panel. The older TJ's had a slot marked 'auto' for this, the new ones
use fuse hole 28. It is in the owners manual.
Mike
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> I have issues with your statement "The clutch safety switch would not
> allow me to restart the engine".
>
> Either Jeep has radically changed the design or you just don't know how
> the clutch works.
>
> The clutch switch is on the pedal. Push the pedal down and no matter
> what shape the linkage is in, the engine 'Will' try to turn over.
>
> If you want to complain about the cheap part, then at least do the
> homework so you aren't giving out bad or totally wrong information.
>
> It is very possible to drive a Jeep with broken clutch linkage. You
> would have people believe they are screwed if this happens. They
> aren't. The Jeep can be put into gear, the clutch pedal depressed and
> the engine will start the Jeep in gear.
>
> No disagreement about DC going cheap....
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
>
> uboat27 wrote:
> >
> <snip>
#216
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Warning!! Dangerous design flaw in the 2006 Jeep Wranglers!!
The ball-bearing idea doesn't appeal to me - the pressure is basically
uni-directional and remains pretty much static in one quadrant which
is not what ball/roller bearings are designed for. On my MJ I swapped
in a clutch master from a 94 YJ/XJ and had to do some creative
engineering on that pushrod since the stock rod that cam with the
master was the wrong length for my application. I cut the platic end
off and threaded the pushrod for about 3/4 inch from the pedal end.
Then I welded up a metal end oiece that I could screw the rod into
(with a locking nut to secure things) and pressed an off-the-shelf
porous bronze bushing in for the pedal bolt to pass thru. It's an
extra oiling point, but I can now adjust the push rod to whatever
length I want and I can see no wear on the bushing after 5 years/70k
miles.
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 16:22:18 UTC "JD Adams" <JDAdams@Softcom.Net>
wrote:
>
>
> The rod itself was made of plastic? Interesting. I have an '05 TJL.
> The clutch master cylinder actuator rod in this model is made of steel,
> with a nylon swivel fitting swedged to the end where it hooks up to the
> pedal pivot pin. IMO, the pivot fitting should be redesigned using all
> metal parts that would include lubricated ball-bearings and seals, just
> like Semi's use.
>
> Inquirie about the new part they plan to use. Insist that they use the
> metal-rod design --it may be a mid-year spec update. I can't see a
> plastic actuator rod being reliable enough for anyone, and I doubt they
> want to see you come back with the same problem.
>
> -JD
>
--
Will Honea
uni-directional and remains pretty much static in one quadrant which
is not what ball/roller bearings are designed for. On my MJ I swapped
in a clutch master from a 94 YJ/XJ and had to do some creative
engineering on that pushrod since the stock rod that cam with the
master was the wrong length for my application. I cut the platic end
off and threaded the pushrod for about 3/4 inch from the pedal end.
Then I welded up a metal end oiece that I could screw the rod into
(with a locking nut to secure things) and pressed an off-the-shelf
porous bronze bushing in for the pedal bolt to pass thru. It's an
extra oiling point, but I can now adjust the push rod to whatever
length I want and I can see no wear on the bushing after 5 years/70k
miles.
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 16:22:18 UTC "JD Adams" <JDAdams@Softcom.Net>
wrote:
>
>
> The rod itself was made of plastic? Interesting. I have an '05 TJL.
> The clutch master cylinder actuator rod in this model is made of steel,
> with a nylon swivel fitting swedged to the end where it hooks up to the
> pedal pivot pin. IMO, the pivot fitting should be redesigned using all
> metal parts that would include lubricated ball-bearings and seals, just
> like Semi's use.
>
> Inquirie about the new part they plan to use. Insist that they use the
> metal-rod design --it may be a mid-year spec update. I can't see a
> plastic actuator rod being reliable enough for anyone, and I doubt they
> want to see you come back with the same problem.
>
> -JD
>
--
Will Honea
#217
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Warning!! Dangerous design flaw in the 2006 Jeep Wranglers!!
The ball-bearing idea doesn't appeal to me - the pressure is basically
uni-directional and remains pretty much static in one quadrant which
is not what ball/roller bearings are designed for. On my MJ I swapped
in a clutch master from a 94 YJ/XJ and had to do some creative
engineering on that pushrod since the stock rod that cam with the
master was the wrong length for my application. I cut the platic end
off and threaded the pushrod for about 3/4 inch from the pedal end.
