was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
My god, you are a cowardly idiot aren't you? Did you just have your 8th
birthday and didn't get the Transformer you wanted? BTW, in an effort to
extend an olive branch to start the negotiations, (plus I was worried you
might have another conniption fit), I top AND bottom posted for you. But
wait...maybe that will **** you off even more when you figure out that two
different people didn't coincidentally say the EXACT same thing. Wow...what
are the odds of that?
"General Failure" <Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote in message
news:ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous...
> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>
> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>
> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>
> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing
> in
> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to
> open
> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>
> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>
> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid
> a
> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>
> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
>
>
> -=-
> This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
>
>
>
>
My god, you are a cowardly idiot aren't you? Did you just have your 8th
birthday and didn't get the Transformer you wanted? BTW, in an effort to
extend an olive branch to start the negotiations, (plus I was worried you
might have another conniption fit), I top AND bottom posted for you. But
wait...maybe that will **** you off even more when you figure out that two
different people didn't coincidentally say the EXACT same thing. Wow...what
are the odds of that?
birthday and didn't get the Transformer you wanted? BTW, in an effort to
extend an olive branch to start the negotiations, (plus I was worried you
might have another conniption fit), I top AND bottom posted for you. But
wait...maybe that will **** you off even more when you figure out that two
different people didn't coincidentally say the EXACT same thing. Wow...what
are the odds of that?
"General Failure" <Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote in message
news:ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous...
> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>
> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>
> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>
> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing
> in
> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to
> open
> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>
> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>
> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid
> a
> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>
> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
>
>
> -=-
> This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
>
>
>
>
My god, you are a cowardly idiot aren't you? Did you just have your 8th
birthday and didn't get the Transformer you wanted? BTW, in an effort to
extend an olive branch to start the negotiations, (plus I was worried you
might have another conniption fit), I top AND bottom posted for you. But
wait...maybe that will **** you off even more when you figure out that two
different people didn't coincidentally say the EXACT same thing. Wow...what
are the odds of that?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
My god, you are a cowardly idiot aren't you? Did you just have your 8th
birthday and didn't get the Transformer you wanted? BTW, in an effort to
extend an olive branch to start the negotiations, (plus I was worried you
might have another conniption fit), I top AND bottom posted for you. But
wait...maybe that will **** you off even more when you figure out that two
different people didn't coincidentally say the EXACT same thing. Wow...what
are the odds of that?
"General Failure" <Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote in message
news:ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous...
> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>
> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>
> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>
> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing
> in
> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to
> open
> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>
> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>
> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid
> a
> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>
> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
>
>
> -=-
> This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
>
>
>
>
My god, you are a cowardly idiot aren't you? Did you just have your 8th
birthday and didn't get the Transformer you wanted? BTW, in an effort to
extend an olive branch to start the negotiations, (plus I was worried you
might have another conniption fit), I top AND bottom posted for you. But
wait...maybe that will **** you off even more when you figure out that two
different people didn't coincidentally say the EXACT same thing. Wow...what
are the odds of that?
birthday and didn't get the Transformer you wanted? BTW, in an effort to
extend an olive branch to start the negotiations, (plus I was worried you
might have another conniption fit), I top AND bottom posted for you. But
wait...maybe that will **** you off even more when you figure out that two
different people didn't coincidentally say the EXACT same thing. Wow...what
are the odds of that?
"General Failure" <Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote in message
news:ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous...
> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>
> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>
> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>
> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing
> in
> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to
> open
> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>
> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>
> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid
> a
> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>
> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
>
>
> -=-
> This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
>
>
>
>
My god, you are a cowardly idiot aren't you? Did you just have your 8th
birthday and didn't get the Transformer you wanted? BTW, in an effort to
extend an olive branch to start the negotiations, (plus I was worried you
might have another conniption fit), I top AND bottom posted for you. But
wait...maybe that will **** you off even more when you figure out that two
different people didn't coincidentally say the EXACT same thing. Wow...what
are the odds of that?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, CobraJet <coiled@basking.hiss> wrote:
>In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
>
>> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>>
>> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>>
>> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
>> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
>> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
>> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>>
>> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing in
>> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to open
>> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
>> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>>
>> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
>> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>>
>> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
>> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid a
>> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
>> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>>
>> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
>
> Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
>me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
>Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
>suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
>now is the time.
