Trail(er) trash
06-06-2006, 08:26 AM
#491
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - Trail(er) trash
Most "moderate Republicans" of today are much more liberal than most
Democrats of the 1960's.
Tom
"Jeff DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:SV5hg.14276$Qg.6364@tornado.southeast.rr.com. ..
> You never really could that's why whatever party you belong to it's
> important to support the best people you can in the primaries.
>
> For someone with my political viewpoint a "moderate" Republican is no
> better than a Democrat, and I won't vote for them.
>
> Jeff DeWitt
>
Democrats of the 1960's.
Tom
"Jeff DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:SV5hg.14276$Qg.6364@tornado.southeast.rr.com. ..
> You never really could that's why whatever party you belong to it's
> important to support the best people you can in the primaries.
>
> For someone with my political viewpoint a "moderate" Republican is no
> better than a Democrat, and I won't vote for them.
>
> Jeff DeWitt
>
06-06-2006, 08:26 AM
#492
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - Trail(er) trash
Most "moderate Republicans" of today are much more liberal than most
Democrats of the 1960's.
Tom
"Jeff DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:SV5hg.14276$Qg.6364@tornado.southeast.rr.com. ..
> You never really could that's why whatever party you belong to it's
> important to support the best people you can in the primaries.
>
> For someone with my political viewpoint a "moderate" Republican is no
> better than a Democrat, and I won't vote for them.
>
> Jeff DeWitt
>
Democrats of the 1960's.
Tom
"Jeff DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:SV5hg.14276$Qg.6364@tornado.southeast.rr.com. ..
> You never really could that's why whatever party you belong to it's
> important to support the best people you can in the primaries.
>
> For someone with my political viewpoint a "moderate" Republican is no
> better than a Democrat, and I won't vote for them.
>
> Jeff DeWitt
>
06-06-2006, 08:26 AM
#493
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - Trail(er) trash
Most "moderate Republicans" of today are much more liberal than most
Democrats of the 1960's.
Tom
"Jeff DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:SV5hg.14276$Qg.6364@tornado.southeast.rr.com. ..
> You never really could that's why whatever party you belong to it's
> important to support the best people you can in the primaries.
>
> For someone with my political viewpoint a "moderate" Republican is no
> better than a Democrat, and I won't vote for them.
>
> Jeff DeWitt
>
Democrats of the 1960's.
Tom
"Jeff DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:SV5hg.14276$Qg.6364@tornado.southeast.rr.com. ..
> You never really could that's why whatever party you belong to it's
> important to support the best people you can in the primaries.
>
> For someone with my political viewpoint a "moderate" Republican is no
> better than a Democrat, and I won't vote for them.
>
> Jeff DeWitt
>
06-06-2006, 07:40 PM
#494
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - Trail(er) trash
Exactly so, that's why I won't vote for them!
Jeff DeWitt
mabar wrote:
> Most "moderate Republicans" of today are much more liberal than most
> Democrats of the 1960's.
>
> Tom
>
> "Jeff DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:SV5hg.14276$Qg.6364@tornado.southeast.rr.com. ..
>
>>You never really could that's why whatever party you belong to it's
>>important to support the best people you can in the primaries.
>>
>>For someone with my political viewpoint a "moderate" Republican is no
>>better than a Democrat, and I won't vote for them.
>>
>>Jeff DeWitt
>>
>
>
>
Jeff DeWitt
mabar wrote:
> Most "moderate Republicans" of today are much more liberal than most
> Democrats of the 1960's.
>
> Tom
>
> "Jeff DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:SV5hg.14276$Qg.6364@tornado.southeast.rr.com. ..
>
>>You never really could that's why whatever party you belong to it's
>>important to support the best people you can in the primaries.
>>
>>For someone with my political viewpoint a "moderate" Republican is no
>>better than a Democrat, and I won't vote for them.
>>
>>Jeff DeWitt
>>
>
>
>
06-06-2006, 07:40 PM
#495
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - Trail(er) trash
Exactly so, that's why I won't vote for them!
