|
Re: TJ vs. JK
It must be said that in mid-96 when the '97 Wrangler TJ was released there
was a huge uproar over the redesign, mainly with the redesign of the suspension. (No leaf springs? No bone-jarring ride? It's not a Real Jeep!) I think with every redesign you get purists that just can't handle it, and long for the good old days. Anyone here remember attnews? "Brian" <bsheller@verizon.net> wrote in message news:bsheller-A1AB09.21374718072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com... > It's just different. Maybe some good, maybe some bad. It's all a matter > of taste. Many people have an emotional and/or personal attachment to > the TJ, and many might just love the capabilities of the new version. > > What you're missing is that people just have different tastes and > different opinions, that's all. And those people will attempt to > rationalize their subjective personal feelings by citing the objective > physical differences. "Electronic stability control??? That's not a REAL > Jeep!!!" What they really mean is, "I don't want MY Jeep to have > complicated electronics, I like it the old way." There's absolutely > nothing wrong with that. > > I'll bet the JKs do AWESOME off-road and on-road. But the Jeep I want is > a 2006 Rubicon Unlimited. Just my personal preference. > > B > > In article <1184791538.410883.168290@j4g2000prf.googlegroups. com>, > txjeep7@gmail.com wrote: > >> >> As soon as I saw the photos and read the first specs, my heart has >> been racing with desire. Pamela Anderson move over, all my lust is >> for the latest and greatest off the Chrysler assembly line! >> >> But wait. There seems to be a derisive undercurrent of scorn and >> disappointment here on the jeep group. People are saying things like >> "the TJ is the last wrangler I'll ever buy." >> >> Why?????? What am I missing? What's wrong with the JK... it sounds >> like an offroader's dream! >> |
Re: TJ vs. JK
It must be said that in mid-96 when the '97 Wrangler TJ was released there
was a huge uproar over the redesign, mainly with the redesign of the suspension. (No leaf springs? No bone-jarring ride? It's not a Real Jeep!) I think with every redesign you get purists that just can't handle it, and long for the good old days. Anyone here remember attnews? "Brian" <bsheller@verizon.net> wrote in message news:bsheller-A1AB09.21374718072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com... > It's just different. Maybe some good, maybe some bad. It's all a matter > of taste. Many people have an emotional and/or personal attachment to > the TJ, and many might just love the capabilities of the new version. > > What you're missing is that people just have different tastes and > different opinions, that's all. And those people will attempt to > rationalize their subjective personal feelings by citing the objective > physical differences. "Electronic stability control??? That's not a REAL > Jeep!!!" What they really mean is, "I don't want MY Jeep to have > complicated electronics, I like it the old way." There's absolutely > nothing wrong with that. > > I'll bet the JKs do AWESOME off-road and on-road. But the Jeep I want is > a 2006 Rubicon Unlimited. Just my personal preference. > > B > > In article <1184791538.410883.168290@j4g2000prf.googlegroups. com>, > txjeep7@gmail.com wrote: > >> >> As soon as I saw the photos and read the first specs, my heart has >> been racing with desire. Pamela Anderson move over, all my lust is >> for the latest and greatest off the Chrysler assembly line! >> >> But wait. There seems to be a derisive undercurrent of scorn and >> disappointment here on the jeep group. People are saying things like >> "the TJ is the last wrangler I'll ever buy." >> >> Why?????? What am I missing? What's wrong with the JK... it sounds >> like an offroader's dream! >> |
Re: TJ vs. JK
It must be said that in mid-96 when the '97 Wrangler TJ was released there
was a huge uproar over the redesign, mainly with the redesign of the suspension. (No leaf springs? No bone-jarring ride? It's not a Real Jeep!) I think with every redesign you get purists that just can't handle it, and long for the good old days. Anyone here remember attnews? "Brian" <bsheller@verizon.net> wrote in message news:bsheller-A1AB09.21374718072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com... > It's just different. Maybe some good, maybe some bad. It's all a matter > of taste. Many people have an emotional and/or personal attachment to > the TJ, and many might just love the capabilities of the new version. > > What you're missing is that people just have different tastes and > different opinions, that's all. And those people will attempt to > rationalize their subjective personal feelings by citing the objective > physical differences. "Electronic stability control??? That's not a REAL > Jeep!!!" What they really mean is, "I don't want MY Jeep to have > complicated electronics, I like it the old way." There's absolutely > nothing wrong with that. > > I'll bet the JKs do AWESOME off-road and on-road. But the Jeep I want is > a 2006 Rubicon Unlimited. Just my personal preference. > > B > > In article <1184791538.410883.168290@j4g2000prf.googlegroups. com>, > txjeep7@gmail.com wrote: > >> >> As soon as I saw the photos and read the first specs, my heart has >> been racing with desire. Pamela Anderson move over, all my lust is >> for the latest and greatest off the Chrysler assembly line! >> >> But wait. There seems to be a derisive undercurrent of scorn and >> disappointment here on the jeep group. People are saying things like >> "the TJ is the last wrangler I'll ever buy." >> >> Why?????? What am I missing? What's wrong with the JK... it sounds >> like an offroader's dream! >> |
Re: TJ vs. JK
I couldn't have said it better myself. I'm an XJ/YJ man, just my preference.
