Tahoe vs. JGC - help!
02-11-2004, 08:18 PM
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Tahoe vs. JGC - help!
Ya, but using that rationale, when DO you buy an all new model
vehicle? I've heard that 'never buy the first model year' argument
before, and the fact is that often certain problems still exist three
or four years later. It just doesn't wash IMO. Unless you want to sit
on the fence until the middle or end of a production run that is, but
that's a lotta waitin' hehehe. Look at the 97-99 Wranglers... they
pretty much all exhibit the same 'problems' (exhaust manifold and
instrument cluster come to mind). If you were in the market for a new
vehicle back in 96, would you wait until 2000 to buy your Wrangler in
that case (and end up with the noisy-in-neutral 5sp manual
transmission as a trade off)? :)
Dave
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:54:14 -0500, "j carter" <jcarter10@comcast.net>
wrote:
*snip*
>As for the '05, it'll be all new and I sure wouldn't want one for just
>that reason. (Detroit has never been able to get a new design off the
>drawing board and onto the road without multiple problems.) Look at all the
>trouble GM is STILL having with the Trailblazers!
*snip*
vehicle? I've heard that 'never buy the first model year' argument
before, and the fact is that often certain problems still exist three
or four years later. It just doesn't wash IMO. Unless you want to sit
on the fence until the middle or end of a production run that is, but
that's a lotta waitin' hehehe. Look at the 97-99 Wranglers... they
pretty much all exhibit the same 'problems' (exhaust manifold and
instrument cluster come to mind). If you were in the market for a new
vehicle back in 96, would you wait until 2000 to buy your Wrangler in
that case (and end up with the noisy-in-neutral 5sp manual
transmission as a trade off)? :)
Dave
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:54:14 -0500, "j carter" <jcarter10@comcast.net>
wrote:
*snip*
>As for the '05, it'll be all new and I sure wouldn't want one for just
>that reason. (Detroit has never been able to get a new design off the
>drawing board and onto the road without multiple problems.) Look at all the
>trouble GM is STILL having with the Trailblazers!
*snip*
02-11-2004, 08:18 PM
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Tahoe vs. JGC - help!
Ya, but using that rationale, when DO you buy an all new model
vehicle? I've heard that 'never buy the first model year' argument
before, and the fact is that often certain problems still exist three
or four years later. It just doesn't wash IMO. Unless you want to sit
on the fence until the middle or end of a production run that is, but
that's a lotta waitin' hehehe. Look at the 97-99 Wranglers... they
pretty much all exhibit the same 'problems' (exhaust manifold and
instrument cluster come to mind). If you were in the market for a new
vehicle back in 96, would you wait until 2000 to buy your Wrangler in
that case (and end up with the noisy-in-neutral 5sp manual
transmission as a trade off)? :)
Dave
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:54:14 -0500, "j carter" <jcarter10@comcast.net>
wrote:
*snip*
>As for the '05, it'll be all new and I sure wouldn't want one for just
>that reason. (Detroit has never been able to get a new design off the
>drawing board and onto the road without multiple problems.) Look at all the
>trouble GM is STILL having with the Trailblazers!
*snip*
vehicle? I've heard that 'never buy the first model year' argument
before, and the fact is that often certain problems still exist three
or four years later. It just doesn't wash IMO. Unless you want to sit
on the fence until the middle or end of a production run that is, but
that's a lotta waitin' hehehe. Look at the 97-99 Wranglers... they
pretty much all exhibit the same 'problems' (exhaust manifold and
instrument cluster come to mind). If you were in the market for a new
vehicle back in 96, would you wait until 2000 to buy your Wrangler in
that case (and end up with the noisy-in-neutral 5sp manual
transmission as a trade off)? :)
Dave
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:54:14 -0500, "j carter" <jcarter10@comcast.net>
wrote:
*snip*
>As for the '05, it'll be all new and I sure wouldn't want one for just
>that reason. (Detroit has never been able to get a new design off the
>drawing board and onto the road without multiple problems.) Look at all the
>trouble GM is STILL having with the Trailblazers!
