To whomever has the problem with Bill
04-21-2006, 02:52 PM
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
To whomever has the problem with Bill
Look,
I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this
newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would
prefer he not have to read your spew. Everyone in here has gotten the
message that you are not happy with Mr. ------. OKAY! Be a man an let it
go, or handle it in a more appropriate manner. This is not the place or the
forum for your problems. Again There are kids reading this material and
your protest are not suitable for them.
Thanks,
Tom
I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this
newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would
prefer he not have to read your spew. Everyone in here has gotten the
message that you are not happy with Mr. ------. OKAY! Be a man an let it
go, or handle it in a more appropriate manner. This is not the place or the
forum for your problems. Again There are kids reading this material and
your protest are not suitable for them.
Thanks,
Tom
04-21-2006, 03:25 PM
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
cantrelm wrote:
> Look,
> I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this
> newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would
> prefer he not have to read your spew. Everyone in here has gotten the
> message that you are not happy with Mr. ------. OKAY! Be a man an let it
> go, or handle it in a more appropriate manner. This is not the place or the
> forum for your problems. Again There are kids reading this material and
> your protest are not suitable for them.
I agree it is inappropriate and stupid. Bill does provoke a lot of
people with his obstinate and often deliberately obtuse posts, on the
other hand he does put his contact information on his website so if
someone wants to duke it out with Bill, who is probably not afraid of a
good fistfight and likes one once in a while, they need to go over
there and do so. Hopefully both will come out sufficiently battered to
change their attitude.
I would suggest you set up a good filter on your computer if you
believe your children should be "protected' from profane and abusive
material on Usenet.
04-21-2006, 03:25 PM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
cantrelm wrote:
> Look,
> I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this
> newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would
> prefer he not have to read your spew. Everyone in here has gotten the
> message that you are not happy with Mr. ------. OKAY! Be a man an let it
> go, or handle it in a more appropriate manner. This is not the place or the
> forum for your problems. Again There are kids reading this material and
> your protest are not suitable for them.
I agree it is inappropriate and stupid. Bill does provoke a lot of
people with his obstinate and often deliberately obtuse posts, on the
other hand he does put his contact information on his website so if
someone wants to duke it out with Bill, who is probably not afraid of a
good fistfight and likes one once in a while, they need to go over
there and do so. Hopefully both will come out sufficiently battered to
change their attitude.
I would suggest you set up a good filter on your computer if you
believe your children should be "protected' from profane and abusive
material on Usenet.
04-21-2006, 03:25 PM
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
cantrelm wrote:
> Look,
> I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this
> newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would
> prefer he not have to read your spew. Everyone in here has gotten the
> message that you are not happy with Mr. ------. OKAY! Be a man an let it
> go, or handle it in a more appropriate manner. This is not the place or the
> forum for your problems. Again There are kids reading this material and
> your protest are not suitable for them.
I agree it is inappropriate and stupid. Bill does provoke a lot of
people with his obstinate and often deliberately obtuse posts, on the
other hand he does put his contact information on his website so if
someone wants to duke it out with Bill, who is probably not afraid of a
good fistfight and likes one once in a while, they need to go over
there and do so. Hopefully both will come out sufficiently battered to
change their attitude.
I would suggest you set up a good filter on your computer if you
believe your children should be "protected' from profane and abusive
material on Usenet.
04-21-2006, 03:36 PM
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
Bret,
You are correct in that Bill gives them plenty of means as to how to get in
contact with him. This person is a coward and has proven themselves as such
by the fact that they state in their post that their post are going through
remailing services. As for the filter you have a point there too, but it is
not just my children that read this and no matter how good of a filter you
use you are not going to be able to stop it all.
I just wish the person that is doing this would grow up and start acting
like something other than a spoiled teenager. My wife teacher middle school
and she said even they don't act this childish!!!!!!
Tom
"Bret Ludwig" <bretldwig@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1145647528.717608.122950@i40g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
>
> cantrelm wrote:
> > Look,
> > I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this
> > newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would
> > prefer he not have to read your spew. Everyone in here has gotten the
> > message that you are not happy with Mr. ------. OKAY! Be a man an let
it
> > go, or handle it in a more appropriate manner. This is not the place or
the
> > forum for your problems. Again There are kids reading this material and
> > your protest are not suitable for them.
>
>
> I agree it is inappropriate and stupid. Bill does provoke a lot of
> people with his obstinate and often deliberately obtuse posts, on the
> other hand he does put his contact information on his website so if
> someone wants to duke it out with Bill, who is probably not afraid of a
> good fistfight and likes one once in a while, they need to go over
> there and do so. Hopefully both will come out sufficiently battered to
> change their attitude.
>
> I would suggest you set up a good filter on your computer if you
> believe your children should be "protected' from profane and abusive
> material on Usenet.
>
You are correct in that Bill gives them plenty of means as to how to get in
contact with him. This person is a coward and has proven themselves as such
by the fact that they state in their post that their post are going through
remailing services. As for the filter you have a point there too, but it is
not just my children that read this and no matter how good of a filter you
use you are not going to be able to stop it all.
I just wish the person that is doing this would grow up and start acting
like something other than a spoiled teenager. My wife teacher middle school
and she said even they don't act this childish!!!!!!
Tom
"Bret Ludwig" <bretldwig@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1145647528.717608.122950@i40g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
>
> cantrelm wrote:
> > Look,
> > I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this
> > newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would
> > prefer he not have to read your spew. Everyone in here has gotten the
> > message that you are not happy with Mr. ------. OKAY! Be a man an let
it
> > go, or handle it in a more appropriate manner. This is not the place or
the
> > forum for your problems. Again There are kids reading this material and
> > your protest are not suitable for them.
>
>
> I agree it is inappropriate and stupid. Bill does provoke a lot of
> people with his obstinate and often deliberately obtuse posts, on the
> other hand he does put his contact information on his website so if
> someone wants to duke it out with Bill, who is probably not afraid of a
> good fistfight and likes one once in a while, they need to go over
> there and do so. Hopefully both will come out sufficiently battered to
> change their attitude.
>
> I would suggest you set up a good filter on your computer if you
> believe your children should be "protected' from profane and abusive
> material on Usenet.
>
04-21-2006, 03:36 PM
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
Bret,
You are correct in that Bill gives them plenty of means as to how to get in
contact with him. This person is a coward and has proven themselves as such
by the fact that they state in their post that their post are going through
remailing services. As for the filter you have a point there too, but it is
not just my children that read this and no matter how good of a filter you
use you are not going to be able to stop it all.
I just wish the person that is doing this would grow up and start acting
like something other than a spoiled teenager. My wife teacher middle school
and she said even they don't act this childish!!!!!!
Tom
"Bret Ludwig" <bretldwig@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1145647528.717608.122950@i40g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
>
> cantrelm wrote:
> > Look,
> > I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this
> > newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would
> > prefer he not have to read your spew. Everyone in here has gotten the
> > message that you are not happy with Mr. ------. OKAY! Be a man an let
it
> > go, or handle it in a more appropriate manner. This is not the place or
the
> > forum for your problems. Again There are kids reading this material and
> > your protest are not suitable for them.
>
>
> I agree it is inappropriate and stupid. Bill does provoke a lot of
> people with his obstinate and often deliberately obtuse posts, on the
> other hand he does put his contact information on his website so if
> someone wants to duke it out with Bill, who is probably not afraid of a
> good fistfight and likes one once in a while, they need to go over
> there and do so. Hopefully both will come out sufficiently battered to
> change their attitude.
>
> I would suggest you set up a good filter on your computer if you
> believe your children should be "protected' from profane and abusive
> material on Usenet.
>
You are correct in that Bill gives them plenty of means as to how to get in
contact with him. This person is a coward and has proven themselves as such
by the fact that they state in their post that their post are going through
remailing services. As for the filter you have a point there too, but it is
not just my children that read this and no matter how good of a filter you
use you are not going to be able to stop it all.
I just wish the person that is doing this would grow up and start acting
like something other than a spoiled teenager. My wife teacher middle school
and she said even they don't act this childish!!!!!!
Tom
"Bret Ludwig" <bretldwig@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1145647528.717608.122950@i40g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
>
> cantrelm wrote:
> > Look,
> > I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this
> > newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would
> > prefer he not have to read your spew. Everyone in here has gotten the
> > message that you are not happy with Mr. ------. OKAY! Be a man an let
it
> > go, or handle it in a more appropriate manner. This is not the place or
the
> > forum for your problems. Again There are kids reading this material and
> > your protest are not suitable for them.
>
>
> I agree it is inappropriate and stupid. Bill does provoke a lot of
> people with his obstinate and often deliberately obtuse posts, on the
> other hand he does put his contact information on his website so if
> someone wants to duke it out with Bill, who is probably not afraid of a
> good fistfight and likes one once in a while, they need to go over
> there and do so. Hopefully both will come out sufficiently battered to
> change their attitude.
>
> I would suggest you set up a good filter on your computer if you
> believe your children should be "protected' from profane and abusive
> material on Usenet.
>
04-21-2006, 03:36 PM
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
Bret,
You are correct in that Bill gives them plenty of means as to how to get in
contact with him. This person is a coward and has proven themselves as such
by the fact that they state in their post that their post are going through
remailing services. As for the filter you have a point there too, but it is
not just my children that read this and no matter how good of a filter you
use you are not going to be able to stop it all.
I just wish the person that is doing this would grow up and start acting
like something other than a spoiled teenager. My wife teacher middle school
and she said even they don't act this childish!!!!!!
Tom
"Bret Ludwig" <bretldwig@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1145647528.717608.122950@i40g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
>
> cantrelm wrote:
> > Look,
> > I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this
> > newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would
> > prefer he not have to read your spew. Everyone in here has gotten the
> > message that you are not happy with Mr. ------. OKAY! Be a man an let
it
> > go, or handle it in a more appropriate manner. This is not the place or
the
> > forum for your problems. Again There are kids reading this material and
> > your protest are not suitable for them.
>
>
> I agree it is inappropriate and stupid. Bill does provoke a lot of
> people with his obstinate and often deliberately obtuse posts, on the
> other hand he does put his contact information on his website so if
> someone wants to duke it out with Bill, who is probably not afraid of a
> good fistfight and likes one once in a while, they need to go over
> there and do so. Hopefully both will come out sufficiently battered to
> change their attitude.
>
> I would suggest you set up a good filter on your computer if you
> believe your children should be "protected' from profane and abusive
> material on Usenet.
>
You are correct in that Bill gives them plenty of means as to how to get in
contact with him. This person is a coward and has proven themselves as such
by the fact that they state in their post that their post are going through
remailing services. As for the filter you have a point there too, but it is
not just my children that read this and no matter how good of a filter you
use you are not going to be able to stop it all.
I just wish the person that is doing this would grow up and start acting
like something other than a spoiled teenager. My wife teacher middle school
and she said even they don't act this childish!!!!!!
Tom
"Bret Ludwig" <bretldwig@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1145647528.717608.122950@i40g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
>
> cantrelm wrote:
> > Look,
> > I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this
> > newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would
> > prefer he not have to read your spew. Everyone in here has gotten the
> > message that you are not happy with Mr. ------. OKAY! Be a man an let
it
> > go, or handle it in a more appropriate manner. This is not the place or
the
> > forum for your problems. Again There are kids reading this material and
> > your protest are not suitable for them.
>
>
> I agree it is inappropriate and stupid. Bill does provoke a lot of
> people with his obstinate and often deliberately obtuse posts, on the
> other hand he does put his contact information on his website so if
> someone wants to duke it out with Bill, who is probably not afraid of a
> good fistfight and likes one once in a while, they need to go over
> there and do so. Hopefully both will come out sufficiently battered to
> change their attitude.
>
> I would suggest you set up a good filter on your computer if you
> believe your children should be "protected' from profane and abusive
> material on Usenet.
>
04-21-2006, 03:56 PM
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
"cantrelm" <cantrelm@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:uR92g.39900$Jk3.20769@bignews5.bellsouth.net. ..
> I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this
> newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would
> prefer he not have to read your spew.
Although I have to agree that this nutcase with the hots for Bill should
just relay his carnal desires in private email, I have to wonder about why
you would let your 11-year old read USENET... Expecting others to watch
their language because kids are someplace they have no business being is not
exactly reasonable...
--
"I don't wish to be argumentative, but I disagree with the Islamic belief
that I should be killed."
news:uR92g.39900$Jk3.20769@bignews5.bellsouth.net. ..
> I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this
> newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would
> prefer he not have to read your spew.
Although I have to agree that this nutcase with the hots for Bill should
just relay his carnal desires in private email, I have to wonder about why
you would let your 11-year old read USENET... Expecting others to watch
their language because kids are someplace they have no business being is not
exactly reasonable...
--
"I don't wish to be argumentative, but I disagree with the Islamic belief
that I should be killed."
04-21-2006, 03:56 PM
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
"cantrelm" <cantrelm@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:uR92g.39900$Jk3.20769@bignews5.bellsouth.net. ..
> I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this
> newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would
> prefer he not have to read your spew.
Although I have to agree that this nutcase with the hots for Bill should
just relay his carnal desires in private email, I have to wonder about why
you would let your 11-year old read USENET... Expecting others to watch
their language because kids are someplace they have no business being is not
exactly reasonable...
--
"I don't wish to be argumentative, but I disagree with the Islamic belief
that I should be killed."
news:uR92g.39900$Jk3.20769@bignews5.bellsouth.net. ..
> I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this
> newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would
> prefer he not have to read your spew.
Although I have to agree that this nutcase with the hots for Bill should
just relay his carnal desires in private email, I have to wonder about why
you would let your 11-year old read USENET... Expecting others to watch
their language because kids are someplace they have no business being is not
exactly reasonable...
--
"I don't wish to be argumentative, but I disagree with the Islamic belief
that I should be killed."
04-21-2006, 03:56 PM
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
"cantrelm" <cantrelm@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:uR92g.39900$Jk3.20769@bignews5.bellsouth.net. ..
> I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this
> newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would
> prefer he not have to read your spew.
Although I have to agree that this nutcase with the hots for Bill should
just relay his carnal desires in private email, I have to wonder about why
you would let your 11-year old read USENET... Expecting others to watch
their language because kids are someplace they have no business being is not
exactly reasonable...
--
"I don't wish to be argumentative, but I disagree with the Islamic belief
that I should be killed."
news:uR92g.39900$Jk3.20769@bignews5.bellsouth.net. ..
> I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this
> newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would
> prefer he not have to read your spew.
Although I have to agree that this nutcase with the hots for Bill should
just relay his carnal desires in private email, I have to wonder about why
you would let your 11-year old read USENET... Expecting others to watch
their language because kids are someplace they have no business being is not
exactly reasonable...
--
"I don't wish to be argumentative, but I disagree with the Islamic belief
that I should be killed."