was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
04-21-2006, 11:17 PM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
"Spdloader" <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote in message
news:bTg2g.35$P65.22@southeast.rr.com...
: What you need is a bullet in your empty gourd.
:
: ....and I'll post on whichever side of the prior post I damn well please
top
: or bottom.
:
: Spdloader
:
Thank you ...
you said it prefectly.
Kate
04-21-2006, 11:17 PM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
"Spdloader" <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote in message
news:bTg2g.35$P65.22@southeast.rr.com...
: What you need is a bullet in your empty gourd.
:
: ....and I'll post on whichever side of the prior post I damn well please
top
: or bottom.
:
: Spdloader
:
Thank you ...
you said it prefectly.
Kate
04-21-2006, 11:17 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
"Spdloader" <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote in message
news:bTg2g.35$P65.22@southeast.rr.com...
: What you need is a bullet in your empty gourd.
:
: ....and I'll post on whichever side of the prior post I damn well please
top
: or bottom.
:
: Spdloader
:
Thank you ...
you said it prefectly.
Kate
04-21-2006, 11:20 PM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
Amen!
Jeff DeWitt
Kate wrote:
> "Spdloader" <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:bTg2g.35$P65.22@southeast.rr.com...
> : What you need is a bullet in your empty gourd.
> :
> : ....and I'll post on whichever side of the prior post I damn well please
> top
> : or bottom.
> :
> : Spdloader
> :
>
>
> Thank you ...
> you said it prefectly.
>
> Kate
>
>
Amen!
Jeff DeWitt
<G>
Jeff DeWitt
Kate wrote:
> "Spdloader" <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:bTg2g.35$P65.22@southeast.rr.com...
> : What you need is a bullet in your empty gourd.
> :
> : ....and I'll post on whichever side of the prior post I damn well please
> top
> : or bottom.
> :
> : Spdloader
> :
>
>
> Thank you ...
> you said it prefectly.
>
> Kate
>
>
Amen!
Jeff DeWitt
<G>
04-21-2006, 11:20 PM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
Amen!
Jeff DeWitt
Kate wrote:
> "Spdloader" <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:bTg2g.35$P65.22@southeast.rr.com...
> : What you need is a bullet in your empty gourd.
> :
> : ....and I'll post on whichever side of the prior post I damn well please
> top
> : or bottom.
> :
> : Spdloader
> :
>
>
> Thank you ...
> you said it prefectly.
>
> Kate
>
>
Amen!
Jeff DeWitt
<G>
Jeff DeWitt
Kate wrote:
> "Spdloader" <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:bTg2g.35$P65.22@southeast.rr.com...
> : What you need is a bullet in your empty gourd.
> :
> : ....and I'll post on whichever side of the prior post I damn well please
> top
> : or bottom.
> :
> : Spdloader
> :
>
>
> Thank you ...
> you said it prefectly.
>
> Kate
>
>
Amen!
Jeff DeWitt
<G>
04-21-2006, 11:20 PM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
Amen!
Jeff DeWitt
Kate wrote:
> "Spdloader" <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:bTg2g.35$P65.22@southeast.rr.com...
> : What you need is a bullet in your empty gourd.
> :
> : ....and I'll post on whichever side of the prior post I damn well please
> top
> : or bottom.
> :
> : Spdloader
> :
>
>
> Thank you ...
> you said it prefectly.
>
> Kate
>
>
Amen!
Jeff DeWitt
<G>
Jeff DeWitt
Kate wrote:
> "Spdloader" <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:bTg2g.35$P65.22@southeast.rr.com...
> : What you need is a bullet in your empty gourd.
> :
> : ....and I'll post on whichever side of the prior post I damn well please
> top
> : or bottom.
> :
> : Spdloader
> :
>
>
> Thank you ...
> you said it prefectly.
>
> Kate
>
>
Amen!
Jeff DeWitt
<G>
04-22-2006, 12:15 AM
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: cancel <4449993B.DE96BDB8@***.net>
L.W.(Bill) ------ III <----------@***.net>, the goggle-eyed
headmistress, grimaced:
/L/oudmouthed
/./
/W/onk with
/./
/(/
/B/attered
/I/ron rod and
/L/arge
/L/ovebud desires
/)/
/H/opeless
/U/terus unicorn for
/G/roping.
/H/irsute
/E/ffie who likes
/S/ickening
/I/nterfemoral intercourse with
/I/guanas.