Then I welded up a metal end oiece that I could screw the rod into
(with a locking nut to secure things) and pressed an off-the-shelf
porous bronze bushing in for the pedal bolt to pass thru. It's an
extra oiling point, but I can now adjust the push rod to whatever
length I want and I can see no wear on the bushing after 5 years/70k
miles.
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 16:22:18 UTC "JD Adams" <JDAdams@Softcom.Net>
wrote:
>
>
> The rod itself was made of plastic? Interesting. I have an '05 TJL.
> The clutch master cylinder actuator rod in this model is made of steel,
> with a nylon swivel fitting swedged to the end where it hooks up to the
> pedal pivot pin. IMO, the pivot fitting should be redesigned using all
> metal parts that would include lubricated ball-bearings and seals, just
> like Semi's use.
>
> Inquirie about the new part they plan to use. Insist that they use the
> metal-rod design --it may be a mid-year spec update. I can't see a
> plastic actuator rod being reliable enough for anyone, and I doubt they
> want to see you come back with the same problem.
>
> -JD
>
--
Will Honea
uni-directional and remains pretty much static in one quadrant which
is not what ball/roller bearings are designed for. On my MJ I swapped
in a clutch master from a 94 YJ/XJ and had to do some creative
engineering on that pushrod since the stock rod that cam with the
master was the wrong length for my application. I cut the platic end
off and threaded the pushrod for about 3/4 inch from the pedal end.
Then I welded up a metal end oiece that I could screw the rod into
(with a locking nut to secure things) and pressed an off-the-shelf
porous bronze bushing in for the pedal bolt to pass thru. It's an
extra oiling point, but I can now adjust the push rod to whatever
length I want and I can see no wear on the bushing after 5 years/70k
miles.
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 16:22:18 UTC "JD Adams" <JDAdams@Softcom.Net>
wrote:
>
>
> The rod itself was made of plastic? Interesting. I have an '05 TJL.
> The clutch master cylinder actuator rod in this model is made of steel,
> with a nylon swivel fitting swedged to the end where it hooks up to the
> pedal pivot pin. IMO, the pivot fitting should be redesigned using all
> metal parts that would include lubricated ball-bearings and seals, just
> like Semi's use.
>
> Inquirie about the new part they plan to use. Insist that they use the
> metal-rod design --it may be a mid-year spec update. I can't see a
> plastic actuator rod being reliable enough for anyone, and I doubt they
> want to see you come back with the same problem.
>
> -JD
>
--
Will Honea
#218
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Warning!! Dangerous design flaw in the 2006 Jeep Wranglers!!
The ball-bearing idea doesn't appeal to me - the pressure is basically
uni-directional and remains pretty much static in one quadrant which
is not what ball/roller bearings are designed for. On my MJ I swapped
in a clutch master from a 94 YJ/XJ and had to do some creative
engineering on that pushrod since the stock rod that cam with the
master was the wrong length for my application. I cut the platic end
off and threaded the pushrod for about 3/4 inch from the pedal end.
Then I welded up a metal end oiece that I could screw the rod into
(with a locking nut to secure things) and pressed an off-the-shelf
porous bronze bushing in for the pedal bolt to pass thru. It's an
extra oiling point, but I can now adjust the push rod to whatever
length I want and I can see no wear on the bushing after 5 years/70k
miles.
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 16:22:18 UTC "JD Adams" <JDAdams@Softcom.Net>
wrote:
>
>
> The rod itself was made of plastic? Interesting. I have an '05 TJL.
> The clutch master cylinder actuator rod in this model is made of steel,
> with a nylon swivel fitting swedged to the end where it hooks up to the
> pedal pivot pin. IMO, the pivot fitting should be redesigned using all
> metal parts that would include lubricated ball-bearings and seals, just
> like Semi's use.
>
> Inquirie about the new part they plan to use. Insist that they use the
> metal-rod design --it may be a mid-year spec update. I can't see a
> plastic actuator rod being reliable enough for anyone, and I doubt they
> want to see you come back with the same problem.
>
> -JD
>
--
Will Honea
uni-directional and remains pretty much static in one quadrant which
is not what ball/roller bearings are designed for. On my MJ I swapped
in a clutch master from a 94 YJ/XJ and had to do some creative
engineering on that pushrod since the stock rod that cam with the
master was the wrong length for my application. I cut the platic end
off and threaded the pushrod for about 3/4 inch from the pedal end.