Carl "Brian" <bsheller@verizon.net> wrote in message news:bsheller-A1AB09.21374718072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com... > It's just different. Maybe some good, maybe some bad. It's all a matter > of taste. Many people have an emotional and/or personal attachment to > the TJ, and many might just love the capabilities of the new version. > > What you're missing is that people just have different tastes and > different opinions, that's all. And those people will attempt to > rationalize their subjective personal feelings by citing the objective > physical differences. "Electronic stability control??? That's not a REAL > Jeep!!!" What they really mean is, "I don't want MY Jeep to have > complicated electronics, I like it the old way." There's absolutely > nothing wrong with that. > > I'll bet the JKs do AWESOME off-road and on-road. But the Jeep I want is > a 2006 Rubicon Unlimited. Just my personal preference. > > B > > In article <1184791538.410883.168290@j4g2000prf.googlegroups. com>, > txjeep7@gmail.com wrote: > >> >> As soon as I saw the photos and read the first specs, my heart has >> been racing with desire. Pamela Anderson move over, all my lust is >> for the latest and greatest off the Chrysler assembly line! >> >> But wait. There seems to be a derisive undercurrent of scorn and >> disappointment here on the jeep group. People are saying things like >> "the TJ is the last wrangler I'll ever buy." >> >> Why?????? What am I missing? What's wrong with the JK... it sounds >> like an offroader's dream! >> |
Re: TJ vs. JK
I couldn't have said it better myself. I'm an XJ/YJ man, just my preference.
Carl "Brian" <bsheller@verizon.net> wrote in message news:bsheller-A1AB09.21374718072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com... > It's just different. Maybe some good, maybe some bad. It's all a matter > of taste. Many people have an emotional and/or personal attachment to > the TJ, and many might just love the capabilities of the new version. > > What you're missing is that people just have different tastes and > different opinions, that's all. And those people will attempt to > rationalize their subjective personal feelings by citing the objective > physical differences. "Electronic stability control??? That's not a REAL > Jeep!!!" What they really mean is, "I don't want MY Jeep to have > complicated electronics, I like it the old way." There's absolutely > nothing wrong with that. > > I'll bet the JKs do AWESOME off-road and on-road. But the Jeep I want is > a 2006 Rubicon Unlimited. Just my personal preference. > > B > > In article <1184791538.410883.168290@j4g2000prf.googlegroups. com>, > txjeep7@gmail.com wrote: > >> >> As soon as I saw the photos and read the first specs, my heart has >> been racing with desire. Pamela Anderson move over, all my lust is >> for the latest and greatest off the Chrysler assembly line! >> >> But wait. There seems to be a derisive undercurrent of scorn and >> disappointment here on the jeep group. People are saying things like >> "the TJ is the last wrangler I'll ever buy." >> >> Why?????? What am I missing? What's wrong with the JK... it sounds >> like an offroader's dream! >> |
Re: TJ vs. JK
I couldn't have said it better myself. I'm an XJ/YJ man, just my preference.