>
> Cordially,
>
> CobraJet
SPIG <----rotfflmao!
I saw his blatent attempt to find sympathy there, and I will not involve
the Ford-Merc group in this. Hopefully Billy will come to his senses and
the operations can be called off.
>In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
>
>> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>>
>> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>>
>> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
>> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
>> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
>> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>>
>> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing in
>> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to open
>> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
>> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>>
>> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
>> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>>
>> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
>> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid a
>> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
>> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>>
>> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
>
> Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
>me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
>Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
>suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
>now is the time.
>
> Cordially,
>
> CobraJet
SPIG <----rotfflmao!
I saw his blatent attempt to find sympathy there, and I will not involve
the Ford-Merc group in this. Hopefully Billy will come to his senses and
the operations can be called off.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, CobraJet <coiled@basking.hiss> wrote:
>In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
>
>> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>>
>> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>>
>> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
>> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
>> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
>> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>>
>> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing in
>> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to open
>> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
>> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>>
>> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
>> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>>
>> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
>> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid a
>> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
>> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>>
>> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
>
> Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
>me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
>Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
>suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
>now is the time.
>
> Cordially,
>
> CobraJet
SPIG <----rotfflmao!
I saw his blatent attempt to find sympathy there, and I will not involve
the Ford-Merc group in this. Hopefully Billy will come to his senses and
the operations can be called off.
>In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
>
>> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>>
>> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>>
>> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
>> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
>> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
>> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>>
>> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing in
>> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to open
>> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
>> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>>
>> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
>> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>>
>> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
>> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid a
>> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
>> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>>
>> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
>
> Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
>me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
>Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
>suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
>now is the time.
>
> Cordially,
>
> CobraJet
SPIG <----rotfflmao!
I saw his blatent attempt to find sympathy there, and I will not involve
the Ford-Merc group in this. Hopefully Billy will come to his senses and
the operations can be called off.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, CobraJet <coiled@basking.hiss> wrote:
>In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
>
>> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>>
>> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>>
>> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
>> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
>> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
>> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>>
>> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing in
>> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to open
>> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
>> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>>
>> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
>> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>>
>> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
>> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid a
>> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
>> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>>
>> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
>
> Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
>me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
>Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
>suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
>now is the time.
>
> Cordially,
>
> CobraJet
SPIG <----rotfflmao!
I saw his blatent attempt to find sympathy there, and I will not involve
the Ford-Merc group in this. Hopefully Billy will come to his senses and
the operations can be called off.
>In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
>
>> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>>
>> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>>
>> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
>> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
>> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
>> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>>
>> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing in
>> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to open
>> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
>> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>>
>> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
>> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>>
>> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
>> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid a
>> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
>> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>>
>> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
>
> Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
>me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
>Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
>suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
>now is the time.
>
> Cordially,
>
> CobraJet
SPIG <----rotfflmao!
I saw his blatent attempt to find sympathy there, and I will not involve
the Ford-Merc group in this. Hopefully Billy will come to his senses and
the operations can be called off.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
In article <D9FLZ74538829.5739583333@reece.net.au>, Thrasher Remailer
<thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, CobraJet <coiled@basking.hiss> wrote:
> >In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
> ><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
> >
> >> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
> >>
> >> I own this ------- newsgroup.
> >>
> >> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
> >> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
> >> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
> >> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
> >>
> >> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing in
> >> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to open
> >> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
> >> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
> >>
> >> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
> >> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
> >>
> >> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
> >> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid a
> >> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
> >> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
> >>
> >> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
> >
> > Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
> >me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
> >Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
> >suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
> >now is the time.
> >
> > Cordially,
> >
> > CobraJet
>
> SPIG <----rotfflmao!
>
> I saw his blatent attempt to find sympathy there, and I will not involve
> the Ford-Merc group in this. Hopefully Billy will come to his senses and
> the operations can be called off.
Hard to say. Have you considered the large factor of the Joel Axiom
here?
<thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, CobraJet <coiled@basking.hiss> wrote:
> >In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
> ><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
> >
> >> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
> >>
> >> I own this ------- newsgroup.