Then I welded up a metal end oiece that I could screw the rod into
(with a locking nut to secure things) and pressed an off-the-shelf
porous bronze bushing in for the pedal bolt to pass thru. It's an
extra oiling point, but I can now adjust the push rod to whatever
length I want and I can see no wear on the bushing after 5 years/70k
miles.
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 16:22:18 UTC "JD Adams" <JDAdams@Softcom.Net>
wrote:
>
>
> The rod itself was made of plastic? Interesting. I have an '05 TJL.
> The clutch master cylinder actuator rod in this model is made of steel,
> with a nylon swivel fitting swedged to the end where it hooks up to the
> pedal pivot pin. IMO, the pivot fitting should be redesigned using all
> metal parts that would include lubricated ball-bearings and seals, just
> like Semi's use.
>
> Inquirie about the new part they plan to use. Insist that they use the
> metal-rod design --it may be a mid-year spec update. I can't see a
> plastic actuator rod being reliable enough for anyone, and I doubt they
> want to see you come back with the same problem.
>
> -JD
>
--
Will Honea
#219
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Warning!! Dangerous design flaw in the 2006 Jeep Wranglers!!
The sealed ball-bearing spherical bearing design's only advantage would
be to eliminate regular lubrication, (as does nylon) but with a very
long service life. It would be expensive, overbuilt and probably
overkill for such a simple application like this, but that's what I
like about Jeeps: simplicity, ruggedness, and ultimate reliability.
If the plastic doo-dad ever croaks on mine, I'll probably weld on a
spherical bearing end just for the novelty. I'd probably opt to weld
the bearing directly to the pedal stud, then cut the actuator rod just
short enough to slip into the hollow spherical bearing rod, bottoming
out to allow just enough freeplay. (Could shim the master cylinder to
accomplish this as well.) The result would outlast the rest of the
Jeep.
I have to wonder if the '07 redesign will also include this part.
-JD
be to eliminate regular lubrication, (as does nylon) but with a very
long service life. It would be expensive, overbuilt and probably
overkill for such a simple application like this, but that's what I
like about Jeeps: simplicity, ruggedness, and ultimate reliability.
If the plastic doo-dad ever croaks on mine, I'll probably weld on a
spherical bearing end just for the novelty. I'd probably opt to weld
the bearing directly to the pedal stud, then cut the actuator rod just
short enough to slip into the hollow spherical bearing rod, bottoming
out to allow just enough freeplay. (Could shim the master cylinder to
accomplish this as well.) The result would outlast the rest of the
Jeep.
I have to wonder if the '07 redesign will also include this part.
-JD
#220
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Warning!! Dangerous design flaw in the 2006 Jeep Wranglers!!
The sealed ball-bearing spherical bearing design's only advantage would
be to eliminate regular lubrication, (as does nylon) but with a very
long service life. It would be expensive, overbuilt and probably
overkill for such a simple application like this, but that's what I
like about Jeeps: simplicity, ruggedness, and ultimate reliability.
If the plastic doo-dad ever croaks on mine, I'll probably weld on a
spherical bearing end just for the novelty. I'd probably opt to weld
the bearing directly to the pedal stud, then cut the actuator rod just
short enough to slip into the hollow spherical bearing rod, bottoming
out to allow just enough freeplay. (Could shim the master cylinder to
accomplish this as well.) The result would outlast the rest of the
Jeep.
I have to wonder if the '07 redesign will also include this part.
-JD
be to eliminate regular lubrication, (as does nylon) but with a very
long service life. It would be expensive, overbuilt and probably
overkill for such a simple application like this, but that's what I
like about Jeeps: simplicity, ruggedness, and ultimate reliability.
If the plastic doo-dad ever croaks on mine, I'll probably weld on a
spherical bearing end just for the novelty. I'd probably opt to weld
the bearing directly to the pedal stud, then cut the actuator rod just
short enough to slip into the hollow spherical bearing rod, bottoming
out to allow just enough freeplay. (Could shim the master cylinder to
accomplish this as well.) The result would outlast the rest of the
Jeep.
I have to wonder if the '07 redesign will also include this part.
-JD