Possible Trolls?
#161
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Possible Trolls?
The '96 Vette, '86 Dodge, and '89 Pontiac with stock records must
be using a computer controlled electronically controlled fuel injection
as per the rule book: http://members.***.net/----------/stockrules.jpg
If another "modern" computer control vehicle could establish a record,
I'm sure the factory sponsors would have them here:
http://www.nhra.com/stats/stk_record.html
I don't believe you've ever driven a 427", because if you had,
you'd never forget the got wrenching growl their rear ends make, and
know none of these "modern" engines could ever come close.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon wrote:
>
> Hey, glad to hear from the Alzheimer's contingent, but have you
> actually *checked* on the performance of a modern computer controlled
> engine?
be using a computer controlled electronically controlled fuel injection
as per the rule book: http://members.***.net/----------/stockrules.jpg
If another "modern" computer control vehicle could establish a record,
I'm sure the factory sponsors would have them here:
http://www.nhra.com/stats/stk_record.html
I don't believe you've ever driven a 427", because if you had,
you'd never forget the got wrenching growl their rear ends make, and
know none of these "modern" engines could ever come close.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon wrote:
>
> Hey, glad to hear from the Alzheimer's contingent, but have you
> actually *checked* on the performance of a modern computer controlled
> engine?
#162
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Possible Trolls?
The '96 Vette, '86 Dodge, and '89 Pontiac with stock records must
be using a computer controlled electronically controlled fuel injection
as per the rule book: http://members.***.net/----------/stockrules.jpg
If another "modern" computer control vehicle could establish a record,
I'm sure the factory sponsors would have them here:
http://www.nhra.com/stats/stk_record.html
I don't believe you've ever driven a 427", because if you had,
you'd never forget the got wrenching growl their rear ends make, and
know none of these "modern" engines could ever come close.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon wrote:
>
> Hey, glad to hear from the Alzheimer's contingent, but have you
> actually *checked* on the performance of a modern computer controlled
> engine?
be using a computer controlled electronically controlled fuel injection
as per the rule book: http://members.***.net/----------/stockrules.jpg
If another "modern" computer control vehicle could establish a record,
I'm sure the factory sponsors would have them here:
http://www.nhra.com/stats/stk_record.html
I don't believe you've ever driven a 427", because if you had,
you'd never forget the got wrenching growl their rear ends make, and
know none of these "modern" engines could ever come close.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon wrote:
>
> Hey, glad to hear from the Alzheimer's contingent, but have you
> actually *checked* on the performance of a modern computer controlled
> engine?
#163
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Possible Trolls?
The '96 Vette, '86 Dodge, and '89 Pontiac with stock records must
be using a computer controlled electronically controlled fuel injection
as per the rule book: http://members.***.net/----------/stockrules.jpg
If another "modern" computer control vehicle could establish a record,
I'm sure the factory sponsors would have them here:
http://www.nhra.com/stats/stk_record.html
I don't believe you've ever driven a 427", because if you had,
you'd never forget the got wrenching growl their rear ends make, and
know none of these "modern" engines could ever come close.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon wrote:
>
> Hey, glad to hear from the Alzheimer's contingent, but have you
> actually *checked* on the performance of a modern computer controlled
> engine?
be using a computer controlled electronically controlled fuel injection
as per the rule book: http://members.***.net/----------/stockrules.jpg
If another "modern" computer control vehicle could establish a record,
I'm sure the factory sponsors would have them here:
http://www.nhra.com/stats/stk_record.html
I don't believe you've ever driven a 427", because if you had,
you'd never forget the got wrenching growl their rear ends make, and
know none of these "modern" engines could ever come close.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Lon wrote:
>
> Hey, glad to hear from the Alzheimer's contingent, but have you
> actually *checked* on the performance of a modern computer controlled
> engine?
#164
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Possible Trolls?
"lateral acceleration"? that's some sort of a play on words. If you
want to talk about acceleration, John force's Mustang pulls over six.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> http://www.autoweb.com.au/cms/A_51140/newsarticle.html
>
> 1.2 g. Not that good by BMW standards - they managed 1.6 g with M3 CSL.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
want to talk about acceleration, John force's Mustang pulls over six.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> http://www.autoweb.com.au/cms/A_51140/newsarticle.html
>
> 1.2 g. Not that good by BMW standards - they managed 1.6 g with M3 CSL.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
#165
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Possible Trolls?
"lateral acceleration"? that's some sort of a play on words. If you
want to talk about acceleration, John force's Mustang pulls over six.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> http://www.autoweb.com.au/cms/A_51140/newsarticle.html
>
> 1.2 g. Not that good by BMW standards - they managed 1.6 g with M3 CSL.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
want to talk about acceleration, John force's Mustang pulls over six.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> http://www.autoweb.com.au/cms/A_51140/newsarticle.html
>
> 1.2 g. Not that good by BMW standards - they managed 1.6 g with M3 CSL.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
#166
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Possible Trolls?
"lateral acceleration"? that's some sort of a play on words. If you
want to talk about acceleration, John force's Mustang pulls over six.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> http://www.autoweb.com.au/cms/A_51140/newsarticle.html
>
> 1.2 g. Not that good by BMW standards - they managed 1.6 g with M3 CSL.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
want to talk about acceleration, John force's Mustang pulls over six.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> http://www.autoweb.com.au/cms/A_51140/newsarticle.html
>
> 1.2 g. Not that good by BMW standards - they managed 1.6 g with M3 CSL.
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
#167
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Possible Trolls?
http://www.autosite.com/library/diction/dict0117.asp
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41CC6358.9F9CCD34@***.net...
> "lateral acceleration"? that's some sort of a play on words. If you
> want to talk about acceleration, John force's Mustang pulls over six.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > http://www.autoweb.com.au/cms/A_51140/newsarticle.html
> >
> > 1.2 g. Not that good by BMW standards - they managed 1.6 g with M3 CSL.
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41CC6358.9F9CCD34@***.net...
> "lateral acceleration"? that's some sort of a play on words. If you
> want to talk about acceleration, John force's Mustang pulls over six.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > http://www.autoweb.com.au/cms/A_51140/newsarticle.html
> >
> > 1.2 g. Not that good by BMW standards - they managed 1.6 g with M3 CSL.
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
#168
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Possible Trolls?
http://www.autosite.com/library/diction/dict0117.asp
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41CC6358.9F9CCD34@***.net...
> "lateral acceleration"? that's some sort of a play on words. If you
> want to talk about acceleration, John force's Mustang pulls over six.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > http://www.autoweb.com.au/cms/A_51140/newsarticle.html
> >
> > 1.2 g. Not that good by BMW standards - they managed 1.6 g with M3 CSL.
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41CC6358.9F9CCD34@***.net...
> "lateral acceleration"? that's some sort of a play on words. If you
> want to talk about acceleration, John force's Mustang pulls over six.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > http://www.autoweb.com.au/cms/A_51140/newsarticle.html
> >
> > 1.2 g. Not that good by BMW standards - they managed 1.6 g with M3 CSL.
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
#169
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Possible Trolls?
http://www.autosite.com/library/diction/dict0117.asp
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41CC6358.9F9CCD34@***.net...
> "lateral acceleration"? that's some sort of a play on words. If you
> want to talk about acceleration, John force's Mustang pulls over six.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > http://www.autoweb.com.au/cms/A_51140/newsarticle.html
> >
> > 1.2 g. Not that good by BMW standards - they managed 1.6 g with M3 CSL.
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41CC6358.9F9CCD34@***.net...
> "lateral acceleration"? that's some sort of a play on words. If you
> want to talk about acceleration, John force's Mustang pulls over six.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > http://www.autoweb.com.au/cms/A_51140/newsarticle.html
> >
> > 1.2 g. Not that good by BMW standards - they managed 1.6 g with M3 CSL.
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
#170
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Possible Trolls?
Can you find another site that can stick their car to the ceiling?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&l...ON&btnG=Search
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> http://www.autosite.com/library/diction/dict0117.asp
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&l...ON&btnG=Search
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> http://www.autosite.com/library/diction/dict0117.asp
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