*snip*
02-12-2004, 08:14 AM
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Tahoe vs. JGC - help!
Right, and sometimes the "fixes" don't fix the problems. Also, some of
the "new and improved" changes during the model runs present their own
new problems. Unless it's a relative disaster like the 84 Corvette, I'd
wait a few months to make sure nothing glaring rears up and then jump in
with both feet...but that's just me.
David C. Moller wrote:
> Ya, but using that rationale, when DO you buy an all new model
> vehicle? I've heard that 'never buy the first model year' argument
> before, and the fact is that often certain problems still exist three
> or four years later. It just doesn't wash IMO. Unless you want to sit
> on the fence until the middle or end of a production run that is, but
> that's a lotta waitin' hehehe. Look at the 97-99 Wranglers... they
> pretty much all exhibit the same 'problems' (exhaust manifold and
> instrument cluster come to mind). If you were in the market for a new
> vehicle back in 96, would you wait until 2000 to buy your Wrangler in
> that case (and end up with the noisy-in-neutral 5sp manual
> transmission as a trade off)? :)
>
> Dave
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
the "new and improved" changes during the model runs present their own
new problems. Unless it's a relative disaster like the 84 Corvette, I'd
wait a few months to make sure nothing glaring rears up and then jump in
with both feet...but that's just me.
David C. Moller wrote:
> Ya, but using that rationale, when DO you buy an all new model
> vehicle? I've heard that 'never buy the first model year' argument
> before, and the fact is that often certain problems still exist three
> or four years later. It just doesn't wash IMO. Unless you want to sit
> on the fence until the middle or end of a production run that is, but
> that's a lotta waitin' hehehe. Look at the 97-99 Wranglers... they
> pretty much all exhibit the same 'problems' (exhaust manifold and
> instrument cluster come to mind). If you were in the market for a new
> vehicle back in 96, would you wait until 2000 to buy your Wrangler in
> that case (and end up with the noisy-in-neutral 5sp manual
> transmission as a trade off)? :)
>
> Dave
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
02-12-2004, 08:14 AM
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Tahoe vs. JGC - help!
Right, and sometimes the "fixes" don't fix the problems. Also, some of
the "new and improved" changes during the model runs present their own
new problems. Unless it's a relative disaster like the 84 Corvette, I'd
wait a few months to make sure nothing glaring rears up and then jump in
with both feet...but that's just me.
David C. Moller wrote:
> Ya, but using that rationale, when DO you buy an all new model
> vehicle? I've heard that 'never buy the first model year' argument
> before, and the fact is that often certain problems still exist three
> or four years later. It just doesn't wash IMO. Unless you want to sit
> on the fence until the middle or end of a production run that is, but
> that's a lotta waitin' hehehe. Look at the 97-99 Wranglers... they
> pretty much all exhibit the same 'problems' (exhaust manifold and
> instrument cluster come to mind). If you were in the market for a new
> vehicle back in 96, would you wait until 2000 to buy your Wrangler in
> that case (and end up with the noisy-in-neutral 5sp manual
> transmission as a trade off)? :)
>
> Dave
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
the "new and improved" changes during the model runs present their own
new problems. Unless it's a relative disaster like the 84 Corvette, I'd
wait a few months to make sure nothing glaring rears up and then jump in
with both feet...but that's just me.
David C. Moller wrote:
> Ya, but using that rationale, when DO you buy an all new model
> vehicle? I've heard that 'never buy the first model year' argument
> before, and the fact is that often certain problems still exist three
> or four years later. It just doesn't wash IMO. Unless you want to sit
> on the fence until the middle or end of a production run that is, but
> that's a lotta waitin' hehehe. Look at the 97-99 Wranglers... they
> pretty much all exhibit the same 'problems' (exhaust manifold and
> instrument cluster come to mind). If you were in the market for a new
> vehicle back in 96, would you wait until 2000 to buy your Wrangler in
> that case (and end up with the noisy-in-neutral 5sp manual
> transmission as a trade off)? :)
>
> Dave
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
02-12-2004, 08:14 AM
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Tahoe vs. JGC - help!
Right, and sometimes the "fixes" don't fix the problems. Also, some of
the "new and improved" changes during the model runs present their own
new problems. Unless it's a relative disaster like the 84 Corvette, I'd
wait a few months to make sure nothing glaring rears up and then jump in
with both feet...but that's just me.
David C. Moller wrote:
> Ya, but using that rationale, when DO you buy an all new model
> vehicle? I've heard that 'never buy the first model year' argument
> before, and the fact is that often certain problems still exist three
> or four years later. It just doesn't wash IMO. Unless you want to sit
> on the fence until the middle or end of a production run that is, but
> that's a lotta waitin' hehehe. Look at the 97-99 Wranglers... they
> pretty much all exhibit the same 'problems' (exhaust manifold and
> instrument cluster come to mind). If you were in the market for a new
> vehicle back in 96, would you wait until 2000 to buy your Wrangler in
> that case (and end up with the noisy-in-neutral 5sp manual
> transmission as a trade off)? :)
>
> Dave
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
the "new and improved" changes during the model runs present their own
new problems. Unless it's a relative disaster like the 84 Corvette, I'd
wait a few months to make sure nothing glaring rears up and then jump in
with both feet...but that's just me.
David C. Moller wrote:
> Ya, but using that rationale, when DO you buy an all new model
> vehicle? I've heard that 'never buy the first model year' argument
> before, and the fact is that often certain problems still exist three
> or four years later. It just doesn't wash IMO. Unless you want to sit
> on the fence until the middle or end of a production run that is, but
> that's a lotta waitin' hehehe. Look at the 97-99 Wranglers... they
> pretty much all exhibit the same 'problems' (exhaust manifold and
> instrument cluster come to mind). If you were in the market for a new
> vehicle back in 96, would you wait until 2000 to buy your Wrangler in
> that case (and end up with the noisy-in-neutral 5sp manual
> transmission as a trade off)? :)
>
> Dave
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
02-12-2004, 11:25 AM
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Tahoe vs. JGC - help!
I'd probably wait until the second year - and in the case of Chrysler, keep
my fingers crossed. Although the '84 Vette is a good example of my
"rationale". And I have two friends with Trailblazers who are not happy
campers either.
"David C. Moller" <dmoller@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:ogkl20ph6mi962ak2v0qk2ou028m5la5lc@4ax.com...
> Ya, but using that rationale, when DO you buy an all new model
> vehicle? I've heard that 'never buy the first model year' argument
> before, and the fact is that often certain problems still exist three
> or four years later. It just doesn't wash IMO. Unless you want to sit
> on the fence until the middle or end of a production run that is, but
> that's a lotta waitin' hehehe. Look at the 97-99 Wranglers... they
> pretty much all exhibit the same 'problems' (exhaust manifold and
> instrument cluster come to mind). If you were in the market for a new
> vehicle back in 96, would you wait until 2000 to buy your Wrangler in
> that case (and end up with the noisy-in-neutral 5sp manual
> transmission as a trade off)? :)
>
> Dave
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
>
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:54:14 -0500, "j carter" <jcarter10@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
> *snip*
> >As for the '05, it'll be all new and I sure wouldn't want one for just
> >that reason. (Detroit has never been able to get a new design off the
> >drawing board and onto the road without multiple problems.) Look at all
the
> >trouble GM is STILL having with the Trailblazers!
> *snip*
>
my fingers crossed. Although the '84 Vette is a good example of my
"rationale". And I have two friends with Trailblazers who are not happy
campers either.
"David C. Moller" <dmoller@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:ogkl20ph6mi962ak2v0qk2ou028m5la5lc@4ax.com...
> Ya, but using that rationale, when DO you buy an all new model
> vehicle? I've heard that 'never buy the first model year' argument
> before, and the fact is that often certain problems still exist three
> or four years later. It just doesn't wash IMO. Unless you want to sit
> on the fence until the middle or end of a production run that is, but
> that's a lotta waitin' hehehe. Look at the 97-99 Wranglers... they
> pretty much all exhibit the same 'problems' (exhaust manifold and
> instrument cluster come to mind). If you were in the market for a new
> vehicle back in 96, would you wait until 2000 to buy your Wrangler in
> that case (and end up with the noisy-in-neutral 5sp manual
> transmission as a trade off)? :)
>
> Dave
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
>
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:54:14 -0500, "j carter" <jcarter10@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
> *snip*
> >As for the '05, it'll be all new and I sure wouldn't want one for just
> >that reason. (Detroit has never been able to get a new design off the
> >drawing board and onto the road without multiple problems.) Look at all
the
> >trouble GM is STILL having with the Trailblazers!
> *snip*
>
02-12-2004, 11:25 AM
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Tahoe vs. JGC - help!
I'd probably wait until the second year - and in the case of Chrysler, keep
my fingers crossed. Although the '84 Vette is a good example of my
"rationale". And I have two friends with Trailblazers who are not happy
campers either.
"David C. Moller" <dmoller@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:ogkl20ph6mi962ak2v0qk2ou028m5la5lc@4ax.com...
> Ya, but using that rationale, when DO you buy an all new model
> vehicle? I've heard that 'never buy the first model year' argument
> before, and the fact is that often certain problems still exist three
> or four years later. It just doesn't wash IMO. Unless you want to sit
> on the fence until the middle or end of a production run that is, but
> that's a lotta waitin' hehehe. Look at the 97-99 Wranglers... they
> pretty much all exhibit the same 'problems' (exhaust manifold and
> instrument cluster come to mind). If you were in the market for a new
> vehicle back in 96, would you wait until 2000 to buy your Wrangler in
> that case (and end up with the noisy-in-neutral 5sp manual
> transmission as a trade off)? :)
>
> Dave
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
>
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:54:14 -0500, "j carter" <jcarter10@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
> *snip*
> >As for the '05, it'll be all new and I sure wouldn't want one for just
> >that reason. (Detroit has never been able to get a new design off the
> >drawing board and onto the road without multiple problems.) Look at all
the
> >trouble GM is STILL having with the Trailblazers!
> *snip*
>
my fingers crossed. Although the '84 Vette is a good example of my
"rationale". And I have two friends with Trailblazers who are not happy
campers either.
"David C. Moller" <dmoller@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:ogkl20ph6mi962ak2v0qk2ou028m5la5lc@4ax.com...
> Ya, but using that rationale, when DO you buy an all new model
> vehicle? I've heard that 'never buy the first model year' argument
> before, and the fact is that often certain problems still exist three
> or four years later. It just doesn't wash IMO. Unless you want to sit
> on the fence until the middle or end of a production run that is, but
> that's a lotta waitin' hehehe. Look at the 97-99 Wranglers... they
> pretty much all exhibit the same 'problems' (exhaust manifold and
> instrument cluster come to mind). If you were in the market for a new
> vehicle back in 96, would you wait until 2000 to buy your Wrangler in
> that case (and end up with the noisy-in-neutral 5sp manual
> transmission as a trade off)? :)
>
> Dave
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
>
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:54:14 -0500, "j carter" <jcarter10@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
> *snip*
> >As for the '05, it'll be all new and I sure wouldn't want one for just
> >that reason. (Detroit has never been able to get a new design off the
> >drawing board and onto the road without multiple problems.) Look at all
the
> >trouble GM is STILL having with the Trailblazers!
> *snip*
>
02-12-2004, 11:25 AM
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Tahoe vs. JGC - help!
I'd probably wait until the second year - and in the case of Chrysler, keep
my fingers crossed. Although the '84 Vette is a good example of my
"rationale". And I have two friends with Trailblazers who are not happy
campers either.
"David C. Moller" <dmoller@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:ogkl20ph6mi962ak2v0qk2ou028m5la5lc@4ax.com...
> Ya, but using that rationale, when DO you buy an all new model
> vehicle? I've heard that 'never buy the first model year' argument
> before, and the fact is that often certain problems still exist three
> or four years later. It just doesn't wash IMO. Unless you want to sit
> on the fence until the middle or end of a production run that is, but
> that's a lotta waitin' hehehe. Look at the 97-99 Wranglers... they
> pretty much all exhibit the same 'problems' (exhaust manifold and
> instrument cluster come to mind). If you were in the market for a new
> vehicle back in 96, would you wait until 2000 to buy your Wrangler in
> that case (and end up with the noisy-in-neutral 5sp manual
> transmission as a trade off)? :)
>
> Dave
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
>
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:54:14 -0500, "j carter" <jcarter10@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
> *snip*
> >As for the '05, it'll be all new and I sure wouldn't want one for just
> >that reason. (Detroit has never been able to get a new design off the
> >drawing board and onto the road without multiple problems.) Look at all
the
> >trouble GM is STILL having with the Trailblazers!
> *snip*
>
my fingers crossed. Although the '84 Vette is a good example of my
"rationale". And I have two friends with Trailblazers who are not happy
campers either.
"David C. Moller" <dmoller@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:ogkl20ph6mi962ak2v0qk2ou028m5la5lc@4ax.com...
> Ya, but using that rationale, when DO you buy an all new model
> vehicle? I've heard that 'never buy the first model year' argument
> before, and the fact is that often certain problems still exist three
> or four years later. It just doesn't wash IMO. Unless you want to sit
> on the fence until the middle or end of a production run that is, but
> that's a lotta waitin' hehehe. Look at the 97-99 Wranglers... they
> pretty much all exhibit the same 'problems' (exhaust manifold and
> instrument cluster come to mind). If you were in the market for a new
> vehicle back in 96, would you wait until 2000 to buy your Wrangler in
> that case (and end up with the noisy-in-neutral 5sp manual
> transmission as a trade off)? :)
>
> Dave
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
>
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:54:14 -0500, "j carter" <jcarter10@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
> *snip*
> >As for the '05, it'll be all new and I sure wouldn't want one for just
> >that reason. (Detroit has never been able to get a new design off the
> >drawing board and onto the road without multiple problems.) Look at all
the
> >trouble GM is STILL having with the Trailblazers!
> *snip*
>
02-12-2004, 11:58 AM
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Tahoe vs. JGC - help!
The Trailblazer and the Blazette it replaced were always a POS, not a
case of a new design with temporary flaws, just a case of crap on
wheels. I wouldn't tell your friends to hold their breath waiting on
improvements.
j carter wrote:
> I'd probably wait until the second year - and in the case of Chrysler, keep
> my fingers crossed. Although the '84 Vette is a good example of my
> "rationale". And I have two friends with Trailblazers who are not happy
> campers either.
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
case of a new design with temporary flaws, just a case of crap on
wheels. I wouldn't tell your friends to hold their breath waiting on
improvements.
j carter wrote:
> I'd probably wait until the second year - and in the case of Chrysler, keep
> my fingers crossed. Although the '84 Vette is a good example of my
> "rationale". And I have two friends with Trailblazers who are not happy
> campers either.
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
02-12-2004, 11:58 AM
#30
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Tahoe vs. JGC - help!
The Trailblazer and the Blazette it replaced were always a POS, not a
case of a new design with temporary flaws, just a case of crap on
wheels. I wouldn't tell your friends to hold their breath waiting on
improvements.
j carter wrote:
> I'd probably wait until the second year - and in the case of Chrysler, keep
> my fingers crossed. Although the '84 Vette is a good example of my
> "rationale". And I have two friends with Trailblazers who are not happy
> campers either.
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
case of a new design with temporary flaws, just a case of crap on
wheels. I wouldn't tell your friends to hold their breath waiting on
improvements.
j carter wrote:
> I'd probably wait until the second year - and in the case of Chrysler, keep
> my fingers crossed. Although the '84 Vette is a good example of my
> "rationale". And I have two friends with Trailblazers who are not happy
> campers either.
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________