To whomever has the problem with Bill
Look,
I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would prefer he not have to read your spew. Everyone in here has gotten the message that you are not happy with Mr. ------. OKAY! Be a man an let it go, or handle it in a more appropriate manner. This is not the place or the forum for your problems. Again There are kids reading this material and your protest are not suitable for them. Thanks, Tom |
Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
cantrelm wrote: > Look, > I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this > newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would > prefer he not have to read your spew. Everyone in here has gotten the > message that you are not happy with Mr. ------. OKAY! Be a man an let it > go, or handle it in a more appropriate manner. This is not the place or the > forum for your problems. Again There are kids reading this material and > your protest are not suitable for them. I agree it is inappropriate and stupid. Bill does provoke a lot of people with his obstinate and often deliberately obtuse posts, on the other hand he does put his contact information on his website so if someone wants to duke it out with Bill, who is probably not afraid of a good fistfight and likes one once in a while, they need to go over there and do so. Hopefully both will come out sufficiently battered to change their attitude. I would suggest you set up a good filter on your computer if you believe your children should be "protected' from profane and abusive material on Usenet. |
Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
cantrelm wrote: > Look, > I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this > newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would > prefer he not have to read your spew. Everyone in here has gotten the > message that you are not happy with Mr. ------. OKAY! Be a man an let it > go, or handle it in a more appropriate manner. This is not the place or the > forum for your problems. Again There are kids reading this material and > your protest are not suitable for them. I agree it is inappropriate and stupid. Bill does provoke a lot of people with his obstinate and often deliberately obtuse posts, on the other hand he does put his contact information on his website so if someone wants to duke it out with Bill, who is probably not afraid of a good fistfight and likes one once in a while, they need to go over there and do so. Hopefully both will come out sufficiently battered to change their attitude. I would suggest you set up a good filter on your computer if you believe your children should be "protected' from profane and abusive material on Usenet. |
Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
cantrelm wrote: > Look, > I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this > newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would > prefer he not have to read your spew. Everyone in here has gotten the > message that you are not happy with Mr. ------. OKAY! Be a man an let it > go, or handle it in a more appropriate manner. This is not the place or the > forum for your problems. Again There are kids reading this material and > your protest are not suitable for them. I agree it is inappropriate and stupid. Bill does provoke a lot of people with his obstinate and often deliberately obtuse posts, on the other hand he does put his contact information on his website so if someone wants to duke it out with Bill, who is probably not afraid of a good fistfight and likes one once in a while, they need to go over there and do so. Hopefully both will come out sufficiently battered to change their attitude. I would suggest you set up a good filter on your computer if you believe your children should be "protected' from profane and abusive material on Usenet. |
Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
Bret,
You are correct in that Bill gives them plenty of means as to how to get in contact with him. This person is a coward and has proven themselves as such by the fact that they state in their post that their post are going through remailing services. As for the filter you have a point there too, but it is not just my children that read this and no matter how good of a filter you use you are not going to be able to stop it all. I just wish the person that is doing this would grow up and start acting like something other than a spoiled teenager. My wife teacher middle school and she said even they don't act this childish!!!!!! Tom "Bret Ludwig" <bretldwig@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1145647528.717608.122950@i40g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com... > > cantrelm wrote: > > Look, > > I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this > > newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would > > prefer he not have to read your spew. Everyone in here has gotten the > > message that you are not happy with Mr. ------. OKAY! Be a man an let it > > go, or handle it in a more appropriate manner. This is not the place or the > > forum for your problems. Again There are kids reading this material and > > your protest are not suitable for them. > > > I agree it is inappropriate and stupid. Bill does provoke a lot of > people with his obstinate and often deliberately obtuse posts, on the > other hand he does put his contact information on his website so if > someone wants to duke it out with Bill, who is probably not afraid of a > good fistfight and likes one once in a while, they need to go over > there and do so. Hopefully both will come out sufficiently battered to > change their attitude. > > I would suggest you set up a good filter on your computer if you > believe your children should be "protected' from profane and abusive > material on Usenet. > |
Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
Bret,
