Starter interlock question
04-19-2005, 06:02 PM
#91
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Starter interlock question
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:03:19 UTC JD Adams <withheld@my.request> wrote:
> Those concerns aside, it's NICE having it disconnected. Spent 4 hours
> yesterday purging all that dreaded Dex Cool, and being able to just reach in
> through the window to start 'er up was damn convienent.
You'll really appreciate the difference the first time you have to use
the starter to motor youself into some place you can work when the
engine floods or just plain quits.
--
Will Honea
> Those concerns aside, it's NICE having it disconnected. Spent 4 hours
> yesterday purging all that dreaded Dex Cool, and being able to just reach in
> through the window to start 'er up was damn convienent.
You'll really appreciate the difference the first time you have to use
the starter to motor youself into some place you can work when the
engine floods or just plain quits.
--
Will Honea
04-19-2005, 06:02 PM
#92
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Starter interlock question
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:03:19 UTC JD Adams <withheld@my.request> wrote:
> Those concerns aside, it's NICE having it disconnected. Spent 4 hours
> yesterday purging all that dreaded Dex Cool, and being able to just reach in
> through the window to start 'er up was damn convienent.
You'll really appreciate the difference the first time you have to use
the starter to motor youself into some place you can work when the
engine floods or just plain quits.
--
Will Honea
> Those concerns aside, it's NICE having it disconnected. Spent 4 hours
> yesterday purging all that dreaded Dex Cool, and being able to just reach in
> through the window to start 'er up was damn convienent.
You'll really appreciate the difference the first time you have to use
the starter to motor youself into some place you can work when the
engine floods or just plain quits.
--
Will Honea
04-19-2005, 06:02 PM
#93
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Starter interlock question
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:03:19 UTC JD Adams <withheld@my.request> wrote:
> Those concerns aside, it's NICE having it disconnected. Spent 4 hours
> yesterday purging all that dreaded Dex Cool, and being able to just reach in
> through the window to start 'er up was damn convienent.
You'll really appreciate the difference the first time you have to use
the starter to motor youself into some place you can work when the
engine floods or just plain quits.
--
Will Honea
> Those concerns aside, it's NICE having it disconnected. Spent 4 hours
> yesterday purging all that dreaded Dex Cool, and being able to just reach in
> through the window to start 'er up was damn convienent.
You'll really appreciate the difference the first time you have to use
the starter to motor youself into some place you can work when the
engine floods or just plain quits.
--
Will Honea
04-19-2005, 06:24 PM
#94
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Starter interlock question
Ditto!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Will Honea wrote:
>
> You'll really appreciate the difference the first time you have to use
> the starter to motor youself into some place you can work when the
> engine floods or just plain quits.
>
> --
> Will Honea
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Will Honea wrote:
>
> You'll really appreciate the difference the first time you have to use
> the starter to motor youself into some place you can work when the
> engine floods or just plain quits.
>
> --
> Will Honea
04-19-2005, 06:24 PM
#95
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Starter interlock question
Ditto!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Will Honea wrote:
>
> You'll really appreciate the difference the first time you have to use
> the starter to motor youself into some place you can work when the
> engine floods or just plain quits.
>
> --
> Will Honea
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Will Honea wrote:
>
> You'll really appreciate the difference the first time you have to use
> the starter to motor youself into some place you can work when the
> engine floods or just plain quits.
>
> --
> Will Honea
04-19-2005, 06:24 PM
#96
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Starter interlock question
Ditto!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Will Honea wrote:
>
> You'll really appreciate the difference the first time you have to use
> the starter to motor youself into some place you can work when the
> engine floods or just plain quits.
>
> --
> Will Honea
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Will Honea wrote:
>
> You'll really appreciate the difference the first time you have to use
> the starter to motor youself into some place you can work when the
> engine floods or just plain quits.
>
> --
> Will Honea
04-19-2005, 06:24 PM
#97
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Starter interlock question
Ditto!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Will Honea wrote:
>
> You'll really appreciate the difference the first time you have to use
> the starter to motor youself into some place you can work when the
> engine floods or just plain quits.
>
> --
> Will Honea
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Will Honea wrote:
>
> You'll really appreciate the difference the first time you have to use
> the starter to motor youself into some place you can work when the
> engine floods or just plain quits.
>
> --
> Will Honea
04-20-2005, 03:59 PM
#98
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Starter interlock question
Hey JD -
Had a 96 that wasn't connected, now have a 98 Cherokee w/ it connected.
Crawled underneath the dash today... lo and behold... taped next to the
connector, was a spare connector half w/ a wire running between the 2
points...
Just unhooked the one half, threw in this half. I was just going to wire it
like you - but it looks like DC had already thought of it. Funny that the
connector was taped next to it - not complaing though :) So I guess that's
DC's official fix :))
Paul
"JD Adams" <withheld@my.request> wrote in message
news:x6GdnQdDZ_peUPzfRVn-ug@softcom.net...
> Quick question about an '05 TJL I bought in February.
>
> I *loathe* Big Brother demanding that my left foot sit squarely on the
> clutch pedal before I am allowed to crank the engine. The engine crank
> bearings and journals don't like it either, no oil pressure being present
> and all. Some of us are smart enough to fire the damned thing in neutral,
> thank you very much!
>
> Anyway, I simply umplugged 'the device' and shorted it with a small piece
> of wire and some black tape. What I'd rather do is undo the clutch master
> cylinder actuator rod and remove the entire offensive device altogether.
> I can't see far enough up there to determine how to unhook the rod itself.
>
> Has anyone done this? One can always just insert the appropriate fuse in
> the block, however one must tolerate the constant '4WD' lamp, and frankly,
> I'd just assume see the entire pressure switch go away, purely as a matter
> of principle.
>
> Not interested in flames on 'safety concerns'. I'm a veteran Commerical
> Driver and I have no need for bolt-on Goverment mandated safety
> enhancement crapola designed for stupid people and/or Corporations who
> wish to limit their civil liability.
>
> -JD
Had a 96 that wasn't connected, now have a 98 Cherokee w/ it connected.
Crawled underneath the dash today... lo and behold... taped next to the
connector, was a spare connector half w/ a wire running between the 2
points...
Just unhooked the one half, threw in this half. I was just going to wire it
like you - but it looks like DC had already thought of it. Funny that the
connector was taped next to it - not complaing though :) So I guess that's
DC's official fix :))
Paul
"JD Adams" <withheld@my.request> wrote in message
news:x6GdnQdDZ_peUPzfRVn-ug@softcom.net...
> Quick question about an '05 TJL I bought in February.
>
> I *loathe* Big Brother demanding that my left foot sit squarely on the
> clutch pedal before I am allowed to crank the engine. The engine crank
> bearings and journals don't like it either, no oil pressure being present
> and all. Some of us are smart enough to fire the damned thing in neutral,
> thank you very much!
>
> Anyway, I simply umplugged 'the device' and shorted it with a small piece
> of wire and some black tape. What I'd rather do is undo the clutch master
> cylinder actuator rod and remove the entire offensive device altogether.
> I can't see far enough up there to determine how to unhook the rod itself.
>
> Has anyone done this? One can always just insert the appropriate fuse in
> the block, however one must tolerate the constant '4WD' lamp, and frankly,
> I'd just assume see the entire pressure switch go away, purely as a matter
> of principle.
>
> Not interested in flames on 'safety concerns'. I'm a veteran Commerical
> Driver and I have no need for bolt-on Goverment mandated safety
> enhancement crapola designed for stupid people and/or Corporations who
> wish to limit their civil liability.
>
> -JD
04-20-2005, 03:59 PM
#99
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Starter interlock question
Hey JD -
Had a 96 that wasn't connected, now have a 98 Cherokee w/ it connected.
Crawled underneath the dash today... lo and behold... taped next to the
connector, was a spare connector half w/ a wire running between the 2
points...
Just unhooked the one half, threw in this half. I was just going to wire it
like you - but it looks like DC had already thought of it. Funny that the
connector was taped next to it - not complaing though :) So I guess that's
DC's official fix :))
Paul
"JD Adams" <withheld@my.request> wrote in message
news:x6GdnQdDZ_peUPzfRVn-ug@softcom.net...
> Quick question about an '05 TJL I bought in February.
>
> I *loathe* Big Brother demanding that my left foot sit squarely on the
> clutch pedal before I am allowed to crank the engine. The engine crank
> bearings and journals don't like it either, no oil pressure being present
> and all. Some of us are smart enough to fire the damned thing in neutral,
> thank you very much!
>
> Anyway, I simply umplugged 'the device' and shorted it with a small piece
> of wire and some black tape. What I'd rather do is undo the clutch master
> cylinder actuator rod and remove the entire offensive device altogether.
> I can't see far enough up there to determine how to unhook the rod itself.
>
> Has anyone done this? One can always just insert the appropriate fuse in
> the block, however one must tolerate the constant '4WD' lamp, and frankly,
> I'd just assume see the entire pressure switch go away, purely as a matter
> of principle.
>
> Not interested in flames on 'safety concerns'. I'm a veteran Commerical
> Driver and I have no need for bolt-on Goverment mandated safety
> enhancement crapola designed for stupid people and/or Corporations who
> wish to limit their civil liability.
>
> -JD
Had a 96 that wasn't connected, now have a 98 Cherokee w/ it connected.
Crawled underneath the dash today... lo and behold... taped next to the
connector, was a spare connector half w/ a wire running between the 2
points...
Just unhooked the one half, threw in this half. I was just going to wire it
like you - but it looks like DC had already thought of it. Funny that the
connector was taped next to it - not complaing though :) So I guess that's
DC's official fix :))
Paul
"JD Adams" <withheld@my.request> wrote in message
news:x6GdnQdDZ_peUPzfRVn-ug@softcom.net...
> Quick question about an '05 TJL I bought in February.
>
> I *loathe* Big Brother demanding that my left foot sit squarely on the
> clutch pedal before I am allowed to crank the engine. The engine crank
> bearings and journals don't like it either, no oil pressure being present
> and all. Some of us are smart enough to fire the damned thing in neutral,
> thank you very much!
>
> Anyway, I simply umplugged 'the device' and shorted it with a small piece
> of wire and some black tape. What I'd rather do is undo the clutch master
> cylinder actuator rod and remove the entire offensive device altogether.
> I can't see far enough up there to determine how to unhook the rod itself.
>
> Has anyone done this? One can always just insert the appropriate fuse in
> the block, however one must tolerate the constant '4WD' lamp, and frankly,
> I'd just assume see the entire pressure switch go away, purely as a matter
> of principle.
>
> Not interested in flames on 'safety concerns'. I'm a veteran Commerical
> Driver and I have no need for bolt-on Goverment mandated safety
> enhancement crapola designed for stupid people and/or Corporations who
> wish to limit their civil liability.
>
> -JD
04-20-2005, 03:59 PM
#100
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Starter interlock question
Hey JD -
Had a 96 that wasn't connected, now have a 98 Cherokee w/ it connected.
Crawled underneath the dash today... lo and behold... taped next to the
connector, was a spare connector half w/ a wire running between the 2
points...
Just unhooked the one half, threw in this half. I was just going to wire it
like you - but it looks like DC had already thought of it. Funny that the
connector was taped next to it - not complaing though :) So I guess that's
DC's official fix :))
Paul
"JD Adams" <withheld@my.request> wrote in message
news:x6GdnQdDZ_peUPzfRVn-ug@softcom.net...
> Quick question about an '05 TJL I bought in February.
>
> I *loathe* Big Brother demanding that my left foot sit squarely on the
> clutch pedal before I am allowed to crank the engine. The engine crank
> bearings and journals don't like it either, no oil pressure being present
> and all. Some of us are smart enough to fire the damned thing in neutral,
> thank you very much!
>
> Anyway, I simply umplugged 'the device' and shorted it with a small piece
> of wire and some black tape. What I'd rather do is undo the clutch master
> cylinder actuator rod and remove the entire offensive device altogether.
> I can't see far enough up there to determine how to unhook the rod itself.
>
> Has anyone done this? One can always just insert the appropriate fuse in
> the block, however one must tolerate the constant '4WD' lamp, and frankly,
> I'd just assume see the entire pressure switch go away, purely as a matter
> of principle.
>
> Not interested in flames on 'safety concerns'. I'm a veteran Commerical
> Driver and I have no need for bolt-on Goverment mandated safety
> enhancement crapola designed for stupid people and/or Corporations who
> wish to limit their civil liability.
>
> -JD
Had a 96 that wasn't connected, now have a 98 Cherokee w/ it connected.
Crawled underneath the dash today... lo and behold... taped next to the
connector, was a spare connector half w/ a wire running between the 2
points...
Just unhooked the one half, threw in this half. I was just going to wire it
like you - but it looks like DC had already thought of it. Funny that the
connector was taped next to it - not complaing though :) So I guess that's
DC's official fix :))
Paul
"JD Adams" <withheld@my.request> wrote in message
news:x6GdnQdDZ_peUPzfRVn-ug@softcom.net...
> Quick question about an '05 TJL I bought in February.
>
> I *loathe* Big Brother demanding that my left foot sit squarely on the
> clutch pedal before I am allowed to crank the engine. The engine crank
> bearings and journals don't like it either, no oil pressure being present
> and all. Some of us are smart enough to fire the damned thing in neutral,
> thank you very much!
>
> Anyway, I simply umplugged 'the device' and shorted it with a small piece
> of wire and some black tape. What I'd rather do is undo the clutch master
> cylinder actuator rod and remove the entire offensive device altogether.
> I can't see far enough up there to determine how to unhook the rod itself.
>
> Has anyone done this? One can always just insert the appropriate fuse in
> the block, however one must tolerate the constant '4WD' lamp, and frankly,
> I'd just assume see the entire pressure switch go away, purely as a matter
> of principle.
>
> Not interested in flames on 'safety concerns'. I'm a veteran Commerical
> Driver and I have no need for bolt-on Goverment mandated safety
> enhancement crapola designed for stupid people and/or Corporations who
> wish to limit their civil liability.
>
> -JD