Jeff DeWitt
mabar wrote:
> Most "moderate Republicans" of today are much more liberal than most
> Democrats of the 1960's.
>
> Tom
>
> "Jeff DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:SV5hg.14276$Qg.6364@tornado.southeast.rr.com. ..
>
>>You never really could that's why whatever party you belong to it's
>>important to support the best people you can in the primaries.
>>
>>For someone with my political viewpoint a "moderate" Republican is no
>>better than a Democrat, and I won't vote for them.
>>
>>Jeff DeWitt
>>
>
>
>
Jeff DeWitt
mabar wrote:
> Most "moderate Republicans" of today are much more liberal than most
> Democrats of the 1960's.
>
> Tom
>
> "Jeff DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:SV5hg.14276$Qg.6364@tornado.southeast.rr.com. ..
>
>>You never really could that's why whatever party you belong to it's
>>important to support the best people you can in the primaries.
>>
>>For someone with my political viewpoint a "moderate" Republican is no
>>better than a Democrat, and I won't vote for them.
>>
>>Jeff DeWitt
>>
>
>
>
06-06-2006, 07:40 PM
#496
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - Trail(er) trash
Exactly so, that's why I won't vote for them!
Jeff DeWitt
mabar wrote:
> Most "moderate Republicans" of today are much more liberal than most
> Democrats of the 1960's.
>
> Tom
>
> "Jeff DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:SV5hg.14276$Qg.6364@tornado.southeast.rr.com. ..
>
>>You never really could that's why whatever party you belong to it's
>>important to support the best people you can in the primaries.
>>
>>For someone with my political viewpoint a "moderate" Republican is no
>>better than a Democrat, and I won't vote for them.
>>
>>Jeff DeWitt
>>
>
>
>
Jeff DeWitt
mabar wrote:
> Most "moderate Republicans" of today are much more liberal than most
> Democrats of the 1960's.
>
> Tom
>
> "Jeff DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:SV5hg.14276$Qg.6364@tornado.southeast.rr.com. ..
>
>>You never really could that's why whatever party you belong to it's
>>important to support the best people you can in the primaries.
>>
>>For someone with my political viewpoint a "moderate" Republican is no
>>better than a Democrat, and I won't vote for them.
>>
>>Jeff DeWitt
>>
>
>
>
06-07-2006, 11:16 PM
#497
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash
DougW proclaimed:
> L.W.(Bill) ------ III did pass the time by typing:
>
>> I have yet to see a democratic plan for anything.
>
>
> 1) head
> 2) sand
>
I love it when I see politicians publicly arguing with each other and
doing absolutely nothing. For some reason, my wallet always tends to be
thicker when they are doing this than it is when they settle down and
pass another bill--that somehow ends up with a thinner wallet for
everyone but themselves and their buddies. Or to quote a famous old
dead retired conservative senator: "Sometimes there is much to be said
for mediocrity..." in speaking of politicians.
> L.W.(Bill) ------ III did pass the time by typing:
>
>> I have yet to see a democratic plan for anything.
>
>
> 1) head
> 2) sand
>
I love it when I see politicians publicly arguing with each other and
doing absolutely nothing. For some reason, my wallet always tends to be
thicker when they are doing this than it is when they settle down and
pass another bill--that somehow ends up with a thinner wallet for
everyone but themselves and their buddies. Or to quote a famous old
dead retired conservative senator: "Sometimes there is much to be said
for mediocrity..." in speaking of politicians.
06-07-2006, 11:16 PM
#498
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash
DougW proclaimed:
> L.W.(Bill) ------ III did pass the time by typing:
>
>> I have yet to see a democratic plan for anything.
>
>
> 1) head
> 2) sand
>
I love it when I see politicians publicly arguing with each other and
doing absolutely nothing. For some reason, my wallet always tends to be
thicker when they are doing this than it is when they settle down and
pass another bill--that somehow ends up with a thinner wallet for
everyone but themselves and their buddies. Or to quote a famous old
dead retired conservative senator: "Sometimes there is much to be said
for mediocrity..." in speaking of politicians.
> L.W.(Bill) ------ III did pass the time by typing:
>
>> I have yet to see a democratic plan for anything.
>
>
> 1) head
> 2) sand
>
I love it when I see politicians publicly arguing with each other and
doing absolutely nothing. For some reason, my wallet always tends to be
thicker when they are doing this than it is when they settle down and
pass another bill--that somehow ends up with a thinner wallet for
everyone but themselves and their buddies. Or to quote a famous old
dead retired conservative senator: "Sometimes there is much to be said
for mediocrity..." in speaking of politicians.
06-07-2006, 11:16 PM
#499
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash
DougW proclaimed:
> L.W.(Bill) ------ III did pass the time by typing:
>
>> I have yet to see a democratic plan for anything.
>
>
> 1) head
> 2) sand
>
I love it when I see politicians publicly arguing with each other and
doing absolutely nothing. For some reason, my wallet always tends to be
thicker when they are doing this than it is when they settle down and
pass another bill--that somehow ends up with a thinner wallet for
everyone but themselves and their buddies. Or to quote a famous old
dead retired conservative senator: "Sometimes there is much to be said
for mediocrity..." in speaking of politicians.
> L.W.(Bill) ------ III did pass the time by typing:
>
>> I have yet to see a democratic plan for anything.
>
>
> 1) head
> 2) sand
>
I love it when I see politicians publicly arguing with each other and
doing absolutely nothing. For some reason, my wallet always tends to be
thicker when they are doing this than it is when they settle down and
pass another bill--that somehow ends up with a thinner wallet for
everyone but themselves and their buddies. Or to quote a famous old
dead retired conservative senator: "Sometimes there is much to be said
for mediocrity..." in speaking of politicians.
06-07-2006, 11:19 PM
#500
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
Does boredom count?
Earle Horton proclaimed:
> To my knowledge, Mr. Gore hasn't killed anyone yet.
>
> http://netctr.com/iraqdead.html
> http://www.ivaw.net/
> http://cryptome.net/dead/dead-gallery.htm
> http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php
>
> Earle
>
> "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
> news:ded8$4482f3d5$48311525$10923@FUSE.NET...
>
>>There are certainly enough reasons for Al Gore to be considered a 'nut
>
> case'
>
>>although perhaps you are correct that is not the best choice of terms.
>>
>>
>>"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:Xns97D84C2B3481Dxs11eyahoocom@70.169.32.36. ..
>>
>>>Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in
>>>news:d3Cgg.37621$Lg.25287@tornado.southeast.rr. com:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I'm sorry, but I'm not going to be bothered by someone being a bit
>>>>unfair to a nut case like Al Gore.
>>>
>>>When you add things someone didn't do or say with things they did, you
>>>weaken your case and give their supporters a reason to disregard your
>>>entire argument.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Earle Horton proclaimed:
> To my knowledge, Mr. Gore hasn't killed anyone yet.
>
> http://netctr.com/iraqdead.html
> http://www.ivaw.net/
> http://cryptome.net/dead/dead-gallery.htm
> http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php
>
> Earle
>
> "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
> news:ded8$4482f3d5$48311525$10923@FUSE.NET...
>
>>There are certainly enough reasons for Al Gore to be considered a 'nut
>
> case'
>
>>although perhaps you are correct that is not the best choice of terms.
>>
>>
>>"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:Xns97D84C2B3481Dxs11eyahoocom@70.169.32.36. ..
>>
>>>Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in
>>>news:d3Cgg.37621$Lg.25287@tornado.southeast.rr. com:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I'm sorry, but I'm not going to be bothered by someone being a bit
>>>>unfair to a nut case like Al Gore.
>>>
>>>When you add things someone didn't do or say with things they did, you
>>>weaken your case and give their supporters a reason to disregard your
>>>entire argument.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
