Tahoe vs. JGC - help!
02-12-2004, 11:58 AM
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Tahoe vs. JGC - help!
The Trailblazer and the Blazette it replaced were always a POS, not a
case of a new design with temporary flaws, just a case of crap on
wheels. I wouldn't tell your friends to hold their breath waiting on
improvements.
j carter wrote:
> I'd probably wait until the second year - and in the case of Chrysler, keep
> my fingers crossed. Although the '84 Vette is a good example of my
> "rationale". And I have two friends with Trailblazers who are not happy
> campers either.
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
case of a new design with temporary flaws, just a case of crap on
wheels. I wouldn't tell your friends to hold their breath waiting on
improvements.
j carter wrote:
> I'd probably wait until the second year - and in the case of Chrysler, keep
> my fingers crossed. Although the '84 Vette is a good example of my
> "rationale". And I have two friends with Trailblazers who are not happy
> campers either.
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
02-12-2004, 02:51 PM
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Tahoe vs. JGC - help!
I have a 00' Tahoe 4x4 with a 6" lift and running 35's.. I love it!!! I
looked at the JGC's and went with the Tahoe due to the size and towing. I
am pulling a 80 CJ-5 SOA running 33's all over the place, especially up to
the local mud hole in Azusa Canyon with no problems. I have also done some
mild off roading in it and had no problems .
I say go with the Tahoe!
Shamus
80 CJ-5
SOA
33' super swappers
15" x 10" beadlocks
+++
looked at the JGC's and went with the Tahoe due to the size and towing. I
am pulling a 80 CJ-5 SOA running 33's all over the place, especially up to
the local mud hole in Azusa Canyon with no problems. I have also done some
mild off roading in it and had no problems .
I say go with the Tahoe!
Shamus
80 CJ-5
SOA
33' super swappers
15" x 10" beadlocks
+++
02-12-2004, 02:51 PM
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Tahoe vs. JGC - help!
I have a 00' Tahoe 4x4 with a 6" lift and running 35's.. I love it!!! I
looked at the JGC's and went with the Tahoe due to the size and towing. I
am pulling a 80 CJ-5 SOA running 33's all over the place, especially up to
the local mud hole in Azusa Canyon with no problems. I have also done some
mild off roading in it and had no problems .
I say go with the Tahoe!
Shamus
80 CJ-5
SOA
33' super swappers
15" x 10" beadlocks
+++
looked at the JGC's and went with the Tahoe due to the size and towing. I
am pulling a 80 CJ-5 SOA running 33's all over the place, especially up to
the local mud hole in Azusa Canyon with no problems. I have also done some
mild off roading in it and had no problems .
I say go with the Tahoe!
Shamus
80 CJ-5
SOA
33' super swappers
15" x 10" beadlocks
+++
02-12-2004, 02:51 PM
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Tahoe vs. JGC - help!
I have a 00' Tahoe 4x4 with a 6" lift and running 35's.. I love it!!! I
looked at the JGC's and went with the Tahoe due to the size and towing. I
am pulling a 80 CJ-5 SOA running 33's all over the place, especially up to
the local mud hole in Azusa Canyon with no problems. I have also done some
mild off roading in it and had no problems .
I say go with the Tahoe!
Shamus
80 CJ-5
SOA
33' super swappers
15" x 10" beadlocks
+++
looked at the JGC's and went with the Tahoe due to the size and towing. I
am pulling a 80 CJ-5 SOA running 33's all over the place, especially up to
the local mud hole in Azusa Canyon with no problems. I have also done some
mild off roading in it and had no problems .
I say go with the Tahoe!
Shamus
80 CJ-5
SOA
33' super swappers
15" x 10" beadlocks
+++
02-12-2004, 07:03 PM
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Tahoe vs. JGC - help!
I have a 02 tahoe, a 01 expedition and I occasionally drive my father in
laws 95 zj. The tahoe and expedition blow the jeep out of the water for
comfort and strength. the jeep however is more fun and easier to park etc.
KH
"Shamus O Hire" <fruitmn@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:0PQWb.11929$8R5.11175@newssvr29.news.prodigy. com...
> I have a 00' Tahoe 4x4 with a 6" lift and running 35's.. I love it!!! I
> looked at the JGC's and went with the Tahoe due to the size and towing. I
> am pulling a 80 CJ-5 SOA running 33's all over the place, especially up to
> the local mud hole in Azusa Canyon with no problems. I have also done
some
> mild off roading in it and had no problems .
>
> I say go with the Tahoe!
>
> Shamus
>
> 80 CJ-5
> SOA
> 33' super swappers
> 15" x 10" beadlocks
> +++
>
>
laws 95 zj. The tahoe and expedition blow the jeep out of the water for
comfort and strength. the jeep however is more fun and easier to park etc.
KH
"Shamus O Hire" <fruitmn@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:0PQWb.11929$8R5.11175@newssvr29.news.prodigy. com...
> I have a 00' Tahoe 4x4 with a 6" lift and running 35's.. I love it!!! I
> looked at the JGC's and went with the Tahoe due to the size and towing. I
> am pulling a 80 CJ-5 SOA running 33's all over the place, especially up to
> the local mud hole in Azusa Canyon with no problems. I have also done
some
> mild off roading in it and had no problems .
>
> I say go with the Tahoe!
>
> Shamus
>
> 80 CJ-5
> SOA
> 33' super swappers
> 15" x 10" beadlocks
> +++
>
>
02-12-2004, 07:03 PM
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Tahoe vs. JGC - help!
I have a 02 tahoe, a 01 expedition and I occasionally drive my father in
laws 95 zj. The tahoe and expedition blow the jeep out of the water for
comfort and strength. the jeep however is more fun and easier to park etc.
KH
"Shamus O Hire" <fruitmn@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:0PQWb.11929$8R5.11175@newssvr29.news.prodigy. com...
> I have a 00' Tahoe 4x4 with a 6" lift and running 35's.. I love it!!! I
> looked at the JGC's and went with the Tahoe due to the size and towing. I
> am pulling a 80 CJ-5 SOA running 33's all over the place, especially up to
> the local mud hole in Azusa Canyon with no problems. I have also done
some
> mild off roading in it and had no problems .
>
> I say go with the Tahoe!
>
> Shamus
>
> 80 CJ-5
> SOA
> 33' super swappers
> 15" x 10" beadlocks
> +++
>
>
laws 95 zj. The tahoe and expedition blow the jeep out of the water for
comfort and strength. the jeep however is more fun and easier to park etc.
KH
"Shamus O Hire" <fruitmn@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:0PQWb.11929$8R5.11175@newssvr29.news.prodigy. com...
> I have a 00' Tahoe 4x4 with a 6" lift and running 35's.. I love it!!! I
> looked at the JGC's and went with the Tahoe due to the size and towing. I
> am pulling a 80 CJ-5 SOA running 33's all over the place, especially up to
> the local mud hole in Azusa Canyon with no problems. I have also done
some
> mild off roading in it and had no problems .
>
> I say go with the Tahoe!
>
> Shamus
>
> 80 CJ-5
> SOA
> 33' super swappers
> 15" x 10" beadlocks
> +++
>
>
02-12-2004, 07:03 PM
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Tahoe vs. JGC - help!
I have a 02 tahoe, a 01 expedition and I occasionally drive my father in
laws 95 zj. The tahoe and expedition blow the jeep out of the water for
comfort and strength. the jeep however is more fun and easier to park etc.
KH
"Shamus O Hire" <fruitmn@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:0PQWb.11929$8R5.11175@newssvr29.news.prodigy. com...
> I have a 00' Tahoe 4x4 with a 6" lift and running 35's.. I love it!!! I
> looked at the JGC's and went with the Tahoe due to the size and towing. I
> am pulling a 80 CJ-5 SOA running 33's all over the place, especially up to
> the local mud hole in Azusa Canyon with no problems. I have also done
some
> mild off roading in it and had no problems .
>
> I say go with the Tahoe!
>
> Shamus
>
> 80 CJ-5
> SOA
> 33' super swappers
> 15" x 10" beadlocks
> +++
>
>
laws 95 zj. The tahoe and expedition blow the jeep out of the water for
comfort and strength. the jeep however is more fun and easier to park etc.
KH
"Shamus O Hire" <fruitmn@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:0PQWb.11929$8R5.11175@newssvr29.news.prodigy. com...
> I have a 00' Tahoe 4x4 with a 6" lift and running 35's.. I love it!!! I
> looked at the JGC's and went with the Tahoe due to the size and towing. I
> am pulling a 80 CJ-5 SOA running 33's all over the place, especially up to
> the local mud hole in Azusa Canyon with no problems. I have also done
some
> mild off roading in it and had no problems .
>
> I say go with the Tahoe!
>
> Shamus
>
> 80 CJ-5
> SOA
> 33' super swappers
> 15" x 10" beadlocks
> +++
>
>
02-12-2004, 10:07 PM
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Tahoe vs. JGC - help!
Nagging issues with my gf's '99 Grand Cherokee: Replaced Transfer Case, rotors
shake on hard braking, lights in the door switches stopped working, When you
put the Jeep into Drive the doors lock (even though Auto-lock is turned off),
and the Part-time light doesn't come on.
Kick the tires issues with my cousins 2002 Tahoe: replaced the transmission
twice.
So she got rid of it and got a 2003 Suburban: 3 batteries and 1 alternator
later, it's still not charging.
shake on hard braking, lights in the door switches stopped working, When you
put the Jeep into Drive the doors lock (even though Auto-lock is turned off),
and the Part-time light doesn't come on.
Kick the tires issues with my cousins 2002 Tahoe: replaced the transmission
twice.
So she got rid of it and got a 2003 Suburban: 3 batteries and 1 alternator
later, it's still not charging.
02-12-2004, 10:07 PM
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Tahoe vs. JGC - help!
Nagging issues with my gf's '99 Grand Cherokee: Replaced Transfer Case, rotors
shake on hard braking, lights in the door switches stopped working, When you
put the Jeep into Drive the doors lock (even though Auto-lock is turned off),
and the Part-time light doesn't come on.
Kick the tires issues with my cousins 2002 Tahoe: replaced the transmission
twice.
So she got rid of it and got a 2003 Suburban: 3 batteries and 1 alternator
later, it's still not charging.
shake on hard braking, lights in the door switches stopped working, When you
put the Jeep into Drive the doors lock (even though Auto-lock is turned off),
and the Part-time light doesn't come on.
Kick the tires issues with my cousins 2002 Tahoe: replaced the transmission
twice.
So she got rid of it and got a 2003 Suburban: 3 batteries and 1 alternator
later, it's still not charging.
02-12-2004, 10:07 PM
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Tahoe vs. JGC - help!
Nagging issues with my gf's '99 Grand Cherokee: Replaced Transfer Case, rotors
shake on hard braking, lights in the door switches stopped working, When you
put the Jeep into Drive the doors lock (even though Auto-lock is turned off),
and the Part-time light doesn't come on.
Kick the tires issues with my cousins 2002 Tahoe: replaced the transmission
twice.
So she got rid of it and got a 2003 Suburban: 3 batteries and 1 alternator
later, it's still not charging.
shake on hard braking, lights in the door switches stopped working, When you
put the Jeep into Drive the doors lock (even though Auto-lock is turned off),
and the Part-time light doesn't come on.
Kick the tires issues with my cousins 2002 Tahoe: replaced the transmission
twice.
So she got rid of it and got a 2003 Suburban: 3 batteries and 1 alternator
later, it's still not charging.