This should be interesting.......
#41
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: This should be interesting.......
And commit grammar errors. Get rid of the space before the semi-colon.
I would have made that 2 sentences but my former Grammar Teacher, Miss
Schmalz, always preferred the most complex syntax possible.
--
Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
..
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:Ki64f.129548$G8.43936@text.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
> :-) Had too much to drink last night and not much sleep ; can't be
> bothered
> to do much other than veg in front of my computer and spell things
> wrongly.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "Earle Horton" <nurse-nospam-busters@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:4350f022$1_5@alt.athenanews.com...
>> This fellow (the oriignal poster in this thread) isn't just "observing".
> He
>> (or she) had to announce that fact. Nevertheless, one can neglect the
>> effect of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, because reading of Usenet
>> articles is essentially a passive operation. The alleged effect on the
>> poster does not exist, because a poster is more like a light emitting
>> object, than one that reflects light. Reading an article, and somehow
>> having an effect on the author, violates the laws of causality, you see.
>> Now on the other hand, if by his cryptic post he is attempting to nudge
>> someone here into posting a reply, which is a theory that I can not
>> discount, then the analogy might apply. The mere act of observing does
> not
>> suffice, however. I don't have much to do today, either.
>>
>> Earle
>>
>> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
>> news:c834f.129441$G8.106014@text.news.blueyonder.c o.uk...
>> > Heisenberg Uncertainty Principal ; in order to predict the position and
>> > velocity of a particle you have to be able to mesaure its present
> position
>> > and velocity by shining light on it; some of the light will be
>> > scattered
>> by
>> > the particle indicating its position. However, the light will also
> change
>> > the particles position, and the shorter the wavelength of light you
> shine
>> on
>> > it (which you would have thought would make the position more
>> > accurately
>> > observed) the higher the amount of energy you require, and the more you
>> move
>> > the particle.
>> >
>> > :-)
>> >
>> > Dave Milne, Scotland
>> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>> >
>> > "Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
>> > news:f13f4$4350604d$d8449845$1847@FUSE.NET...
>> > > Isn't there a theory that says something like the mere act of
> observing
>> > > changes the subject of the observation?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
>> > > 2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
>> > > Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
>> > > .
>> > > "Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> > > news:GMKdncT7XYi0wc3eRVn-jA@comcast.com...
>> > > > SVTKate proclaimed:
>> > > >> Which participant are you observing?
>> > > >
>> > > > The ones that worry about being observed?
>> > > >
>> > > >> If you were REALLY planning to quietly observe, why did you speak
> up
>> in
>> > > >> the first place?
>> > > >
>> > > > How then, would they have identified those who care one way or
>> > > > the
>> > > > other about whether or not they are being observed?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Of course you realize that now you MUST tell us what you are up
>> > > >> to,
>> who
>> > > >> you are doing, and why you are doing them.
>> > > >
>> > > > More likely they just came out from under a bridge somewhere and
>> > > > could not find a billy goat to observe. Google groups is much
>> > > > faster for passively observing group dynamics... but the whole
>> > > > schtick has been so overwhelmingly overdone any professor with a
>> > > > femtoclue would flunk anyone using such a cliched' project.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> *WEG*
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Kate
>> > > >>
>> > > >> "Square Wheels" <intrepidator@your_cervix_gmail.com> wrote in
> message
>> > > >> news:UbW3f.189900$1i.164532@pd7tw2no...
>> > > >> : .....now that I can finally access this group.
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> : Just here to observe and continue my psychological assessment of
> a
>> > > >> group
>> > > >> : participant.
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> : I'll be very quiet.
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> : --
>> > > >> : A mound is a terrible thing to waste.
>> > > >> :
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
I would have made that 2 sentences but my former Grammar Teacher, Miss
Schmalz, always preferred the most complex syntax possible.
--
Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
..
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:Ki64f.129548$G8.43936@text.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
> :-) Had too much to drink last night and not much sleep ; can't be
> bothered
> to do much other than veg in front of my computer and spell things
> wrongly.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "Earle Horton" <nurse-nospam-busters@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:4350f022$1_5@alt.athenanews.com...