You are correct in that Bill gives them plenty of means as to how to get in contact with him. This person is a coward and has proven themselves as such by the fact that they state in their post that their post are going through remailing services. As for the filter you have a point there too, but it is not just my children that read this and no matter how good of a filter you use you are not going to be able to stop it all. I just wish the person that is doing this would grow up and start acting like something other than a spoiled teenager. My wife teacher middle school and she said even they don't act this childish!!!!!! Tom "Bret Ludwig" <bretldwig@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1145647528.717608.122950@i40g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com... > > cantrelm wrote: > > Look, > > I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this > > newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would > > prefer he not have to read your spew. Everyone in here has gotten the > > message that you are not happy with Mr. ------. OKAY! Be a man an let it > > go, or handle it in a more appropriate manner. This is not the place or the > > forum for your problems. Again There are kids reading this material and > > your protest are not suitable for them. > > > I agree it is inappropriate and stupid. Bill does provoke a lot of > people with his obstinate and often deliberately obtuse posts, on the > other hand he does put his contact information on his website so if > someone wants to duke it out with Bill, who is probably not afraid of a > good fistfight and likes one once in a while, they need to go over > there and do so. Hopefully both will come out sufficiently battered to > change their attitude. > > I would suggest you set up a good filter on your computer if you > believe your children should be "protected' from profane and abusive > material on Usenet. > |
Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
Bret,
You are correct in that Bill gives them plenty of means as to how to get in contact with him. This person is a coward and has proven themselves as such by the fact that they state in their post that their post are going through remailing services. As for the filter you have a point there too, but it is not just my children that read this and no matter how good of a filter you use you are not going to be able to stop it all. I just wish the person that is doing this would grow up and start acting like something other than a spoiled teenager. My wife teacher middle school and she said even they don't act this childish!!!!!! Tom "Bret Ludwig" <bretldwig@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1145647528.717608.122950@i40g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com... > > cantrelm wrote: > > Look, > > I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this > > newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would > > prefer he not have to read your spew. Everyone in here has gotten the > > message that you are not happy with Mr. ------. OKAY! Be a man an let it > > go, or handle it in a more appropriate manner. This is not the place or the > > forum for your problems. Again There are kids reading this material and > > your protest are not suitable for them. > > > I agree it is inappropriate and stupid. Bill does provoke a lot of > people with his obstinate and often deliberately obtuse posts, on the > other hand he does put his contact information on his website so if > someone wants to duke it out with Bill, who is probably not afraid of a > good fistfight and likes one once in a while, they need to go over > there and do so. Hopefully both will come out sufficiently battered to > change their attitude. > > I would suggest you set up a good filter on your computer if you > believe your children should be "protected' from profane and abusive > material on Usenet. > |
Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
"cantrelm" <cantrelm@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:uR92g.39900$Jk3.20769@bignews5.bellsouth.net. .. > I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this > newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would > prefer he not have to read your spew. Although I have to agree that this nutcase with the hots for Bill should just relay his carnal desires in private email, I have to wonder about why you would let your 11-year old read USENET... Expecting others to watch their language because kids are someplace they have no business being is not exactly reasonable... -- "I don't wish to be argumentative, but I disagree with the Islamic belief that I should be killed." |
Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
"cantrelm" <cantrelm@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:uR92g.39900$Jk3.20769@bignews5.bellsouth.net. .. > I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this > newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would > prefer he not have to read your spew. Although I have to agree that this nutcase with the hots for Bill should just relay his carnal desires in private email, I have to wonder about why you would let your 11-year old read USENET... Expecting others to watch their language because kids are someplace they have no business being is not exactly reasonable... -- "I don't wish to be argumentative, but I disagree with the Islamic belief that I should be killed." |
Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
"cantrelm" <cantrelm@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:uR92g.39900$Jk3.20769@bignews5.bellsouth.net. .. > I don't know what your problem is but you need to settle it outside this > newsgroup. I have an 11 year old son that reads these post and I would > prefer he not have to read your spew. Although I have to agree that this nutcase with the hots for Bill should just relay his carnal desires in private email, I have to wonder about why you would let your 11-year old read USENET... Expecting others to watch their language because kids are someplace they have no business being is not exactly reasonable... -- "I don't wish to be argumentative, but I disagree with the Islamic belief that I should be killed." |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:53 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands