On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Sea Jhett <riptide@malibu.com> wrote:
>In article <D9FLZ74538829.5739583333@reece.net.au>, Thrasher Remailer
><thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, CobraJet <coiled@basking.hiss> wrote:
>> >In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
>> ><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
>> >
>> >> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>> >>
>> >> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>> >>
>> >> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
>> >> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
>> >> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
>> >> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>> >>
>> >> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole
>> >> thing in
>> >> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse
>> >> to open
>> >> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
>> >> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>> >>
>> >> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
>> >> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>> >>
>> >> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
>> >> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to
>> >> avoid a
>> >> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
>> >> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>> >>
>> >> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
>> >
>> > Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
>> >me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
>> >Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
>> >suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
>> >now is the time.
>> >
>> > Cordially,
>> >
>> > CobraJet
>>
>> SPIG <----rotfflmao!
>>
>> I saw his blatent attempt to find sympathy there, and I will not involve
>> the Ford-Merc group in this. Hopefully Billy will come to his senses and
>> the operations can be called off.
>
> Hard to say. Have you considered the large factor of the Joel Axiom
>here?

I haven't as I am unfamiliar with the "Joel Axiom."

 

In article <NRFD32XJ38830.5500810185@reece.net.au>, General Failure
<thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:

> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Sea Jhett <riptide@malibu.com> wrote:
> >In article <D9FLZ74538829.5739583333@reece.net.au>, Thrasher Remailer
> ><thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, CobraJet <coiled@basking.hiss> wrote:
> >> >In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
> >> ><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
> >> >>
> >> >> I own this ------- newsgroup.
> >> >>
> >> >> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn
> >> >> how
> >> >> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
> >> >> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to
> >> >> the
> >> >> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
> >> >>
> >> >> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole
> >> >> thing in
> >> >> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse
> >> >> to open
> >> >> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
> >> >> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be
> >> >> ignored.
> >> >>
> >> >> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
> >> >> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be
> >> >> declared.
> >> >>
> >> >> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a
> >> >> smoking
> >> >> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to
> >> >> avoid a
> >> >> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to
> >> >> proper
> >> >> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
> >> >>
> >> >> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
> >> >
> >> > Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
> >> >me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
> >> >Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
> >> >suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
> >> >now is the time.
> >> >
> >> > Cordially,
> >> >
> >> > CobraJet
> >>
> >> SPIG <----rotfflmao!
> >>
> >> I saw his blatent attempt to find sympathy there, and I will not involve
> >> the Ford-Merc group in this. Hopefully Billy will come to his senses and
> >> the operations can be called off.
> >
> > Hard to say. Have you considered the large factor of the Joel Axiom
> >here?
>
> I haven't as I am unfamiliar with the "Joel Axiom."
>

You know. From Billy Joel:

"You can never argue with a crazy mi-mi-mi-mi-mind.
You oughtta know by now..."

The basic flaw is that you are assuming ------ actually "has" the
ability to play nicey with his classmates. He does not. He lives in his
own world and sees himself as Sgt. Rock defending the American flag.
Even if he were to *tell* you he'll be nice (unlikely, an admission of
fault or weakness), he will only redouble his efforts to be an ***.

If a pit bull clamps onto your calf, do you sing it a lullabye? No,
you take out your .45 and ventilate it. Passive intimidation will not
work here. ------ has nothing to lose and all day to drink himself into
a rabid froth. (He is an admitted alcoholic).

The long lesson is that if the SPIG is incapable of rendering ------
unable to post, he will win this conflict. And we will all be cowards
and girlie-men. And I don't know about you, but I don't look
particularly fetching in a skirt and heels.

The SPIG is a diverse group. How humiliating to lose to a boozing
psycho cripple whose Jockeys have been on so long their parasites have
undergone two complete genetic evolutionary mutations.