>> This fellow (the oriignal poster in this thread) isn't just "observing".
> He
>> (or she) had to announce that fact. Nevertheless, one can neglect the
>> effect of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, because reading of Usenet
>> articles is essentially a passive operation. The alleged effect on the
>> poster does not exist, because a poster is more like a light emitting
>> object, than one that reflects light. Reading an article, and somehow
>> having an effect on the author, violates the laws of causality, you see.
>> Now on the other hand, if by his cryptic post he is attempting to nudge
>> someone here into posting a reply, which is a theory that I can not
>> discount, then the analogy might apply. The mere act of observing does
> not
>> suffice, however. I don't have much to do today, either.
>>
>> Earle
>>
>> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
>> news:c834f.129441$G8.106014@text.news.blueyonder.c o.uk...
>> > Heisenberg Uncertainty Principal ; in order to predict the position and
>> > velocity of a particle you have to be able to mesaure its present
> position
>> > and velocity by shining light on it; some of the light will be
>> > scattered
>> by
>> > the particle indicating its position. However, the light will also
> change
>> > the particles position, and the shorter the wavelength of light you
> shine
>> on
>> > it (which you would have thought would make the position more
>> > accurately
>> > observed) the higher the amount of energy you require, and the more you
>> move
>> > the particle.
>> >
>> > :-)
>> >
>> > Dave Milne, Scotland
>> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>> >
>> > "Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
>> > news:f13f4$4350604d$d8449845$1847@FUSE.NET...
>> > > Isn't there a theory that says something like the mere act of
> observing
>> > > changes the subject of the observation?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
>> > > 2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
>> > > Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
>> > > .
>> > > "Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> > > news:GMKdncT7XYi0wc3eRVn-jA@comcast.com...
>> > > > SVTKate proclaimed:
>> > > >> Which participant are you observing?
>> > > >
>> > > > The ones that worry about being observed?
>> > > >
>> > > >> If you were REALLY planning to quietly observe, why did you speak
> up
>> in
>> > > >> the first place?
>> > > >
>> > > > How then, would they have identified those who care one way or
>> > > > the
>> > > > other about whether or not they are being observed?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Of course you realize that now you MUST tell us what you are up
>> > > >> to,
>> who
>> > > >> you are doing, and why you are doing them.
>> > > >
>> > > > More likely they just came out from under a bridge somewhere and
>> > > > could not find a billy goat to observe. Google groups is much
>> > > > faster for passively observing group dynamics... but the whole
>> > > > schtick has been so overwhelmingly overdone any professor with a
>> > > > femtoclue would flunk anyone using such a cliched' project.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> *WEG*
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Kate
>> > > >>
>> > > >> "Square Wheels" <intrepidator@your_cervix_gmail.com> wrote in
> message
>> > > >> news:UbW3f.189900$1i.164532@pd7tw2no...
>> > > >> : .....now that I can finally access this group.
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> : Just here to observe and continue my psychological assessment of
> a
>> > > >> group
>> > > >> : participant.
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> : I'll be very quiet.
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> : --
>> > > >> : A mound is a terrible thing to waste.
>> > > >> :
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
#42
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: This should be interesting.......
And commit grammar errors. Get rid of the space before the semi-colon.
I would have made that 2 sentences but my former Grammar Teacher, Miss
Schmalz, always preferred the most complex syntax possible.
--
Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
..
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:Ki64f.129548$G8.43936@text.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
> :-) Had too much to drink last night and not much sleep ; can't be
> bothered
> to do much other than veg in front of my computer and spell things
> wrongly.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "Earle Horton" <nurse-nospam-busters@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:4350f022$1_5@alt.athenanews.com...
>> This fellow (the oriignal poster in this thread) isn't just "observing".
> He
>> (or she) had to announce that fact. Nevertheless, one can neglect the
>> effect of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, because reading of Usenet
>> articles is essentially a passive operation. The alleged effect on the
>> poster does not exist, because a poster is more like a light emitting
>> object, than one that reflects light. Reading an article, and somehow
>> having an effect on the author, violates the laws of causality, you see.