/I/nciter.
headmistress, grimaced:
/L/oudmouthed
/./
/W/onk with
/./
/(/
/B/attered
/I/ron rod and
/L/arge
/L/ovebud desires
/)/
/H/opeless
/U/terus unicorn for
/G/roping.
/H/irsute
/E/ffie who likes
/S/ickening
/I/nterfemoral intercourse with
/I/guanas.
/I/nciter.
04-22-2006, 12:15 AM
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: cancel <4449993B.DE96BDB8@***.net>
L.W.(Bill) ------ III <----------@***.net>, the goggle-eyed
headmistress, grimaced:
/L/oudmouthed
/./
/W/onk with
/./
/(/
/B/attered
/I/ron rod and
/L/arge
/L/ovebud desires
/)/
/H/opeless
/U/terus unicorn for
/G/roping.
/H/irsute
/E/ffie who likes
/S/ickening
/I/nterfemoral intercourse with
/I/guanas.
/I/nciter.
headmistress, grimaced:
/L/oudmouthed
/./
/W/onk with
/./
/(/
/B/attered
/I/ron rod and
/L/arge
/L/ovebud desires
/)/
/H/opeless
/U/terus unicorn for
/G/roping.
/H/irsute
/E/ffie who likes
/S/ickening
/I/nterfemoral intercourse with
/I/guanas.
/I/nciter.
04-22-2006, 12:15 AM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: cancel <4449993B.DE96BDB8@***.net>
L.W.(Bill) ------ III <----------@***.net>, the goggle-eyed
headmistress, grimaced:
/L/oudmouthed
/./
/W/onk with
/./
/(/
/B/attered
/I/ron rod and
/L/arge
/L/ovebud desires
/)/
/H/opeless
/U/terus unicorn for
/G/roping.
/H/irsute
/E/ffie who likes
/S/ickening
/I/nterfemoral intercourse with
/I/guanas.
/I/nciter.
headmistress, grimaced:
/L/oudmouthed
/./
/W/onk with
/./
/(/
/B/attered
/I/ron rod and
/L/arge
/L/ovebud desires
/)/
/H/opeless
/U/terus unicorn for
/G/roping.
/H/irsute
/E/ffie who likes
/S/ickening
/I/nterfemoral intercourse with
/I/guanas.
/I/nciter.
04-22-2006, 12:17 AM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
My god, you are a cowardly idiot aren't you? Did you just have your 8th
birthday and didn't get the Transformer you wanted? BTW, in an effort to
extend an olive branch to start the negotiations, (plus I was worried you
might have another conniption fit), I top AND bottom posted for you. But
wait...maybe that will **** you off even more when you figure out that two
different people didn't coincidentally say the EXACT same thing. Wow...what
are the odds of that?
"General Failure" <Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote in message
news:ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous...
> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>
> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>
> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>
> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing
> in
> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to
> open
> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>
> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>
> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid
> a
> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>
> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
>
>
> -=-
> This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
>
>
>
>
My god, you are a cowardly idiot aren't you? Did you just have your 8th
birthday and didn't get the Transformer you wanted? BTW, in an effort to
extend an olive branch to start the negotiations, (plus I was worried you
might have another conniption fit), I top AND bottom posted for you. But
wait...maybe that will **** you off even more when you figure out that two
different people didn't coincidentally say the EXACT same thing. Wow...what
are the odds of that?
birthday and didn't get the Transformer you wanted? BTW, in an effort to
extend an olive branch to start the negotiations, (plus I was worried you
might have another conniption fit), I top AND bottom posted for you. But
wait...maybe that will **** you off even more when you figure out that two
different people didn't coincidentally say the EXACT same thing. Wow...what
are the odds of that?
"General Failure" <Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote in message
news:ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous...
> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>
> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>
> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>
> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing
> in
> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to
> open
> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>
> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>
> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid
> a
> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>
> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
>
>
> -=-
> This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
>
>
>
>
My god, you are a cowardly idiot aren't you? Did you just have your 8th
birthday and didn't get the Transformer you wanted? BTW, in an effort to
extend an olive branch to start the negotiations, (plus I was worried you
might have another conniption fit), I top AND bottom posted for you. But
wait...maybe that will **** you off even more when you figure out that two
different people didn't coincidentally say the EXACT same thing. Wow...what
are the odds of that?