> >>
> >> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
> >> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
> >> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
> >> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
> >>
> >> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing in
> >> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to open
> >> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
> >> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
> >>
> >> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
> >> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
> >>
> >> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
> >> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid a
> >> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
> >> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
> >>
> >> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
> >
> > Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
> >me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
> >Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
> >suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
> >now is the time.
> >
> > Cordially,
> >
> > CobraJet
>
> SPIG <----rotfflmao!
>
> I saw his blatent attempt to find sympathy there, and I will not involve
> the Ford-Merc group in this. Hopefully Billy will come to his senses and
> the operations can be called off.
Hard to say. Have you considered the large factor of the Joel Axiom
here?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
In article <D9FLZ74538829.5739583333@reece.net.au>, Thrasher Remailer
<thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, CobraJet <coiled@basking.hiss> wrote:
> >In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
> ><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
> >
> >> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
> >>
> >> I own this ------- newsgroup.
> >>
> >> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
> >> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
> >> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
> >> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
> >>
> >> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing in
> >> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to open
> >> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
> >> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
> >>
> >> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
> >> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
> >>
> >> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
> >> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid a
> >> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
> >> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
> >>
> >> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
> >
> > Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
> >me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
> >Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
> >suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
> >now is the time.
> >
> > Cordially,
> >
> > CobraJet
>
> SPIG <----rotfflmao!
>
> I saw his blatent attempt to find sympathy there, and I will not involve
> the Ford-Merc group in this. Hopefully Billy will come to his senses and
> the operations can be called off.
Hard to say. Have you considered the large factor of the Joel Axiom
here?
<thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, CobraJet <coiled@basking.hiss> wrote:
> >In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
> ><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
> >
> >> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
> >>
> >> I own this ------- newsgroup.
> >>
> >> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
> >> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
> >> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
> >> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
> >>
> >> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing in
> >> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to open
> >> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
> >> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
> >>
> >> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
> >> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
> >>
> >> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
> >> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid a
> >> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
> >> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
> >>
> >> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
> >
> > Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
> >me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
> >Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
> >suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
> >now is the time.
> >
> > Cordially,
> >
> > CobraJet
>
> SPIG <----rotfflmao!
>
> I saw his blatent attempt to find sympathy there, and I will not involve
> the Ford-Merc group in this. Hopefully Billy will come to his senses and
> the operations can be called off.
Hard to say. Have you considered the large factor of the Joel Axiom
here?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
In article <D9FLZ74538829.5739583333@reece.net.au>, Thrasher Remailer
<thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, CobraJet <coiled@basking.hiss> wrote:
> >In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
> ><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
> >
> >> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
> >>
> >> I own this ------- newsgroup.
> >>
> >> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
> >> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
> >> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
> >> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
> >>
> >> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing in
> >> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to open
> >> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
> >> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
> >>
> >> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
> >> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
> >>
> >> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
> >> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid a
> >> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
> >> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
> >>
> >> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
> >
> > Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
> >me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
> >Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
> >suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
> >now is the time.
> >
> > Cordially,
> >
> > CobraJet
>
> SPIG <----rotfflmao!
>
> I saw his blatent attempt to find sympathy there, and I will not involve
> the Ford-Merc group in this. Hopefully Billy will come to his senses and
> the operations can be called off.
Hard to say. Have you considered the large factor of the Joel Axiom
here?
<thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, CobraJet <coiled@basking.hiss> wrote:
> >In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
> ><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
> >
> >> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
> >>
> >> I own this ------- newsgroup.
> >>
> >> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
> >> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
> >> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
> >> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
> >>
> >> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing in
> >> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to open
> >> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
> >> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
> >>
> >> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
> >> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
> >>
> >> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
> >> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid a
> >> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
> >> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
> >>
> >> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
> >
> > Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
> >me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
> >Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
> >suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
> >now is the time.
> >
> > Cordially,
> >
> > CobraJet
>
> SPIG <----rotfflmao!
>
> I saw his blatent attempt to find sympathy there, and I will not involve
> the Ford-Merc group in this. Hopefully Billy will come to his senses and
> the operations can be called off.