CobraJet

 

In article <NRFD32XJ38830.5500810185@reece.net.au>, General Failure
<thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:

> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Sea Jhett <riptide@malibu.com> wrote:
> >In article <D9FLZ74538829.5739583333@reece.net.au>, Thrasher Remailer
> ><thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, CobraJet <coiled@basking.hiss> wrote:
> >> >In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
> >> ><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
> >> >>
> >> >> I own this ------- newsgroup.
> >> >>
> >> >> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn
> >> >> how
> >> >> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
> >> >> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to
> >> >> the
> >> >> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
> >> >>
> >> >> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole
> >> >> thing in
> >> >> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse
> >> >> to open
> >> >> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
> >> >> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be
> >> >> ignored.
> >> >>
> >> >> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
> >> >> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be
> >> >> declared.
> >> >>
> >> >> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a
> >> >> smoking
> >> >> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to
> >> >> avoid a
> >> >> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to
> >> >> proper
> >> >> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
> >> >>
> >> >> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
> >> >
> >> > Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
> >> >me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
> >> >Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
> >> >suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
> >> >now is the time.
> >> >
> >> > Cordially,
> >> >
> >> > CobraJet
> >>
> >> SPIG <----rotfflmao!
> >>
> >> I saw his blatent attempt to find sympathy there, and I will not involve
> >> the Ford-Merc group in this. Hopefully Billy will come to his senses and
> >> the operations can be called off.
> >
> > Hard to say. Have you considered the large factor of the Joel Axiom
> >here?
>
> I haven't as I am unfamiliar with the "Joel Axiom."
>

You know. From Billy Joel:

"You can never argue with a crazy mi-mi-mi-mi-mind.
You oughtta know by now..."

The basic flaw is that you are assuming ------ actually "has" the
ability to play nicey with his classmates. He does not. He lives in his
own world and sees himself as Sgt. Rock defending the American flag.
Even if he were to *tell* you he'll be nice (unlikely, an admission of
fault or weakness), he will only redouble his efforts to be an ***.

If a pit bull clamps onto your calf, do you sing it a lullabye? No,
you take out your .45 and ventilate it. Passive intimidation will not
work here. ------ has nothing to lose and all day to drink himself into
a rabid froth. (He is an admitted alcoholic).

The long lesson is that if the SPIG is incapable of rendering ------
unable to post, he will win this conflict. And we will all be cowards
and girlie-men. And I don't know about you, but I don't look
particularly fetching in a skirt and heels.

The SPIG is a diverse group. How humiliating to lose to a boozing
psycho cripple whose Jockeys have been on so long their parasites have
undergone two complete genetic evolutionary mutations.

CobraJet

 

In article <NRFD32XJ38830.5500810185@reece.net.au>, General Failure
<thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:

> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Sea Jhett <riptide@malibu.com> wrote:
> >In article <D9FLZ74538829.5739583333@reece.net.au>, Thrasher Remailer
> ><thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, CobraJet <coiled@basking.hiss> wrote:
> >> >In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
> >> ><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
> >> >>
> >> >> I own this ------- newsgroup.
> >> >>
> >> >> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn
> >> >> how
> >> >> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
> >> >> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to
> >> >> the
> >> >> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
> >> >>
> >> >> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole
> >> >> thing in
> >> >> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse
> >> >> to open
> >> >> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
> >> >> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be
> >> >> ignored.
> >> >>
> >> >> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
> >> >> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be
> >> >> declared.
> >> >>
> >> >> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a
> >> >> smoking
> >> >> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to
> >> >> avoid a
> >> >> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to
> >> >> proper
> >> >> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
> >> >>
> >> >> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
> >> >
> >> > Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
> >> >me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
> >> >Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
> >> >suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
> >> >now is the time.
> >> >
> >> > Cordially,
> >> >
> >> > CobraJet
> >>
> >> SPIG <----rotfflmao!
> >>
> >> I saw his blatent attempt to find sympathy there, and I will not involve
> >> the Ford-Merc group in this. Hopefully Billy will come to his senses and
> >> the operations can be called off.
> >
> > Hard to say. Have you considered the large factor of the Joel Axiom
> >here?
>
> I haven't as I am unfamiliar with the "Joel Axiom."
>

You know. From Billy Joel:

"You can never argue with a crazy mi-mi-mi-mi-mind.
You oughtta know by now..."

The basic flaw is that you are assuming ------ actually "has" the
ability to play nicey with his classmates. He does not. He lives in his
own world and sees himself as Sgt. Rock defending the American flag.
Even if he were to *tell* you he'll be nice (unlikely, an admission of
fault or weakness), he will only redouble his efforts to be an ***.

If a pit bull clamps onto your calf, do you sing it a lullabye? No,
you take out your .45 and ventilate it. Passive intimidation will not
work here. ------ has nothing to lose and all day to drink himself into
a rabid froth. (He is an admitted alcoholic).

The long lesson is that if the SPIG is incapable of rendering ------
unable to post, he will win this conflict. And we will all be cowards
and girlie-men. And I don't know about you, but I don't look
particularly fetching in a skirt and heels.

The SPIG is a diverse group. How humiliating to lose to a boozing
psycho cripple whose Jockeys have been on so long their parasites have
undergone two complete genetic evolutionary mutations.

CobraJet

 

On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 19:27:35 +0000, 428CJ wrote:

> Passive intimidation will not
> work here. ------ has nothing to lose and all day to drink himself into
> a rabid froth. (He is an admitted alcoholic).

And also with an admitted Vicodin habit.

 

On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 19:27:35 +0000, 428CJ wrote:

> Passive intimidation will not
> work here. ------ has nothing to lose and all day to drink himself into
> a rabid froth. (He is an admitted alcoholic).

And also with an admitted Vicodin habit.

 

On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 19:27:35 +0000, 428CJ wrote:

> Passive intimidation will not
> work here. ------ has nothing to lose and all day to drink himself into
> a rabid froth. (He is an admitted alcoholic).

And also with an admitted Vicodin habit.

 

In article <m9R2g.62983$WI1.13593@pd7tw2no>, Pink Freud
<psychokiller@terminal-analysis.org> wrote:

> On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 19:27:35 +0000, 428CJ wrote:
>
> > Passive intimidation will not
> > work here. ------ has nothing to lose and all day to drink himself into
> > a rabid froth. (He is an admitted alcoholic).
>
> And also with an admitted Vicodin habit.
>

I missed that one, but I don't doubt it.

After my last post I read another thread and was in disbelief that
some jeepsters are cutting ------ slack. That is just ridiculous. It
isn't just the netKKKopping, but the blatant taunting and
self-aggrandizing that labels this ------- as a Darwin escapee. Look at
it this way; if this jerk spouted off like this at your local pub, how
long do you think it would be before he was found dead in the alley?
Around here, it would probably be on the first night.

Do we have to put up with it here, just because it's the Internet?
Hell no. And you lazy-*** sonzuhbitches that think ------ is an ASSet
because of his URL's, learn how to search for ---- on your own. If a
loser with Windows 98 can do it, what does that say about you?

CobraJet

 

In article <m9R2g.62983$WI1.13593@pd7tw2no>, Pink Freud
<psychokiller@terminal-analysis.org> wrote:

> On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 19:27:35 +0000, 428CJ wrote:
>
> > Passive intimidation will not
> > work here. ------ has nothing to lose and all day to drink himself into
> > a rabid froth. (He is an admitted alcoholic).
>
> And also with an admitted Vicodin habit.
>

I missed that one, but I don't doubt it.

After my last post I read another thread and was in disbelief that
some jeepsters are cutting ------ slack. That is just ridiculous. It
isn't just the netKKKopping, but the blatant taunting and
self-aggrandizing that labels this ------- as a Darwin escapee. Look at
it this way; if this jerk spouted off like this at your local pub, how
long do you think it would be before he was found dead in the alley?
Around here, it would probably be on the first night.

Do we have to put up with it here, just because it's the Internet?
Hell no. And you lazy-*** sonzuhbitches that think ------ is an ASSet
because of his URL's, learn how to search for ---- on your own. If a
loser with Windows 98 can do it, what does that say about you?

CobraJet

 

In article <m9R2g.62983$WI1.13593@pd7tw2no>, Pink Freud
<psychokiller@terminal-analysis.org> wrote:

> On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 19:27:35 +0000, 428CJ wrote:
>
> > Passive intimidation will not
> > work here. ------ has nothing to lose and all day to drink himself into
> > a rabid froth. (He is an admitted alcoholic).
>
> And also with an admitted Vicodin habit.
>

I missed that one, but I don't doubt it.

After my last post I read another thread and was in disbelief that
some jeepsters are cutting ------ slack. That is just ridiculous. It
isn't just the netKKKopping, but the blatant taunting and
self-aggrandizing that labels this ------- as a Darwin escapee. Look at
it this way; if this jerk spouted off like this at your local pub, how
long do you think it would be before he was found dead in the alley?
Around here, it would probably be on the first night.

Do we have to put up with it here, just because it's the Internet?
Hell no. And you lazy-*** sonzuhbitches that think ------ is an ASSet
because of his URL's, learn how to search for ---- on your own. If a
loser with Windows 98 can do it, what does that say about you?

CobraJet