>> Now on the other hand, if by his cryptic post he is attempting to nudge
>> someone here into posting a reply, which is a theory that I can not
>> discount, then the analogy might apply. The mere act of observing does
> not
>> suffice, however. I don't have much to do today, either.
>>
>> Earle
>>
>> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
>> news:c834f.129441$G8.106014@text.news.blueyonder.c o.uk...
>> > Heisenberg Uncertainty Principal ; in order to predict the position and
>> > velocity of a particle you have to be able to mesaure its present
> position
>> > and velocity by shining light on it; some of the light will be
>> > scattered
>> by
>> > the particle indicating its position. However, the light will also
> change
>> > the particles position, and the shorter the wavelength of light you
> shine
>> on
>> > it (which you would have thought would make the position more
>> > accurately
>> > observed) the higher the amount of energy you require, and the more you
>> move
>> > the particle.
>> >
>> > :-)
>> >
>> > Dave Milne, Scotland
>> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>> >
>> > "Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
>> > news:f13f4$4350604d$d8449845$1847@FUSE.NET...
>> > > Isn't there a theory that says something like the mere act of
> observing
>> > > changes the subject of the observation?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
>> > > 2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
>> > > Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
>> > > .
>> > > "Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> > > news:GMKdncT7XYi0wc3eRVn-jA@comcast.com...
>> > > > SVTKate proclaimed:
>> > > >> Which participant are you observing?
>> > > >
>> > > > The ones that worry about being observed?
>> > > >
>> > > >> If you were REALLY planning to quietly observe, why did you speak
> up
>> in
>> > > >> the first place?
>> > > >
>> > > > How then, would they have identified those who care one way or
>> > > > the
>> > > > other about whether or not they are being observed?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Of course you realize that now you MUST tell us what you are up
>> > > >> to,
>> who
>> > > >> you are doing, and why you are doing them.
>> > > >
>> > > > More likely they just came out from under a bridge somewhere and
>> > > > could not find a billy goat to observe. Google groups is much
>> > > > faster for passively observing group dynamics... but the whole
>> > > > schtick has been so overwhelmingly overdone any professor with a
>> > > > femtoclue would flunk anyone using such a cliched' project.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> *WEG*
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Kate
>> > > >>
>> > > >> "Square Wheels" <intrepidator@your_cervix_gmail.com> wrote in
> message
>> > > >> news:UbW3f.189900$1i.164532@pd7tw2no...
>> > > >> : .....now that I can finally access this group.
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> : Just here to observe and continue my psychological assessment of
> a
>> > > >> group
>> > > >> : participant.
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> : I'll be very quiet.
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> : --
>> > > >> : A mound is a terrible thing to waste.
>> > > >> :
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
I would have made that 2 sentences but my former Grammar Teacher, Miss
Schmalz, always preferred the most complex syntax possible.
--
Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
..
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:Ki64f.129548$G8.43936@text.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
> :-) Had too much to drink last night and not much sleep ; can't be
> bothered
> to do much other than veg in front of my computer and spell things
> wrongly.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "Earle Horton" <nurse-nospam-busters@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:4350f022$1_5@alt.athenanews.com...
>> This fellow (the oriignal poster in this thread) isn't just "observing".
> He
>> (or she) had to announce that fact. Nevertheless, one can neglect the
>> effect of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, because reading of Usenet
>> articles is essentially a passive operation. The alleged effect on the
>> poster does not exist, because a poster is more like a light emitting
>> object, than one that reflects light. Reading an article, and somehow
>> having an effect on the author, violates the laws of causality, you see.
>> Now on the other hand, if by his cryptic post he is attempting to nudge
>> someone here into posting a reply, which is a theory that I can not
>> discount, then the analogy might apply. The mere act of observing does
> not
>> suffice, however. I don't have much to do today, either.
>>
>> Earle
>>
>> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
>> news:c834f.129441$G8.106014@text.news.blueyonder.c o.uk...
>> > Heisenberg Uncertainty Principal ; in order to predict the position and
>> > velocity of a particle you have to be able to mesaure its present
> position
>> > and velocity by shining light on it; some of the light will be
>> > scattered
>> by
>> > the particle indicating its position. However, the light will also
> change
>> > the particles position, and the shorter the wavelength of light you
> shine
>> on
>> > it (which you would have thought would make the position more
>> > accurately
>> > observed) the higher the amount of energy you require, and the more you
>> move
>> > the particle.
>> >
>> > :-)
>> >
>> > Dave Milne, Scotland
>> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>> >
>> > "Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
>> > news:f13f4$4350604d$d8449845$1847@FUSE.NET...
>> > > Isn't there a theory that says something like the mere act of
> observing
>> > > changes the subject of the observation?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
>> > > 2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
>> > > Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
>> > > .
>> > > "Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> > > news:GMKdncT7XYi0wc3eRVn-jA@comcast.com...
>> > > > SVTKate proclaimed:
>> > > >> Which participant are you observing?
>> > > >
>> > > > The ones that worry about being observed?
>> > > >
>> > > >> If you were REALLY planning to quietly observe, why did you speak
> up
>> in
>> > > >> the first place?
>> > > >
>> > > > How then, would they have identified those who care one way or
>> > > > the
>> > > > other about whether or not they are being observed?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Of course you realize that now you MUST tell us what you are up
>> > > >> to,
>> who
>> > > >> you are doing, and why you are doing them.
>> > > >
>> > > > More likely they just came out from under a bridge somewhere and
>> > > > could not find a billy goat to observe. Google groups is much
>> > > > faster for passively observing group dynamics... but the whole
>> > > > schtick has been so overwhelmingly overdone any professor with a
>> > > > femtoclue would flunk anyone using such a cliched' project.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> *WEG*
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Kate
>> > > >>
>> > > >> "Square Wheels" <intrepidator@your_cervix_gmail.com> wrote in
> message
>> > > >> news:UbW3f.189900$1i.164532@pd7tw2no...
>> > > >> : .....now that I can finally access this group.
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> : Just here to observe and continue my psychological assessment of
> a
>> > > >> group
>> > > >> : participant.
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> : I'll be very quiet.
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> : --
>> > > >> : A mound is a terrible thing to waste.
>> > > >> :
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
#43
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: This should be interesting.......
And commit grammar errors. Get rid of the space before the semi-colon.
I would have made that 2 sentences but my former Grammar Teacher, Miss
Schmalz, always preferred the most complex syntax possible.
--
Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
..
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:Ki64f.129548$G8.43936@text.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
> :-) Had too much to drink last night and not much sleep ; can't be
> bothered
> to do much other than veg in front of my computer and spell things
> wrongly.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "Earle Horton" <nurse-nospam-busters@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:4350f022$1_5@alt.athenanews.com...
>> This fellow (the oriignal poster in this thread) isn't just "observing".
> He
>> (or she) had to announce that fact. Nevertheless, one can neglect the
>> effect of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, because reading of Usenet
>> articles is essentially a passive operation. The alleged effect on the
>> poster does not exist, because a poster is more like a light emitting
>> object, than one that reflects light. Reading an article, and somehow
>> having an effect on the author, violates the laws of causality, you see.
>> Now on the other hand, if by his cryptic post he is attempting to nudge
>> someone here into posting a reply, which is a theory that I can not
>> discount, then the analogy might apply. The mere act of observing does
> not
>> suffice, however. I don't have much to do today, either.
>>
>> Earle
>>
>> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
>> news:c834f.129441$G8.106014@text.news.blueyonder.c o.uk...
>> > Heisenberg Uncertainty Principal ; in order to predict the position and
>> > velocity of a particle you have to be able to mesaure its present
> position
>> > and velocity by shining light on it; some of the light will be
>> > scattered
>> by
>> > the particle indicating its position. However, the light will also
> change
>> > the particles position, and the shorter the wavelength of light you
> shine
>> on
>> > it (which you would have thought would make the position more
>> > accurately
>> > observed) the higher the amount of energy you require, and the more you
>> move
>> > the particle.
>> >
>> > :-)
>> >
>> > Dave Milne, Scotland
>> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>> >
>> > "Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
>> > news:f13f4$4350604d$d8449845$1847@FUSE.NET...
>> > > Isn't there a theory that says something like the mere act of
> observing
>> > > changes the subject of the observation?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
>> > > 2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
>> > > Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
>> > > .
>> > > "Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> > > news:GMKdncT7XYi0wc3eRVn-jA@comcast.com...
>> > > > SVTKate proclaimed:
>> > > >> Which participant are you observing?
>> > > >
>> > > > The ones that worry about being observed?
>> > > >
>> > > >> If you were REALLY planning to quietly observe, why did you speak
> up
>> in
>> > > >> the first place?
>> > > >
>> > > > How then, would they have identified those who care one way or
>> > > > the
>> > > > other about whether or not they are being observed?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Of course you realize that now you MUST tell us what you are up
>> > > >> to,
>> who
>> > > >> you are doing, and why you are doing them.
>> > > >
>> > > > More likely they just came out from under a bridge somewhere and
>> > > > could not find a billy goat to observe. Google groups is much
>> > > > faster for passively observing group dynamics... but the whole
>> > > > schtick has been so overwhelmingly overdone any professor with a
>> > > > femtoclue would flunk anyone using such a cliched' project.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> *WEG*
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Kate
>> > > >>
>> > > >> "Square Wheels" <intrepidator@your_cervix_gmail.com> wrote in
> message
>> > > >> news:UbW3f.189900$1i.164532@pd7tw2no...
>> > > >> : .....now that I can finally access this group.
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> : Just here to observe and continue my psychological assessment of
> a
>> > > >> group
>> > > >> : participant.
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> : I'll be very quiet.
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> : --
>> > > >> : A mound is a terrible thing to waste.
>> > > >> :
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
I would have made that 2 sentences but my former Grammar Teacher, Miss
Schmalz, always preferred the most complex syntax possible.
--
Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
..
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:Ki64f.129548$G8.43936@text.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
> :-) Had too much to drink last night and not much sleep ; can't be
> bothered
> to do much other than veg in front of my computer and spell things
> wrongly.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "Earle Horton" <nurse-nospam-busters@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:4350f022$1_5@alt.athenanews.com...
>> This fellow (the oriignal poster in this thread) isn't just "observing".
> He
>> (or she) had to announce that fact. Nevertheless, one can neglect the
>> effect of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, because reading of Usenet
>> articles is essentially a passive operation. The alleged effect on the
>> poster does not exist, because a poster is more like a light emitting
>> object, than one that reflects light. Reading an article, and somehow
>> having an effect on the author, violates the laws of causality, you see.
>> Now on the other hand, if by his cryptic post he is attempting to nudge
>> someone here into posting a reply, which is a theory that I can not
>> discount, then the analogy might apply. The mere act of observing does
> not
>> suffice, however. I don't have much to do today, either.
>>
>> Earle
>>
>> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
>> news:c834f.129441$G8.106014@text.news.blueyonder.c o.uk...
>> > Heisenberg Uncertainty Principal ; in order to predict the position and
>> > velocity of a particle you have to be able to mesaure its present
> position
>> > and velocity by shining light on it; some of the light will be
>> > scattered
>> by
>> > the particle indicating its position. However, the light will also
> change
>> > the particles position, and the shorter the wavelength of light you
> shine
>> on
>> > it (which you would have thought would make the position more
>> > accurately
>> > observed) the higher the amount of energy you require, and the more you
>> move
>> > the particle.
>> >
>> > :-)
>> >
>> > Dave Milne, Scotland
>> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>> >
>> > "Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
>> > news:f13f4$4350604d$d8449845$1847@FUSE.NET...
>> > > Isn't there a theory that says something like the mere act of
> observing
>> > > changes the subject of the observation?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
>> > > 2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
>> > > Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
>> > > .
>> > > "Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> > > news:GMKdncT7XYi0wc3eRVn-jA@comcast.com...
>> > > > SVTKate proclaimed:
>> > > >> Which participant are you observing?
>> > > >
>> > > > The ones that worry about being observed?
>> > > >
>> > > >> If you were REALLY planning to quietly observe, why did you speak
> up
>> in
>> > > >> the first place?
>> > > >
>> > > > How then, would they have identified those who care one way or
>> > > > the
>> > > > other about whether or not they are being observed?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Of course you realize that now you MUST tell us what you are up
>> > > >> to,
>> who
>> > > >> you are doing, and why you are doing them.
>> > > >
>> > > > More likely they just came out from under a bridge somewhere and
>> > > > could not find a billy goat to observe. Google groups is much
>> > > > faster for passively observing group dynamics... but the whole
>> > > > schtick has been so overwhelmingly overdone any professor with a
>> > > > femtoclue would flunk anyone using such a cliched' project.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> *WEG*
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Kate
>> > > >>
>> > > >> "Square Wheels" <intrepidator@your_cervix_gmail.com> wrote in
> message
>> > > >> news:UbW3f.189900$1i.164532@pd7tw2no...
>> > > >> : .....now that I can finally access this group.
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> : Just here to observe and continue my psychological assessment of
> a
>> > > >> group
>> > > >> : participant.
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> : I'll be very quiet.
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> :
>> > > >> : --
>> > > >> : A mound is a terrible thing to waste.
>> > > >> :
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
#44
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: This should be interesting.......
Dave Milne did pass the time by typing:
> :-) Had too much to drink last night and not much sleep ; can't be bothered
> to do much other than veg in front of my computer and spell things wrongly.
Did the same here. Let's see if I have this right...
"It was a right proper **** up." Close?
oh my aching noggin...
And for those that wonder, I took a taxi to the pub.
--
DougW
> :-) Had too much to drink last night and not much sleep ; can't be bothered
> to do much other than veg in front of my computer and spell things wrongly.
Did the same here. Let's see if I have this right...
"It was a right proper **** up." Close?
oh my aching noggin...
And for those that wonder, I took a taxi to the pub.
--
DougW
#45
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: This should be interesting.......
Dave Milne did pass the time by typing:
> :-) Had too much to drink last night and not much sleep ; can't be bothered
> to do much other than veg in front of my computer and spell things wrongly.
Did the same here. Let's see if I have this right...
"It was a right proper **** up." Close?
oh my aching noggin...
And for those that wonder, I took a taxi to the pub.
--
DougW
> :-) Had too much to drink last night and not much sleep ; can't be bothered
> to do much other than veg in front of my computer and spell things wrongly.
Did the same here. Let's see if I have this right...
"It was a right proper **** up." Close?
oh my aching noggin...
And for those that wonder, I took a taxi to the pub.
--
DougW
#46
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: This should be interesting.......
Dave Milne did pass the time by typing:
> :-) Had too much to drink last night and not much sleep ; can't be bothered
> to do much other than veg in front of my computer and spell things wrongly.
Did the same here. Let's see if I have this right...
"It was a right proper **** up." Close?
oh my aching noggin...
And for those that wonder, I took a taxi to the pub.
--
DougW
> :-) Had too much to drink last night and not much sleep ; can't be bothered
> to do much other than veg in front of my computer and spell things wrongly.
Did the same here. Let's see if I have this right...
"It was a right proper **** up." Close?
oh my aching noggin...
And for those that wonder, I took a taxi to the pub.
--
DougW
#47
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: This should be interesting.......
Right proper **** up is exactly the correct expression. Had a leaving party
as I start a new job on Tuesday !
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:Uac4f.3060$xE1.2682@okepread07...
> Dave Milne did pass the time by typing:
> > :-) Had too much to drink last night and not much sleep ; can't be
bothered
> > to do much other than veg in front of my computer and spell things
wrongly.
>
> Did the same here. Let's see if I have this right...
> "It was a right proper **** up." Close?
>
> oh my aching noggin...
>
> And for those that wonder, I took a taxi to the pub.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
as I start a new job on Tuesday !
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:Uac4f.3060$xE1.2682@okepread07...
> Dave Milne did pass the time by typing:
> > :-) Had too much to drink last night and not much sleep ; can't be
bothered
> > to do much other than veg in front of my computer and spell things
wrongly.
>
> Did the same here. Let's see if I have this right...
> "It was a right proper **** up." Close?
>
> oh my aching noggin...
>
> And for those that wonder, I took a taxi to the pub.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
#48
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: This should be interesting.......
Right proper **** up is exactly the correct expression. Had a leaving party
as I start a new job on Tuesday !
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:Uac4f.3060$xE1.2682@okepread07...
> Dave Milne did pass the time by typing:
> > :-) Had too much to drink last night and not much sleep ; can't be
bothered
> > to do much other than veg in front of my computer and spell things
wrongly.
>
> Did the same here. Let's see if I have this right...
> "It was a right proper **** up." Close?
>
> oh my aching noggin...
>
> And for those that wonder, I took a taxi to the pub.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
as I start a new job on Tuesday !
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:Uac4f.3060$xE1.2682@okepread07...
> Dave Milne did pass the time by typing:
> > :-) Had too much to drink last night and not much sleep ; can't be
bothered
> > to do much other than veg in front of my computer and spell things
wrongly.
>
> Did the same here. Let's see if I have this right...
> "It was a right proper **** up." Close?
>
> oh my aching noggin...
>
> And for those that wonder, I took a taxi to the pub.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
#49
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: This should be interesting.......
Right proper **** up is exactly the correct expression. Had a leaving party
as I start a new job on Tuesday !
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:Uac4f.3060$xE1.2682@okepread07...
> Dave Milne did pass the time by typing:
> > :-) Had too much to drink last night and not much sleep ; can't be
bothered
> > to do much other than veg in front of my computer and spell things
wrongly.
>
> Did the same here. Let's see if I have this right...
> "It was a right proper **** up." Close?
>
> oh my aching noggin...
>
> And for those that wonder, I took a taxi to the pub.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
as I start a new job on Tuesday !
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:Uac4f.3060$xE1.2682@okepread07...
> Dave Milne did pass the time by typing:
> > :-) Had too much to drink last night and not much sleep ; can't be
bothered
> > to do much other than veg in front of my computer and spell things
wrongly.
>
> Did the same here. Let's see if I have this right...
> "It was a right proper **** up." Close?
>
> oh my aching noggin...
>
> And for those that wonder, I took a taxi to the pub.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
#50
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: This should be interesting.......
Over-dramatizing yes, but I wouldn't call that straight-out falsifying,
unless she said she was in very deep water. I didn't see the broadcast.
My observation, YOMV.
"Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:6d244$435041e9$d8449845$6338@FUSE.NET...
> NBC caught falsifying the news during a live broadcast
>
> http://apnews.excite.com/article/200...D8D824KO4.html
>
> --
> Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
> 2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
> Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
> .
> "Square Wheels" <intrepidator@your_cervix_gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:UbW3f.189900$1i.164532@pd7tw2no...
>> .....now that I can finally access this group.
>>
>> Just here to observe and continue my psychological assessment of a group
>> participant.
>>
>> I'll be very quiet.
>>
>>
>> --
>> A mound is a terrible thing to waste.
>>
>
>
unless she said she was in very deep water. I didn't see the broadcast.
My observation, YOMV.
"Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:6d244$435041e9$d8449845$6338@FUSE.NET...
> NBC caught falsifying the news during a live broadcast
>
> http://apnews.excite.com/article/200...D8D824KO4.html
>
> --
> Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
> 2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
> Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
> .
> "Square Wheels" <intrepidator@your_cervix_gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:UbW3f.189900$1i.164532@pd7tw2no...
>> .....now that I can finally access this group.
>>
>> Just here to observe and continue my psychological assessment of a group
>> participant.
>>
>> I'll be very quiet.
>>
>>
>> --
>> A mound is a terrible thing to waste.
>>
>
>