Carl "Brian" <bsheller@verizon.net> wrote in message news:bsheller-A1AB09.21374718072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com... > It's just different. Maybe some good, maybe some bad. It's all a matter > of taste. Many people have an emotional and/or personal attachment to > the TJ, and many might just love the capabilities of the new version. > > What you're missing is that people just have different tastes and > different opinions, that's all. And those people will attempt to > rationalize their subjective personal feelings by citing the objective > physical differences. "Electronic stability control??? That's not a REAL > Jeep!!!" What they really mean is, "I don't want MY Jeep to have > complicated electronics, I like it the old way." There's absolutely > nothing wrong with that. > > I'll bet the JKs do AWESOME off-road and on-road. But the Jeep I want is > a 2006 Rubicon Unlimited. Just my personal preference. > > B > > In article <1184791538.410883.168290@j4g2000prf.googlegroups. com>, > txjeep7@gmail.com wrote: > >> >> As soon as I saw the photos and read the first specs, my heart has >> been racing with desire. Pamela Anderson move over, all my lust is >> for the latest and greatest off the Chrysler assembly line! >> >> But wait. There seems to be a derisive undercurrent of scorn and >> disappointment here on the jeep group. People are saying things like >> "the TJ is the last wrangler I'll ever buy." >> >> Why?????? What am I missing? What's wrong with the JK... it sounds >> like an offroader's dream! >> |
Re: TJ vs. JK
I couldn't have said it better myself. I'm an XJ/YJ man, just my preference.
Carl "Brian" <bsheller@verizon.net> wrote in message news:bsheller-A1AB09.21374718072007@comcast.dca.giganews.com... > It's just different. Maybe some good, maybe some bad. It's all a matter > of taste. Many people have an emotional and/or personal attachment to > the TJ, and many might just love the capabilities of the new version. > > What you're missing is that people just have different tastes and > different opinions, that's all. And those people will attempt to > rationalize their subjective personal feelings by citing the objective > physical differences. "Electronic stability control??? That's not a REAL > Jeep!!!" What they really mean is, "I don't want MY Jeep to have > complicated electronics, I like it the old way." There's absolutely > nothing wrong with that. > > I'll bet the JKs do AWESOME off-road and on-road. But the Jeep I want is > a 2006 Rubicon Unlimited. Just my personal preference. > > B > > In article <1184791538.410883.168290@j4g2000prf.googlegroups. com>, > txjeep7@gmail.com wrote: > >> >> As soon as I saw the photos and read the first specs, my heart has >> been racing with desire. Pamela Anderson move over, all my lust is >> for the latest and greatest off the Chrysler assembly line! >> >> But wait. There seems to be a derisive undercurrent of scorn and >> disappointment here on the jeep group. People are saying things like >> "the TJ is the last wrangler I'll ever buy." >> >> Why?????? What am I missing? What's wrong with the JK... it sounds >> like an offroader's dream! >> |
Re: TJ vs. JK
<txjeep7@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1184791538.410883.168290@j4g2000prf.googlegro ups.com... >I have been reading some of the specs on the JK Rubicon > Unlimited.... front and rear lockers you can activate with the > flick of a switch? dana 44s front and rear? 32" tires standard, no > lift kit needed?? 4.10 gear ratio, 4:1 compression, and a six speed > manual? And all with a factory warranty!!! Sounds like the most > capable stock jeep EVER. You might even be able to stick 33s or 34s > on it straight out of the showroom! Not to mention, it can tow 3500 > pounds.... I might finally be able to get rid of the separate tow > vehicle I had to keep for my jet skis and ATVs because my TJ couldn't > tow over 2000 lbs! > > As soon as I saw the photos and read the first specs, my heart has > been racing with desire. Pamela Anderson move over, all my lust is > for the latest and greatest off the Chrysler assembly line! > > But wait. There seems to be a derisive undercurrent of scorn and > disappointment here on the jeep group. People are saying things like > "the TJ is the last wrangler I'll ever buy." > > Why?????? What am I missing? What's wrong with the JK... it sounds > like an offroader's dream! > > I remember when the TJ came out, people scoffed and said it would > never be as good as the YJ. And when the YJ came out, people swore > they'd never give up the CJ. I'm too young to remember when the CJ > first hit the market, but I'm willing to bet people were dissing it > when compared to the Willys. > > So... is all this anti-JK sentiment just "sour grapes" but people > who are slow to change (and perhaps a bit unhappy/jealous that they > bought a TJ and now something has eclipsed it)? Or is there some > real, material failing in the JK that I need to be aware of before > trekking to a dealership to lay down my cash for one? > I guess I'll be the first one here to admit to buying a JK. We had an '01 TJ with the 4 banger engine and it was a perfectly capable off road Jeep. Not fast on the highway but it always got you where you needed to go. It was getting, as they say, a bit long in the tooth and was beginning to need lots of time and money to keep things under repair so we went and looked at the JK Jeeps. We have had it about a month, has a couple thousand miles on it now. What do we think of it? Well to start with, it is tremendously quieter on the road. You can actually listen to the radio at interstate speeds. The top is easier to put up and down, it's much, much easier to put the side windows in. The back seat folds up out of the way with the flick of a lever all by itself. It also comes out much easier than the TJ. We have the standard tranny and are getting an average of 18 MPG around town with country road driving mixed in, no highway to speak of. It's a LOT higher than the TJ was, both from the larger wheels and tires and the body seems to sit higher on the frame. When you take the doors off there is a plug that you simply pull and the dome lights are disabled, no more going in behind the glove box and pulling number four fuse. Folks rap the ESP stability thing but I haven't noticed that it's even there. There is a button on the dash to turn it off if you think it's bothering you. The disk brakes at all four wheels are awesome and have great stopping power compared to the old TJ we had. The old Jeep trick of pressing your brake pedal when you get a wheel spinning to send more torque to the other wheel has been used for years. The JK does this for you, it has traction control for all four wheels that will pinch the brake on a wheel that gets spinning so the power will go to the other wheel. Sort of a poor man's limited slip. I had to go try this out so I headed out to some muddy areas and got on the gas to spin things. I was surprised, it really does work and help. The other big knock I keep seeing is the demise of the 4 liter in line six. I came out of a 4 banger TJ so this moter has huge power to me. Folks will always like stuff and other folks won't, thats just life and makes it interesting. Now, what don't I like? The TJ front seats would fold and tip up to let people in the back. The JK just lets the seat back fold forward and the seat slides forward on it's track making it real difficult to get anyone into the back seat. We rarely use the back seat for passengers so it's not too big a deal to us but it would be if you use the back seat much. The radio still sucks. The front seat belts flap between the floor and the upper slide mount when you have the top off. Other than that, we are very happy with the new Jeep. After drooling over the Rubicon, we bought the X model with the only option being the package with a/c, cloth seats, adjustable height drivers seat and center console. I guess everyone will have to decide for themselves if this one is for them or not. We're quite happy and it is our daily driver as well as being our play toy and I'm convinced, now I'm comparing pretty much stock Jeeps here, it's a more capable Jeep both on the road and off than my TJ was. Time may change my mind or maybe not. Hope this answers some of your questions and is just my two cents worth on the JK. Happy Jeeping everyone! Les |
Re: TJ vs. JK
<txjeep7@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1184791538.410883.168290@j4g2000prf.googlegro ups.com... >I have been reading some of the specs on the JK Rubicon > Unlimited.... front and rear lockers you can activate with the > flick of a switch? dana 44s front and rear? 32" tires standard, no > lift kit needed?? 4.10 gear ratio, 4:1 compression, and a six speed > manual? And all with a factory warranty!!! Sounds like the most > capable stock jeep EVER. You might even be able to stick 33s or 34s > on it straight out of the showroom! Not to mention, it can tow 3500 > pounds.... I might finally be able to get rid of the separate tow > vehicle I had to keep for my jet skis and ATVs because my TJ couldn't > tow over 2000 lbs! > > As soon as I saw the photos and read the first specs, my heart has > been racing with desire. Pamela Anderson move over, all my lust is > for the latest and greatest off the Chrysler assembly line! > > But wait. There seems to be a derisive undercurrent of scorn and > disappointment here on the jeep group. People are saying things