Hard to say. Have you considered the large factor of the Joel Axiom
here?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Sea Jhett <riptide@malibu.com> wrote:
>In article <D9FLZ74538829.5739583333@reece.net.au>, Thrasher Remailer
><thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, CobraJet <coiled@basking.hiss> wrote:
>> >In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
>> ><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
>> >
>> >> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>> >>
>> >> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>> >>
>> >> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
>> >> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
>> >> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
>> >> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>> >>
>> >> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole
>> >> thing in
>> >> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse
>> >> to open
>> >> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
>> >> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>> >>
>> >> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
>> >> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>> >>
>> >> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
>> >> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to
>> >> avoid a
>> >> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
>> >> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>> >>
>> >> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
>> >
>> > Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
>> >me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
>> >Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
>> >suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
>> >now is the time.
>> >
>> > Cordially,
>> >
>> > CobraJet
>>
>> SPIG <----rotfflmao!
>>
>> I saw his blatent attempt to find sympathy there, and I will not involve
>> the Ford-Merc group in this. Hopefully Billy will come to his senses and
>> the operations can be called off.
>
> Hard to say. Have you considered the large factor of the Joel Axiom
>here?
I haven't as I am unfamiliar with the "Joel Axiom."
>In article <D9FLZ74538829.5739583333@reece.net.au>, Thrasher Remailer
><thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, CobraJet <coiled@basking.hiss> wrote:
>> >In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
>> ><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
>> >
>> >> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>> >>
>> >> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>> >>
>> >> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
>> >> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
>> >> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
>> >> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>> >>
>> >> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole
>> >> thing in
>> >> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse
>> >> to open
>> >> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
>> >> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>> >>
>> >> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
>> >> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>> >>
>> >> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
>> >> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to
>> >> avoid a
>> >> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
>> >> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>> >>
>> >> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
>> >
>> > Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
>> >me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
>> >Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
>> >suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
>> >now is the time.
>> >
>> > Cordially,
>> >
>> > CobraJet
>>
>> SPIG <----rotfflmao!
>>
>> I saw his blatent attempt to find sympathy there, and I will not involve
>> the Ford-Merc group in this. Hopefully Billy will come to his senses and
>> the operations can be called off.
>
> Hard to say. Have you considered the large factor of the Joel Axiom
>here?
I haven't as I am unfamiliar with the "Joel Axiom."
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Sea Jhett <riptide@malibu.com> wrote:
>In article <D9FLZ74538829.5739583333@reece.net.au>, Thrasher Remailer
><thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, CobraJet <coiled@basking.hiss> wrote:
>> >In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
>> ><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
>> >
>> >> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>> >>
>> >> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>> >>
>> >> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
>> >> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
>> >> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
>> >> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>> >>
>> >> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole
>> >> thing in
>> >> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse
>> >> to open
>> >> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
>> >> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>> >>
>> >> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
>> >> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>> >>
>> >> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
>> >> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to
>> >> avoid a
>> >> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
>> >> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>> >>
>> >> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
>> >
>> > Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
>> >me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
>> >Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
>> >suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
>> >now is the time.
>> >
>> > Cordially,
>> >
>> > CobraJet
>>
>> SPIG <----rotfflmao!
>>
>> I saw his blatent attempt to find sympathy there, and I will not involve
>> the Ford-Merc group in this. Hopefully Billy will come to his senses and
>> the operations can be called off.
>
> Hard to say. Have you considered the large factor of the Joel Axiom
>here?
I haven't as I am unfamiliar with the "Joel Axiom."
>In article <D9FLZ74538829.5739583333@reece.net.au>, Thrasher Remailer
><thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, CobraJet <coiled@basking.hiss> wrote:
>> >In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
>> ><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
>> >
>> >> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>> >>
>> >> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>> >>
>> >> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
>> >> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
>> >> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
>> >> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>> >>
>> >> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole
>> >> thing in
>> >> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse
>> >> to open
>> >> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
>> >> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>> >>
>> >> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
>> >> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>> >>
>> >> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
>> >> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to
>> >> avoid a
>> >> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
>> >> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>> >>
>> >> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
>> >
>> > Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
>> >me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
>> >Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
>> >suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
>> >now is the time.
>> >
>> > Cordially,
>> >
>> > CobraJet
>>
>> SPIG <----rotfflmao!
>>
>> I saw his blatent attempt to find sympathy there, and I will not involve
>> the Ford-Merc group in this. Hopefully Billy will come to his senses and
>> the operations can be called off.
>
> Hard to say. Have you considered the large factor of the Joel Axiom
>here?
I haven't as I am unfamiliar with the "Joel Axiom."