Trail(er) trash
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
Jerry Bransford <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in news:%mHfg.1322$sP1.50
@fed1read07:
[snip]
> And Rick, I can't believe you'd call a farmer a "-----" because he got
> pissed over offroaders who screwed up his cultivated fields.
He didn't call him a ----- because he got pissed off. He called him a
----- because getting pissed off (and posting to Usenet, I guess) was all
that he apparently did. If such a thing happened to my neighbor's fields,
he'd call the cops, and they'd damn well solve the problem. Like others, I
can't conceive of a rural community where this problem would not be
adequately dealt with if brought to the attention of law enforcement.
Perhaps OP is an absentee gentleman hobby-farmer?
@fed1read07:
[snip]
> And Rick, I can't believe you'd call a farmer a "-----" because he got
> pissed over offroaders who screwed up his cultivated fields.
He didn't call him a ----- because he got pissed off. He called him a
----- because getting pissed off (and posting to Usenet, I guess) was all
that he apparently did. If such a thing happened to my neighbor's fields,
he'd call the cops, and they'd damn well solve the problem. Like others, I
can't conceive of a rural community where this problem would not be
adequately dealt with if brought to the attention of law enforcement.
Perhaps OP is an absentee gentleman hobby-farmer?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
Jerry Bransford <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in news:%mHfg.1322$sP1.50
@fed1read07:
[snip]
> And Rick, I can't believe you'd call a farmer a "-----" because he got
> pissed over offroaders who screwed up his cultivated fields.
He didn't call him a ----- because he got pissed off. He called him a
----- because getting pissed off (and posting to Usenet, I guess) was all
that he apparently did. If such a thing happened to my neighbor's fields,
he'd call the cops, and they'd damn well solve the problem. Like others, I
can't conceive of a rural community where this problem would not be
adequately dealt with if brought to the attention of law enforcement.
Perhaps OP is an absentee gentleman hobby-farmer?
@fed1read07:
[snip]
> And Rick, I can't believe you'd call a farmer a "-----" because he got
> pissed over offroaders who screwed up his cultivated fields.
He didn't call him a ----- because he got pissed off. He called him a
----- because getting pissed off (and posting to Usenet, I guess) was all
that he apparently did. If such a thing happened to my neighbor's fields,
he'd call the cops, and they'd damn well solve the problem. Like others, I
can't conceive of a rural community where this problem would not be
adequately dealt with if brought to the attention of law enforcement.
Perhaps OP is an absentee gentleman hobby-farmer?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
Jerry Bransford <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in news:%mHfg.1322$sP1.50
@fed1read07:
[snip]
> And Rick, I can't believe you'd call a farmer a "-----" because he got
> pissed over offroaders who screwed up his cultivated fields.
He didn't call him a ----- because he got pissed off. He called him a
----- because getting pissed off (and posting to Usenet, I guess) was all
that he apparently did. If such a thing happened to my neighbor's fields,
he'd call the cops, and they'd damn well solve the problem. Like others, I
can't conceive of a rural community where this problem would not be
adequately dealt with if brought to the attention of law enforcement.
Perhaps OP is an absentee gentleman hobby-farmer?
@fed1read07:
[snip]
> And Rick, I can't believe you'd call a farmer a "-----" because he got
> pissed over offroaders who screwed up his cultivated fields.
He didn't call him a ----- because he got pissed off. He called him a
----- because getting pissed off (and posting to Usenet, I guess) was all
that he apparently did. If such a thing happened to my neighbor's fields,
he'd call the cops, and they'd damn well solve the problem. Like others, I
can't conceive of a rural community where this problem would not be
adequately dealt with if brought to the attention of law enforcement.
Perhaps OP is an absentee gentleman hobby-farmer?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash
"billy ray" <Kill.them.all@God.knows.his.own.com> wrote in
news:a47ea$447f43e8$48311525$19189@FUSE.NET:
> You may have something there.
>
> If the liberals and Demoncrats could keep their pants zipped the
> population would drop severely and decent people might again populate
> the earth.
Yeah! *belch* now get back in the kitchen and GET ME SOME PIE, BITCH!
news:a47ea$447f43e8$48311525$19189@FUSE.NET:
> You may have something there.
>
> If the liberals and Demoncrats could keep their pants zipped the
> population would drop severely and decent people might again populate
> the earth.
Yeah! *belch* now get back in the kitchen and GET ME SOME PIE, BITCH!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash
"billy ray" <Kill.them.all@God.knows.his.own.com> wrote in
news:a47ea$447f43e8$48311525$19189@FUSE.NET:
> You may have something there.
>
> If the liberals and Demoncrats could keep their pants zipped the
> population would drop severely and decent people might again populate
> the earth.
Yeah! *belch* now get back in the kitchen and GET ME SOME PIE, BITCH!
news:a47ea$447f43e8$48311525$19189@FUSE.NET:
> You may have something there.
>
> If the liberals and Demoncrats could keep their pants zipped the
> population would drop severely and decent people might again populate
> the earth.
Yeah! *belch* now get back in the kitchen and GET ME SOME PIE, BITCH!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash
"billy ray" <Kill.them.all@God.knows.his.own.com> wrote in
news:a47ea$447f43e8$48311525$19189@FUSE.NET:
> You may have something there.
>
> If the liberals and Demoncrats could keep their pants zipped the
> population would drop severely and decent people might again populate
> the earth.
Yeah! *belch* now get back in the kitchen and GET ME SOME PIE, BITCH!
news:a47ea$447f43e8$48311525$19189@FUSE.NET:
> You may have something there.
>
> If the liberals and Demoncrats could keep their pants zipped the
> population would drop severely and decent people might again populate
> the earth.
Yeah! *belch* now get back in the kitchen and GET ME SOME PIE, BITCH!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in news:0kKfg.11712$Qg.4920
@tornado.southeast.rr.com:
> The ****'s were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is
> hardly far right!
Right is as right does, Jeff; learn your history. The ***** were not in
the least socialist, no matter what their name says; in fact, socialists
and other leftists were very much a persecuted group under the **** regime.
@tornado.southeast.rr.com:
> The ****'s were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is
> hardly far right!
Right is as right does, Jeff; learn your history. The ***** were not in
the least socialist, no matter what their name says; in fact, socialists
and other leftists were very much a persecuted group under the **** regime.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in news:0kKfg.11712$Qg.4920
@tornado.southeast.rr.com:
> The ****'s were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is
> hardly far right!
Right is as right does, Jeff; learn your history. The ***** were not in
the least socialist, no matter what their name says; in fact, socialists
and other leftists were very much a persecuted group under the **** regime.
@tornado.southeast.rr.com:
> The ****'s were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is
> hardly far right!
Right is as right does, Jeff; learn your history. The ***** were not in
the least socialist, no matter what their name says; in fact, socialists
and other leftists were very much a persecuted group under the **** regime.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in news:0kKfg.11712$Qg.4920
@tornado.southeast.rr.com:
> The ****'s were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is
> hardly far right!
Right is as right does, Jeff; learn your history. The ***** were not in
the least socialist, no matter what their name says; in fact, socialists
and other leftists were very much a persecuted group under the **** regime.
@tornado.southeast.rr.com:
> The ****'s were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is
> hardly far right!
Right is as right does, Jeff; learn your history. The ***** were not in
the least socialist, no matter what their name says; in fact, socialists
and other leftists were very much a persecuted group under the **** regime.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
Oh boy are we getting way off topic however...
I don't claim to be an expert on the *****, but among other unsavory
things they were they WERE socialists.
A few points, ****'s promoted the limiting of profits, abolishment of
rent and increasing social benefits, all socialist ideas.
There is an excellent essay from Nobel Prize winner Friedrich A. Hayek
titled "The Socialist Roots of Nazism"
http://lamar.colostate.edu/~grjan/hayeknaziism.html
I suspect that the reason that it's commonly accepted that Nazism isn't
really socialism is because the Socialists are (correctly) terrified to
be connected with Nazism in any way and react very strongly to any
suggestion that Nazism was socialist.
In other words it's not politically correct to link the two... but then
I'm not politically correct!
Jeff DeWitt
Mary Malmros wrote:
> Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in news:0kKfg.11712$Qg.4920
> @tornado.southeast.rr.com:
>
>
>>The ****'s were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is
>>hardly far right!
>
>
> Right is as right does, Jeff; learn your history. The ***** were not in
> the least socialist, no matter what their name says; in fact, socialists
> and other leftists were very much a persecuted group under the **** regime.
I don't claim to be an expert on the *****, but among other unsavory
things they were they WERE socialists.
A few points, ****'s promoted the limiting of profits, abolishment of
rent and increasing social benefits, all socialist ideas.
There is an excellent essay from Nobel Prize winner Friedrich A. Hayek
titled "The Socialist Roots of Nazism"
http://lamar.colostate.edu/~grjan/hayeknaziism.html
I suspect that the reason that it's commonly accepted that Nazism isn't
really socialism is because the Socialists are (correctly) terrified to
be connected with Nazism in any way and react very strongly to any
suggestion that Nazism was socialist.
In other words it's not politically correct to link the two... but then
I'm not politically correct!
Jeff DeWitt
Mary Malmros wrote:
> Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in news:0kKfg.11712$Qg.4920
> @tornado.southeast.rr.com:
>
>
>>The ****'s were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is
>>hardly far right!
>
>
> Right is as right does, Jeff; learn your history. The ***** were not in
> the least socialist, no matter what their name says; in fact, socialists
> and other leftists were very much a persecuted group under the **** regime.