like > "the TJ is the last wrangler I'll ever buy." > > Why?????? What am I missing? What's wrong with the JK... it sounds > like an offroader's dream! > > I remember when the TJ came out, people scoffed and said it would > never be as good as the YJ. And when the YJ came out, people swore > they'd never give up the CJ. I'm too young to remember when the CJ > first hit the market, but I'm willing to bet people were dissing it > when compared to the Willys. > > So... is all this anti-JK sentiment just "sour grapes" but people > who are slow to change (and perhaps a bit unhappy/jealous that they > bought a TJ and now something has eclipsed it)? Or is there some > real, material failing in the JK that I need to be aware of before > trekking to a dealership to lay down my cash for one? > I guess I'll be the first one here to admit to buying a JK. We had an '01 TJ with the 4 banger engine and it was a perfectly capable off road Jeep. Not fast on the highway but it always got you where you needed to go. It was getting, as they say, a bit long in the tooth and was beginning to need lots of time and money to keep things under repair so we went and looked at the JK Jeeps. We have had it about a month, has a couple thousand miles on it now. What do we think of it? Well to start with, it is tremendously quieter on the road. You can actually listen to the radio at interstate speeds. The top is easier to put up and down, it's much, much easier to put the side windows in. The back seat folds up out of the way with the flick of a lever all by itself. It also comes out much easier than the TJ. We have the standard tranny and are getting an average of 18 MPG around town with country road driving mixed in, no highway to speak of. It's a LOT higher than the TJ was, both from the larger wheels and tires and the body seems to sit higher on the frame. When you take the doors off there is a plug that you simply pull and the dome lights are disabled, no more going in behind the glove box and pulling number four fuse. Folks rap the ESP stability thing but I haven't noticed that it's even there. There is a button on the dash to turn it off if you think it's bothering you. The disk brakes at all four wheels are awesome and have great stopping power compared to the old TJ we had. The old Jeep trick of pressing your brake pedal when you get a wheel spinning to send more torque to the other wheel has been used for years. The JK does this for you, it has traction control for all four wheels that will pinch the brake on a wheel that gets spinning so the power will go to the other wheel. Sort of a poor man's limited slip. I had to go try this out so I headed out to some muddy areas and got on the gas to spin things. I was surprised, it really does work and help. The other big knock I keep seeing is the demise of the 4 liter in line six. I came out of a 4 banger TJ so this moter has huge power to me. Folks will always like stuff and other folks won't, thats just life and makes it interesting. Now, what don't I like? The TJ front seats would fold and tip up to let people in the back. The JK just lets the seat back fold forward and the seat slides forward on it's track making it real difficult to get anyone into the back seat. We rarely use the back seat for passengers so it's not too big a deal to us but it would be if you use the back seat much. The radio still sucks. The front seat belts flap between the floor and the upper slide mount when you have the top off. Other than that, we are very happy with the new Jeep. After drooling over the Rubicon, we bought the X model with the only option being the package with a/c, cloth seats, adjustable height drivers seat and center console. I guess everyone will have to decide for themselves if this one is for them or not. We're quite happy and it is our daily driver as well as being our play toy and I'm convinced, now I'm comparing pretty much stock Jeeps here, it's a more capable Jeep both on the road and off than my TJ was. Time may change my mind or maybe not. Hope this answers some of your questions and is just my two cents worth on the JK. Happy Jeeping everyone! Les |
Re: TJ vs. JK
<txjeep7@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1184791538.410883.168290@j4g2000prf.googlegro ups.com... >I have been reading some of the specs on the JK Rubicon > Unlimited.... front and rear lockers you can activate with the > flick of a switch? dana 44s front and rear? 32" tires standard, no > lift kit needed?? 4.10 gear ratio, 4:1 compression, and a six speed > manual? And all with a factory warranty!!! Sounds like the most > capable stock jeep EVER. You might even be able to stick 33s or 34s > on it straight out of the showroom! Not to mention, it can tow 3500 > pounds.... I might finally be able to get rid of the separate tow > vehicle I had to keep for my jet skis and ATVs because my TJ couldn't > tow over 2000 lbs! > > As soon as I saw the photos and read the first specs, my heart has > been racing with desire. Pamela Anderson move over, all my lust is > for the latest and greatest off the Chrysler assembly line! > > But wait. There seems to be a derisive undercurrent of scorn and > disappointment here on the jeep group. People are saying things like > "the TJ is the last wrangler I'll ever buy." > > Why?????? What am I missing? What's wrong with the JK... it sounds > like an offroader's dream! > > I remember when the TJ came out, people scoffed and said it would > never be as good as the YJ. And when the YJ came out, people swore > they'd never give up the CJ. I'm too young to remember when the CJ > first hit the market, but I'm willing to bet people were dissing it > when compared to the Willys. > > So... is all this anti-JK sentiment just "sour grapes" but people > who are slow to change (and perhaps a bit unhappy/jealous that they > bought a TJ and now something has eclipsed it)? Or is there some > real, material failing in the JK that I need to be aware of before > trekking to a dealership to lay down my cash for one? > I guess I'll be the first one here to admit to buying a JK. We had an '01 TJ with the 4 banger engine and it was a perfectly capable off road Jeep. Not fast on the highway but it always got you where you needed to go. It was getting, as they say, a bit long in the tooth and was beginning to need lots of time and money to keep things under repair so we went and looked at the JK Jeeps. We have had it about a month, has a couple thousand miles on it now. What do we think of it? Well to start with, it is tremendously quieter on the road. You can actually listen to the radio at interstate speeds. The top is easier to put up and down, it's much, much easier to put the side windows in. The back seat folds up out of the way with the flick of a lever all by itself. It also comes out much easier than the TJ. We have the standard tranny and are getting an average of 18 MPG around town with country road driving mixed in, no highway to speak of. It's a LOT higher than the TJ was, both from the larger wheels and tires and the body seems to sit higher on the frame. When you take the doors off there is a plug that you simply pull and the dome lights are disabled, no more going in behind the glove box and pulling number four fuse. Folks rap the ESP stability thing but I haven't noticed that it's even there. There is a button on the dash to turn it off if you think it's bothering you. The disk brakes at all four wheels are awesome and have great stopping power compared to the old TJ we had. The old Jeep trick of pressing your brake pedal when you get a wheel spinning to send more torque to the other wheel has been used for years. The JK does this for you, it has traction control for all four wheels that will pinch the brake on a wheel that gets spinning so the power will go to the other wheel. Sort of a poor man's limited slip. I had to go try this out so I headed out to some muddy areas and got on the gas to spin things. I was surprised, it really does work and help. The other big knock I keep seeing is the demise of the 4 liter in line six. I came out of a 4 banger TJ so this moter has huge power to me. Folks will always like stuff and other folks won't, thats just life and makes it interesting. Now, what don't I like? The TJ front seats would fold and tip up to let people in the back. The JK just lets the seat back fold forward and the seat slides forward on it's track making it real difficult to get anyone into the back seat. We rarely use the back seat for passengers so it's not too big a deal to us but it would be if you use the back seat much. The radio still sucks. The front seat belts flap between the floor and the upper slide mount when you have the top off. Other than that, we are very happy with the new Jeep. After drooling over the Rubicon, we bought the X model with the only option being the package with a/c, cloth seats, adjustable height drivers seat and center console. I guess everyone will have to decide for themselves if this one is for them or not. We're quite happy and it is our daily driver as well as being our play toy and I'm convinced, now I'm comparing pretty much stock Jeeps here, it's a more capable Jeep both on the road and off than my TJ was. Time may change my mind or maybe not. Hope this answers some of your questions and is just my two cents worth on the JK. Happy Jeeping everyone! Les |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:22 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands